Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $28,398
35%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 35%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: stateconstitution

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • The Six States With No Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms

    11/02/2014 8:48:24 AM PST · by rktman · 26 replies
    thetruthaboutguns.com ^ | 11/2/2014 | Dean Weingarten
    There are six states with constitutions that don’t explicitly protect the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The last state to add such a protection was Wisconsin, in 1998. The last stage of the process to amend the Badger State’s founding document was via a referendum and it passed with an overwhelming 74% of the vote. The sorry six that still lack enshrinement of the RKBA are listed below. And it won’t surprise you that these states are some of the least supportive of gun ownership and Second Amendment rights . . .
  • U.S. Conference of Mayors held for supporting Same-Sex Marriage

    06/24/2014 12:45:31 PM PDT · by SoFloFreeper · 17 replies
    Maine News ^ | 6/24/14 | Petra Maria Longewag
    U.S. Conference of Mayors had a 4-day conference that ended on Monday. More than 200 mayors participated in this gathering that took place in Dallas. The result of this was U.S. Conference of Mayors urging federal courts up to the U.S. Supreme Court to allow same-sex couples nationwide to marry. The same conference was held back in 2009, that time too it endorsed the freedom of same-sex couples to marry. The same thing it reaffirmed in this current resolution. The major noting of the group was that that 19 states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex couples to marry....
  • Two Solutions to the Wisconsin Stalemate

    02/28/2011 3:38:27 AM PST · by Scanian · 15 replies
    The American Thinker ^ | February 28, 2011 | Cliff Thier
    The Republican majority of the Wisconsin State Senate has at hand the tools to end its stalemate now. The Wisconsin Constitution requires that to vote on a law dealing with taxing or spending or borrowing, a "quorum" is needed, and the minimum number to constitute a "quorum" is sixty percent of the elected members of the legislature: ARTICLE VIII FINANCE Vote on fiscal bills; quorum. SECTION 8. On the passage in either house of the legislature of any law which imposes, continues or renews a tax, or creates a debt or charge, or makes, continues or renews an appropriation of...
  • CA: How Wannabe Govs Stand on State Constitution Do-Over

    05/21/2009 2:50:19 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 11 replies · 691+ views
    CalBuzz ^ | 5/21 | Jerry Roberts and Phil Trounstine
    Meg Whitman embraced the call for a constitutional convention by an influential business group Wednesday, while Republican gubernatorial rival Steve Poizner scoffed at the idea as “one more excuse” for Sacramento politicians. ... One day after California voters (well, about a quarter of them who bothered to participate) delivered a deafening roar of disapproval to Capitol electeds by overwhelmingly rejecting a propositional package of alleged budget reforms, the political atmosphere crackled with the lexicon of political change, as vows to “overhaul” and “restructure” a “failed system” and a “broken government” echoed throughout the state. In Sacramento, the corporate good government...
  • Milwaukee Police Chief Flynn is bordering on irresponsible

    04/21/2009 8:54:19 AM PDT · by JohnPierce · 6 replies · 741+ views
    Examiner.com ^ | April 21, 2009 | John Pierce
    Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn said he would advise his officers to question anyone out in public with a gun. He went on to say that "If my officers see someone walking around the City of Milwaukee with a firearm openly displayed, it borders on irresponsible if I were to communicate to members of my community that they can carry that firearm with impunity."
  • Oregon High Court rules live sex shows should be allowed

    09/29/2005 7:47:21 PM PDT · by aimhigh · 302 replies · 7,817+ views
    KGW ^ | 9/29/2005 | CHARLES E. BEGGS, AP
    SALEM — The Oregon Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional Thursday a state law against conducting live sex shows and a local ordinance regulating conduct of nude dancers. Both restrictions violate the Oregon Constitution's guarantees of free speech and free expression, the court said in a pair of 5-1 decisions. The free expression rulings continued the court's modern pattern of broadly interpreting state constitutional rights as forbidding virtually all regulation of obscenity. The court's decisions have given Oregon "one of the most protective approaches to the interests of freedom of expression," of any state, said Steven Green, a Willamette University...
  • U.S. Judge Rejects Nebraska Gay-Marriage Ban

    05/12/2005 3:30:21 PM PDT · by Crackingham · 70 replies · 1,963+ views
    AP ^ | 5/12/05 | Kevin O'Hanlon
    A federal judge Thursday struck down Nebraska's ban on gay marriage, saying the measure interferes not only with the rights of gay couples but also with those of foster parents, adopted children and people in a host of other living arrangements. The constitutional amendment, which defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman, was passed overwhelmingly by the voters in November 2000. U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon said the ban "imposes significant burdens on both the expressive and intimate associational rights" of gays "and creates a significant barrier to the plaintiffs' right to petition or to participate...
  • House approves gay-marriage ban [Texas]

    04/26/2005 7:09:23 AM PDT · by Racehorse · 4 replies · 234+ views
    Austin American-Statesman ^ | 26 April 2005 | Michelle M. Martinez
    Efforts to add a ban on gay marriage to the state constitution advanced Monday when the Texas House of Representatives approved the measure with a necessary two-thirds vote. [ . . . ] In Texas, same-sex marriages are forbidden, and civil unions are not recognized. The 101 members who voted in favor of the resolution . . . would let Texas voters decide whether the constitution should be amended to say that marriage should be between a man and a woman. "The Texas Legislature continues to push policies that hurt real Texas families by denying children of placement in loving...
  • Defense of Marriage Bill Resurfaces at Legislature ( In Minnesota)

    03/08/2005 9:32:07 PM PST · by Coastal · 1 replies · 178+ views
    AP ^ | March 8, 2005 | Patrick Condon
    One of the more divisive issues of last year's legislative session will return this week with the reintroduction of a proposal to amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage and civil unions. Critics and supporters staked out familiar positions on Tuesday after the chief sponsor, Sen. Michele Bachmann, said she would resurrect the plan because Minnesotans want the chance to vote on whether to amend the constitution to bar same-sex unions. "The momentum is with us, the people are with us," said Bachmann, R-Stillwater. "We're hoping to get this taken care of and get it over with."
  • Have you ever read your State Constitution? (Link)

    12/28/2002 10:49:04 AM PST · by B4Ranch · 27 replies · 1,090+ views
      Alabama State Constitution Alaska State Constitution Arizona State Constitution   Arkansas State Constitution   California State Constitution   Colorado State Constitution Connecticut State Constitution Delaware State Constitution   Florida State Constitution   Georgia State Constitution Hawaii State Constitution Idaho State Constitution Illinois State Constitution Indiana State Constitution Iowa State Constitution Kansas State Constitution Kentucky Commonwealth Constitution Louisiana State Constitution Maine State Constitution Maryland State Constitution. Massachusetts Commonwealth Constitution Michigan State Constitution Minnesota State Constitution   Mississippi State Constitution Missouri State Constitution Montana State Constitution Nebraska State Constitution Nevada State Constitution New Hampshire State Constitution New Jersey State Constitution New Mexico State Constitution New York...
  • Some voted to keep racist language

    11/07/2002 6:42:22 PM PST · by Glutton · 13 replies · 227+ views
    the Register Guard ^ | 7 Nov 02 | By JOSEPH FRAZIER
    PORTLAND - In 21st Century Oregon it might have seemed a no-brainer: Should voters remove racially offensive language from the state constitution, where it had lurked forgotten for nearly 150 years? The measure passed, but in a state awash in liberal tradition 29 percent - nearly one-third of voters - on Tuesday still voted "no." One passage wiped out by Tuesday's election reads, ``No free negro, or mulatto, not residing in this state at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall come, reside, or be within this State, or hold any real estate.'' Over the decades, racist provisions...
  • NC’s Governor Easley threatens local governments

    09/21/2002 7:16:33 PM PDT · by Madcelt · 16 replies · 243+ views
    The Asheville Tribune ^ | Sept 19,2002 | By Clint Parker
    A Wilmington newspaper is reporting that a top aide to Governor Mike Easley threatened loss of "...local projects dear to the New Hanover County Commissioners..." if "...they [the commissioners] were to win a lawsuit against the administration over money Gov. Mike Easley..." withheld from local governments to balance the budget. The Wilmington Star says that John Merritt, a Senior Advisor for Policy and Communications for Easley, went on to say, "They [commissioners] are like a son getting mad at his father, who's lost his job, for not paying his allowance. Now, they're saying they'll sue the dad. There's a likelihood...