Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

24 reasons that Trump could win (because deplorables)
Silver Bulletin ^ | Oct 20, 2024 | Nate Silver

Posted on 10/21/2024 5:29:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

If there's a second Trump term, we won't lack for explanations.

This election remains extremely close, but Donald Trump has been gaining ground. One of my pet peeves is with the idea that this is Kamala Harris’s election to lose. I could articulate some critiques of her campaign, but if you study the factors that have historically determined elections, you'll see that she’s battling difficult circumstances.

So, today’s newsletter simply aims to provide a laundry list of factors that favor Trump, with many links to evidence in previous Silver Bulletin posts and elsewhere. These are in no particular order.

Harris is the favorite to win the popular vote, but the Electoral College bias favors Republicans by about 2 percentage points. In an era of intense partisanship and close elections, this is inherently difficult for Democrats to overcome.



TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: 2024election; election2024; electoralcollege; fivethirtyeight; natesilver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Populism is often a highly effective strategy, and many Trump voters are indeed “deplorable” in the Hillary Clinton sense of the term.

Some of Nate's other "reasons" are even more bigoted and despicable.

1 posted on 10/21/2024 5:29:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Silver is a jerk. Except when he’s right.


2 posted on 10/21/2024 5:33:18 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Because a majority of American’s hate snobs.


3 posted on 10/21/2024 5:43:38 PM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Democrats’ argument that Trump is a critical threat to democracy is valid and important”

Bull, I don’t remember seeing Kamala’s name on my Dem primary ballot. Who is the threat to democracy?

4 posted on 10/21/2024 5:43:47 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She won’t win the popular vote. What did she get among democrat primary voters in 2020? About .03 %? Right, now she’s going to win the popular vote ?


5 posted on 10/21/2024 5:45:37 PM PDT by atc23 (The Matriarchal Society we embrace has led to masks and mandates and the cult of "safety")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is funny, because he attribute failings of the Biden/Harris administration to falsehoods widely believed on the Left.

He characterizes problems with what is going on in the world as affecting the Democrat's position, but is very careful to insinuate, none of those problems were created by Democratic Party/Leftist policies.

It is interesting he notices the "felonies" don't affect President Trump's popularity, but never mentions Democratic Party and Biden Administration funded lawfare as the reason.

He notes X (formerly Twitter) has "shifted far to the right", but never explains how it was far to the left and it was Biden administration policy to push Twitter in that direction, and to censor their political opposition.

6 posted on 10/21/2024 5:49:42 PM PDT by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

I know I do.


7 posted on 10/21/2024 5:51:01 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything

The rat party.


8 posted on 10/21/2024 5:51:31 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: No name given

FDR was a ragging Socalist, but he ALWAYS celebrated the avarage American.


9 posted on 10/21/2024 5:52:07 PM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
..many Trump voters are indeed “deplorable”..saying they're "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic."

Indeed deplorable? Where does one want to begin in picking apart this calumny?

Each of these insults is a study in ad hominem attack. Where do Hillary or Nate get their definition of
each reprehensible term?

Then to apply these terms in blanket fashion to those who won't vote for you is astounding.

10 posted on 10/21/2024 5:52:49 PM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is already under the tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democratic-party-big-govt-machine-explained-flow-charts


11 posted on 10/21/2024 5:53:43 PM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

The rest of the Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight keywords, sorted:

12 posted on 10/21/2024 5:55:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Thommas

Snobs who are stupid. That’s the media


13 posted on 10/21/2024 5:57:40 PM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Except Nate is hardly ever right.


14 posted on 10/21/2024 6:19:18 PM PDT by KevinB (Word for the day: "kakistocracy" - a society governed by its least suitable or competent citizens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Nate hits all around the target and misses the heart of the matter.


15 posted on 10/21/2024 6:40:18 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I see a lot of solid reasons that make sense.

Of course there were gonna be the idiotic ones


16 posted on 10/21/2024 7:07:54 PM PDT by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

>> if you study the factors that have historically determined elections, you’ll see that [Hairless is] battling difficult circumstances

Yeah, poor thing! Like an outer-space-grade vacuum where her brain ought to be. That’s a tough campaign impediment!


17 posted on 10/21/2024 7:32:06 PM PDT by Nervous Tick ("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Maybe if she didn’t sound like a whiny crybaby shrew more people would pay attention to her.


18 posted on 10/21/2024 7:41:28 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (I do not recognize Biden’s authority. (@FeistyFed on TS) 🐝.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

So, I guess anyone who doesn’t vote for a certain candidate is according to that candidate, a deplorable ? Then according to Hillary, we have a lot more of the deplorables than anyone thought.


19 posted on 10/22/2024 4:00:44 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Voters have nostalgia for the relatively strong economic performance in the first three years of Trump’s term and associate the problems of 2020 with Democrats, even though they weren’t in charge at the time.
Democrats “weren’t in charge” in 2020 - but Trump wasn’t actually in control of the Republican Party, either. In reality, Trump’s ascendance constitutes a takeover of the Republican Party by Ross Perot’s Reform Party.
Harris is seeking to become the first woman president. In the only previous attempt, undecideds broke heavily against Hillary Clinton, and she underperformed her polls.
She is also running for the ultimate executive position while having a resume which is devoid of executive experience. Neither prosecutor nor Senator is an executive position, and neither is vice president. She is only a quasi-incumbent part of the Biden/Harris Administration.

She would be (the first woman) president right now, if she were a “stand up guy” who executed her constitutional duty to invoke the 25th Amendment. But seemingly she doesn’t have the clout in “her own" administration to pull that off.

Trump’s conviction on a series of felony charges hardly made any difference, for instance.
The framers of the Constitution could very easily have forbidden the selection of a felon to be POTUS. They didn’t. One very logical reason for that would be that they could smell Biden’s DOJ a mile - centuries, actually - away. In that sense the act of calling Mr. Trump “a felon” should logically put your own fingerprints on that illegitimate action by partisan prosecutors, judges, and jurors.

Of course the other reason the framers didn’t forbid selection of “a felon” to POTUS might have been that they all - in the King of England’s eyes - were felons.


20 posted on 10/22/2024 6:02:50 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson