Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,231
18%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 18%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: supremefart

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Supreme Court declines to take Nicholas Sandmann’s petition

    03/26/2024 6:57:01 AM PDT · by Twotone · 6 replies
    Washington Examiner ^ | March 25, 2024 | Kaelan Deese
    The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the case of Nicholas Sandmann, a former Kentucky high school student who sued several news outlets for allegedly libelous coverage of his viral encounter with a Native American activist in 2019. Justices decided not to take up Sandmann’s petition against several outlets, including ABC News, The New York Times, Gannett, and others, leaving in place a lower court’s dismissal of the massive libel suit. The former student argued he was defamed by reports about his confrontation with Native American activist Nathan Phillips at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., five years ago....
  • Special Counsel Jack Smith Asks Supreme Court to Decide Trump Immunity – Highest Court Immediately Drops All Business to Comply With Special Counsel Request

    12/12/2023 6:48:14 AM PST · by bitt · 89 replies
    theconservativetreehouse.com ^ | 12/11/2023 | sundance
    After years of assembling datapoints around the potential for the Supreme Court to be compromised, it was the discovery of Mary McCord’s husband Sheldon Snook deep in the office of Chief Justice John Roberts that finally sealed the deal for me personally. Yes, the Supreme Court is compromised. Quick Context. Mary McCord was the architect of all Trump targeting efforts. The FISA on Carter Page, the weaponization of the DOJ-NSD, the installation of Michael Atkinson as Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), the companion to Sally Yates in the Flynn targeting, lead staff for the Schiff/Nadler impeachment effort, later appointment by...
  • High Court Gives Biden Win for Now in Navy Vaccine Case

    03/25/2022 4:36:15 PM PDT · by nickcarraway · 52 replies
    AP News ^ | 3/25 | Jessica Gresko
    The Supreme Court is giving the Navy a freer hand determining what job assignments it gives to 35 sailors who sued after refusing on religious grounds to comply with an order to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The high court in a brief order Friday sided with the Biden administration and said that while the lawsuit plays out, the Navy may consider the sailors’ vaccination status in making deployment, assignment and other operational decisions. The group that sued includes mostly Navy SEALs. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that there was a “simple overarching reason” that he agreed with the court’s decision. The...
  • U.S. Supreme Court denies Trump's request to block the release of White House records (8-1)

    01/19/2022 3:17:41 PM PST · by janetjanet998 · 46 replies
    U.S. Supreme Court denies Trump's request to block the release of White House records from Jan. 6 "select committee" by an 8-1 vote.
  • SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN OSHA VACCINE MANDATE

    01/13/2022 11:38:54 AM PST · by rxsid · 402 replies
    citizenfreepress.com ^ | 01.13.2022 | Kane
    SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN OSHA VACCINE MANDATEBREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) January 13, 2022
  • Supreme Court Says No Religious Exemption from Covid Vaccination for N.Y. Health Workers

    12/13/2021 2:53:38 PM PST · by Tolerance Sucks Rocks · 48 replies
    MSN.com ^ | December 13, 2021 | Jess Bravin
    WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court turned down emergency requests by New York healthcare workers for a religious exemption from state requirements to vaccinate against Covid-19. A federal appeals court in New York previously denied the workers’ requests. The court denied the requests in brief written orders. As is typical for such emergency actions, the majority didn’t explain its thinking. Three conservative justices—Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch—said they would have allowed the exemptions. In October, the court denied a similar application from Maine healthcare workers seeking exemption from their state’s vaccination requirements, which lower courts had rejected. The same three conservatives...
  • U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Religious Challenge to New York Vaccine Mandate

    12/13/2021 2:47:10 PM PST · by jacknhoo · 27 replies
    Reuters via USNews ^ | Dec. 13, 2021, at 3:02 p.m. | By Andrew Chung
    By Andrew Chung (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected challenges brought by a group of Christian doctors and nurses and an organization that promotes vaccine skepticism to New York's refusal to allow religious exemptions to the state's mandate that healthcare workers be vaccinated against COVID-19. Acting in two cases, the justices denied emergency requests for an injunction requiring the state to permit religious exemptions while litigation over the mandate's legality continues in lower courts. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have granted the injunction. The Supreme Court previously rejected other challenges...
  • In 1st Ruling on State Mandates, High Court Won't Stop Vaccines for Maine Health Workers

    10/19/2021 3:08:19 PM PDT · by rarestia · 31 replies
    NewsMax ^ | Tuesday, 19 October 2021 04:37 PM | Staff
    The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to hear an emergency appeal of a vaccine requirement imposed on Maine health care workers, the latest defeat for opponents of vaccine mandates. It was the first time the Supreme Court weighed in on a statewide vaccine mandate. It previously rejected challenges of vaccine requirements for New York City teachers and Indiana University staff and students. Justice Stephen Breyer rejected the emergency appeal but left the door open to try again as the clock ticks on Maine’s mandate. The state will begin enforcing it Oct. 29. The Maine vaccine requirement that was put in...
  • Supreme Court won’t rule on governor’s pandemic authority

    10/04/2021 12:04:21 PM PDT · by Oldeconomybuyer · 62 replies
    The Associated Press ^ | October 4, 2021
    BOSTON (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday against hearing an appeal of a decision that found Gov. Charlie Baker did not overstep his authority with sweeping orders to close businesses and limit gatherings to control the coronavirus early in the pandemic. The nation’s highest court announced without comment Monday that it would not consider the appeal. The lawsuit argued that Baker had no authority to issue public health-related orders under the state’s Civil Defense Act, which it said was designed to protect the state from foreign invasions, insurrections, and catastrophic events like hurricanes and fires. The Massachusetts Supreme...
  • Supreme Court denies New York City teachers' request to block vaccine mandate

