Skip to comments.
24 reasons that Trump could win (because deplorables)
Silver Bulletin ^
| Oct 20, 2024
| Nate Silver
Posted on 10/21/2024 5:29:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
If there's a second Trump term, we won't lack for explanations.
This election remains extremely close, but Donald Trump has been gaining ground. One of my pet peeves is with the idea that this is Kamala Harris’s election to lose. I could articulate some critiques of her campaign, but if you study the factors that have historically determined elections, you'll see that she’s battling difficult circumstances.
So, today’s newsletter simply aims to provide a laundry list of factors that favor Trump, with many links to evidence in previous Silver Bulletin posts and elsewhere. These are in no particular order.
Harris is the favorite to win the popular vote, but the Electoral College bias favors Republicans by about 2 percentage points. In an era of intense partisanship and close elections, this is inherently difficult for Democrats to overcome.
Inflation hit a peak of 9.1 percentage points in June 2022. It has abated now, but prices remain much higher than when Joe Biden took office, and voters are historically highly sensitive to inflation. Democrats can also plausibly be blamed for it given intensive increases in government spending during COVID recovery efforts.
Though the reasons for this are much debated, voter perceptions about the economy lag substantially behind objective data, and growth in take-home income has been sluggish for many years for the working class amid rising corporate profits.
Incumbent parties worldwide are doing very poorly, and the historical incumbency advantage has diminished to the point where it may now be an incumbency handicap instead given perpetually negative perceptions about the direction of the country.
Populism is often a highly effective strategy, and many Trump voters are indeed “deplorable” in the Hillary Clinton sense of the term.
Illegal/unauthorized immigration increased substantially during the first few years of the Biden/Harris administration amid a rising global backlash to immigration.
Harris ran far to her left in 2019, adopting many unpopular positions, and doesn’t really have a viable strategy for explaining her changing stances.
The cultural vibes are shifting to the right, and the left continues to pay a price for the excesses of 2020 on COVID, crime, “wokeness,” and other issues.
Voters have nostalgia for the relatively strong economic performance in the first three years of Trump’s term and associate the problems of 2020 with Democrats, even though they weren’t in charge at the time.
Democrats’ dominance among Black voters and other racial and ethnic minority groups is slipping. It may be unfortunate timing: the memory of the Civil Rights Era is fading. Educational polarization, which implies deteriorating Democratic performance among working-class voters of all races, may also be coming to dominate other factors. It’s possible this works out well for Democrats if Harris makes corresponding gains among white voters, who pack more leverage in the Electoral College, but there’s no guarantee.
Many men, especially young men, feel lost amidst declining college enrollment, contributing to a rightward shift and a growing gender gap.
Biden sought to be president until he was 86. Voters had extremely reasonable objections to this, and it neuters what should have been one of Harris’s best issues about Trump’s age and cognitive fitness.
Share
Harris also got a late start to her race, inheriting most of the staff from the poorly-run Biden campaign. She’s proven to be a good candidate in many respects, but it’s always a big leap when the understudy is suddenly thrust into the spotlight.
Harris is seeking to become the first woman president. In the only previous attempt, undecideds broke heavily against Hillary Clinton, and she underperformed her polls.
Trust in media continues to fall to abysmal levels. One can debate how to attribute blame for this between longstanding conservative efforts to discredit the media, a secular decline in trust in institutions, and various overreaching and hypocrisy in the press. But it’s hard for even legitimate Trump critiques to penetrate the mass public. Trump’s conviction on a series of felony charges hardly made any difference, for instance.
Trump has traits of a classic con man, but con artistry is often effective, and Trump is skilled at convincing voters that he’s on their side even if his election would not be in their best interest. Furthermore, Trump presents Democrats with a Three Stooges Syndrome problem: a range of plausible attacks so vast that they tend to cancel one another out.
Democrats’ college-educated consultant class has poor instincts for how to appeal to the mass public, while Trump has done more to cultivate support among “weird” marginal voting groups.
Democrats’ argument that Trump is a critical threat to democracy is valid and important, given January 6 and Trump’s broad disrespect for the rule of law. But it’s a tough sell: ultimately, January 6 was a near-miss — it could very, very easily have been much, much worse — and Democrats hold the White House, the Senate, and many key governorships now. It isn’t intuitive to voters that democracy is threatened and Democrats may have staked too many chips on this line of attack.
Foreign policy might not matter much to voters, but the world has become more unstable under Biden’s tenure. There has been a decline in democracy worldwide and an increase in interstate conflict, crises in the Middle East and Ukraine, deteriorating US-China relations, increasing immigration flows because of global instability, and a pullout from Afghanistan that negatively impacted Biden’s popularity.
The Israel-Hamas war split the Democratic base in a way no comparable issue has split the GOP base.
There are more left-leaning third-party candidates than right-leaning ones, and the former leading third-party candidate (RFK Jr.) endorsed Trump and undermined Harris’s post-convention momentum.
The richest man in the world, Elon Musk, has become a huge Trump stan and is doing everything in his power to tip the election to him. Twitter/X remains an influential platform among journalists but has shifted far to the right. Elon and Silicon Valley have also created a permission structure for other wealthy elites to advocate for Trump explicitly and provided a new base of money and cultural influence.
Trump was very nearly killed in an assassination attempt, and then there was a second one against him. The first attempt was closely correlated with an increase in favorability ratings for Trump, and polling shows he’s considerably more popular and sympathetic than in 2016 or 2020.
Harris has been running on vibes and has failed to articulate a clear vision for the country. It might have been a good strategy if the “fundamentals” favored her, but they don’t.
TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: 2024election; election2024; electoralcollege; fivethirtyeight; natesilver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Populism is often a highly effective strategy, and many Trump voters are indeed “deplorable” in the Hillary Clinton sense of the term. Some of Nate's other "reasons" are even more bigoted and despicable.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Silver is a jerk. Except when he’s right.
To: Responsibility2nd
Because a majority of American’s hate snobs.
3
posted on
10/21/2024 5:43:38 PM PDT
by
cowboyusa
(YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Democrats’ argument that Trump is a critical threat to democracy is valid and important”
Bull, I don’t remember seeing Kamala’s name on my Dem primary ballot. Who is the threat to democracy?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
She won’t win the popular vote. What did she get among democrat primary voters in 2020? About .03 %? Right, now she’s going to win the popular vote ?
5
posted on
10/21/2024 5:45:37 PM PDT
by
atc23
(The Matriarchal Society we embrace has led to masks and mandates and the cult of "safety")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is funny, because he attribute failings of the Biden/Harris administration to falsehoods widely believed on the Left.
He characterizes problems with what is going on in the world as affecting the Democrat's position, but is very careful to insinuate, none of those problems were created by Democratic Party/Leftist policies.
It is interesting he notices the "felonies" don't affect President Trump's popularity, but never mentions Democratic Party and Biden Administration funded lawfare as the reason.
He notes X (formerly Twitter) has "shifted far to the right", but never explains how it was far to the left and it was Biden administration policy to push Twitter in that direction, and to censor their political opposition.
6
posted on
10/21/2024 5:49:42 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: cowboyusa
7
posted on
10/21/2024 5:51:01 PM PDT
by
No name given
( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
To: mikey_hates_everything
8
posted on
10/21/2024 5:51:31 PM PDT
by
No name given
( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
To: No name given
FDR was a ragging Socalist, but he ALWAYS celebrated the avarage American.
9
posted on
10/21/2024 5:52:07 PM PDT
by
cowboyusa
(YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
..many Trump voters are indeed “deplorable”..saying they're "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic." Indeed deplorable? Where does one want to begin in picking apart this calumny?
Each of these insults is a study in ad hominem attack. Where do Hillary or Nate get their definition of
each reprehensible term?
Then to apply these terms in blanket fashion to those who won't vote for you is astounding.
10
posted on
10/21/2024 5:52:49 PM PDT
by
Thommas
(The snout of the camel is already under the tent.)
