Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $25,422
31%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 31%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: michaelluttig

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • VIDEO: Loony Judge Luttig Claims Trump Threatens America's "Heart and SOOOUUUUUUULLL"

    05/06/2024 1:33:20 PM PDT · by PJ-Comix · 22 replies
    Rumble ^ | May 6, 2024 | DUmmie FUnnies
    VIDEOLoony former federal Judge Michael Luttig recently turned himself into a laughable clown show when the U.S. Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY shot down his ABSURD scheme to keep President Donald Trump off the 2024 ballots. When that extreme HUMILIATION slapped him in the face, Luttig went into a state of highly entertaining grief-stricken mourning which was covered here in the DUmmie FUnnies. However, after a brief period of hiding in shame, Luttig is baaaaaack with yet more lunacy. He now seems to think that DEMOCRACY IS AT STAKE. No, not because of all the illegal LAWFARE being thrown at Trump with...
  • VIDEO: MSNBC Goes Into Deep Mourning Over Supreme Court Hearing Trump Immunity Appeal

    02/28/2024 6:33:18 PM PST · by PJ-Comix · 29 replies
    Rumble ^ | February 28, 2024 | DUmmie FUnnies
    VIDEOMSNBC went into a state of deep deep mourning when the news broke that the Supreme Court will take up President Trump's immunity appeal thus delaying the trial for more months to come and likely past the November election. Of special note is former judge Michael Luttig whose crackpot Lawfare idea that states can use the 14th Amendment to remove Trump from the ballot is currently being laughed out of the Supreme Court. With his crackpot idea being laughed away, Luttig was profoundly saddened by the news that the J6 trial will probably be delayed past the election. His face...
  • Scarborough Flip Flop—Suddenly He Supports Colorado Court Kicking Trump Off Ballot

    12/21/2023 2:56:07 PM PST · by governsleastgovernsbest · 33 replies
    NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein
    Who got to Joe Scarborough?/The question arises in light of Scarborough's stunning flip-flop over the Colorado Supreme Court decision kicking Donald Trump off the ballot. Yesterday, we caught Scarborough expressing surprising skepticism over the court's ruling. Scarborough dubiously asked whether the decision should be made by "people on cable news," or by state judges "randomly" deciding. Scarborough suggested that a prerequisite to barring Trump should be a conviction for insurrection in a D.C. court. What a difference a day makes! Twenty-four hours later, there was Scarborough this morning, praising the Colorado decision to the heavens as "the most pro-democratic thing...
  • 'MSNBC Conservative': Colorado Court Banning Trump From Ballot 'Not Political In Any Sense'

    12/21/2023 10:13:31 AM PST · by governsleastgovernsbest · 36 replies
    NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein
    [snip] On Nicolle Wallace's show yesterday, Luttig once again played the role of a useful conservative propounding views destined to delight the left. He declared that the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court banning Donald Trump from the ballot, supposedly pursuant to the terms of the 14th Amendment, to be: "a masterful judicial opinion. It is unassailable and irrefutable in every single respect."You could sense liberal hearts swooning from coast to coast! And in a statement that was either deeply naive or deeply cynical, Luttig said of of the Colorado court's decision: "This is not politics. It is certainly not...
  • VIDEO: TDS Never Trumper Lawfare Proponent Eerily Resembles Sam Kinison

    11/28/2023 9:35:12 AM PST · by PJ-Comix · 5 replies
    Rumble ^ | November 28, 2023 | DUmmie FUnnies
    VIDEOWhile watching the November 28, 2023 Morning Joe show interview with TDS Never Trumper J. Michael Luttig hyping the use of lawfare against President Donald Trump, I was struck by the resemblance both facially and vocally of Luttig to the late great comedian Sam Kinison. In this video I present the two of them for your own comparison. Am I just crazy or do you also see the resemblance between the two? (Maybe don't answer that question.) Of course, I am not comparing them politically since Kinison mostly avoided politics plus even he would NOT go to such an extreme...
  • Prominent Conservatives say election was lost, not stolen (Not conservatives, RINOs and Never Trumpers)

    07/14/2022 10:05:20 PM PDT · by CedarDave · 81 replies
    Fox News ^ | July 14, 2022 | Mike Emanuel, Sally Personsl
    A group of prominent conservatives released a new report Thursday outlining their investigation into the 2020 election and have concluded former President Trump's claims of a stolen election are unfounded. The report, "LOST NOT STOLEN: The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election," was put together by three former federal judges and eight conservative leaders who investigated Trump's claims. Over the course of a year, the group looked at all 64 cases of the Trump campaign's fraudulent claims in six key states and concluded that there were no substantial instances of fraud that would have...
  • Are you now or have you ever been a supporter of Donald Trump?

    06/25/2022 4:35:13 AM PDT · by MtnClimber · 69 replies
    American Thinker ^ | 25 Jun, 2022 | Dennis Lund
    Today, loyalty to the nation is again being questioned. As the Pelosi-Thompson-Cheney circus rolls on in D.C., signals are given that the Democrats, have their sights set on more than just the former President. Obviously, the primary purpose of the pseudo-hearing is twofold: Destroy Trump and keep January Sixth alive, until November. Recently retired judge Michael Luttig, said the quiet part out loud: “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are still a clear and present danger to American democracy,” The comment harkens back to the McCarthy era hearings and guilt by association. Once a communist always a communist has...
  • Retired Judge Breaks Down MAGA Blueprint To Steal Election: 2020 Was ‘A Dry Run’

    04/29/2022 5:16:58 PM PDT · by MarvinStinson · 72 replies
    aol ^ | April 28, 2022
    A retired federal judge appointed by former President George H.W. Bush warned in an opinion piece published by CNN on Wednesday that Republicans are “already a long way toward recapturing the White House in 2024, whether Trump or another Republican candidate wins the election or not.” In his essay, J. Michael Luttig broke down what he called the “Republican blueprint” to steal the 2024 election ― the cornerstone of which, he said, was the Supreme Court’s embrace of the “independent state legislature” doctrine. The 2020 election fraud lies peddled by former President Donald Trump and his allies are just “the...
  • Federal Judge Resigns to Work for Boeing [Judge J. Michael Luttig has resigned from the 4th U.S.

    05/10/2006 9:15:46 AM PDT · by Sub-Driver · 39 replies · 1,706+ views
    Federal Judge Resigns to Work for Boeing By LARRY O'DELL, Associated Press Writer 5 minutes ago Judge J. Michael Luttig has resigned from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to accept a job as senior vice president and general counsel for Boeing Co., the company said Wednesday. Luttig, 51, a conservative judge, had been mentioned last year as a possible nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court. He was appointed to the 4th Circuit by former President Bush in 1991
  • Garza or Alito next: The Supreme Court do-over

    10/30/2005 1:17:40 PM PST · by Giant Conservative · 51 replies · 2,901+ views
    Renew America ^ | October 30, 2005 | Chris Knight
    The White House decided to employ a politically-palatable, pundit-prescribed exit strategy with the withdrawal of Harriet Miers. Because of that, Miss Miers is no longer a nominee to the United States Supreme Court, and much of America may believe the Bush Administration's contention that she withdrew over a request for documents. In actuality, she withdrew because her 1993 pro-abortion speech came to light, and that was the straw that broke the camel's back for the great Dr. James Dobson, Senator Sam Brownback, Senator John Thune, and any members of the conservative base who had reserved judgment up to that point....
  • A Bruising High Court Fight Likely - Two conservative favorites reportedly top Bush list

    10/30/2005 7:50:40 AM PST · by XR7 · 122 replies · 3,322+ views
    The Seattle Times ^ | 10/30/05 | Jan Crawford Greenburg
    WASHINGTON — Rebounding from the failed nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, President Bush is poised to select between two of the nation's leading conservative federal appeals-court judges — both with deep backgrounds in constitutional law — for what promises to be a bruising Senate confirmation battle. With an announcement expected today or Monday, administration officials have narrowed the focus to Judges Samuel Alito of New Jersey and Michael Luttig of Virginia, sources involved in the process said. Both have sterling legal qualifications and solid conservative credentials, and either would set off an explosive fight with Senate Democrats,...
  • Bush narrows Supreme Court selection to 2, sources say(great picks IMHO!!!)

    10/29/2005 5:23:51 PM PDT · by Halfmanhalfamazing · 263 replies · 6,760+ views
    Mercury News ^ | Sat, Oct. 29, 2005 | JAN CRAWFORD GREENBURG
    WASHINGTON - Rebounding from the failed nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, President Bush is poised to select between two of the nation's leading conservative federal appeals court judges - both experienced jurists with deep backgrounds in constitutional law - for what promises to be a bruising Senate confirmation battle. With an announcement expected Sunday or Monday, administration officials have narrowed the focus to Judges Samuel Alito of New Jersey and Michael Luttig of Virginia, sources involved in the process said. Both have sterling legal qualifications and solid conservative credentials, and both would set off an explosive fight...
  • Sen. Allen Suggests Court Nominees

    10/28/2005 12:52:10 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 96 replies · 1,905+ views
    NewsMax ^ | 10/28/05 | NewsMax
    Senator George Allen (R-VA) named names Thursday when asked by Fox News to suggest viable replacements for the now withdrawn Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers. Allen mentioned Judges Michael Luttig, Karen Williams, J. Harvey Wilkinson, and Janice Rogers Brown as potential nominees. Luttig, Williams, and Wilkinson serve on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals covering Allen’s home state of Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia. Luttig has served on the Fourth Circuit since 1991. He had previously served as a law clerk for Antonin Scalia, when Scalia was a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for...
  • Whom should Bush nominate now? --- Online Poll

    10/27/2005 9:15:03 AM PDT · by Seeking the truth · 130 replies · 3,045+ views
    Ocents.com ^ | October 27,2005 | Seeking the Truth
    Ok, Harriet Miers has withdrawn. Who will be next? Whom should Bush nominate? Make your choice!
  • Luttig Boomlet

    10/02/2005 5:23:04 PM PDT · by playball0 · 16 replies · 686+ views
    Self ^ | 10/2/2005 | Self
    Tradesport has had a big run today on Michael Luttig to be the next Supreme Court nominee. He has moved up from a 30-1 longshot to the favorite.
  • Stand Up to Them, Mr. President: Nominate Another Scalia

    09/10/2005 9:27:57 AM PDT · by Theodore R. · 28 replies · 751+ views
    Human Events Online ^ | 00-09-05 | Buchanan, Patrick J.
    Stand Up to Them, Mr. President: Nominate Another Scalia by Patrick J. Buchanan Posted Sep 9, 2005 We are about to find out what George W. Bush is made of. For he is approaching the greatest crisis of his presidency. Nine days after 9-11, Bush gave the most powerful speech of his career and rallied a nation. Today, he sits atop a government whose agencies -- FEMA and Homeland Security -- are synonyms for bumbling in the worst disaster in American history. Democrats sense Bush may be assaulted with impunity. He can't or won't fight back. Thus, Hillary hits four...
  • Court Rules U.S. Can Indefinitely Detain Citizens

    09/09/2005 8:45:44 AM PDT · by Pikamax · 63 replies · 1,413+ views
    Washington Post ^ | 09/09/05 | Jerry Markon
    Court Rules U.S. Can Indefinitely Detain Citizens Ruling Comes in the Case of 'Enemy Combatant' Jose Padilla By Jerry Markon Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, September 9, 2005; 10:39 AM A federal appeals court ruled today that the president can indefinitely detain a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil in the absence of criminal charges, holding that such authority is vital to protect the nation from terrorist attacks. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit came in the case of Jose Padilla, a former Chicago gang member who was arrested in Chicago in 2002 and...
  • Court allows ‘dirty bomb’ suspect to be held

    09/09/2005 1:28:15 PM PDT · by conservativegirl · 15 replies · 520+ views
    MSNBC ^ | 9-9-2005 | A.P.
    RICHMOND, Va. - A federal appeals court Friday sided with the Bush administration and reversed a judge's order that the government either charge or free “dirty bomb” suspect Jose Padilla. The three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the president has the authority to detain a U.S. citizen closely associated with al-Qaida. “The exceedingly important question before us is whether the President of the United States possesses the authority to detain militarily a citizen of this country who is closely associated with al Qaeda, an entity with which the United States is at war,”...
  • Chief Justice William Rehnquist just died!

    09/03/2005 8:07:24 PM PDT · by kcvl · 1,273 replies · 35,309+ views
    Per CNN...
  • But What Kind of Conservative? {Buchanan on Roberts}

    07/25/2005 6:33:13 AM PDT · by Theodore R. · 7 replies · 334+ views
    WND.com ^ | 07-25-05 | Buchanan, Patrick J.
    But what kind of conservative? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: July 25, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern © 2005 Creators Syndicate, Inc. Will George Bush be seen historically as the George Patton – or the George McClellan of the culture wars? That question endures. For with his nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court, the president consciously chose to avoid battle with the Left. As he did not want a fight, Bush named a conservative without a single scar from the culture wars and no record of having served. He chose an establishment-conservative, not a warrior-conservative. Judge Roberts is a man of high...