E. Pluribus Unum
Since Nov 22, 1998

view home page, enter name:


Can’t have everybody who gets the “vaccines” having adverse reactions at once.

That would be bad "optics."

Only 5% of the production lots contain the special ingredients at any given time.

That’s why the vaccines don’t actually prevent the illness and why “boosters” are required.

Every time you get a “booster” you have a one-in-twenty chance of hitting the "adverse reaction" jackpot.

And people will think it was just your time to go and never consider the terminator vaccines as the culprit.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SKKUiQQiUDnn/


Just because the globalist depopulation oligarchs war-gamed a global coronavirus pandemic lockdown so they could force experimental “vaccines” with an unprecedented number of catastrophic adverse reactions upon every human being on the planet to combat a gain-of-function virus they paid the Chinese Communist Party's Wuhan Lab to create and release into the wild so they could impose vaccine passports to track and control your every move does NOT mean anything nefarious is afoot.® 🤡
There is nothing "scientific" about "consensus."

"Consensus" is politics.

Fraudulent "scientific consensus" is criminal conspiracy.


If you were an ethical promoter of a vaccine, wouldn't you actively collect adverse reaction information instead of actively not collecting it and deliberately obliterating any scientifically valid control group by vaccinating them, too?

“Who lacks sex - speaks about sex, hungry talks about food, a person who has no money - about money, and our oligarchs and bankers talk about morality.”
https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/
https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/22/a-religious-exemption-request-for-those-who-have-already-had-covid/
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/08/15/vaccines-may-do-more-harm-than-good-to-those-recovered-from-covid-19-experts/

The fact that there is any question that natural immunity is sufficient tells you the Fauci/China biological warfare virus "vaccines" are not about protecting anyone from the disease.
We shouldn’t let them distract us with vaccines, lockdowns, passports, social distancing and masks.

We should be concentrating on the arrest, indictment, trial, conviction, sentencing and execution for crimes against humanity of the people responsible for unleashing the Fauci/China biological warfare virus and the terminator “vaccines” on an unsuspecting world.


https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
CDC: Teens Injected with COVID Shots have 7.5 X More Deaths, 15 X More Disabilities, 44 X More Hospitalizations than All FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021

At the age of 68 I contracted the Fauci/China biological warfare virus and survived it with ease.

I thought it was the ordinary sinus infection that I get once or twice a year and got my usual prescription for amoxicillin.

A few months later I gave blood and found out I had the antibodies.


What's Going On? Parts 1-3; Mass Vaccination Injuries Caught On Tape
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/1976-swine-flu-scandal-the-cdcs-history-of-lying-about-vaccine-dangers-and-effectiveness/
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3992201/posts
One question: What makes the Fauci/China biological warfare virus so different that the whole world must be vaccinated when we have never had mandatory vaccinations for any other common cold virus in history and survived?
"The most terrifying force of death comes from the hands of "Men who wanted to be left Alone". They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, the lives as they have lived them, are over. The moment the "Men who wanted to be left Alone" are forced to fight back, it is a small form of suicide. They are literally killing off who they used to be. . . . Which is why, when forced to take up violence, these "Men who wanted to be left Alone", fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives. They fight with raw hate, and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror. TRUE TERROR will arrive at the Left's door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy . . . . but it will fall upon deaf ears." --Author Unknown
They have no idea how many terrorists are waltzing over our open borders. But they know everyone who was in the general vicinity of the so-called capitol riots of January 6th.

I am requesting a religious exception from receiving any of the three vaccines currently authorized under the EUA because they were all developed and/or tested using cell lines derived from aborted human fetuses or embryos. This directly contradicts my deeply held belief in the God-given sanctity of all human life from conception to natural death. I firmly believe that abortion is a grave sin, and that using cell lines derived from an aborted human fetus or embryo to develop or test any vaccine or other medication, or for any other purpose, is also a grave sin. By receiving any one of these vaccines I would be approving of the use of these cell lines and approving of the abortion from which they are derived, which I simply cannot do, as a matter of conscience. I would consider receiving a COVID vaccine that was not developed or tested in any way with cell lines derived from aborted human fetuses or embryos when one becomes available.
https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/18-reason-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine
Anarcho-tyranny is the dehumanizing state of affairs whereby the state refuses to stop violent crime, yet still vigorously enforces even the most unjust and petty laws against ordinary people.
So let me get this straight,...

...the Fauci/China biological warfare virus barely mutated for a whole year, but once the terminator "vaccines" were rolled out, suddenly a whole Greek-alphabet of new "variants" appeared...

...and the UNVACCINATED are to blame.


You don't die of the Fauci/China biological warfare virus, or any respiratory virus for that matter. You die of the opportunistic bacterial infections it creates the conditions for. That's why antibiotics work, and a vaccine is not necessary.
According to the CDC's own numbers, covid has a 99.74% survival rate.
4,000,000 global CCP virus deaths out of a global population of 7,900,000,000 = 0.05%, the average age was 80, the median age was 78.

The overwhelming number of people who died had four or more comorbidities.

This is not the case with the people dying from the “cure.”

Forcing an experimental "vaccine" on unwitting human subjects is a crime against humanity.

They thought they would have us in chains by now, but it hasn't gone according to plan. They are desperate to keep the hoax alive.

They don't talk about deaths anymore because deaths have plummeted.

They talk about cases, but not the number of cases because there aren't that many.

They talk breathlessly about the percentage increase in cases from last week.

200% rise in cases! OMG!

1 case last week! 3 cases this week! OMG! OMG! OMG!

That's no working anymore, so now there is a new WTF variant every other day!

OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG!


"Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong

Sure, I'll take your experimental "vaccine."
But my health and safety are far too important to show up in person.
Just mail it to me.
I'll give myself the shot and send in the paperwork saying I'm vaccinated.
Just like mail-in voting.
You know; safe, secure and honest.

38 Million flu cases in 2019-2020. Only 1,800 cases 2020-2021. Do you believe in magic?
https://noqreport.com/2021/08/07/from-shots-to-clots-science-shows-covid-vaccines-cause-blood-clots/
VIDEO: Covid-19 Vaccine Program Director Admits Injection Destroys Immune System
https://www.thecentersquare.com/indiana/indiana-life-insurance-ceo-says-deaths-are-up-40-among-people-ages-18-64/article_71473b12-6b1e-11ec-8641-5b2c06725e2c.html
TWENTY FIVE TOP QUOTES FROM THE DOJ'S REPORT ON THE MICHAEL BROWN SHOOTING

http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown_1.pdf

(For official DOJ report, Google "DOJ Report on Shooting of Michael Brown PDF.")

[01] The evidence, when viewed as a whole, does not support the conclusion that Wilson’s uses of deadly force were “objectively unreasonable” under the Supreme Court’s definition. (Page 5)

[02] when the store clerk tried to stop Brown, Brown used his physical size to stand over him and forcefully shove him away. (Page 6)

[03] Wilson was aware of the theft and had a description of the suspects as he encountered Brown and Witness 101. (Page 6)

[04] Autopsy results and bullet trajectory, skin from Brown’s palm on the outside of the SUV door as well as Brown’s DNA on the inside of the driver’s door corroborate Wilson’s account that during the struggle, Brown used his right hand to grab and attempt to control Wilson’s gun. (Page 6)

[05] there is no credible evidence to disprove Wilson’s account of what occurred inside the SUV. (Page 7)

[06] autopsy results confirm that Wilson did not shoot Brown in the back as he was running away because there were no entrance wounds to Brown’s back. (Page 7)

[07] witnesses who originally stated Brown had his hands up in surrender recanted their original accounts (Page 8)

[08] several witnesses stated that Brown appeared to pose a physical threat to Wilson as he moved toward Wilson. (Page 8)

[09] The physical evidence also establishes that Brown moved forward toward Wilson after he turned around to face him. The physical evidence is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. (Page 10)

[10] evidence does not establish that it was unreasonable for Wilson to perceive Brown as a threat while Brown was punching and grabbing him in the SUV and attempting to take his gun. (Page 11)

[11] Wilson’s account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses (Page 12)

[12] Wilson’s account was consistent with those results, and consistent with the accounts of other independent eyewitnesses, whose accounts were also consistent with the physical evidence. Wilson’s statements were consistent with each other in all material ways, and would not be subject to effective impeachment for inconsistencies or deviation from the physical evidence.8 Therefore, in analyzing all of the evidence, federal prosecutors found Wilson’s account to be credible. (Page 16)

[13] Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence. (Page 78)

[14] Multiple credible witnesses corroborate virtually every material aspect of Wilson’s account and are consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 78)

[15] several of these witnesses stated that they would have felt threatened by Brown and would have responded in the same way Wilson did. (Page 82)

[16] there are no witnesses who could testify credibly that Wilson shot Brown while Brown was clearly attempting to surrender. (Page 83)

[17] There is no witness who has stated that Brown had his hands up in surrender whose statement is otherwise consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 83)

[18] The media has widely reported that there is witness testimony that Brown said “don’t shoot” as he held his hands above his head. In fact, our investigation did not reveal any eyewitness who stated that Brown said “don’t shoot.” (Page 83)

[19] Wilson did not know that Brown was not armed at the time he shot him, and had reason to suspect that he might be when Brown reached into the waistband of his pants as he advanced toward Wilson. (Page 84)

[20] Wilson did not have time to determine whether Brown had a gun and was not required to risk being shot himself in order to make a more definitive assessment.

[21] In addition, even assuming that Wilson definitively knew that Brown was not armed, Wilson was aware that Brown had already assaulted him once and attempted to gain control of his gun. (Page 85)

[22] Wilson has a strong argument that he was justified in firing his weapon at Brown as he continued to advance toward him and refuse commands to stop, and the law does not require Wilson to wait until Brown was close enough to physically assault Wilson. (Page 85)

[23] we must avoid substituting our personal notions of proper police procedure for the instantaneous decision of the officer at the scene. We must never allow the theoretical, sanitized world of our imagination to replace the dangerous and complex world that policemen face every day.” (Page 85)

[24] “It may appear, in the calm aftermath, that an officer could have taken a different course, but we do not hold the police to such a demanding standard.” (citing Gardner v. Buerger, 82 F.3d 248, 251 (8th Cir. 1996) (same))). Rather, where, as here, an officer points his gun at a suspect to halt his advance, that suspect should be on notice that “escalation of the situation would result in the use of the firearm.” Estate of Morgan at 498. An officer is permitted to continue firing until the threat is neutralized. See Plumhoff v. Rickard, 134 S.Ct. 2012, 2022 (2014) (“Officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended”). For all of the reasons stated, Wilson’s conduct in shooting Brown as he advanced on Wilson, and until he fell to the ground, was not objectively unreasonable and thus not a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. (Page 85)

[25] Given that Wilson’s account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses, to include aspects of the testimony of Witness 101, there is no credible evidence that Wilson willfully shot Brown as he was attempting to surrender or was otherwise not posing a threat. (Page 86)

For the reasons set forth above, this matter lacks prosecutive merit and should be closed.

The Ten Planks of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto
(and How Statists Implement Them)

  1. Abolition of private property rights (via property taxes, restrictive zoning laws, "fair housing" edicts, environmental and "wetlands" regulations, UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030, etc.)

  2. Institution of a heavily graduated income tax (by calling it "taxing the rich")

  3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance (through a confiscatory estate tax on "the rich")

  4. Confiscation of the property of enemies of the state (through lawless application of asset forfeiture and eminent domain)

  5. Centralization of credit into the hands of the state (Federal Reserve, Federal Trade Commission, TARP, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, federal takeover of student loans, etc.)