To: cowboyusa
The rest of the Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight keywords, sorted:
- 21 States Have Shifted to Donald Trump in Past Month -- Nate Silver Forecast [10/21/2024]
- Donald Trump Has to Love This News From Nate Silver's 2024 Electoral College Projection [10/18/2024]
- Donald Trump Surges Ahead of Kamala Harris in Nate Silver's Forecast [10/17/2024]
- Poll: GOP's Moreno Takes Lead over Democrat Sherrod Brown in High Stakes Ohio Senate Race [10/17/2024]
- 19 States Have Shifted to Donald Trump in Past Week -- Nate Silver Model [10/13/2024]
- Kamala Harris' Chances of Beating Donald Trump Drop -- Nate Silver Forecast [09/28/2024]
- Kamala Harris missed 'big opportunity' with one campaign decision, polling expert says -- and it could cost her the election [09/09/2024]
- VIDEO: Leftist PANIC Attacks Over Nate Silver's Model Showing Trump 60% Victory Probability [09/06/2024]
- Nate Silver Election Model raises Trump's victory chances to 60.1%, Pennsylvania to 61% [09/05/2024]
- Whoops: Report That Harris Team Regrets Not Picking Shapiro, As Nate Silver Has More Bad News for Them Whoops: Report That Harris Team Regrets Not Picking Shapiro, As Nate Silver Has More Bad News for Them [09/05/2024]
- Kamala Harris grows her lead over Trump in wake of convention -- but polling guru says it isn't all bad news for Trump [08/30/2024]
- Nate Silver's Latest Election Projection Model Will Crush Liberal 'Joy' [08/29/2024]
- Electoral College Model Forecasts Donald Trump Heavily Favored to Defeat Kamala Harris [07/30/2024]
- Nate Silver calls for Biden to resign after 'incoherent' comments in ABC interview [07/05/2024]
- We Now Know Why FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver Wanted Joe Biden to Drop Out of the 2024 Race [06/26/2024]
- Expert Election Model Gives Trump 2 in 3 Chance of Winning White House [06/26/2024]
- Nate Silver's Initial Prediction Has Trump at 66% Chance of Winning 2024 [06/26/2024]
- There's Something Fishy About FiveThirtyEight's Election Projection Model [06/12/2024]
- Nate Silver Calls to Shut Down Gemini After Google's AI Chatbot Refuses to Say if Hitler or Musk Is Worse [02/25/2024]
- Biden is headed for defeat in upcoming election -- and Dems have 'no plan to fix the problems': top pollster [02/19/2024]
- Nate Silver Sounds the Alarm on Biden Campaign: 'He's Losing Now and There's No Plan' [02/19/2024]
- Polling guru Nate Silver warns Biden could be just one 'McConnell moment' from losing in 2024 [09/05/2023]
- FiveThirtyEight Founder Nate Silver Leaving ABC News as Disney Layoffs Continue [04/25/2023]
- Will The Polls Overestimate Democrats Again? [09/19/2022]
- More than a third of Republicans on ballots in November support Donald Trump's false stolen-election claims: report (you know this really ticks them off!) [09/07/2022]
- [Nate Silver] Democrats are slightly favored to win the Senate (69%) [09/06/2022]
- Yes, Special Elections Really Are Signaling A Better-Than-Expected Midterm For Democrats [08/25/2022]
- The Political Environment Might Be Improving For Democrats [07/29/2022]
- Democrats Favored to Win Senate for First Time as Polling Improves: 538 [07/27/2022]
- CNN Savages Biden's Disapproval Rating: 'Worst Ever' at This Point in 1st Term [07/14/2022]
- Nate Silver Redistricting Analysis: Democrats poised to INCREASE their House majority in November [04/13/2022]
- Nate Silver: 'I'm Not Really Buying' Sarah Palin's Political Comeback [04/10/2022]
- A 'growing form of radicalism': Expert warns pro-Trump activists are undermining GOP moderates (Oh no!!!) [03/14/2022]
- Trump's 2022 Endorsements Are Earlier, Bolder And More Dangerous Than When He Was President (they're getting worried!) [12/08/2021]
- New Batch of Votes Found In Philadelphia (23,277 Votes In, All For Biden) [11/04/2020]
- Election Forecaster Nate Silver On Fox News, AP Calling Arizona For Biden: 'Should Be Retracted Now' [11/04/2020]
- Biden is favored to win the election (Nate Silver from 538) 11-01-2020 [11/01/2020]
- Nate Silver: "Without Pennsylvania, Biden becomes an underdog" [11/01/2020]
- Nate Silver, The Election Analyst Who Gives Biden 77% Chance Of Winning Blew It Big Time In 2016 [09/27/2020]
- Nate Silver Electoral Map -- You Decide [09/10/2020]
- FiveThirtyEight: You'd Better Believe Trump Can Win Minnesota [09/01/2020]
- Nate Silver releases election forecast: Looks very similar to 2016, too soon to count Trump out [08/12/2020]
- At the end of the day, it's only July, there are a lot of unprecedented events happening, ... if we wind up in a photo finish, Trump likely wins b/c of the Electoral College. [07/28/2020]
- Pollster Nate Silver: 'A Biden landslide is possible' [06/22/2020]
- Nate Silver: No Strong Evidence Russian Hacking, Disinformation Swung 2016 Election [02/23/2020]
- Bernie is Now 50/50 to Win Nomination as Biden's Chances Crater: Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight [02/06/2020]
- Election Update: The First Post-Debate Polls Are In! And They're ... Pretty Weird. [01/22/2020]
- Castro invokes 'Baby Yoda' in tweet supporting early primaries in more diverse states [12/03/2019]
- Do Americans Support Impeaching President Trump? [10/02/2019]
- If This Is Trump's Best Case, The Ukraine Scandal Is Looking Really Bad For Him [09/26/2019]
- What Republicans And Democrats Are Doing In The States Where They Have Total Power [05/28/2019]
- These Senate seats are up for election in 2020 [05/06/2019]
- Bounce? Two Polls Show Trump's Job Approval Rising After Mueller's Findings Were Revealed [03/28/2019]
- Could Congress Block Trump's Emergency Declaration? [02/18/2019]
- Nate Silver in final midterm projections: 'Democrats need a couple things to go wrong' to lose House [11/05/2018]
- Whoops! Nate Silver now HEDGING his 'blue wave' bet for Democrats [11/05/2018]
- Nate Silver says Dems could retake House, or not: 'Both extremely possible' [11/04/2018]
- Republicans Need A Systematic Polling Error To Win The House [11/04/2018]
- Nate Silver: I'm not at all convinced there's movement nationally toward Democrats [11/03/2018]
- <FLASHBACK> The Polls Were Skewed Toward Democrats [11/03/2018]
- DCCC raises more than $100 million online for midterms [10/31/2018]
- Nate Silver: 85% chance Dems win the House [10/29/2018]
- Nate Silver: 86% Dems takes the House [10/23/2018]
- Nate Silver: "Trumpian News Cycle" Makes 2018 Prediction Difficult; Expect "An October Surprise(tr) [10/21/2018]
- Not So Cocksure Now? Nate Silver Says 75% Chance Dems Win House [08/17/2018]
- Note To 'Experts': Obama Is Not a Top 10 President [02/21/2018]
- I used to think gun control was the answer. My research told me otherwise. [10/03/2017]
- Nate Silver Explains How MSM Helped Hillary Lose Election [02/07/2017]
- Nate Silver: Clinton 'almost certainly' would be president if not for Comey [12/11/2016]
- What A Difference 2 Percentage Points Makes [11/09/2016]
- Nate Silver sold em fools gold [11/09/2016]
- Nate Silver: 2016 Polls Less Reliable Than Prior Years [11/08/2016]
- NATE SILVER PREDICTS TRUMP WINS FLORIDA [11/06/2016]
- Nate Silver: Polls showing Clinton up 5 points not backed by data [11/06/2016]
- Nate Silver's Very Very Wrong Predictions about Donald Trump are Terrifying [11/04/2016]
- The Cubs Have A Smaller Chance Of Winning Than Trump Does [11/02/2016]
- 538 Nate has Trump moving up now almost 30% chance of winning. [11/01/2016]
- US election 2016: statistician Nate Silver's big Donald Trump mistake [10/30/2016]
- Donald Trump continues to slide in the polls ... (BARF ALERT!!) [10/17/2016]
- Leaked Monmouth U. polling memo: Democrats 'despondent'; Hillary..., seen as a 'lying harpy' [10/06/2016]
- Nate Silver's 538: Trump would win if election were held today [09/26/2016]
- Who will win the Presidency? [09/26/2016]
