(MOST INTERESTING...)
““Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:
The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.
It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to factchecking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.
The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.”
Thought we knew 90% of all this ahead of time or figured it out when it was happening.
Why go to all the trouble with a new podium when all she needed to do was get a step.
It has also been revealed that:
<><>Kamala shares a close connection with ABC journo and debate moderator, Linsey Davis.
<><>they are sorority sisters
<><>Both are members of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.,
<><>AKA Sorority recently formed a PAC to raise money for Harris.
None of these ABC/Harris connections were disclosed to the public
ahead of the debate, raising serious questions about conflicts of interest.
This does not instill faith that any of this is real. Don't get me wrong, I know she got the questions in advance. We all do. We know it was 3 against 1 on that debate stage. When an outlet other than the Baitway Pundit gets on board, I might change my mind.
Be careful what you push out there, FReepers! Some of it truly is #FakeNews, even on our side, and it makes us look like idiots.
So he wasn’t Seth Rich’d in a car crash?
I wonder why the ABC bimbo didn't ask Harris and Trump about women who get a big leg up in their careers by 'sleeping with the married boss/powerful man' who 'helps'? Trump was always asked about anything sexual even if only an innuendo.
So ABC considered it a DEI debate?