Iraqi Prisoner "Abuse" (John Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Comment)

5.6.04 | Mia T

[Mia T]

Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
John Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Comment
NEW virtual john kerry can bore + snowboard at the same time series

by Mia T, 4.30.04

 

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

[freedomlover]

I added "ISTHISKEYWORDCOOL" just for fun.

Couldn't hep it.

[Mia T]

"SanFranciscoDemocrat"

Arguably the ultimate tautology. ;)

[cake_crumb]

LOL!

[Mia T]

;)

[Delta 21]

Kerry is an embarrasment to dorky lookin people everywhere.

[jla]

Arguably the ultimate tautology.

*L*

[Mia T]

flyboy--SanFranciscoDemocrat

 

To argue that Bush's service was not lethally dangerous is a favorite canard of the left.

The F-102 fighter jet is basically flames attached to a large fuel tank.  Many a courageous Guard pilot died in training or in the course of everyday flying.  I actually know one.

OTOH, the proximate cause of this entire mess, the cowardly rapist, was a genuine risk-averse draft-dodger.

Did you vote for him?--Mia T

 

 

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

owever questionable the reason for the clintons' easy disregard for the genocide that threatened Rwanda or the terrorism that threatens America, its correlate is clear; a clinton calculus rooted in cowardice and self-aggrandizement.

And both of these components are captured vividly in the movie clip above.

Notice in particular how each president reacts to a boy being crushed by the crowd: clinton reflexively moves to protect himself as he assails the overzealous swarm; the Ghanaian president, without hesitation and with increased risk to himself, lifts the little boy to safety.

Mia T, 4.9.04
THE CLINTONS' EASY DISREGARD FOR GENOCIDE AND TERRORISM
the role of clinton cowardice and self-aggrandizement

[M. Peach]

Hello Mia -

You are truly amazing. I hope you got a chance to see Sean Hannity make a fool of Senator Corzine this evening. I laughed so hard when Corzine asked for Rumsfeld to resign - then Sean hit him with exactly what you're talking about.

Sean may have even seen your web site - because he stated most of what you say here. He asked Corzine how could he possibly ask Rumsfeld to resign when the man he supports (Kerry) did so much worse - then he rattled off the litany of crimes Kerry admitted to.

He made an absolute fool out of him. I think it was Sean's greatest moment.

[M. Peach]

BTW - your portrayal of Kerry's balancing act was hilarious - How do you do that? Have you ever marketed yourself to a major network like Newsmax or others?

You have a style unlike anything I've ever seen.

[Mia T]

thx and hi:)

I actually just caught the hannity-corzine rerun. Sean is wonderful; relentless, clear-thinking...

corzine, OTOH, isn't the sharpest tack in the box. (how did he ever rise to the top of goldman sachs, i wonder...)

[Mia T]

They're actual snowboarding moves. ;)

[Mia T]

related post/essay:

"CRY BUSH" + Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
What are the Dems up to?

Kerry Condemnation Focuses on Process; Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Condemn Content

NEW virtual john kerry can bore + snowboard at the same time series

 

by Mia T, 5.06.04

 

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

ohn Kerry, self-professed war criminal, needed the Iraqi prisoner "abuse" scandal about as much as bill clinton, documented rapist, needed the Saddam rape rooms or the marauding Milosevic rapist-guerrillas.

For this reason, Kerry did not respond for a full week to this latest leftist-fulminated Bush-bashing brouhaha, and when Kerry did finally respond, the focus of his condemnation was process, not content, his pulled punches notwithstanding.

Makes sense. War criminals, by definition, lack the requisite moral authority to address such war-related "abuses."

By contrast, the response from Kerry's leftist colleagues has been so disproportionate -- and so predictable -- that it approaches farce of farce, even if we discount demonstrated Democrat willingness to trade American blood and national security for reacquired power.

The Democrats, apparently not adherents of Aesop, have "cried Bush" far too many times to be to be anything but preposterous. Are the reflexively self-serving, power-hungry Dems simply clueless actors? Or are they part of a larger orchestrated effort to muddy up Kerry's Vietnam-atrocities swamp?

[jla]

bump