Free Republic 4th Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $29,318
36%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 36%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts on Bloggers & Personal

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • 7-Million NO KINGS Turnout is ‘Biggest Ever’? Then Why Did Mainstream Media FAKE the IMAGES

    10/20/2025 3:28:37 AM PDT · 3 of 48
    Sirius Lee to mbrfl
    This is the number one story the MSM is trying to push today. The effort reeks of desperation and flop sweat.

    I'm reminded of the practiced earnestness with which they tried to gaslight us about how good the economy was and how sharp Bite Me was two years ago.

  • 7-Million NO KINGS Turnout is ‘Biggest Ever’? Then Why Did Mainstream Media FAKE the IMAGES

    10/20/2025 3:27:50 AM PDT · 2 of 48
    Candor7 to mbrfl
    Reminds me of a semi vulgar joke with an MSNBC mouse floating down the river on a shingle laying face up with an erection, yelling " RAISE THE DRAWBRIDGE!"

    The Dems and their left have been removed from power, except for a few municipal politicians and governors who are now part of a well defined nullification movement.They will be de-elected or locked up.Watch it happen.This is why CTV and MSNBC have become so desperate.

  • VIDEO: Helen Andrews | Overcoming the Feminization of Culture

    10/20/2025 3:26:56 AM PDT · 4 of 28
    SaveFerris to TigerClaws; governsleastgovernsbest; Morgana; fwdude; Elsie; ViLaLuz; Libloather; ...
    (The Democrat party has become FULLY FEMINIZED at this point.)

    Heh, just now 🔍 🔎 searched on Obama and such...

    CHILD-GROOMING DEMOCRAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA



    CHILD-GROOMING DEMOCRAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA



    CHILD-GROOMING DEMOCRAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA



    CHILD-GROOMING DEMOCRAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA



    Sound Doctrine REALLY applies here

    [Obergefell v. Hodges - DECIDED
    ON FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2015]


    All According to SATAN'S Plan

    DEMOCRAT Barack Hussein Obama's Rainbow White House HAPPENED ON FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2015 - turning the White House into a Godless Reprobate Abomination



    DO NO HARM, Christians, but REJECT this
    Godless Reprobate Agenda. WALK AWAY.

    (For the thread)

  • Attack On Europe: Documenting Russian Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (2 year anniversary)

    10/20/2025 3:21:36 AM PDT · 20,965 of 21,684
    JonPreston to AdmSmith
  • Attack On Europe: Documenting Russian Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (2 year anniversary)

    10/20/2025 3:18:54 AM PDT · 20,964 of 21,684
    AdmSmith
    Day 1,332 of the Muscovian invasion. 890 [average is 849/day], i.e. more than 37 Russians, Norks and Cubans/h. Vehicles and fuel tanks more than 90% and artillery more than 75% above average.

  • Attack On Europe: Documenting Russian Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (2 year anniversary)

    10/20/2025 3:10:22 AM PDT · 20,963 of 21,684
    JonPreston to AdmSmith
    We do not report in detail on Russian war crimes because these activities are well-covered in Western media and do not directly affect the military operations we are assessing and forecasting. We will continue to evaluate and report on the effects of these criminal activities on the Ukrainian military and the Ukrainian population and specifically on combat in Ukrainian urban areas. We utterly condemn Russian violations of the laws of armed conflict and the Geneva Conventions and crimes against humanity even though we do not describe them in these reports.  

    Ukrainian Operations in The Russian Federation

    Nothing Significant To Report.

    Russian Supporting Effort: Northern Axis

    Russian objective: Create defensible buffer zones in northern Ukraine along the international border

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in northern Sumy Oblast on October 13 but did not advance.

    Map Thumbnail

    Russian forces attacked in Kursk and Sumy oblasts, including north of Sumy City near Kindrativka, Kostyantynivka, and Oleksiivka, on October 12 and 13.[20] Russian sources claimed that Ukrainian forces counterattacked near Kindrativka and Kostyantynivka.[21]

    A scout from a Ukrainian battalion operating in Sumy Oblast reported on October 13 that Russian forces are suffering heavy casualties in the “kill zone” (an area immediately near the frontline where a mass of tactical strike and reconnaissance drones pose an elevated risk to any equipment or personnel that enters the area).[22] The scout stated that Russian forces have significantly fewer armored vehicles and artillery systems compared to 2022-2023. The scout stated that Russian forces are attacking in small groups on foot but are sometimes using light vehicles to move toward the frontline. A Russian milblogger reportedly affiliated with the Russian Northern Grouping of Forces claimed that the Russian military command redeployed elements of the 3rd Battalion of the Russian 22nd Motorized Rifle Regiment (72nd Motorized Rifle Division, 44th Army Corps [AC], Leningrad Military District [LMD]) and the 28th Separate Rifle Battalion (127th Motorized Rifle Division, reportedly under the operational control of the Northern Grouping of Forces) from Russian border areas, where they were operating far from the first line of Russia’s border defenses, to Oleksiivka to reinforce Russian forces.[23] The milblogger claimed that Russian forces in the area are still having issues with coordination or joint planning.

    Order of Battle: Drone operators of the Russian Rubikon Center for Advanced Unmanned Technologies reportedly struck and destroyed a Ukrainian truck mounted Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) in Sumy Oblast.[24] Drone operators of the 56th Airborne (VDV) Regiment (7th VDV Division) are reportedly operating in Sumy Oblast.[25]

    Russian Main Effort: Eastern Ukraine

    Russian Subordinate Main Effort #1

    Russian objective: Push Ukrainian forces back from the international border with Belgorod Oblast and approach to within tube artillery range of Kharkiv City.

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in northern Kharkiv Oblast on October 13 but did not advance.

    Map Thumbnail

    Russian forces attacked northeast of Kharkiv City near Vovchansk and Synelnykove on October 12 and 13.[26] A Russian milblogger reportedly affiliated with the Russian Northern Grouping of Forces claimed that counterattacked in Vovchansk.[27]

    Ukraine’s Kharkiv Oblast Prosecutor’s Office reported on October 13 that Russian forces conducted a first-person view (FPV) drone strike against a school dormitory in Kyivskyi Raion, Kharkiv City.[28] Ukrainian news outlet Suspline reported that the strike was the first Russian FPV strike against central Kharkiv City.[29] The deputy general director of a Ukrainian electronic warfare (EW) equipment manufacturer and Ukrainian Air Force reserve officer, Anatoliy Khrapchinskyi, reported to Suspline that Russian forces may have used a mothership drone to carry the FPV drone about 10 to 20 kilometers away from the target. Khrapchinskyi stated that Russian forces may have used an FPV drone with about 2.5 kilograms of explosives. Khrapchinskyi assessed that the strike was part of Russia’s terror tactics and efforts to increase the “kill zone” (an area immediately near the frontline where a mass of tactical strike and reconnaissance drones pose an elevated risk to any equipment or personnel that enters the area) since Russian forces are too far away to use traditional tube artillery or mortars against Kharkiv City.

    Order of Battle: Elements of the Chechen Zapad-Akhmat Battalion and the Russian 128th Motorized Rifle Brigade (44th Army Corps [AC], Leningrad Military District [LMD]) are reportedly operating in Kharkiv Oblast.[30]

    Russian forces continued offensive operations northeast of Velykyi Burluk near Khatnie and Milove and southeast of Velykyi Burluk near Bolohivka on October 13 but did not advance.

    Russian Subordinate Main Effort #2

    Russian objective: Capture the remainder of Luhansk Oblast and push westward into eastern Kharkiv Oblast and encircle northern Donetsk Oblast

    Map Thumbnail

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Kupyansk direction on October 13 but did not advance.

    Russian forces attacked near Kupyansk itself; northeast of Kupyansk near Novovasylivka and Kamyanka and toward Dvorichanske and Kolodyazne; north of Kupyansk near Zapadne and toward Kutkivka; east of Kupyansk near Petropavlivka; and southeast of Kupyansk near Pishchane and Stepova Novoselivka on October 12 and 13.[31] A Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces counterattacked near Radkivka (north of Kupyansk).[32]

    Order of Battle: Drone operators of the Russian Tiger drone detachment of the 272nd Motorized Rifle Regiment (47th Tank Division, 1st Guards Tank Army [GTA], Moscow Military District [MMD]) are reportedly striking Ukrainian positions near Pishchane.[33]

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Borova direction on October 13 but did not make confirmed advances.

    Map Thumbnail

    Unconfirmed claims: The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) claimed on October 13 that Russian forces seized Borivska-Andriivka (northeast of Borova).[34]

    Russian forces attacked northeast of Borova near Zelenyi Hai and southeast of Borova near Hrekivka on October 12 and 13.[35]

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Lyman direction on October 13 but did not make confirmed advances.

    Unconfirmed claims: Russian milbloggers claimed that Russian forces advanced east of Drobysheve (northwest of Lyman); north of Stavky (north of Lyman); south of Kolodyazi (northeast of Lyman); west, south, and southwest of Zarichne (east of Lyman); and in central Yampil (southeast of Lyman).[36]

    Russian forces attacked toward Lyman itself; northwest of Lyman near Drobysheve, Novoselivka, and Shandryholove; north of Lyman near Novomykhailivka; northeast of Lyman near Kolodyazi and Myrne; east of Lyman near Torske; and southeast of Lyman near Yampil on October 12 and 13.[37]

    Russian Subordinate Main Effort #3

    Russian objective: Capture the entirety of Donetsk Oblast, the claimed territory of Russia’s proxies in Donbas, and advance into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast

    Map Thumbnail

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Siversk direction on October 13 but did not advance.

    Russian forces attacked near Siversk, northeast of Siversk near Serebryanka, and southeast of Siversk near Vyimka on October 12 and 13.[38]

    A Ukrainian non-commissioned officer (NCO) of a Ukrainian brigade operating in the Siversk direction reported on October 13 that Russian forces recently conducted rotations, resupplied forces in the area, and are accumulating personnel and equipment in the rear, likely in preparation for a possible mechanized assault.[39] The NCO reported that the Russian military command recently deployed 500 servicemembers to the area from training grounds. The NCO added that Russian forces are trying to reduce the “kill zone” (an area immediately near the frontline where a mass of tactical strike and reconnaissance drones pose an elevated risk to any equipment or personnel that enters the area), including by using infiltration tactics to reach the frontline faster.

    A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces recently struck a railway overpass in the northern outskirts of Siversk with a VT-40 fiber optic first-person view (FPV) drone.[40]

    Ukrainian forces recently advanced in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area.

    Map Thumbnail

    Assessed Ukrainian advances: Geolocated footage published on October 11 indicates that Ukrainian forces recently advanced in the northern outskirts of Shcherbynivka (south of Kostyantynivka).[41]

    Unconfirmed claims: A Russian milblogger claimed on October 13 that Russian forces advanced southeast of Novomarkove (northeast of Kostyantynivka).[42] Geolocated footage published on October 13 shows Ukrainian forces striking a Russian servicemember moving along the Severskyi Donets-Donbas Canal southeast of Novomarkove after what ISW assesses was a Russian infiltration mission.[43] ISW assesses that this event did not advance the forward edge of the battle area (FEBA). The Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces advanced in the area based on the infiltration mission.

    Russian forces attacked near Kostyantynivka itself; east of Kostyantynivka near Stupochky and Predtechyne; southeast of Kostyantynivka near Pleshchiivka; south of Kostyantynivka near Shcherbynivka and Oleksandro-Shultyne and toward Berestok; south of Druzhkivka near Rusyn Yar and Poltavka and toward Mykolaipillya; and southwest of Druzhkivka near Volodymyrivka on October 12 and 13.[44]

    A Russian milblogger claimed on October 13 that Russian forces conducted an FAB-3000 glide bomb strike against Ukrainian forces in Kostyantynivka.[45]

    Order of Battle: Drone operators of the Russian 54th Motorized Rifle Regiment (6th Motorized Rifle Division, 3rd Army Corps [AC], reportedly under operational control of the Southern Grouping of Forces) are striking Ukrainian forces in Shcherbynivka.[46] Drone operators of the 1194th Motorized Rifle Regiment (4th Motorized Rifle Brigade, 3rd Combined Arms Army [CAA], formerly 2nd Luhansk People’s Republic [LNR] AC, Southern Military District [SMD]) and the Chechen 78th Sever-Akhmat Motorized Rifle Regiment (42nd Motorized Rifle Division, 58th CAA, SMD) are striking Ukrainian forces near Ivanopillya (southeast of Kostyantynivka).[47] Elements of the 103rd Motorized Rifle Regiment (150th Motorized Rifle Division, 8th CAA, SMD) are reportedly operating in the southern Kostyantynivka direction.[48] Drone operators of the Russian 33rd and 255th motorized rifle regiments (both of the 20th Motorized Rifle Division, 8th CAA) are reportedly striking Ukrainian forces in the Kostyantynivka direction.[49]

    Russian forces recently advanced in the Dobropillya tactical area.