- Nate Silver: Trump closing in, Clinton lead 'a lot less safe' than Obama's in 2012 [09/25/2016]
- Election Update: Reports Of A Clinton Rebound Have Been Greatly Exaggerated [09/23/2016]
- Nate Silver: Despite massively outspending Trump, Clinton's odds of victory collapsing [09/21/2016]
- Nate Silver: Trump Improving In Ohio, Hillary Slipping [09/05/2016]
- Nate Silver: Trump would likely win if election were held today [07/25/2016]
- NATE SILVER: Donald Trump would most likely win the election if it were held today [07/25/2016]
- There's a High Probability Nate Silver Is Wrong Again About Donald Trump [06/29/2016]
- Nate Silver gives Hillary Clinton 79% chance of winning presidency; Trump only 20% [06/29/2016]
- Nate Silver: 79 percent chance Clinton wins [06/29/2016]
- Of Course Trump Can Win (538.com) [05/31/2016]
- How I Acted Like A Pundit And Screwed Up On Donald Trump [05/18/2016]
- NATE SILVER: 'We basically got the Republican race wrong' [05/05/2016]
- Facebook is spending millions to keep Mark Zuckerberg alive [04/28/2016]
- Nate Silver officially loses it, predicts Zuckerberg-Petraeus ticket [04/26/2016]
- Trump's 'System Is Rigged' Argument Is Working [04/23/2016]
- Trump's Odds of Winning Way Better than Nate Silver Believes [04/16/2016]
- NATE SILVER: Donald Trump's chances of locking up the nomination appear to be dwindling [04/14/2016]
- A State-By-State Roadmap For The Rest Of The Republican Primary [04/13/2016]
- Trump's New Magic Number Is 40 Percent Of The Vote [04/07/2016]
- Ted Cruz, Not Paul Ryan, Would Probably Win A Contested Convention [04/06/2016]
- 538 Analyst Eats 'Humble Pie' Over Bernie Sanders Win in Michigan [03/09/2016]
- Bernie Sanders beats Hillary Clinton in stunning Michigan primary upset [03/08/2016]
- Sanders beats Clinton in Michigan Dem Primary, Fox News Projects [03/08/2016]
- Trump Optimists And Trump Skeptics Are About To Go To War [02/21/2016]
- Donald Trump̢¢s New Hampshire Win Means These Media Members Are Winners & Losers [02/09/2016]
- NATE SILVER: Here's who's favored to win the Iowa caucuses (Odds of winning: Trump 54%-Cruz 33%) [02/01/2016]
- Nate Silver: CNN poll implies a turnout of about 320K in the Iowa GOP caucus [01/21/2016]
- Donald Trump Is Really Unpopular With General Election Voters [01/19/2016]
- Donald Trump Is Really Unpopular With General Election Voters [01/18/2016]
- 538 projects Cruz, Clinton to win Iowa: The site also gives Trump a clear edge in New Hampshire [01/17/2016]
- Harry̢¢s Guide To 2016 Election Polls [12/23/2015]
- Iowa̢¢s Women Could Be Donald Trump̢¢s Undoing [12/17/2015]
- Nate Silver: 80% chance Super Bowl will be won by 1 of these 5 teams [12/03/2015]
- Dear Nate Silver: The Media (and the GOP) Should Be â¬ËœFreaking Out⬢ About Trump⬢s Poll Numbers [11/25/2015]
- Dear Media, Stop Freaking Out About Donald Trump̢¢s Polls [11/23/2015]
- Coming to grips with a President Trump [11/22/2015]
- Apparently Nate Silver Has Just Discovered The GOPe Splitter Strategyâ¬Â¦. [11/07/2015]
- Nate Silver: Trump, Carson Have About 5% Chance Of Winning Gop Nomination [09/15/2015]
- Why 'Has Trump peaked?' is Exactly the Wrong Question [08/17/2015]
- Nate Silver: Donald Trump Is The World's Greatest Troll [07/21/2015]
- Nate Silver: No, the Democrats don't have a lock on an Electoral College majority [05/12/2015]
- Nate Silver: Polls are failing us [05/08/2015]
- Humiliation for Obama's election guru in his last campaign: David Axelrod sees Labour shellacked [05/08/2015]
- Nate Silver: Clinton Begins The 2016 Campaign, And It's A Toss-up Between Her and Any GOP Candidate [04/13/2015]
- Climate scientist being investigated by Congress for not believing in global warming enough [02/26/2015]
- The Strange Source of Our Cuba Policy [12/21/2014]
- The Celebrated Nate Silver's Polls Were Off; Really, Really Off [11/05/2014]
- Nate Silver: 74 Percent Chance GOP Will Take Senate [11/03/2014]
- Concha: As Bleak Prospects Show, Democratic Race-Baiting Tactics Being Rejected [10/31/2014]
- Nate Silver: Are Democrats disadvantaged by (gasp) skewed polls? [10/15/2014]
- Nate Silver's Senate Update: When Should Democrats Panic? [09/29/2014]
- Nate Silver's Senate Update: Democrats Draw Almost Even. Is It The Money? [09/16/2014]
- FiveThirtyEight's Senate Model Is Back And It Gives Republicans The Edge [09/03/2014]
- Nate Silver Is Half Right About the Tea Party [05/25/2014]
- Every Day, Your Mom Wasted 90 Minutes of Her Life On You, So Get Her a Present [05/10/2014]
- Karl Rove flip-flops on Nate Silver [04/30/2014]
- Jindal now wants LA to get out of Common Core [04/15/2014]
- Like Bush, Many Republicans Are Moderate on Immigration [04/15/2014]
- A Gaffe Can Matter When It Motivates the Base (Iowa Democrat Bruce Braley) [04/01/2014]
- For Columnist, a Change of Tone (Krugman vs. 538/Nate Silver) [03/26/2014]
- Progressives Turn on Their Prodigies: Ezra Klein and Nate Silver fall from Liberal Grace [03/25/2014]
- Democrats to Nate Silver: You're Wrong (Mad at him for Predicting GOP Senate Takeover) [03/24/2014]
- FiveThirtyEight Senate Forecast: GOP Is Slight Favorite in Race for Senate Control [03/23/2014]
- Nate Silver Rips Thomas Friedman: Not Much 'Original Thinking' [03/14/2014]
- Who Scares Democrats More Than the Koch Brothers? Nate Silver. [03/14/2014]
- Nate Silver: Media is overstating the magnitude of the shutdown's political impact. [10/10/2013]
- Nate Silver quits New York Times to take up 'dream job' at ESPN [07/23/2013]
- Nate Silver: GOP Closer to Taking Senate Control in 2014 [07/16/2013]
- Nate Silver Predicts GOP Holding 50-51 Senate Seats After 2014 Election [07/15/2013]
- Nate Silver Ranks Walker Most Rightwing Gov in the Country (Liberal blog) [07/12/2013]
- How insider Nate Silver was able to make better 2012 predictions- The IRS card. Morris owed apology [05/28/2013]
- The Signal and the Silence: When is prediction useful -- and when is it dangerous? [04/16/2013]
- Obama Keeps it Real: Fake Plant for Fake Products for Fake Cars [03/11/2013]
- Did Nate Silver Tip the 2012 Election to Obama? (Will Quit if He's Too Powerful) [02/15/2013]
- Nate Silver's Super Bowl Pick: The 49ers (Nate Silver in hiding now...) [02/04/2013]
- Statistician Nate Silver predicts Seahawks-Patriots rematch in Super Bowl(Seahawks Lose Today) [01/13/2013]
- The Best or Worst Pollsters in the 2012 Election -- How did Nate Silver Do It? (Gallup is Dead Last) [11/14/2012]
- FiveThirtyEight Forecast Barack Obama 313.0 Romney 225.0 Electoral Vote [11/06/2012]
- New FB Page "Nate Silver Wrong" [11/06/2012]
- Anti-Nate Silver online campaign launched [11/05/2012]
- NATE SILVER: Obama's Odds Of Winning Have Now Hit An Overwhelming 86% [11/05/2012]
- Nate Silver just covered his A** [11/04/2012]
- Nov. 2: For Romney to Win, State Polls Must Be Statistically Biased (Silver: 83.7% Chance Obama Win) [11/03/2012]
- Nate Silver, 2009: Any Candidate Losing Independents "Must Necessarily" Lose The Election [11/01/2012]
- If You Can't Withstand Media BS, Turn Off Everything Else...(Rush Slams Concern Trolls Alert) [11/01/2012]
- Nate Silver Ups The Ante On Historic Wager Offer With Joe Scarborough (Who will win the elections?) [11/01/2012]
- DUmmie FUnnies 11-01-12 (DUmmies Hug Their Nate Silver Security Blanket) [11/01/2012]
- In Pennsylvania, the Democratic Lean Is Slight, but Durable ( Nate Silver Watch Oct 29 ) [10/29/2012]
- Nate Silver: 'Romney, clearly, could still win' [10/29/2012]
- Nate Silver is partisan and wrong (ACTUAL Newspaper Headline) [10/29/2012]
- FiveThirtyEight Blog Doubles Down: Ohio a Near Lock for Obama [10/27/2012]
- Signs and Omens: Obama's Fading Hope and the Graveyard Whistling Choir [10/24/2012]
- In National Polling, It's Gallup vs. the Rest (Nate Silver in full liberal melt-down mode) [10/19/2012]
- NATE SILVER: Obama's Odds Of Winning Have Climbed Back To 66% [10/18/2012]
- Why is the New York Times, Nate Silver apoplectic over a local poll from Michigan? [09/03/2012]
- Rick Perry rebound in Iowa: Assisted by veterans? [12/14/2011]
- Newt Gingrich will not be the Republican nominee -- even if it means a brokered convention [12/09/2011]
- Stimulus Package Directed Cash to Democrats [04/09/2010]
- Into the Lion's Den - My post on FiveThirtyEight.com [03/02/2009]
12
posted on
10/21/2024 5:55:33 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: Thommas
Snobs who are stupid. That’s the media
13
posted on
10/21/2024 5:57:40 PM PDT
by
cowboyusa
(YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Except Nate is hardly ever right.
14
posted on
10/21/2024 6:19:18 PM PDT
by
KevinB
(Word for the day: "kakistocracy" - a society governed by its least suitable or competent citizens)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Nate hits all around the target and misses the heart of the matter.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I see a lot of solid reasons that make sense.
Of course there were gonna be the idiotic ones
16
posted on
10/21/2024 7:07:54 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
>> if you study the factors that have historically determined elections, you’ll see that [Hairless is] battling difficult circumstances
Yeah, poor thing! Like an outer-space-grade vacuum where her brain ought to be. That’s a tough campaign impediment!
17
posted on
10/21/2024 7:32:06 PM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Maybe if she didn’t sound like a whiny crybaby shrew more people would pay attention to her.
18
posted on
10/21/2024 7:41:28 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(I do not recognize Biden’s authority. (@FeistyFed on TS) 🐝.)
To: Thommas
So, I guess anyone who doesn’t vote for a certain candidate is according to that candidate, a deplorable ? Then according to Hillary, we have a lot more of the deplorables than anyone thought.
19
posted on
10/22/2024 4:00:44 AM PDT
by
oldtech
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Voters have nostalgia for the relatively strong economic performance in the first three years of Trump’s term and associate the problems of 2020 with Democrats, even though they weren’t in charge at the time. Democrats “weren’t in charge” in 2020 - but Trump wasn’t actually in control of the Republican Party, either. In reality, Trump’s ascendance constitutes a takeover of the Republican Party by Ross Perot’s Reform Party.
Harris is seeking to become the first woman president. In the only previous attempt, undecideds broke heavily against Hillary Clinton, and she underperformed her polls. She is also running for the ultimate executive position while having a resume which is devoid of executive experience. Neither prosecutor nor Senator is an executive position, and neither is vice president. She is only a quasi-incumbent part of the Biden/Harris Administration. She would be (the first woman) president right now, if she were a “stand up guy” who executed her constitutional duty to invoke the 25th Amendment. But seemingly she doesn’t have the clout in “her own" administration to pull that off.
Trump’s conviction on a series of felony charges hardly made any difference, for instance. The framers of the Constitution could very easily have forbidden the selection of a felon to be POTUS. They didn’t. One very logical reason for that would be that they could smell Biden’s DOJ a mile - centuries, actually - away. In that sense the act of calling Mr. Trump “a felon” should logically put your own fingerprints on that illegitimate action by partisan prosecutors, judges, and jurors. Of course the other reason the framers didn’t forbid selection of “a felon” to POTUS might have been that they all - in the King of England’s eyes - were felons.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson