Posted on 12/28/2002 10:49:04 AM PST by B4Ranch
|
||
|
||
|
Sec. 21. The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of them-
selves and the State shall not be questioned.
Sec. 25. To guard against transgressions of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that everything in this article is excepted out of the general powers of government and shall forever remain inviolate.
When you consider that one of the items excepted from the general powers of government is:
Sec. 21. The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.
Doesn't that make ALL PA gun control laws unconstitutional?
See post 5 for further reassurance. Or maybe not. :)
Only citizens should be counted when apportioning seats in the legislature.
When I asked the head of a San Francisco EnvironMental law firm why this wouldn't make CA property owners more secure in their rights, he said that Federal Judges were more "Anti-Government" than CA Judges!!!
Our Constitution is not only an abortion due to legislators constantly changing it on a whim to make it "living/breathing," the Direct Democracy Initiative Process with the Ballot Box Legislation Industry in our State is rapidly bastardizing the poor thing to DEATH!!!
It is REALLY UNSTABLE on the OPERATING TABLE, all the time!!!
All men are, by nature, free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and seeking and obtaining happiness and safety.
§ 1.04 Bearing arms; standing armies; military powers (1851)
The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be kept up; and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.
After reading these articles from the Ohio Constitution Bill of Rights, it is difficult to understand why people think we need a Concealed Carry Law in Ohio.
All Illinois high students are required to take a test on both the U.S. and the Illinois constitution. I am familiar with both.
The 1970 Illinois state constitution is somewhat conservative and contains a number of protections against bureaucratic government. The amendments we have psased since then (such as the cutback amendment to reduce the size of the state house) have mostly followed that spirt, with the exception of that stupid 1998 amendment to increase the governor's appointment power...However, the state legislature has never really cared much to follow the constitution.
"...the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
--Illinois Constitution, Article I, Section 22.
Once upon a time in a land far, far away there lived a phree people . . .SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
"Once upon a time in a land far, far away there lived a phree people . . ."
Why did they phail, in such a short time???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.