![]() |
E. Pluribus Unum
Since Nov 22, 1998
| |||||
|
Since CO2 is soluble in water and the oceans cover a majority of the Earth's surface, the oceans sequester more CO2 than any other CO2 sink.
Because of the inverse solubility of CO2 with temperature, the colder the oceans get, the more CO2 they can absorb.
Conversely, when the oceans get warmer, they expel CO2.
Atmospheric CO2 therefore follows global temperatures, it does not cause them.
You can see the yearly global atmospheric CO2 fluctuation as the oceans warm and cool with the seasons in the NOAA graph below.
The "settled science" that CO2 causes "climate change" is criminal sophistry.
Just because the globalist depopulation oligarchs war-gamed a global coronavirus pandemic lockdown so they could force experimental “vaccines” with an unprecedented number of catastrophic adverse reactions upon every human being on the planet to combat a gain-of-function biological warfare virus they paid the Chinese Communist Party's Wuhan Lab to create and release into the wild so they could impose vaccine passports to track and control your every move does NOT mean anything nefarious is afoot.® 🤡 |
Denying a loan to an unqualified POC is “racial profiling.”
Approving a loan to an unqualified POC is “predatory lending.”
See how that works?
That would be bad "optics."
5% of the production lots account for 100% of the deaths.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SKKUiQQiUDnn/
That’s why the vaccines don’t actually prevent the illness and why “boosters” are required.
Every time you get a “booster” you have a one-in-twenty chance of hitting the "adverse reaction" jackpot.
And people will think it was just your time to go and never consider the terminator vaccines as the culprit.
https://banned.video/watch?id=61df784eae95bf6e8f3edc68
And don't give me that "I won't get as sick" nonsense because there is absolutely no evidence of that, just dogmatic pronouncements by the professional affirmative action bureaucratic parasites you worship.
Lawsuit claims banks should have seen evidence of sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein
Banks ask federal court to throw out lawsuit
Joe Biden promptly flies into Virgin Islands for "vacation"
Virgin Islands Governor fires the Attorney General, installs acting Attorney General
Epstein lawsuit is dropped.
If you don't like it, don't read it.
If you have naturally acquired immunity but submit to one of the experimental Fauci/China biological warfare virus vaccines anyway, your naturally acquired immunity is destroyed.
The Fauci/China biological warfare virus vaccines do not protect you from the illness.
They contend, without evidence, that you have less of a chance of dying from it, but that’s because they slap the “unvaccinated” onto ventilators and pump them full of Remdesivir for the $39,000 bounty.
Hospitals are rolling in dough from all the Fauci/China biological warfare virus contract killings they have performed.
2. Who was behind the 2014 proxy coup in Ukraine that deposed a democratically elected President? Were you protesting then?
3. Why do you trust the global depopulationist oligarchy backing Ukraine?
These are the same people behind the global biological warfare attack and economic destruction of the plandemic.
These are the same people behind the Great Reset plan to starve 90% of the world’s population while they live comfortably in their well-stocked New Zealand escape compounds waiting for the “useless eaters” to be dead.
These are the same people flooding our country with third-world primitive “migrants” who are going to be roaming the countryside like a swarm of locusts when the supply chain sputters to a halt and the grocery store shelves are empty in the very not-too-distant future.
I know one thing for certain: if you support these people, you deserve everything they have planned for you, and you are going to get it.
https://anncoulter.com/2014/09/03/speed-kills-racial-profiling-study/
CLASSICAL LIBERAL:“I don’t agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
COLLECTIVIST LIBERAL: “I don't agree with what you say, and I want you put to death if you continue to say it.”
"Consensus" is politics.
Fraudulent "scientific consensus" is criminal conspiracy.
https://rumble.com/vwy6pm-revealing-ukraine.html
How “sovereign” is a nation, that has a government imposed on it by a foreign coup, its political organs are controlled by foreign NGOs, its leadership that relies on aid and political favors from its imperial master, and covers-up the corruption, and fires its own members on the wishes of particular cronies in Washington DC?
Globalist billionaires prefer massive, middle-of-the night dumps of anonymous ballots into unmonitored drop-boxes because they want to make sure all votes are counted, especially the trafficked ballots they paid good money for.
...the Fauci/China biological warfare virus barely mutated for a whole year, but when the terminator "vaccines" were rolled out, suddenly a whole Greek-alphabet of new "variants" appeared...
...and the UNVACCINATED are to blame?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3992201/posts
There were only 1,800 flu cases the winter of 2020-2021.
That's because hospitals got paid $13,000 for every Fauci/China biological warfare virus diagnosis, and $39,000 for every biological warfare virus patient they slapped on a ventilator to kill them.
https://www.hfma.org/topics/news/2020/07/the-new-round-will-pay--50-000-per-covid-19-admission--compared-.html
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/hospital-payments-and-the-covid-19-death-count/
Hospitals are rolling in dough from all the money they made on the contract killings. The university hospital in my college town is building multiple new wings.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4040074/posts?page=58#58
According to the CDC's own numbers, the Fauci/China biological warfare virus has a 99.74% survival rate.
75% of the people who died from it had four or more comorbidities.
The Fauci/China biological warfare virus is an ordinary flue There is no need for any of the Fauci/China biological warfare virus "vaccines."
We should be concentrating on the arrest, indictment, trial, conviction, sentencing and execution for crimes against humanity of the people responsible for unleashing the Fauci/China biological warfare virus and the weaponized “vaccines” on an unsuspecting world.
There were five states that unprecedently stopped counting on election night with Trump millions of votes ahead and came back the next morning with Brandon mysteriously millions of votes ahead.
That alone was enough cause to pause and investigate.
The right of assembly in Canada doesn’t allow the government to lock you in your house, put a near moratorium on foreign travel, and close churches either.
The system is now indicating there are health issues with the vaccines in large numbers. Instead of reacting to the data, to make improvements or remove the vaccines from the market, the government informs us the data in the system is “inaccurate”.
The logical conclusions are:
What other explanation is there?
I thought it was the ordinary sinus infection that I get once or twice a year and got my usual prescription for amoxicillin.
A few months later when I gave blood again the antibodies showed up when they hadn't before.
http://www.laissez-fairerepublic.com/TenPlanks.html
"Pay insufficient attention, to the frightening scenario of a comprehensive cyber attack could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole. The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyber attack." - Klaus Schwab
The overwhelming number of people who died had four or more comorbidities.
This is not the case with the people dying from the “cure.”
https://banned.video/watch?id=61df784eae95bf6e8f3edc68
Forcing an experimental "vaccine" on unwitting human subjects is a crime against humanity.
They thought they would have us in chains by now, but it hasn't gone according to plan. They are desperate to keep the hoax alive.
They don't talk about deaths anymore because deaths have plummeted.
They talk about cases, but not the number of cases because there aren't that many.
They talk breathlessly about the percentage increase in cases from last week.
200% rise in cases! OMG!
1 case last week! 3 cases this week! OMG! OMG! OMG!
That's not working anymore, so now there is a new WTF variant every other day!
OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG!
Sure, I'll take your experimental "vaccine." But my health and safety are far too important to show up in person. Just mail it to me. I'll give myself the shot and send in the paperwork saying I'm vaccinated. Just like mail-in voting. You know; safe, secure and honest.
Only 1,800 flu cases in 2020-2021.
Very strange.
TWENTY FIVE TOP QUOTES FROM THE DOJ'S REPORT ON THE MICHAEL BROWN SHOOTING
(For official DOJ report, Google "DOJ Report on Shooting of Michael Brown PDF.")
[01] The evidence, when viewed as a whole, does not support the conclusion that Wilson's uses of deadly force were "objectively unreasonable" under the Supreme Court's definition. (Page 5)
[02] when the store clerk tried to stop Brown, Brown used his physical size to stand over him and forcefully shove him away. (Page 6)
[03] Wilson was aware of the theft and had a description of the suspects as he encountered Brown and Witness 101. (Page 6)
[04] Autopsy results and bullet trajectory, skin from Brown's palm on the outside of the SUV door as well as Brown's DNA on the inside of the driver's door corroborate Wilson's account that during the struggle, Brown used his right hand to grab and attempt to control Wilson's gun. (Page 6)
[05] there is no credible evidence to disprove Wilson's account of what occurred inside the SUV. (Page 7)
[06] autopsy results confirm that Wilson did not shoot Brown in the back as he was running away because there were no entrance wounds to Brown's back. (Page 7)
[07] witnesses who originally stated Brown had his hands up in surrender recanted their original accounts (Page 8)
[08] several witnesses stated that Brown appeared to pose a physical threat to Wilson as he moved toward Wilson. (Page 8)
[09] The physical evidence also establishes that Brown moved forward toward Wilson after he turned around to face him. The physical evidence is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. (Page 10)
[10] evidence does not establish that it was unreasonable for Wilson to perceive Brown as a threat while Brown was punching and grabbing him in the SUV and attempting to take his gun. (Page 11)
[11] Wilson's account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses (Page 12)
[12] Wilson's account was consistent with those results, and consistent with the accounts of other independent eyewitnesses, whose accounts were also consistent with the physical evidence. Wilson's statements were consistent with each other in all material ways, and would not be subject to effective impeachment for inconsistencies or deviation from the physical evidence.8 Therefore, in analyzing all of the evidence, federal prosecutors found Wilson's account to be credible. (Page 16)
[13] Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence. (Page 78)
[14] Multiple credible witnesses corroborate virtually every material aspect of Wilson's account and are consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 78)
[15] several of these witnesses stated that they would have felt threatened by Brown and would have responded in the same way Wilson did. (Page 82)
[16] there are no witnesses who could testify credibly that Wilson shot Brown while Brown was clearly attempting to surrender. (Page 83)
[17] There is no witness who has stated that Brown had his hands up in surrender whose statement is otherwise consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 83)
[18] The media has widely reported that there is witness testimony that Brown said "don't shoot" as he held his hands above his head. In fact, our investigation did not reveal any eyewitness who stated that Brown said "don't shoot." (Page 83)
[19] Wilson did not know that Brown was not armed at the time he shot him, and had reason to suspect that he might be when Brown reached into the waistband of his pants as he advanced toward Wilson. (Page 84)
[20] Wilson did not have time to determine whether Brown had a gun and was not required to risk being shot himself in order to make a more definitive assessment.
[21] In addition, even assuming that Wilson definitively knew that Brown was not armed, Wilson was aware that Brown had already assaulted him once and attempted to gain control of his gun. (Page 85)
[22] Wilson has a strong argument that he was justified in firing his weapon at Brown as he continued to advance toward him and refuse commands to stop, and the law does not require Wilson to wait until Brown was close enough to physically assault Wilson. (Page 85)
[23] we must avoid substituting our personal notions of proper police procedure for the instantaneous decision of the officer at the scene. We must never allow the theoretical, sanitized world of our imagination to replace the dangerous and complex world that policemen face every day. (Page 85)
[24] It may appear, in the calm aftermath, that an officer could have taken a different course, but we do not hold the police to such a demanding standard. (citing Gardner v. Buerger, 82 F.3d 248, 251 (8th Cir. 1996) (same))). Rather, where, as here, an officer points his gun at a suspect to halt his advance, that suspect should be on notice that escalation of the situation would result in the use of the firearm. Estate of Morgan at 498. An officer is permitted to continue firing until the threat is neutralized. See Plumhoff v. Rickard, 134 S.Ct. 2012, 2022 (2014) (Officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended). For all of the reasons stated, Wilson's conduct in shooting Brown as he advanced on Wilson, and until he fell to the ground, was not objectively unreasonable and thus not a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. (Page 85)
[25] Given that Wilson's account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses, to include aspects of the testimony of Witness 101, there is no credible evidence that Wilson willfully shot Brown as he was attempting to surrender or was otherwise not posing a threat. (Page 86)
For the reasons set forth above, this matter lacks prosecutive merit and should be closed.
The Ten Planks of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto (and How Statists Implement Them) |
|
Fortunately, in 98% of defensive gun uses (DGUs), a shot is not fired.
Which means that a mouse gun is as good as a cannon 98% of the time.
Fact: Guns prevent an estimated 2.5 million crimes a year or 6,849 every day. Most often, the gun is never fired and no blood (including the criminal’s) is shed.
Source: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/7.1/Gun-Facts-7.1-screen.pdf, page 21.
Fact: A victim may have a strong reluctance to talk to a government agent about a firearm brandishing incident (which are 98% of DGUs) because they may not know the act was 100% legal.
Source: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/7.1/Gun-Facts-7.1-screen.pdf, page 83.
In other words, the 98% number is probably low.
Straight, white males are the only people it is legal to discriminate against, and discrimination against them is required by law.
And, simultaneously with legislated POC supremacist powers targeting them, straight, white males are "white supremacists."
Man is responsible for 3.4% of that 0.04%
The total amount of anthropogenic CO2 In the atmosphere is therefore 0.0014%
Completely eliminate man's contribution and the Earth's atmosphere still contains 0.04% CO2.
No climate "scientist's" computer model comes close to that degree of accuracy and never will because of the impossibility of knowing and mapping an infinite number of initial conditions at a precise moment in time.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09/04/chaos-climate-part-3-chaos-models/
The only reason climate "scientists" don't use the solar cycle climate model is because it doesn't give them the result they want; global warming (which is code for exterminating 90% of the global population).
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/nyregion/ny-regents-teacher-exams-alst.html
Regents Drop Teacher Literacy Test Seen as Discriminatory
By Kate Taylor
New York Times, March 13, 2017
The Board of Regents on Monday eliminated a requirement that aspiring teachers in New York State pass a literacy test to become certified after the test proved controversial because black and Hispanic candidates passed it at significantly lower rates than white candidates.
The Regents also moved forward with a proposal that would allow some students who failed another test, aimed at evaluating practical skills like lesson planning and assessment, to be certified as teachers based on their grades and professors’ recommendations.
Together, the steps signal how much the Regents’ approach has changed under the current chancellor, Betty A. Rosa, after several years of efforts to raise the bar for entering the profession.
Under the previous chancellor, Merryl H. Tisch, the state created a set of more rigorous licensing exams. Among them was the Academic Literacy Skills Test, or ALST, which was intended to assess reading and analytical writing skills, and the edTPA, which requires candidates to submit a portfolio of work, including unedited videos of them interacting with students.
The literacy test proved challenging to many prospective teachers, but particularly for black and Hispanic candidates. An analysis done in 2014, the year the test was first administered, found that 64 percent of white candidates passed the test on the first try, while only 46 percent of Hispanic candidates and 41 percent of black candidates did.
Nonetheless, a federal judge who had found two older certification tests to be discriminatory ruled in 2015 that the ALST was not biased, because it measured skills that were necessary for teaching.
However, deans of education schools, especially those with large numbers of black and Hispanic students, disagreed, and argued that the exam was exacerbating a shortage of teachers of color. More than 80 percent of public-school teachers in the country are white, according to the federal Education Department, while a majority of public school students are not.
Others said that the exam was redundant, given the other requirements to become a teacher.
Michael Middleton, dean of the Hunter College School of Education, said in an interview on Monday that the battery of exams currently required of teacher candidates — four, in most cases — was onerous and expensive, and that eliminating the ALST was appropriate.
“We already know that our licensure candidates have a bachelor’s degree, which in my mind means they have basic literacy and communication skills,” Dr. Middleton said.
The state Education Department has said it will review another required licensing test, the Educating All Students exam, which measures teachers’ skills at reaching students with disabilities and those learning English, to see if it should be adjusted to also assess literacy skills.
The edTPA has not proved as difficult as the ALST: The overall pass rate is 77 percent, according to the state Education Department. But black candidates pass the test at rates lower than candidates of other races or ethnicities. A task force convened by the Regents, made up of deans and professors of education schools, as well as teachers and district superintendents, recommended recalibrating the passing score on the exam and allowing certain students who fall short of a passing score on the edTPA to become certified based on the recommendations of their teachers. The Regents agreed on Monday to move forward with that proposal.
Kate Walsh, president of the National Council on Teacher Quality, said that eliminating the literacy exam because of minority candidates’ performance on it was the wrong response.
“What we are effectively doing is perpetuating a cycle of underperformance,” she said.
“People are showing a tremendous amount of weakness by just backpedaling because they feel like it’s the politically sensible thing to do,” she added.
Even before Monday’s actions, the Regents had backed off the tougher requirements, instituting safety nets that allowed candidates who failed the edTPA to try to pass an older test to qualify, and allowed those who failed the ALST to show through their coursework and grades that they had the skills that the test measures.
https://www.darkdox.com/watch-2000-mules-free/
https://www.kaufmancountyconservatives.com/watch-free-2000-mules-movie/
https://arc018.com/watch-movie/watch-2000-mules-free-79867.8306851
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/2000-mules-watch-the-full-movie/
https://www.tokyvideo.com/video/2000-mules-full-movie-online-free-hd
But for them, America would have the per capita murder rate of Switzerland.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu
The world population from 1918-1920 was approximately 1,900,000,000
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/
The Spanish flu global death rate was therefore somewhere between 0.89% and 5.26%
100 x 17,000,000 / 1,900,000,000 = 0.89%
100 x 100,000,000 / 1,900,000,000 = 5.26%
As of April 2021 there have been 3,000,000 CCP virus deaths worldwide.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-56783878
As of April 2021 there were approximately 7,900,000,000 billion human beings on Earth.
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
The CCP virus death rate is therefore approximately 0.038%.
100 x 3,000,000 / 7,900,000,000 = 0.038%
The CCP virus death rate is therefore between 0.72% and 4.0% of the Spanish flu.
100 x 0.038% / 0.89% = 4.0%
100 x 0.038% / 5.26% = 0.72%
We shut down the entire planet for a “plague” that has a global death rate 4% or less of the Spanish flu.
COMMUNISM - The government takes the fruits of your labor and gives it to others. If you refuse the government arrests you.
SOCIALISM - The government politely takes the fruits of your labor and gives it to others. If you refuse the government arrests you.
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM - The government, at the request of 51% of voters, politely takes the fruits of your labor and gives it to others. If you refuse the government arrests you.
Socialism/Communism/Democratic-Socialism produce NOTHING Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists wish to “redistribute.”
Socialism/Communism/Democratic-Socialism can only exist as a parasite of capitalism.
The more Socialism/Communism/Democratic-Socialism you have, the less capitalism you have.
The less capitalism you have, the less Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists have to “redistribute.”
The use of violence to promote a political objective is the definition of terrorism.
The endorsement of political violence by those holding power is the definition of fascism.
In June 2020, in the aftermath of the nationwide rioting following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a Minneapolis police officer, Kamala Harris even gleefully predicted that the protests, during which rioting and looting occurred, wouldn’t end, telling Stephen Colbert, host of The Late Show, that they shouldn’t end.
“They’re not going to stop. They’re not going to stop,” she told him. “This is a movement, I’m telling you. They’re not gonna stop. And everyone beware because they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop before Election Day and they’re not going to stop after Election Day. And everyone should take note of that. They’re not gonna let up and they should not.”
The protests Kamala Harris spoke of were responsible for an estimated $1 – $2 billion in property damage between May 26 and June 8, 2020, and dozens of deaths, including that of retired St. Louis police officer David Dorn.
What would happen if Trump said of the protestors who were in Washington, DC on January 6th, “They’re not going to stop. They’re not going to stop. This is a movement, I’m telling you. They’re not gonna stop. And everyone beware because they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna let up and they should not.”
FACT: Guns prevent an estimated 2.5 million crimes a year or 6,849 every day. 98+% of the time the gun is not fired and no blood (including the criminal’s) is shed.
SOURCE: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/7.1/Gun-Facts-7.1-screen.pdf, pages 21, 83.
FACT: 98% of mass-shootings occur in gun-free zones
SOURCE: https://www.dailywire.com/news/what-percentage-mass-shootings-happen-gun-free-amanda-prestigiacomo
This is not a Russia vs Ukraine war.
It is a US Deep State/Totalitarian Globalist vs Sovereign Nation-State war.
We fomented a Ukraine revolution/coup in 2014, caused a civil war and sided with the neo-Nazis and Ukrainian nationalists that wanted to exterminate the ethnic Russian population.
We encouraged Ukraine to ignore the Minsk Agreement it signed that would have brought peace to the region.
We armed Ukraine with offensive weapons, teased NATO membership for Ukraine and opened biological weapons labs there.
Then we built the Ukrainian army into the largest army in the NATO zone besides us, and massed it for deployment in the area of the Donbass in obvious preparation for an attack.
And finally, when Russia responded to all that, we claimed they invaded Ukraine for no good reason to annex territory.
![]() |
It’s the law.
And they are employing the same globaltarian "justice" system that has unconstitutionally held January 6th "insurrectionists" in solitary confiment for almost two years without bail or trial.
The lawyers have stated in the trials that money is not their goal, their goal is to deprive him of his platform and ensure that he will never have a public platform again.
The trials are a joke. He was not allowed to have a jury trial in the judgement phase. The judge "deemed" him guilty.
They said he forfeited because he did not provide discovery that proved his guilt, then they cherry picked the tons of discovery he provided for "evidence" in the trial.
They want it both ways.
They want to say he forfeited because he didn't provide discovery, then they use the documents he provided as "evidence" in the trial.
The jury trials are just show trials to determine how much he owes.
The judge told the jury he is guilty and presented "experts" who said, without evidence, that Jones is richer than George Soros.
Love or hate Alex Jones, this should scare the cheezy puffs out of anybody with two brain cells in a row.
Alex Jones was the test case for cancelling people from social media.
This is the test case for suing anyone into oblivion who says anything that contradicts the globaltarian narrative.
Sneer all you want at Alex Jones, you are next on the menu.
OBAMA 2008 * 69,000,000 votes Wins 873 Counties Wins 18 of 19 Bellwether counties Wins Florida, Ohio, and Iowa WINS House seats ***WINS ELECTION*** TRUMP 2020 * 74,000,000 votes Wins 2497 Counties Wins 18 of 19 Bellwether counties Wins Florida, Ohio, and Iowa WINS House seats ***LOSES ELECTION*** BIDEN 2020 * 81,000,000 votes Wins 477 Counties LOSES 18 of 19 Bellwether counties LOSES Florida, Ohio, and Iowa LOSES House seats ***WINS ELECTION***
Democracy dies with Democrats. Populism is democracy writ large. That’s why they hate and vilify “populism.”
What’s different about this flu that requires an infinite number of “vaccinations?”
Enquiring minds want to know.
You just have to prove there were enough questionable events to warrant an investigation and that the officials who failed to investigate violated their oaths of office to support and defend the US Constitution.
Number of illegals sent to Martha’s Vineyard: 50 Number of illegals sent to Kamala’s house in DC: 140 Number of illegals entering the country in 2022: 2.75 million Guess which one gets the least outrage and media coverage?
Donald Trump loves America and the American people. The DC Uniparty Swamp hates America and the American people. Any questions?
Orange Putin bad! Globohomo puppet good! Nuclear war fun!
Is anybody else being stalked by it?