Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: X User ‘Black Insurrectionist’ Agrees to Put Gateway Pundit in Contact with Alleged ABC Whistleblower’s Attorney After Releasing ‘Affidavit’ on Debate Rigging Scandal
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 9/16/2024 | JIM HOFT

Posted on 09/16/2024 7:16:14 AM PDT by bitt

In recent days, calls for an investigation into ABC’s moderation of last week’s presidential debate have reached a fever pitch, with many questioning the glaring bias displayed during the event.

The moderators repeatedly fact-checked Donald Trump while allowing Kamala Harris to peddle unchecked lies and propaganda.

Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) revealed on Friday that a Senate investigation into ABC News and Kamala Harris’s campaign is underway. Marshall suspects collusion between ABC and the Harris team, citing Kamala’s unusually prepared responses as evidence that she knew the questions ahead of time.

Former Clinton advisor Mark Penn also joined the fray, calling for a third-party investigation into the internal communications at ABC News.

“There should be an independent review of all internal texts and emails to find out whether there was a plan to fact-check one candidate, effectively rigging the debate,” Penn stated during an appearance on the John Solomon Reports podcast.

It has also been revealed that Kamala Harris shares a close connection with ABC’s lead moderator, Linsey Davis. Both are members of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., and with Harris’s rise as the Democratic nominee, AKA recently formed a PAC in support.

None of these connections were disclosed to the public ahead of the debate, raising serious questions about conflicts of interest.

According to a post-debate interview, Linsey Davis admitted she worked with co-moderator David Muir only to fact-check Trump throughout the event.

On September 12, 2024, the Twitter-X account “Black Insurrectionist” dropped a bombshell tweet claiming to have access to a signed affidavit from an ABC whistleblower. The tweet reads:

“I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/screenshot-2024-09-16-at-12.42.32am.jpg

By Sunday, the alleged affidavit was released, and it didn’t hold back. In part, the affidavit stated:

“Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:

The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.

It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to factchecking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.

The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate. […]

..MORE


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abc; abcwhistleblower; blackinsurrectionist; debate; debaterigging; fakegaykaren; fakewaypundit; hofthaters4harris; hofthatersarefaggots; hoftisafairy; humblehomoshatehoft; media; msm; sodomizedgunner; sodomizedkaren

1 posted on 09/16/2024 7:16:14 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

(MOST INTERESTING...)

““Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:

The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.

It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to factchecking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.

The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.”


2 posted on 09/16/2024 7:17:21 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
"Trust the Plan" — all smoke, no fire, no thanks.

3 posted on 09/16/2024 7:24:50 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thought we knew 90% of all this ahead of time or figured it out when it was happening.

Why go to all the trouble with a new podium when all she needed to do was get a step.


4 posted on 09/16/2024 7:25:43 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It has also been revealed that:
<><>Kamala shares a close connection with ABC journo and debate moderator, Linsey Davis.
<><>they are sorority sisters
<><>Both are members of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.,
<><>AKA Sorority recently formed a PAC to raise money for Harris.

None of these ABC/Harris connections were disclosed to the public
ahead of the debate, raising serious questions about conflicts of interest.


5 posted on 09/16/2024 7:28:02 AM PDT by Liz (Faith is believing what you cannot see; its reward is to see what you believe. St Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Tom Fitton (Judicial Watch) would be better person to put in touch with. He’s a great lawyer. Gateway Pundit is only a blogger.


6 posted on 09/16/2024 7:30:16 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; poconopundit; Jane Long; Diana in Wisconsin; Grampa Dave; Godzilla; Vaduz; null and void; ...

p


7 posted on 09/16/2024 7:30:25 AM PDT by Liz (Faith is believing what you cannot see; its reward is to see what you believe. St Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

JUDICIAL WATCH
425 Third Street, SW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C.

Phone: 1 202 646 5172
Email: info@judicialwatch.org
Web site: www.judicialwatch.org


8 posted on 09/16/2024 7:33:04 AM PDT by Liz (Faith is believing what you cannot see; its reward is to see what you believe. St Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Ah...cool. The Baitway Pundit, home of the BOOM! KRAKEN! EXCLUSIVE! GROUND BREAKING EVIDENCE!

This does not instill faith that any of this is real. Don't get me wrong, I know she got the questions in advance. We all do. We know it was 3 against 1 on that debate stage. When an outlet other than the Baitway Pundit gets on board, I might change my mind.

Be careful what you push out there, FReepers! Some of it truly is #FakeNews, even on our side, and it makes us look like idiots.

9 posted on 09/16/2024 7:38:58 AM PDT by dware (Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

ABC has more to hide than tell not surprised.

None of these ABC/Harris connections were disclosed to the public
ahead of the debate, raising serious questions about conflicts of interest.


10 posted on 09/16/2024 7:52:30 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

The sole reason why Harris is the nominee is Joe Biden’s incapacity. It should have been the first question asked of her, “What did you know, when did you know it ?” The whistleblower put his finger right on it, before the debate. Meantime, either before or after the debate, I have not seen a discussion of the lack of curiosity on this uppermost topic from anyone in the Trump community, let alone outside it. You being so dismissive, no doubt had discussed this elsewhere, show us. The dog finally barked and his name is ABC Whistleblower.


11 posted on 09/16/2024 8:12:24 AM PDT by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

So he wasn’t Seth Rich’d in a car crash?


12 posted on 09/16/2024 8:13:22 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Pray for Biden: Psalms 109: 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sopo
Please ping me when the whistle-blower comes forth and is identified. Thanks in advance!

13 posted on 09/16/2024 8:18:42 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Unping me.

You write too much in your headline of ping messages.


14 posted on 09/16/2024 8:25:14 AM PDT by Dacula (Catholics against Kamala)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Still looking for your discussion of why the most pertinent of all questions was left out, other than that indicated by the whistleblower. I thought the usual method of whistleblowers was to maintain anonymity to avoid retaliation.


15 posted on 09/16/2024 8:37:38 AM PDT by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sopo
Big claims require big evidence. What the whistle-blower claims is possible. Maybe even plausible. But until some concrete proof is provided, it remains just another internet rabbit hole.

I welcome proof of the claim. I hope the whistle-blower comes forth with some.

16 posted on 09/16/2024 8:42:43 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

“X” marks the spot.


17 posted on 09/16/2024 8:49:39 AM PDT by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bitt
The moderators repeatedly fact-checked Donald Trump while allowing Kamala Harris to peddle unchecked lies and propaganda.

I wonder why the ABC bimbo didn't ask Harris and Trump about women who get a big leg up in their careers by 'sleeping with the married boss/powerful man' who 'helps'? Trump was always asked about anything sexual even if only an innuendo.

18 posted on 09/16/2024 9:16:25 AM PDT by GOPJ (Corrupt ABC referees/mods trying to throw the game to Kamala made Kamala look worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

“Gateway Pundit is only a blogger.”

The Gateway Pundit is an online publication with full-time journalists and editors, that receives over 100 million pageviews per month. You can’t really dismiss it as a mere “blog.”


19 posted on 09/16/2024 9:20:38 AM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitt

So ABC considered it a DEI debate?


20 posted on 09/16/2024 10:00:16 AM PDT by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson