Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some voted to keep racist language
the Register Guard ^ | 7 Nov 02 | By JOSEPH FRAZIER

Posted on 11/07/2002 6:42:22 PM PST by Glutton

PORTLAND - In 21st Century Oregon it might have seemed a no-brainer: Should voters remove racially offensive language from the state constitution, where it had lurked forgotten for nearly 150 years?

The measure passed, but in a state awash in liberal tradition 29 percent - nearly one-third of voters - on Tuesday still voted "no."

One passage wiped out by Tuesday's election reads, ``No free negro, or mulatto, not residing in this state at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall come, reside, or be within this State, or hold any real estate.''

Over the decades, racist provisions in Oregon's constitution and statutes have been as hardy and stubborn as the pioneers who wrote them.

Whether those who voted ``no'' on Measure 14 were reluctant to tamper with a historical document or whether there were hidden racial feelings is unclear.

Other objectionable language and provisions in the constitution have been removed gradually. That which remained has survived a century of opportunities for change through the initiative process.

``I didn't feel any opposition to it at all,'' Mike Leighton, editor of the black-oriented Portland Observer newspaper said Wednesday.

"Maybe it's the 30 percent of the people who will vote against anything,'' Leighton said, adding ``I would hope people didn't vote that way because they want racist language or because they support racism.''

``Oregon's national liberal reputation was challenged by (failed) gay rights initiatives in the 1990s and somewhat by this vote as well,'' political analyst Jim Moore said. ``The state's national reputation has always had a hole in it.''

Moore noted that the state somewhat reluctantly in the 1960s removed real estate covenants that could block resale of property to Asians and blacks. A constitutional provision barring Chinese from owning property in the state remains and was not affected by Tuesday's vote, he said.

``There are people out there who basically say blacks are inferior or that it is no big deal to have that language in there,'' he said.

He said some who voted for Measure 14 may have done so because it seemed to negate the history of the state.

Chet Orloff, director emeritus of the Oregon Historical Society, said some of the people who voted ``no'' may have felt the constitution should stand as a historical record. But not all of them.

``Five or 10 percent, maybe more, of the people who voted it down have some racist attitudes and this is being reflected,'' he said. ``This is giving them an opportunity to express it in a secret way.''

The measure passed in all 36 counties but had its toughest opposition in sparsely populated and usually conservative rural counties such as Harney, Lake, Wheeler, Malheur, Klamath and Crook.

Discriminatory language once was rampant in Oregon's laws and constitution. Much of what remained was overridden by amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

Many of Oregon's early settlers were disenchanted Southern whites, who brought their ideas, and in some cases their slaves, with them.

Many more displaced by the Civil War followed, often settling in the Rogue Valley, which was isolated by poor roads from the rest of the state until fairly recently. There, attitudes grew and prospered, generally unleavened by what was going on around them.

However both Rogue Valley counties of Jackson and Josephine passed Measure 14 handily.

The Ku Klux Klan, an anti-Catholic movement in Oregon, was instrumental in the 1922 election of Gov. Walter Pierce.

In that year Oregon voted to close all Catholic schools in the state, a decision thrown out by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1925.

Southern sympathies in Oregon ran high during the Civil War, high enough to cause a Union fort to be built near Corvallis. President Lincoln silenced several Oregon newspapers with secessionist sympathies by pulling their mailing privileges.

In 1844, slavery was declared illegal in the Oregon Country and adult blacks were ordered out. Those who remained were to be whipped every six months until they left, although the punishment was amended to forced labor and there is a record of only one black actually being ejected.

In 1862 Oregon imposed a $5 tax on all blacks, Chinese, Hawaiians and ``mulattos'' and banned marriage between whites and anyone more than one-quarter black.

Four years later the state rejected the 14th Amendment granting citizenship to blacks and extended the marriage ban to anyone a quarter or more Chinese or Hawaiian or a half or more Indian. The mixed marriage ban stayed on the books until 1951.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: housecleaning; racism; stateconstitution

1 posted on 11/07/2002 6:42:22 PM PST by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Racism ran deep in some areas.
2 posted on 11/07/2002 6:48:09 PM PST by Jolly Rodgers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Rodgers
Yes, in the 1880's in northern California a bounty of $5 was offered for every Indian head brought in. By the way, Frazier, don't try to blame this on the South. It was the entire country. The Pacific Northwest is a long way from the South.
3 posted on 11/07/2002 6:59:33 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Rodgers
Indeed. A dacade or so ago, former Register Guard columnist Don Bishop made made big political hay over a little town's tavern (in Noti)that had a device that would have been bloody and crippling to wear labled "aparthied handcuffs."

Naturally this whipped very liberal Eugene into a frenzy, and the tavern owners fled after selling the joint.

Eugene-Springfield is a metro area that is so caucasian it is quite obvious that the early Twentieth Century saw widespread efforts to keep non whites moving on through the area.

The largest demographic change has been a boom in the hispanic population. Indeed, it is larger then that of negros and other non caucasian groups.

This migration generates heat and discontent in rural Lane County, but much like the racism for negros, it is wispered and muttered in "safe" circles.

4 posted on 11/07/2002 6:59:58 PM PST by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
A 71% approval rate is very high. You don't get 100% approval rates on any vote, except in Stalin's USSR or Saddam's Iraq. Which, of course, is what the true believing leftist really wants.
5 posted on 11/07/2002 7:22:27 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Sometimes racism is harder to kill in places where the races don't actually live together much. As bad as it was in the South I think its easier to move ahead due to the long history and shared culture.
6 posted on 11/07/2002 7:22:38 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
I doubt that most of the "no" votes were racists. I walked into the voting booth on tuesday having no idea whatsoever that there were a bunch of judges that I had to vote up or down on. I voted them all down, for no better reason than if I had voted them all up. About 30% voted that way.
7 posted on 11/07/2002 7:30:24 PM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
"Maybe it's the 30 percent of the people who will vote against anything,"

I think it's safe to say 30% don't even read what they are voting for, just vote.
8 posted on 11/07/2002 7:35:02 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
My understanding is that the KKK was quite active in that area,and used to hold cross burnings on top of your local butte.
9 posted on 11/07/2002 10:18:05 PM PST by Rocksalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Oh, I agree. Don't get me wrong, I figure a sizable number of folks vote no just to be contentious just for the sake of being contentious in any event.

Racism is a nasty thing liberals like to pretend does not affect them. It does, I see them slip time to time here in very liberal Eugene. They are just sly about it if they are bigotted, that's all.

10 posted on 11/08/2002 4:19:51 PM PST by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rocksalt
Yeah, the KKK grew in the wake of Griffin's movie "Birth of a Nation," and influences even as high as racist Democratic President Widrow Wilson in the early 20th Century.

Wilson fired all negros working in civil service jobs such as the then 100 percent government owned and operated United States Post Office.

Here in Eugene, the KKK used to march in Independence day parades, and the fight to remove the huge cross from Skinner's Butte stemed from the old sundown laws where negros werte warned not to be in city limits when the sun left the sky.

The cross is sais by some here to have been a warning to the 'wrong' railroad riders at the station at the foot of the butte that the local KKK considered this town their turf to "protect."

11 posted on 11/08/2002 4:27:57 PM PST by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
You are correct in this observation. I grew up in Connecticut, and live in Oregon. Racists tend to be sneakier in both places, and having lived in North Carolina while a Paratrooper, I have noted much of the problems in Connecticut (at least Clinton where I lived) and Oregon concerning racism stem from the ignorance from the lack of living together as you aptly note in your post
12 posted on 11/08/2002 4:31:21 PM PST by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
I was reading a book last night that detailed how a wealthy affiliate of the KKK had actually financed the Nation of Islam during the 1960's. The book claimed the KKK was backing the NOI because they were separitists as opposed to MLK's intregrationism. They figured anyone calling for a separation of the races would play into their agenda.
13 posted on 11/08/2002 5:48:09 PM PST by Rocksalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rocksalt
Sounds like a chain smoker setting out to rearrange the explosive shed if you ask me. I'll have to keep my eyes open for facts on that.
14 posted on 11/08/2002 5:53:02 PM PST by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson