Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Resigns to Work for Boeing [Judge J. Michael Luttig has resigned from the 4th U.S.
Yahoo ^

Posted on 05/10/2006 9:15:46 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Federal Judge Resigns to Work for Boeing

By LARRY O'DELL, Associated Press Writer 5 minutes ago

Judge J. Michael Luttig has resigned from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to accept a job as senior vice president and general counsel for Boeing Co., the company said Wednesday.

Luttig, 51, a conservative judge, had been mentioned last year as a possible nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.

He was appointed to the 4th Circuit by former President Bush in 1991

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 4thcircuit; boeing; jmichaelluttig; judge; luttig; michaelluttig; resignation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Well another court fight......
1 posted on 05/10/2006 9:15:49 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I should have those problems.


2 posted on 05/10/2006 9:17:19 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Going for the real $$$$


3 posted on 05/10/2006 9:17:52 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Good for him. Judges don't make squat anyway.


4 posted on 05/10/2006 9:18:20 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (Liberal Democrats-Party before country, surrender before victory, generous with other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He could still be nominated to the SC. But it doesn't look like he wants to make a govt. salary anymore.


5 posted on 05/10/2006 9:18:23 AM PDT by Clump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

What a great judge- what a great justice he would have made (well, he still could).

I hope he makes more money than he can count, he's done the Fourth Circuit proud.

6 posted on 05/10/2006 9:20:06 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Saw the writing on the walls that he would not be a SCOTUS nominee while Bush 43 is in office. Might as well take the big money / perks from Boeing.


7 posted on 05/10/2006 9:20:08 AM PDT by double_down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Good for him.. Take the money and prosper.


8 posted on 05/10/2006 9:20:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Resume building. Didn't the Liberals recently say they wanted a SC Justice with "real world experience?"


9 posted on 05/10/2006 9:22:16 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Liberalism in a parasite that ALWAYS kills its host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Too bad. But you have to be really dedicated and idealistic to be a conservative judge these days. Nothing but political abuse, bad press, and weak support from the Republicans who should be supporting them.


10 posted on 05/10/2006 9:28:32 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He didn't get the SCOTUS nod, and it seems like he doesn't think there will be another shot for it.

Can't say I blame the man.


11 posted on 05/10/2006 9:30:07 AM PDT by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
He sure had quite a few law school bloggers as fans for SCOTUS. Shame really, but I don't blame him.
12 posted on 05/10/2006 9:33:45 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, imo, this proves he didn't deserve the Supreme Court appointment.

And I'm glad more than ever he didn't receive it.

Yes, I think it's fair to state this is in reaction to an understanding he wouldn't be appointed by this administration. But he quits at a timing when it is next to impossible to get RINO's to move swiftly on confirmation in the Senate, at a time with activist judges are overstepping their bounds.

He's more than free to leave and pursue a job that makes money. I wish him well on that. One I preseume he expect to enjoy. But it's evident in this action that he lacked the committment we need from a Republican nominee to the Supreme Court.


13 posted on 05/10/2006 9:42:10 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (<a href = "http://www.send-a-brick.com/brick.htm" >Be Heard: Send a Brick</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
Well, imo, this proves he didn't deserve the Supreme Court appointment.
Why? This is resume enhancement, and a stop to resume degradation. The more court cases he judges the more enemies he makes. He has already "been there, done that" as a federal judge. He is never gonna be more qualified no matter how long he's on the bench.

14 posted on 05/10/2006 9:52:56 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

No, this is not resume enhancement.

It's a silent acknowledgement he won't receive from this administration the Supreme Court appointment he had hoped for. It is unlikely a future administration will consider him for an appointment unless, perhaps, Allen won the nomination and the presidency. Except Allen has clearly demonstrated his interests reside towards the Judge from Lind's state (Karen Williams). He seems to have the same mindset as many in Washington that at least two women should be on the Court.

Luttig can read the signs. This administration has passed on him twice, and the rest of Washington seems to be enamored with someone of the opposite sex being appointed next. By the time the political correct mindset offer a male may next be appointed, Luttig's age will be a factor. Youth is critical in our appointments. If he was going to be appointed it would have happened with the second opening.

Given this reality he has chosen a different line of work. Which is fine, he should do what's best for him. But clearly his committment is not as strong to holding the line against Liberal activist judges/Dems/RINO's as a Supreme Court nominee's should be. If it was, he would have stayed in this position.


15 posted on 05/10/2006 10:57:31 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (<a href = "http://www.send-a-brick.com/brick.htm" >Be Heard: Send a Brick</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

It's a good thing Luttig was not nominated to the Supreme Court. You have to have something more than expectations of a high salary to be a good SC Justice. That's why the American people should feel blessed that we have four good conservative judges on the Court who pride themselves on their judicial philosophy rather than making a lot of money.


16 posted on 05/10/2006 11:01:05 AM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Soul Seeker
I'm having a hard time understanding why taking a job as GC at Boening disqualifies him for SCOTUS. No judge can be given any assurances of a nomination to a Court. One makes their decisions based on opportunities as they are presented. Nor do those decisions indicate one's commitment to a Court.

A state district court judge is being nominated to the federal district bench. But even a nomination is no guarantee that she will ever sit as a federal judge.

18 posted on 05/10/2006 11:05:32 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Revolving Door

Welcome to Free Republic!


19 posted on 05/10/2006 11:06:32 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

Plus, I do not think that Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito would like to be considered Republican nominees to the SCOTUS.


20 posted on 05/10/2006 11:09:25 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson