Free Republic 4th Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $30,741
37%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 37%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: scotus

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Ketanji Brown Jackson halts order requiring full SNAP payments, for now

    11/07/2025 7:19:58 PM PST · by bitt · 42 replies
    https://thehill.com/ ^ | 11/07/25 | Zach Schonfeld
    Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson temporarily halted an order requiring the Trump administration make full Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) November payments by Friday. Jackson’s ruling pauses some of the payments until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit can decide the administration’s motion to block the order pending its appeal. It does not reflect a ruling on the underlying legal merits of the case, but it provides a temporary reprieve to the Trump administration, which went to the Supreme Court earlier Friday evening. “Given the First Circuit’s representations, an administrative stay is required to facilitate the...
  • Supreme Court issues emergency order temporarily blocking full SNAP food aid payments

    11/07/2025 6:31:01 PM PST · by janetjanet998 · 43 replies
    BREAKING: Supreme Court issues emergency order temporarily blocking full SNAP food aid payments - AP
  • Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court after appeals court orders full payment of food stamps

    11/07/2025 4:29:39 PM PST · by CFW · 30 replies
    Just the News ^ | 11/7/25 | Natalia Mittelstadt
    The Trump administration on Friday appealed to the Supreme Court after an appeals court ordered the government to fully fund food stamps for November. The First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday ordered the U.S. Department of Agriculture to begin taking steps to fully cover Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program payments by the end of the day Friday, CBS News reported. The appeals court had denied the administration's request for a temporary administrative stay of a lower court order, adding that it is still considering the Justice Department's request for longer relief while it considers the appeal. "The core power...
  • Will the Supreme Court force Trump to repay tariffs? The issue before the court is whether the Economic Emergency Powers Act delegates tariff making to the president

    11/07/2025 10:40:14 AM PST · by SeekAndFind · 37 replies
    Spectator World ^ | 11/07/2025 | Chris Mondics
    The most important thing to know about the Trump administration’s defense of its hotly contested use of tariffs to bring allies and opponents to heel is not that it is a novel and unprecedented legal argument but rather a full-throated articulation of the campaign themes that got the president elected – in both 2016 and 2000. In its legal documents, and in the oral arguments that took place before the Supreme Court Wednesday, the Trump administration paints a picture of America under siege. Once thriving industrial towns in the Midwest hollowed out. Factories dismantled as supply chains have been moved...
  • Supreme Court hands Trump MAJOR LEGAL WIN

    11/06/2025 9:51:02 PM PST · by SmokingJoe · 13 replies
    YouTube ^ | 11/05/2025 | DeVory Darkins
    Yet another win at SCOTUS for Trump (6 - 3) with the three far left witches voting against Trump as usual. This is the 24th SCOTUS win for Trump. This ruling reaffirmed Trump's EO banning giving out US passports with transgender, non binary designations. US passports will be male or female and that's it.Also some district judge ruled Trump pay SNAP in full despite Shutdown, which Trump DOJ quickly appealed to SCOTUS. Trump will probably win that one too.
  • Supreme Court lets Trump block transgender and nonbinary people from choosing passport sex markers

    11/06/2025 4:25:15 PM PST · by artichokegrower · 8 replies
    KSBW ^ | November 6, 2025 | By LINDSAY WHITEHURST
    The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to enforce a policy blocking transgender and nonbinary people from choosing passport sex markers that align with their gender identity. The decision is Trump’s latest win on the court's emergency docket, and allows the administration to enforce the policy while a lawsuit over it plays out. It halts a lower-court order requiring the government to keep letting people choose male, female or X on their passport to line up with their gender identity on new or renewed passports. The court’s three liberal justices dissented
  • Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce passport restrictions targeting transgender people

    11/06/2025 12:49:58 PM PST · by Red Badger · 30 replies
    NBC News ^ | November 06, 2025 | Lawrence Hurley
    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the Trump administration to enforce a policy aimed at limiting transgender rights that would restrict sex designations on passports to “male” and “female” based on sex assigned at birth. The justices granted an emergency request filed by the administration, which is seeking to reverse a policy introduced during the Biden administration that allowed people to put “X” as a gender marker or self-select male or female. "Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth—in both cases, the Government is merely attesting to...
  • Supreme Court Delivers Critical Ruling In Key Case

    11/06/2025 12:28:27 PM PST · by UMCRevMom@aol.com · 31 replies
    conservativebrief.com ^ | 11-3-2025 | Martin Walsh
    President Donald Trump has picked up a big win at the U.S. Supreme Court on a key issue driving his presidency. The court annulled a lower court injunction that was obstructing the president from revoking the protected legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants presently living in the United States. The ruling was 8–1 in support of the president’s position, with the sole dissent originating from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, appointed by former President Joe Biden. The ruling facilitates the Trump administration’s efforts to revoke Biden-era Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 300,000 Venezuelan migrants residing in the U.S.....
  • Conservative justices sharply question Trump tariffs in high-stakes hearing

    11/05/2025 4:24:14 PM PST · by MinorityRepublican · 81 replies
    BBC News ^ | November 5, 2025 | Anthony Zurcher and Natalie Sherman
    President Donald Trump's use of sweeping tariffs faced sharp questioning at the Supreme Court on Wednesday, in a case with major implications for the president's agenda and the global economy. A majority of justices, including several conservatives, expressed doubts about the White House's justification of the import duties, which the president has said are necessary to restore America's manufacturing base and fix its trade imbalance. The measures are being challenged by a number of small businesses and a group of states, which contend that the president has overstepped his authority in imposing the levies, which are in effect a tax....
  • Trump administration faced deeply skeptical Supreme Court in tariff arguments

    11/05/2025 8:52:52 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 55 replies
    CNN ^ | 11/05/2025 | John Fritze, Elisabeth Buchwald, Devan Cole and Holmes Lybrand
    In the most significant economic case to reach the Supreme Court in years, Trump’s authority to issue emergency tariffs faced deep skepticism from key conservatives — including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. • While justices had tough questions for both sides, a majority expressed reservations about the administration relying on declared emergencies to issue the unchecked tariffs. • As plaintiffs presented their case, Kavanaugh repeatedly noted that courts had previously allowed then-President Richard Nixon to use similar emergency powers to impose tariffs during his administration. • Both sides previously framed the...
  • Trump Tariffs LIVE THREAD: Oral Argument Live Blog for Wednesday, November 5.

    11/05/2025 6:22:54 AM PST · by Bruce Campbells Chin · 58 replies
    SCOTUSblog ^ | November 5, 2025 | Various
    Beginning at 9:30 a.m., we will be live blogging as the court hears oral arguments in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump.
  • Supreme Court’s conservatives face a test of their own in judging Trump’s tariffs

    11/04/2025 2:03:55 PM PST · by E. Pluribus Unum · 33 replies
    Los Angeles Times ^ | Nov. 4, 2025 3 AM PT | David G. Savage
    Small-business owners sued over Trump’s tariffs, saying they had severely disrupted their businesses.The outcome is likely to turn on three doctrines that have been championed by the Supreme Court’s conservatives. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservatives face a test of their own making this week as they decide whether President Trump had the legal authority to impose tariffs on imports from nations across the globe.At issue are import taxes that are paid by American businesses and consumers. Small-business owners had sued, including a maker of “learning toys” in Illinois and a New York importer of wines and spirits. They said...
  • The Moment of Truth on Tariffs

    11/04/2025 10:08:54 AM PST · by lasereye · 29 replies
    Powerlineblog ^ | November 4, 2025 | John Hinderaker
    I wrote here and here about the federal lawsuit that challenges President Trump’s authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose most of his tariffs, including his worldwide “reciprocal” tariffs. The case, V.O.S. Selections, Inc. et al. v. Trump, originated in the Court of International Trade, which held 3-0 that the challenged tariffs were not authorized by Congress. That decision was upheld on a 7-4 vote by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case is now in the Supreme Court, where it will be argued tomorrow. The New York Post covers the Supreme Court proceeding,...
  • Even Fellow Liberal Supreme Court Justices Are Getting Fed Up with Ketanji Brown Jackson: Report

    10/31/2025 12:30:50 PM PDT · by DFG · 50 replies
    The Western Journal ^ | 10/31/2025 | Michael Schwarz
    When you use skin color and chromosomes as criteria for filling positions of trust, as opposed to filling those positions with the best people regardless of skin color or chromosomes, you will not, unless by accident, get the best people for the job. No public figure in recent memory exemplifies this maxim more than Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. But that does not even tell half of the story. According to The New York Times, Jackson has found herself increasingly at odds not only with SCOTUS’ nominally conservative majority, but also with her fellow liberals, Justices Elena Kagan and...
  • These 2 Supreme Court Cases May Affect Future Elections

    10/30/2025 7:22:40 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 2 replies
    Epoch Times ^ | 10/30/2025 | Stacy Robinson
    The country is gearing up for the 2026 midterms, and the stakes are especially high for both allies and opponents of President Donald Trump’s administration.In October, the Supreme Court heard two cases that may impact upcoming elections: one dealing with race-based congressional maps, and the other addressing whether federal candidates can challenge state laws that allow ballot counting after election day.Race-Based RedistrictingFollowing a lawsuit by minority voters, a federal court in Louisiana ordered the state to redraw its congressional map to add a second majority-black district, since that demographic made up one-third of the state’s population. After it did so,...
  • After Losing At SCOTUS, Wisconsin Finds A New Way To ‘Target’ Catholic Charities

    10/24/2025 5:36:18 PM PDT · by E. Pluribus Unum · 12 replies
    The Federalist ^ | October 24, 2025 | Shawn Fleetwood
    Wisconsin is seeking to deny a tax exemption not only to the CCB, but to all such religious and nonreligious organizations across the state. Amid leftists’ ongoing judicial coup against the Trump administration, America’s propaganda media have fomented baseless fears that President Trump is going to “defy” or “ignore” a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court if it rules on a case in a way he doesn’t like. But if these so-called “defenders of democracy” are concerned about government officials “ignoring” court rulings as they claim, where is their outrage about Democrat-led Wisconsin’s apparent bid to sidestep SCOTUS in a...
  • Nearly all Republican AGs add firepower to Trump's birthright citizenship push

    10/24/2025 1:43:54 PM PDT · by conservative98 · 15 replies
    Fox News ^ | October 24, 2025 2:48pm EDT | Ashley Oliver
    FIRST ON FOX: Nearly all Republican attorneys general asked the Supreme Court on Friday to side with President Donald Trump in his fight to curtail birthright citizenship, offering a wide show of support for one of the president’s most controversial agenda items. The 24 states, led by Iowa’s Brenna Bird and Tennessee’s Jonathan Skrmetti, argued in an amicus brief that the 14th Amendment, which addresses birthright citizenship, was not designed to give automatic citizenship to babies born to mothers living in the country illegally or temporarily visiting.
  • DOJ warns California officials to 'stand down

    10/24/2025 10:41:24 AM PDT · by MCSETots · 8 replies
    Fox News ^ | 10/24/2025 | Alexandra Koch
    U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a formal letter to top California officials Thursday, warning them against any attempts to arrest or impede federal law enforcement officers enforcing immigration laws. The letter, addressed to Gov. Gavin Newsom; state Attorney General Rob Bonta; Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.; and San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins, stressed that federal agents and officers are carrying out lawful duties, and any interference by state or local officials is both "illegal and futile." The letter was sent after Pelosi, the former House Speaker, and Rep. Kevin Mullin, D-Calif., issued a statement Wednesday threatening to arrest...
  • Taxpayer-Funded Schools Can’t Prohibit Prayer And Promote Witchcraft

    10/22/2025 3:49:59 PM PDT · by CFW · 8 replies
    The Federalist ^ | 10/22/25 | Rhonda Thomas
    When a public high school in Orange County, Florida, aired a weekly “Witchy Wednesday” religious video series on the schoolwide TV system, led by students and featuring detailed instructions on casting spells and performing rituals, including soul cleansing and moon worship, many parents were stunned. The school canceled the series after public outcry and intervention from Liberty Counsel, in which the legal group asked for equal time for Christian instruction. But the larger question remains: Why would a public school introduce spiritual practices rooted in witchcraft to impressionable young students, and what does this reveal about the direction of public...
  • Supreme Court to decide constitutionality of law barring illegal drug users from having guns

    10/20/2025 10:51:16 AM PDT · by Red Badger · 15 replies
    CBS News ^ | October 20, 2025 | Melissa Quinn
    Washington — The Supreme Court on Monday said it will decide whether a federal law that prohibits unlawful drug users from having firearms violates the Second Amendment, adding a second high-stakes case involving gun rights to the docket for its current term. The Justice Department is urging the high court to uphold the prohibition, arguing that there are "narrow circumstances" in which the government may burden the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. A federal appeals court ruled that the law is unconstitutional in most cases, and the Trump administration said that decision should be reversed. In agreeing...