Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $26,157
32%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 32%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: prosecution

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Dems use the legal system to target the right — yet give the left a pass

    05/08/2024 5:12:11 AM PDT · by Texas Fossil · 21 replies
    New York Post ^ | May 6, 2024, | Glenn H. Reynolds
    “For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.”This philosophy, announced by Brazilian President Getulio Vargas in the 1940s, is no longer just the favored approach of Latin American strongmen. It has become the openly practiced strategy of today’s Democratic machine.Laws that hamper Democrats are ignored. Laws that might be used to hurt Republicans are enforced to — and often well past — the limits of the law.One need look no farther than the absurd circus-clown show trial (one pundit prefers the term “goat rodeo”) in which the state of New York has gone so far in trying to turn...
  • Rep. Matt Gaetz posts video of former prosecutor who investigated Trump pleading the fifth under questioning

    05/02/2024 8:54:46 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 23 replies
    Just The News ^ | 05/02/2024 | Nicholas Ballasy
    Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., posted a video on Thursday of a former prosecutor who investigated former President Trump pleading the fifth under questioning about his actions.The video was recorded during a closed session of the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government in May 2023, according to a congressional source.Mark Pomerantz, former special assistant to the New York County District Attorney, can be seen in the video declining to answer several questions, such as, "Did you knowingly break any laws when investigating President Trump?" and "Did you misuse any federal funds when investigating President Trump?"His counsel appeared to...
  • Using the Anti-Klan Act to Address Campus Antisemitism

    04/30/2024 4:46:27 PM PDT · by Candor7 · 8 replies
    The Middle East Forum ^ | 30 April 2024 | Gregg Roman
    This is the second in a series of four articles discussing how the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act and other federal civil rights laws could potentially be used to bring a class action lawsuit against Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) for their coordinated efforts to harass and intimidate Jewish students on college campuses. See the first article here.( link) What does the 1964 Mississippi Burning case that occurred at the height of the civil rights struggle have in common with the plight of besieged Jewish and Israeli university students today? More than university administrators or the faculty...
  • Backpage: A Blueprint for Squelching Speech

    04/30/2024 11:45:32 AM PDT · by Twotone · 1 replies
    Reason ^ | April 29, 2024 | Elizabeth Nolan Brown
    U.S. District Judge Diane Humetewa acquitted three former Backpage executives of myriad counts against them last week—more evidence of how empty so much of the federal case against them is. Humetewa ruled that there was insufficient evidence to uphold 50 of the counts* against journalist and Backpage co-founder Michael Lacey, 10 of the counts against former Executive Vice President Scott Spear, and 18 of the counts against former Chief Financial Officer Jed Brunst. From the beginning, this prosecution has been premised on a bogus rationale (authorities yammer on about sex trafficking though none of the defendants are charged with sex...
  • Justice Thomas Raises Scrutiny On Special Counsel Jack Smith's Appointment In Trump Hearing

    04/28/2024 9:13:08 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 56 replies
    Epoch Times ^ | 04/28/2024 | Naveen Arthappully
    U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has asked former President Donald Trump’s lawyers about whether they challenged special counsel Jack Smith’s authority to bring charges against the president.On April 25, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case about President Trump being immune from prosecution for official acts carried out during his presidency. During the hearing, Justice Thomas asked John Sauer, the attorney who represented Trump in court, “Did you, in this litigation, challenge the appointment of special counsel?” Mr. Smith was appointed to the case by Attorney General Merrick Garland.Mr. Sauer said that Trump attorneys have not...
  • Justice Thomas raised crucial question about legitimacy of special counsel's prosecution of Trump (Jack Smith was a private citizen when AG Garland appointed him as special counsel to investigate Trump in 2022)

    04/27/2024 3:07:08 PM PDT · by Libloather · 38 replies
    Fox News ^ | Thomas Phippen
    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas raised a question Thursday that goes to the heart of Special Counsel Jack Smith's charges against former President Donald Trump. The high court was considering Trump's argument that he is immune from prosecution for actions he took while president, but another issue is whether Smith and the Office of Special Counsel have the authority to bring charges at all. "Did you, in this litigation, challenge the appointment of special counsel?" Thomas asked Trump attorney John Sauer on Thursday during a nearly three-hour session at the Supreme Court. Sauer replied that Trump's attorneys had not raised...
  • Trump’s Judges Aren’t Using Legal Reasoning, They’re following political instructions.

    04/06/2024 8:26:14 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 10 replies
    American Thinker ^ | 04/06/2024 | Matthew G. Andersson
    Even if you don’t happen to be a lawyer, law professor or legal scholar, it isn’t hard to see a big problem with many of the published decisions made by judges who are hearing defense arguments and motions made by President Trump, in the continued “lawfare” cases being used by the DNC (not the United States) to persecute him financially, and block him politically. There are a number of these judicial positions that are out in the press. I’d like to focus on just one: the most recent case in Georgia involving free speech.I’m not going to write up a...
  • Finally: Federal Judge Nails DOJ for Giving Pass to Antifa While Selectively Prosecuting Trump Supporters

    03/15/2024 7:33:41 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 15 replies
    PJ Media ^ | 03/15/2024 | Victoria Taft
    Finally a federal judge who believes in justice or something close to it. Could this be a crack in the dike of the tyranny of the DOJ? Is this the beginning of the end of Antifa pattern of violence and silence? We can hope. To understand what's at stake, let's take you back. At UC Berkeley in 2017, Antifa and their local black bloc franchisees set fires and rioted to prevent Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking on campus. The anti-free speech violent protesters set off munitions, broke windows, beat people, and scared the university away from allowing any right-wing speakers to...
  • BREAKING: Judge Rules Fani Willis Can Continue Trump Prosecution—But There's a Catch

    03/15/2024 7:21:46 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 129 replies
    PJ Media ^ | 03/15/2024 | Chris Queen
    Fulton County, Ga., Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee made his decision on whether District Attorney Fani Willis can continue prosecuting Donald Trump and 18 other co-defendants on corruption charges. McAfee ruled that Willis can continue to prosecute the former president and his co-defendants, but he has given the state multiple options to handle the case. All options involve Nathan Wade stepping away from the team. “The prosecution of this case cannot proceed until the State selects one of two options,” McAfee wrote in his decision. “The District Attorney may choose to step aside, along with the whole of her office,...
  • House May Refer January 6 Committee Members for Prosecution

    03/14/2024 2:22:21 PM PDT · by ChicagoConservative27 · 97 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 03/14/2024 | JOEL B. POLLAK
    House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) said Wednesday that he may refer members of the January 6 Committee to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for hiding and destroying documents. Loudermilk has been investigating the work of the January 6 Committee, and discovered last year that the Committee had destroyed documents and other records, despite being warned by then-incoming Speaker of the House Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to preserve all of the evidence it had collected in months of investigations and closed-door testimony. He told John Solomon of JusttheNews.com that it was possible members of the committee...
  • Arizona Prosecutor Refuses to Extradite Suspected Killer to NY: Doesn't Trust Alvin Bragg to Prosecute

    02/21/2024 9:27:01 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 7 replies
    Red State ^ | 02/21/2024 | Ward Clark
    Day by day, it seems like the divisions in our country get more and more stark. In another example of the growing differences in red vs. blue regions, Maricopa County Attorney General Rachel Mitchell is refusing to extradite a suspected murderer to New York, stating that she does not trust Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to prosecute the accused killer.At a Wednesday press briefing, Maricopa County Attorney General Rachel Mitchell said she would not release 26-year-old Raad Almansoori to authorities in New York City, saying it is safer for the general public to keep him locked up in Arizona rather...
  • Gov. Kathy Hochul lets the cat out of the bag about how politicized New York's prosecution of Trump was

    02/19/2024 2:50:50 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 27 replies
    American Thinker ^ | 02/19/2024 | Monica Showalter
    Following the monstrous $355 million fine leveled against President Trump and his associates for a victimless claim of inflating assets in New York City, New York's governor, Kathy Hochul, assured concerned investors that they have "nothing to worry about."According to The Hill: New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) addressed New York business owners in a new interview and told them there was “nothing to worry about” after former President Trump was hit with a $355 million fine and a ban on conducting business in New York for three years.Hochul joined John Catsimatidis on “The Cats Roundtable” on WABC 770 AM,...
  • Colorado Lawyer Flails As Clarence Thomas Calmly Destroys His Trump Disqualification Argument

    02/08/2024 11:08:47 AM PST · by CFW · 73 replies
    The Federalist ^ | 2/8/24 | BY: SHAWN FLEETWOOD
    By merely asking for examples, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas calmly destroyed respondents’ argument for disqualifying former President Donald Trump from Colorado’s 2024 presidential primary ballot. The moment came on Thursday morning, during oral arguments on Trump’s appeal to overturn the Colorado Supreme Court’s Dec. 19 decision to keep him off the Centennial State’s 2024 primary ballot. Colorado’s highest court claimed in its ruling that the former president can be “disqualified” from holding office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which stipulates that “[n]o person” who has previously sworn an oath as an officer of the United States...
  • SUPREME Court: Trump must respond to special counsel’s presidential immunity petition BEFORE Christmas!

    12/11/2023 6:53:05 PM PST · by AnthonySoprano · 56 replies
    Fox News ^ | 12/11/2023 | Bradford Betz
    The Supreme Court has indicated it will expedite consideration of a petition by special counsel Jack Smith on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted on charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election results. The Court has asked Trump’s lawyers to respond to the special counsel's motion by next Wednesday, December 20
  • Special counsel asks Supreme Court to rule on Trump’s immunity in Jan. 6 case

    12/11/2023 12:09:48 PM PST · by thegagline · 62 replies
    DNYUZ ^ | 12/11/2023 | Staff
    Special counsel Jack Smith’s team has asked the Supreme Court to step in and decide the issue of presidential immunity regarding former President Donald Trump’s federal election interference charges. Smith is asking the court to immediately resolve the issue, to prevent any delay of the March 4 trial date. “Respondent’s appeal of the ruling rejecting his immunity and related claims, however, suspends the trial of the charges against him, scheduled to begin on March 4, 2024,” the special counsel wrote in a filing Monday. “It is of imperative public importance that respondent’s claims of immunity be resolved by this Court...
  • Trump Indictments Haven’t Sunk His Campaign, but a Conviction Might

    11/07/2023 8:02:19 AM PST · by Alas Babylon! · 64 replies
    DNYUZ via NY Times ^ | 6 Nove 2023 | Jonathan Swan, Ruth Igielnik and Maggie Haberman
    For Donald J. Trump, a new set of New York Times/Siena College polls captures a stunning, seemingly contradictory picture. His 91 felony charges in four different jurisdictions have not significantly hurt him among voters in battleground states. Yet he remains weaker than at least one of his Republican rivals, and if he’s convicted and sentenced in any of his cases, some voters appear ready to turn on him — to the point where he could lose the 2024 election. Snip---------------- If the former president is convicted and sentenced — as many of his allies expect him to be in the...
  • Campaign Seeking Recall of Alameda County DA Pamela Price Set to Gather Signatures

    10/04/2023 2:01:50 PM PDT · by nickcarraway · 8 replies
    CBS NEWS ^ | SEPTEMBER 28, 2023
    Organizers of a campaign to recall Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price are preparing to gather signatures after their petition received approval from election officials. "Save Alameda For Everyone" or S.A.F.E., announced Thursday that their petition was approved by the Alameda County Registrar of Voters. The group said it has 160 days to gather 73,195 valid signatures from Alameda County voters to qualify for the ballot. Carl Chan, president of the Oakland Chinatown Chamber of Commerce and a recall proponent, said in a statement, "District Attorney Pamela Price has absolutely failed the people of Alameda County. Crime is spiraling out...
  • VIDEO – President Trump is Furious at Judicial Conduct and Activist Judge Arthur Engoron in New York City Civil Trial

    10/02/2023 12:43:34 PM PDT · by SoConPubbie · 79 replies
    The Last Refuge ^ | October 2, 2023 | Sundance
    There are no elements to this farce of a judicial proceeding which will survive appellate court review. The entire motive and process is easily identified by any intellectually honest person as a complete sham and legal clown show, intended to advance extreme ideological Lawfare.President Trump delivered remarks and held an impromptu press conference during the recess of the court. President Trump is furious at the ridiculous nature of the proceedings and the judicial activism that is on display. WATCH:BREAKING NEWS: Trump Viciously Insults NYC Judge Right Outside Courtroom Amidst Civil Fraud Trial.The fact that some professional republicans are just as...
  • SCOOP: Judge Finds Patriot Front Prosecutor Acted in ‘Bad Faith,’ Tosses Case

    08/19/2023 1:55:00 AM PDT · by CFW · 23 replies
    HeadlineUSA ^ | 8/18/23 | Ken Silva
    An Idaho judge dismissed on Friday the state’s case against a Patriot Front member accused of conspiring to riot at an LGBT demonstration last year, finding that a prosecutor acted in “bad faith” by failing to provide the defendant with possibly exculpatory evidence. Judge Destry Randles’s order stems from the incident in June 2022, when 31 members of the right-wing nationalist group were arrested after someone reported seeing people loading into a U-Haul van like “a little army” at a hotel parking lot in Coeur d’Alene. Five of the Patriot Front defendants were convicted of misdemeanor charges of conspiracy to...
  • Majority of Americans say Trump deserves prosecution over 2020 election actions, poll finds

    08/17/2023 8:27:52 AM PDT · by thegagline · 84 replies
    I Washington Times ^ | 08/17/2023 | Tom Howell, Jr
    The majority of Americans say former President Donald Trump should be criminally prosecuted for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election results, according to a new Quinnipiac poll.The poll found 54% of Americans said prosecution is warranted as Mr. Trump faces criminal indictments in federal court and in Fulton County, Georgia, over his post-election actions. About 42% said he should not face prosecution.< Ninety-five percent of Democrats said Mr. Trump should be prosecuted, and 5% said he should not. Fifty-seven percent of independents said the ex-president should face prosecution, and 37% said he should not. However, 12% of Republicans said...