  6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation into the hands of the state (FCC, DOT, FEMA, NTSB, FAA, etc.).

  7. Consolidation and subjugation of all major industries to central government control (FDA, EPA, OSHA, ICC, HUD, NLRB, EEOC, DOE, TSA etc.)

  8. Mandatory labor union membership ("card check" to bypass employee consent, automatic withholding of union dues, forced unionization of health care workers, teachers, police, firefighters, etc.)

  9. Equitable redistribution of all wealth (TANF, SSI, EITC, SNAP, Community Reinvestment Act, etc.)

  10. Free public education (and food, housing, health care, cell phones, Internet access, etc.)


The last thing you want to do is shoot someone in self-defense because there are life-changing repercussions even if totally justified.

Fortunately, in 98% of defensive gun uses (DGUs), a shot is not fired.

Which means that a mouse gun is as good as a cannon 98% of the time.

Fact: Guns prevent an estimated 2.5 million crimes a year or 6,849 every day. Most often, the gun is never fired and no blood (including the criminal’s) is shed.

Source: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/7.1/Gun-Facts-7.1-screen.pdf, page 21.

Fact: A victim may have a strong reluctance to talk to a government agent about a firearm brandishing incident (which are 98% of DGUs) because they may not know the act was 100% legal.

Source: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/7.1/Gun-Facts-7.1-screen.pdf, page 83.

In other words, the 98% number is probably low.


“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is...in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.” ― Theodore Dalrymple
The solar cycle climate model is 93% accurate at predicting present-day climate based on historical climate data.

https://nextgrandminimum.com/2018/11/22/professor-valentina-zharkova-breaks-her-silence-and-confirms-super-grand-solar-minimum/

No climate "scientist's" computer model comes close to that degree of accuracy and never will because of the impossibility of knowing and mapping a virtually infinite number of initial conditions at a precise moment in time.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09/04/chaos-climate-part-3-chaos-models/

The only reason climate "scientists" don't use the solar cycle climate model is because it doesn't give them the result they want; global warming.


In 2017, the state of New York passed a law requiring prospective school teachers to take a literacy test to get their license, but repealed it the following year because 36 percent of whites, 54 percent of Hispanics and 59 percent of blacks failed on the first try.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/nyregion/ny-regents-teacher-exams-alst.html


The Spanish flu of 1918-1920 claimed between 17,000,000 to 100,000,000 lives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu

The world population from 1918-1920 was approximately 1,900,000,000

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/

The Spanish flu global death rate was therefore somewhere between 0.89% and 5.26%

100 x 17,000,000 / 1,900,000,000 = 0.89%
100 x 100,000,000 / 1,900,000,000 = 5.26%

As of April 2021 there have been 3,000,000 CCP virus deaths worldwide.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-56783878

As of April 2021 there were approximately 7,900,000,000 billion human beings on Earth.

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

The CCP virus death rate is therefore approximately 0.038%.

100 x 3,000,000 / 7,900,000,000 = 0.038%

The CCP virus death rate is therefore between 0.72% and 4.0% of the Spanish flu.

100 x 0.038% / 0.89% = 4.0%
100 x 0.038% / 5.26% = 0.72%

We shut down the entire planet for a “plague” that has a global death rate 4% or less of the Spanish flu.


https://rairfoundation.com/exposed-klaus-schwabs-school-for-covid-dictators-plan-for-great-reset-videos/
https://truthbasedmedia.com/2021/12/14/the-lancet-scolds-those-claiming-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated/

The use of violence to promote a political objective is the definition of terrorism.

The endorsement of political violence by those holding power is the definition of fascism.


Nothing says "Trust the Science" like asking for the data to be hidden for 75 years.
"The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." --Selwyn Duke
Truth is hate to people who hate truth.



































https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.freerepublic.com/~epluribusunum/