Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Allen Suggests Court Nominees
NewsMax ^ | 10/28/05 | NewsMax

Posted on 10/28/2005 12:52:10 PM PDT by wagglebee

Senator George Allen (R-VA) named names Thursday when asked by Fox News to suggest viable replacements for the now withdrawn Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers.

Allen mentioned Judges Michael Luttig, Karen Williams, J. Harvey Wilkinson, and Janice Rogers Brown as potential nominees.

Luttig, Williams, and Wilkinson serve on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals covering Allen’s home state of Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia.

Luttig has served on the Fourth Circuit since 1991. He had previously served as a law clerk for Antonin Scalia, when Scalia was a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and for Chief Justice Warren Burger from 1983 to 1984. He was widely rumored to be on the short-list of candidates for both the Rehnquist opening, now filled by Chief Justice John Roberts, and the O’Connor opening prior to the now-withdrawn nomination of Miers.

Luttig authored the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute, a case enforcing the Constitution’s long-ignored Commerce Clause. "Though the authority conferred upon the federal government be broad,” Luttig wrote, "it is an authority constrained by no less than that of the People themselves.”

Williams has served on the Fourth Circuit since 1992. Allen singled her out for her opinion in a case upholding the Pledge of Allegiance in Virginia schools in August 2005. "The Pledge, unlike prayer, is not a religious exercise or activity, but a patriotic one,” Williams wrote. "(It) ... does not amount to an establishment of religion.”

Though lesser known than Luttig and Wilkinson, Williams could benefit from her gender, as some politicians and pundits will likely press the president to nominate another woman.

Wilkinson was nominated for the Fourth Circuit by Ronald Reagan in 1984, and has served since that time. Like Luttig, he was widely considered to be on the short-list for both of the open slots on the Supreme Court. At 61, he would not serve on the bench for as long as some conservatives hope for the next Bush nominee.

Wilkinson wrote the majority opinion in a case that upheld President Clinton’s "don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for gay people in the military, holding that courts have no power to overrule a president’s military policies.

He also wrote a strong dissent in a case that upheld damages for emotional distress in the case of Falwell v. Flynt where the Rev. Jerry Falwell claimed severe emotional distress over a parody of him published in Hustler Magazine. "Nothing is more thoroughly democratic,” Wilkinson wrote, "than to have the high and mighty lampooned and spoofed.” The Supreme Court eventually agreed with Wilkinson and overruled the decision of the Fourth Circuit.

Janice Rogers Brown is the most controversial judge on the short list provided by Allen. She is the daughter of an Alabama sharecropper and an unrepentant libertarian-conservative. She served on the California Supreme Court from 1996 to 2004.

Brown has served on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals since earlier this year when she was confirmed in the now infamous "deal” made by the "Gang of 14” to avoid a Democratic filibuster and subsequent Republican invocation of the so-called "nuclear option.”

Her nomination may result in the "brawl” that many conservative commentators, such as the Weekly Standard’s Fred Barnes, have anticipated. It would also put Democrats in an awkward position as Brown has overcome being born into a life of poverty to reach the second most powerful court in the United States, and has done so while abhorring the ever-increasing role of government.

"Where government moves in,” Brown told the Federalist Society in 2000, "community retreats, civil society disintegrates, and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is families under siege, war in the streets, unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility; and the triumph of deceit.”

She is beloved by "movement conservatives,” and reviled by liberals. Conservative attorney Peter Kirsanow says as a "black female ... who may not view Roe as the zenith of constitutional jurisprudence,” she represents the "Storm of the Century” as a judicial nominee.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 109th; allen2008; courtnominees; georgeallen; janicerogersbrown; jharveywilkinson; judicialnominees; karenwilliams; michaelluttig; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
Nothing to complain about with Allen's list. Hopefully, George Allen will get to add a few more justices after he is elected president in 2008.
1 posted on 10/28/2005 12:52:11 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Sorry, did I miss where Allen was elected president?


2 posted on 10/28/2005 12:53:13 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State

Anticipated Breaking News ...


3 posted on 10/28/2005 12:54:49 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
unrepentant libertarian-conservative.

*thumbs up*

4 posted on 10/28/2005 12:55:36 PM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Speeches and quotes by JRB:

http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm


5 posted on 10/28/2005 12:55:58 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State
when asked by Fox News to suggest viable replacements

Sue the guy for answering a question.

6 posted on 10/28/2005 12:56:07 PM PDT by Huck (My very first post on the Miers pick, 10/3/05, 7:33:22 AM EDT: "Bad news for us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What about "Scalito"?


7 posted on 10/28/2005 12:56:30 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State

What do you mean? I was just being (realistically) optimistic about Allen winning in 2008. As far as his other comments, he was asked who he thought would be good and he answered.


8 posted on 10/28/2005 12:57:03 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I'd include Michael McConnell on that list, too.


9 posted on 10/28/2005 12:57:32 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Is there anything about Roe or Abortion in those quotes?


10 posted on 10/28/2005 12:57:37 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: No Longer Free State; EDINVA; iceskater; xyz123; Mudboy Slim; Corin Stormhands; jla; ...
Sorry, did I miss where Allen was elected president?

November 4, 2008

Lighten up Francis, he had an opinion.

Question asked. Question answered.

12 posted on 10/28/2005 12:58:28 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (John Kerry Endorses Tim Kaine: "Tim Kaine was against the Death Penalty before he was for it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

I don't think Alito's name was "in play" when Allen made his comments. I didn't know a lot about Alito before today, but everything that I've read has really impressed me.


13 posted on 10/28/2005 12:58:50 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
A month ago, we were seeing articles exactly like this.

I bet Bush goes with his gardener this time around.

14 posted on 10/28/2005 12:58:58 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

So would I.


15 posted on 10/28/2005 12:59:29 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Luttig & Brown are fine with me. I don't know as much about Wilkerson or Williams, so they may be alright.

I especially like the fact that JRB has received lots of flak for her views and remains "unrepentant." I REALLY like that, as it makes her less likely to flip due to the pressure to "fit in" that will inevitably come with being on the Court.
16 posted on 10/28/2005 12:59:34 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Allen does sound the best for the USA right now.


17 posted on 10/28/2005 12:59:37 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (I shot an error into the air. It's still going everywhere. R. A. HEINLEIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Everytime this Senator opens his mouth (lately) I find myself agreeing with him.


18 posted on 10/28/2005 1:00:01 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (I am Lord of the Sea People! Ruler of their under water universe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Is this the same Allen who thought the President should meet with Mother Sheehan?

Thought so.

19 posted on 10/28/2005 1:00:21 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima

What is JRB views on Roe v. Wade and abortion in general?


20 posted on 10/28/2005 1:00:28 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson