Did anyone else miss this important fact? I know it was stated in the body of the various postings on the whistleblower, but I think a lot of people, me included, missed it and the implications of this fact. It begs the question. If the whistleblower is not credible, and the whole premise is a lie, then how was he or she able to predict exactly what happened at the September 10, debate? His affidavit states that he sent out sealed stamped letters to himself and others on September 9, before the debate, including House Speaker Johnson. The affidavit states...