    Map Thumbnail

    Assessed Russian advances: Ukrainian military observer Kostyantyn Mashovets stated that Russian forces seized Dorozhnie (southeast of Dobropillya).[50]

    Mashovets stated that the Russian military command committed unspecified naval infantry elements, which were previously operating near Poltavka and Popiv Yar (both east of Dobropillya in the Russian near rear), into battle near Volodymyrivka (east of Dobropillya on the west bank of the Kazennyi Torets River) in order to support elements of the 51st CAA (formerly 1st Donetsk People’s Republic [DNR] AC, SMD) operating within the Dobropillya salient.[51] Mashovets stated that some naval infantry elements in the area are contending with “exhausting” Ukrainian counterattacks.[52] Mashovets assessed that Russian command structures, especially on the adjacent flanks of the 8th CAA (SMD) and 51st CAA between the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka and Dobropillya tactical areas, are cooperating poorly. Mashovets stated that Russian forces — likely elements of the 114th and 132nd motorized rifle brigades (both of the 51st CAA) — are trying to accumulate assault groups near Dorozhnie and in the area between Ivanivka and Nove Shakhove (both just north of Dorozhnie).[53]

    Russian forces attacked southeast of Dobropillya near Zapovidne; east of Dobropillya near Shakhove; and northeast of Dobropillya near Zolotyi Kolodyaz and Kucheriv Yar on October 12 and 13.[54]

    Order of Battle: Drone operators of the Russian 80th Sparta Reconnaissance Battalion (51st CAA) are reportedly striking Ukrainian forces near Shakhove.[55]

    Russian forces recently marginally advanced in the Pokrovsk direction.

    Map Thumbnail

    Assessed Russian advances: Geolocated footage published on October 13 indicates that Russian forces recently marginally advanced southwest of Mykhailivka (east of Pokrovsk).[56]

    Unconfirmed claims: Russian milbloggers claimed that Russian forces seized Molodetske (southwest of Pokrovsk) and advanced in southern Novopavlivka (south of Pokrovsk).[57] The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) claimed that Russian forces entered eastern Myrnohrad (east of Pokrovsk).[58]

    Russian forces conducted offensive operations near Pokrovsk itself; north of Pokrovsk near Rodynske and toward Bilytske; northeast of Pokrovsk near Krasnyi Lyman and Novoekonomichne; east of Pokrovsk near Myrnohrad, Balahan Myrolyubivka, and Promin; southeast of Pokrovsk near Lysivka; and southwest of Pokrovsk near Zvirove, Kotlyne, Udachne, Molodetske on October 12 and 13.[59]

    Mashovets stated that small Russian infantry groups maintain positions along the railway north of Rodynske.[60] Mashovets stated that Ukrainian forces started counterattacking in the Rodynske-Razine direction (north to northeast of Pokrovsk), likely in part causing Russian forces to significantly reduce their activity west of the Kazennyi Torets River.[61] A commander within a Ukrainian brigade operating in the Pokrovsk direction reported that Russian forces have started to use heavy equipment recently, but are still mostly attacking with infantry.[62] The commander stated that Ukrainian forces are taking Russian prisoners of war (POWs) who were still in Russia only two weeks prior, and that the training levels of Russian personnel in the area vary. A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces have fire control over western Pokrovsk.[63] A Kremlin-affiliated Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces maintain positions near Promin and that earlier claims that Russian forces seized Rodynske are unconfirmed.[64] The milblogger claimed that Russian drone operators are consistently disrupting Ukrainian logistics on the approaches to Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad.

    Order of Battle: Mashovets stated that elements of the Russian 5th and 9th motorized rifle brigades (both of the 51st CAA, SMD), with support from elements of the 1st Slovyansk Motorized Rifle Brigade (51st CAA), are accumulating forces near Novoekonomichne and Mykolaivka (just east of Novoekonomichne) while simultaneously attacking from Mykolaivka.[65] Mashovets stated that elements of the 1st, 5th, and 110th motorized rifle brigades (all three of the 51st CAA) operating in the Sukhetske-Rodynske and Fedorivka-Krasnyi Lyman directions (all northeast of Pokrovsk) had to temporarily halt their attacks as Ukrainian forces had started to actively counterattack in the past few days in the Krasnyi Lyman direction.

    Russian forces recently advanced in the Novopavlivka direction.

    Map Thumbnail

    Assessed Russian advances: Geolocated footage published on October 12 and 13 indicates that Russian forces recently advanced northwest of Kotlyarivka (east of Novopavlivka) and north of Novoukrainka (south of Novopavlivka).[66]

    Unconfirmed claims: A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces advanced east of Ivanivka (southwest of Novopavlivka).[67]

    Russian forces attacked toward Novopavlivka itself; northeast of Novopavlivka near Novoserhiivka; east of Novopavlivka near Kotlyarivka; southeast of Novopavlivka near Horikhove; south of Novopavlivka near Yalta and Dachne; and southwest of Novopavlivka near Ivanivka on October 12 and 13.[68]

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in the Velykomykhailivka direction on October 13 but did not make confirmed advances.

    Unconfirmed claims: A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces advanced northwest and southwest of Verbove (southwest of Velykomykhailivka).[69]

    Russian forces attacked east of Velykomykhailivka near Oleksandrohrad and Sicheneve; southeast of Velykomykhailivka near Sosnivka and Vorone; south of Velykomykhailivka near Stepove; and southwest of Velykomykhailivka near Verbove and Oleksiivka on October 12 and 13.[70] A Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces counterattacked near Oleksiivka.[71]

    Order of Battle: Drone operators of the Russian 36th Motorized Rifle Brigade (29th CAA, Eastern Military District [EMD]) and 14th Spetsnaz Brigade (Russian General Staff’s Main Directorate [GRU]) are reportedly striking Ukrainian forces in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.[73]

    Russian Supporting Effort: Southern Axis

    Russian objective: Maintain frontline positions, secure rear areas against Ukrainian strikes, and advance within tube artillery range of Zaporizhzhia City

    Russian forces continued offensive operations in eastern Zaporizhia Oblast on October 13 but did not make confirmed advances.

    Unconfirmed claims: A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces advanced in central Poltavka (northeast of Hulyaipole).[74]

    Russian forces attacked northeast of Hulyaipole near Novohryhorivka and Poltavka on October 12 and 13.[75]

    Ukraine’s State Emergency Service reported on October 13 that Russian forces struck a civilian car in Zaporizhia Oblast, killing two civilians.[76]

    Order of Battle: Elements of the Russian 60th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade (5th Combined Arms Army [CAA], Eastern Military District [EMD]) are reportedly operating in Novohryhorivka.[77] Elements of the 11th Air Force and Air Defense Army (Russian Aerospace Forces [VKS] and EMD) are reportedly striking Ukrainian forces in Uspenivka (northeast of Hulyaipole) with guided glide bombs.[78]

    Ukrainian forces recently advanced in western Zaporizhia Oblast.

    Map Thumbnail

    Assessed Ukrainian advances: A Ukrainian military spokesperson announced on October 12 that Ukrainian forces recently liberated Shcherbaky (west of Orikhiv).[79]

    Refinement of areas under Russian claims: Ukrainian Assault Forces Commander Colonel Valentyn Manko reported that Ukrainian forces partially liberated Stepove (west of Orikhiv), indicating that Ukrainian forces maintain positions or recently advanced in areas that Russian sources previously claimed were under Russian control.[80]

    Russian forces attacked west of Orikhiv near Stepove, Stepnohirsk, and Prymorske on October 12 and 13.[81]

    Order of Battle: Drone operators of the Russian Shaman detachment of the Russian 1455th Motorized Rifle Regiment (operationally subordinated to the 42nd Motorized Rifle Division, 58th CAA, Southern Military District [SMD]) are reportedly striking Ukrainian forces near Novodanylivka (southeast of Orikhiv).[82] Elements of the Russian 61st Naval Infantry Brigade (Northern Fleet) are reportedly operating in Zaporizhia Oblast.[83]

    Map Thumbnail

    Neither Ukrainian nor Russian sources reported ground activity in the Kherson direction on October 13.

    Map Thumbnail

    A Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces are launching Molniya-2 drones to strike Ukrainian air defenses in right (west) bank Kherson Oblast.[84]

    Russian Air, Missile, and Drone Campaign

    Russian Objective: Target Ukrainian military and civilian infrastructure in the rear and on the front line

    Russian forces conducted a series of drone strikes against Ukraine on the night of October 12 to 13. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russian forces launched 82 Shahed-type, Gerbera-type, and other drones — of which about 50 were strike drones — from the directions of Kursk and Oryol cities and Primorsko-Akhtarsk, Krasnodar Krai.[85] The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Ukrainian forces downed 69 drones, that 13 drones struck seven locations, and that downed debris fell on two locations.[86] Ukrainian officials reported that Russian strikes damaged civilian and energy infrastructure in Chernihiv, Odesa, and Donetsk oblasts.[87]

    Significant Activity in Belarus 

    Russian efforts to increase its military presence in Belarus and further integrate Belarus into Russian-favorable frameworks

    Nothing Significant To Report.

    Note: ISW does not receive any classified material from any source, uses only publicly available information, and draws extensively on Russian, Ukrainian, and Western reporting and social media as well as commercially available satellite imagery and other geospatial data as the basis for these reports. References to all sources used are provided in the endnotes of each update.

  • VIDEO: Helen Andrews | Overcoming the Feminization of Culture

    10/20/2025 3:10:08 AM PDT · 3 of 28
    Candor7 to TigerClaws
    Woke radical women, who jeopardize male professionals by sexual assault accusation alone, without due process, are worse than their puritanical predecessors of the prohibition and femino-nazi bra burner movements. This latest wokeness of "ME TOO"is just a reiteration of former insitutionalized PMS.One can easily make the case that these woke mavins are not women, using the current logic of the transgenderites who ignore biological sexual orientation.

    This is a women, without sexual dysphoria.Make no mistake about it. Woke "wimmin" hate real women.So put it right in their face !


  • Attack On Europe: Documenting Russian Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (2 year anniversary)

    10/20/2025 3:09:32 AM PDT · 20,962 of 21,684
    Kudsman to JonPreston

    Are those cross trainer sneakers? Should have set the hounds free and watched the little imp try to outrun them.

  • Attack On Europe: Documenting Russian Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (2 year anniversary)

    10/20/2025 3:04:37 AM PDT · 20,961 of 21,684
    AdmSmith to gleeaikin; BeauBo; blitz128
    Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, October 19, 2025

    Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly reiterated his demand that Ukraine cede all of Donetsk Oblast as a condition for ending the war, and suggested that Russia would be willing to “surrender parts” of occupied southern Ukraine. Ceding Donetsk Oblast to Russia would set conditions for Russia to renew its aggression against Ukraine from more advantageous positions at a time of its choosing. Two senior officials told The Washington Post in an article published on October 18 that Putin told US President Trump on October 16 that Ukraine must cede the remainder of unoccupied Donetsk Oblast to Russia “as a condition for ending the war” and that he “would be willing to surrender parts” of occupied Zaporizhia and Kherson oblasts in exchange.[1] The exact terms of Putin's reported offer are unclear. It is possible that Putin may have been referring to Ukrainian-controlled parts of Zaporizhia and Kherson oblasts that Russia illegally annexed and does not occupy. Putin previously demanded the remainder of Donetsk Oblast in exchange for a ceasefire in August 2025, and ISW has continuously assessed that ceding the remainder of Donetsk Oblast disproportionately favors Russia.[2] Donetsk Oblast contains territory that is strategically vital for Ukraine's defense and defense industrial base (DIB), including the fortress belt — Ukraine's main defensive line in Donetsk Oblast since 2014, which Ukraine has developed into a significant logistical and defense industrial hub.[3] Russian forces currently have no available means of rapidly enveloping or penetrating the fortress belt, which would likely take several years to seize at their current rate of advance. Ceding Donetsk Oblast to Russia would allow Russian forces to avoid a long and bloody struggle and continue fighting into deep rear areas of Ukraine from new positions along the Donetsk Oblast border.[4] Russian forces would have advantageous positions from which to launch attacks into eastern Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia oblasts or southern Kharkiv Oblast – areas that are significantly less fortified than the fortress belt. Such a withdrawal would also set more advantageous conditions for the ongoing Russian offensive to advance across the Oskil River in eastern Kharkiv Oblast and approach Izyum. Russia would have its choice of multiple, mutually supportive offensive operations to undertake should Ukraine cede Donetsk Oblast to Russia, especially if there is no guarantee that Russia will not resume offensive operations in Ukraine.

    Russian officials and pro-Kremlin sources are attempting to portray limited Russian offensive operations in the Kherson direction as an ongoing offensive to recapture Kherson City — efforts that are incompatible with Putin's claimed readiness to make territorial concessions in southern Ukraine. Kherson Oblast occupation governor Vladimir Saldo claimed on October 19 that Russian forces control an industrial part of Kherson City in east (left) bank Kherson Oblast and several dacha areas on the Dnipro River Delta islands, so “therefore the [seizure] of Kherson [City] itself has already begun.”[5] The administrative boundaries of Kherson City are limited to west (right) bank Kherson Oblast, so it is unclear which areas of east bank Kherson Oblast Saldo is referring to. Russian forces withdrew from all of west bank Kherson Oblast as of November 2022 following a successful Ukrainian counteroffensive and interdiction campaign.[6] Kremlin newswire TASS framed Saldo’s statement to imply that Russian forces have begun a new concerted offensive effort to seize Kherson City itself — a significant undertaking that would require Russian forces to ford the Dnipro River and dedicate more manpower and materiel than is currently operating in the Kherson direction.[7] Russian State Duma Defense Committee Member Andrei Kolesnik claimed that Russian forces will seize Kherson City as it is a “constituent entity” that “must be returned to Russia,” but noted that Russian forces will not do so “anytime soon.”[8] ISW has yet to observe any indicators to assess that Russian forces are likely preparing for or have launched a renewed significant offensive operation against west bank Kherson Oblast.

    Russian officials also downplayed the seriousness of Putin's reported proposal, likely in an effort to condition Russian society to accept the Kremlin's intent to continue its war effort in Ukraine. Russian State Duma International Affairs Committee First Deputy Head Alexei Chepa claimed to Russian state media outlet Lenta on October 19 that occupied Kherson and Zaporizhia oblasts “are recognized regions of Russia,” following Russia's September 2022 sham referenda, and that any territorial concessions that Russia may have proposed “were expressed in a more relaxed manner.”[9] These Russian officials are messaging to domestic Russian audiences that the Kremlin maintains its territorial claims over Kherson City and likely all of west bank Kherson Oblast, and that Putin did not seriously make territorial concessions in Ukraine as Western reporting suggests.

    The Kremlin has also failed to prime the Russian information space, particularly Putin's main constituency of ultranationalists, to accept anything less than a full victory in Ukraine. A Russian milblogger characterized Putin's reported proposal as “utter nonsense” and noted that there is no reason for Putin to willingly trade a “convenient defensive line” on the Dnipro River and a land corridor to occupied Crimea through southern Ukraine in exchange for the remainder of unoccupied Donetsk Oblast.[10] Russian officials — including Saldo — similarly opposed making possible territorial concessions to Ukraine around the August 2025 Trump-Putin summit in Alaska.[11] Putin has held firm to his original war aims and territorial claims for over three and a half years of war, and ISW has not observed any indications that he is willing to make meaningful concessions on any of these aims for a lasting peace in Ukraine.[12]

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that Ukraine made bilateral energy proposals to the United States. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced on October 19 that Ukraine made proposals to the United States for gas infrastructure, nuclear power generation, and several other unspecified projects to contribute to Europe's energy independence from Russia.[13]

    Ukrainian forces struck Russian oil infrastructure in Samara and Orenburg oblasts on the night of October 18 to 19. The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Ukrainian forces struck the Novokuibyshevsk oil refinery in Samara Oblast, and geolocated footage published on October 19 shows large fires and smoke plumes near the refinery's oil storage tanks.[14] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Ukrainian forces struck the primary oil processing unit and are still clarifying the damage. The Ukrainian General Staff noted that the Novokuibyshevsk oil refinery produces over 20 types of commercial products and processes about 4.9 million tons of oil per year. The Ukrainian General Staff also reported that Ukrainian forces struck the Orenburg natural gas processing plant in Orenburg Oblast as part of the October 18-19 strikes, and geolocated footage published on October 19 shows a fire at the plant.[15] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that the Orenburg natural gas processing plant is one of Russia's largest natural gas processing complexes, processing up to 45 billion cubic meters of natural gas and 6.2 million tons of gas condensate and oil per year. The Ukrainian General Staff reported that the strikes hit one of the gas processing and purification units. Orenburg Oblast Governor Yevgeny Solntsev claimed on October 19 that Ukrainian strikes caused a fire at and “partially damaged” an unnamed gas plant's infrastructure in the oblast.[16] Ukrainian broadcaster Suspilne reported that the Orenburg gas processing plant is the largest gas and chemical complex in the world.[17] The Kazakhstan Ministry of Energy, citing information from Russian state energy operator Gazprom, reported on October 19 that a drone strike caused the Orenburg gas processing plant to temporarily stop receiving gas from Kazakhstan's Karachaganak oil and gas project, which uses the Orenburg facility to process Kazakh-produced raw natural gas.[18] Bloomberg reported on October 19 that Karachaganak is one of Kazakhstan's top three oil and gas projects and that the Karachaganak oil and gas project cannot cut gas output without reducing crude oil, as the plant co-produces gas and oil.[19]

    German officials reported observing unidentified objects resembling drones over Munich Airport on October 18. The Associated Press (AP) reported on October 19 that German authorities temporarily closed Munich Airport twice on the evening of October 18 due to several reports of unidentified drones operating nearby.[20] The AP reported that German authorities were unable to verify either instance and reopened the airport. The drone incidents, if confirmed, would mark the latest incident in an increasing trend of unidentified drone incursions near critical civilian infrastructure and military facilities throughout Europe.[21] ISW assesses that these unattributed drone sightings are likely associated with Russia's “Phase Zero” campaign — the informational and psychological condition-setting phase — to prepare for a possible NATO-Russia war in the future.[22]

    more + maps https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-19-2025/

  • X: White Male Democrat Screams at Veteran Winsome Sears: "Traitor" and "Go back to Haiti"

    10/20/2025 3:03:19 AM PDT · 19 of 20
    popdonnelly to TigerClaws

    The Democratic Party is made up of lunatic leftists. Who the Hell are these people who think they must always be getting their own way?

  • VIDEO: Helen Andrews | Overcoming the Feminization of Culture

    10/20/2025 2:57:52 AM PDT · 2 of 28
    the_Watchman to TigerClaws

    Actually, the women’s rights movement people have been sitting on their hands when it comes to the issues of fake men participating in women’s sports and taking women’s college scholarships. They are also sitting on their hands when it comes to entering women’s locker rooms to watch actual women changing.

  • Attack On Europe: Documenting Russian Equipment Losses During The 2022 Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (2 year anniversary)

    10/20/2025 2:44:52 AM PDT · 20,960 of 21,684
    JonPreston to Widget Jr; blitz128; PIF; BeauBo; AdmSmith
    Good morning 'tards

    The Ukraine Project is unraveling nicely, just as we told you it would

  • VIDEO: Helen Andrews | Overcoming the Feminization of Culture

    10/20/2025 2:31:19 AM PDT · 1 of 28
    TigerClaws
    Worth a watch. The Democrat party has become feminized fully at this point.
  • Has Xi Jinping Lost Control Of China's Military... And China Itself?

    10/20/2025 2:20:22 AM PDT · 12 of 34
    ifinnegan to sockmonkey

    This is all coming from other Chinese.

    It may be wishful thinking or otherwise internecine and/or psychological warfare.

    But it’s not originating with “Western and Western influenced experts.”

  • Has Xi Jinping Lost Control Of China's Military... And China Itself?

    10/20/2025 2:17:11 AM PDT · 11 of 34
    ifinnegan to Owen

    Your 屁股 hurt?

  • Has Xi Jinping Lost Control Of China's Military... And China Itself?

    10/20/2025 1:28:48 AM PDT · 10 of 34
    SaveFerris to frank ballenger

    [Photo of General He]

    In the Democrat Joe Biden Administration it would have been:

    Photo of General He / She / They / Them / Two-Spirit

  • Has Xi Jinping Lost Control Of China's Military... And China Itself?

    10/20/2025 1:24:54 AM PDT · 9 of 34
    Reeses to sockmonkey
    I think some of the predictions of Western and Western influenced experts are wishful thinking.

    The west should wish Xi stays. He is incompetent in the same vein as Brain-dead Biden and Hor-izontal Harris. He has damaged the CCP to the point it is now facing a USSR-style collapse. The largest bureaucracy in the world is broke and needs to loot Taiwan for survival. Xi is the communist idiot that took them there.

  • Has Xi Jinping Lost Control Of China's Military... And China Itself?

    10/20/2025 12:49:56 AM PDT · 8 of 34
    frank ballenger to SeekAndFind

    Photo of General He.

    After I failed as a standup comic I never recovered. The world will pay.

  • News Summary-Intelligence Report Sunday 10/19/2025*Deadly US Attack On Colombian Ship*Selective Epstein Doc Dump By Johnson Committee*Israel On Attack In Gaza*Explosion On Ship Carrying Cargo From Iran To Houthis In Yemen*US Will Repatriate Survivors...*

    10/20/2025 12:46:00 AM PDT · 10 of 11
    newfreep to Nextrush
  • News Summary-Intelligence Report Sunday 10/19/2025*Deadly US Attack On Colombian Ship*Selective Epstein Doc Dump By Johnson Committee*Israel On Attack In Gaza*Explosion On Ship Carrying Cargo From Iran To Houthis In Yemen*US Will Repatriate Survivors...*

    10/20/2025 12:45:38 AM PDT · 9 of 11
    newfreep to Nextrush