    10/01/2021 2:36:04 PM PDT · by cdnerds · 111 replies
    The Hill ^ | 10/01/2021 | The Hill
    The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request from a group of New York City public school teachers to block the city's coronavirus vaccine mandate.
  • Breaking--Justice Breyer: Trump’s 2020 Election Case Did Not Meet ‘Normal Criteria’ for Supreme Court

    09/12/2021 3:26:23 PM PDT · by White Lives Matter · 45 replies
    Breitbart ^ | September 12, 2021 | Pam Key
    Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said on this week’s broadcast of “Fox News Sunday” that they did not hear President Donald Trump’s 2020 election case because it did not meet “normal criteria.” Anchor Chris Wallace said, “One of your arguments against seeing the court’s political is the fact that it refused to even hear the appeals from the Trump campaign about the 2020 election. Didn’t even hear it them.” ......SNIP...... Wallace asked, “Why was that?” Breyer said, “Why was it? Because they didn’t bring a case, I guess, that met the normal criteria for being heard. When we decide to...
  • Does The President Have The Authority To Issue A Nationwide Ban On Evictions?

    08/04/2021 5:52:48 AM PDT · by MtnClimber · 44 replies
    Manhattan Contrarian ^ | 3 Aug, 2021 | Francis Menton
    As you may know, during the current pandemic, since the enactment of the so-called “CARES Act” in March 2020, there has been in effect, in various forms, a federal “moratorium” on evictions of rental tenants from their apartments. Thus some landlords have now gone well over a year without getting paid what they are owed, and with no access to any legal remedy. The most recent version of the “moratorium” expired on July 31 (Saturday). This version had been promulgated by the CDC on its own authority, without specific authorization from Congress. On Sunday (August 1) the Democratic Congressional leadership...
  • CDC issues new eviction ban for most of U.S. through Oct. 3

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Tuesday issued a new moratorium on evictions that would last until October 3, ending some of the political pressure being placed on President Joe Biden. The new moratorium could help keep millions in their homes as the coronavirus’ delta variant has spread and states have been slow to release federal rental aid. It would temporarily halt evictions in counties with “substantial and high levels” of virus transmissions and would cover areas where 90 percent of the U.S. population lives. The announcement was something of a reversal for the Biden administration after saying...
  • Kavanaugh Sides with Leftists Against Private Business Owners, Upholds CDC’s Moratorium on Evictions of Delinquent Tenants

    07/01/2021 10:44:28 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 34 replies
    NOQ Report ^ | 07/01/2021 | JD Rucker
    The Supreme Court held that the CDC can continue to impose a moratorium on evictions and foreclosures due to the Covid lockdowns causing millions to not pay rent or mortgages yesterday. It was made possible by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the so-called “conservative” Justice who sided with the four progressives.According to POLITICO [emphasis added]:The association had asked the court to act on an emergency basis to vacate a stay on a lower-court decision overturning the ban, saying the “stay will prolong the severe financial burdens borne by landlords under the moratorium for the past nine months.”The Centers for Disease Control and...
  • Supreme Court (5-4) denies landlords’ push to lift CDC ban on residential evictions

    06/29/2021 10:35:07 PM PDT · by 11th_VA · 32 replies
    Fox News ^ | June 29, 2021
    The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to lift the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s ban on residential evictions, which expires at the end of next month. The court voted 5-4 against lifting the ban put in place to help families during the COVID-19 pandemic. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett said they would grant the application, which was requested by a group of landlords. Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the justices who declined the application because he noted that the moratorium is set to expire in a few weeks, on July 31. "In my view,...
  • Supreme Court rejects the appeal by Christian grandma florist fined for refusing to service same-sex wedding: Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch Dissent

    07/03/2021 5:04:50 PM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 64 replies
    Christian Post ^ | 07/03/2021 | Emily Wood
    The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of a Christian florist from Washington state fined refusing to make a floral arrangement for a same-sex wedding because she felt it went against her religious beliefs about marriage. In doing so, the Washington Supreme Court ruling against the Christian florist remains intact. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch each said the court should have taken the case. Though the case dates back to 2013, religious liberty legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom said the fight to defend Barronelle Stutzman, the owner of Arlene’s Flowers and Gifts in Richland, Washington,...
  • Justice Stephen Breyer hires law clerks for the Supreme Court's fall term, hinting that he won't be retiring

    07/02/2021 2:07:32 PM PDT · by outofsalt · 33 replies
    Business Insider ^ | 07/02/2021 | Kelly McLaughlin and Oma Seddiq
    "Progressives have called for Breyer to step down so Biden could nominate his successor."
  • Is the Supreme Court gaslighting us?

    07/01/2021 4:25:01 AM PDT · by MtnClimber · 31 replies
    American Thinker ^ | 1 Jul, 2021 | John Green
    George Washington University Law School Professor Jonathon Turley has posited that recent unanimous Supreme Court rulings may be the court sending a message to politicians. Facing threats to pack the Supreme Court and calls for Justice Stephen Breyer to resign, Turley believes the court is making a rare show of unity. Apparently, the logic is that if they show that they’re not ideological (I know, don’t laugh), the Democrats will understand that packing the court won’t make any difference. They’re trying to validate Chief Justice John Robert’s claim that there are no “Obama judges” or “Trump judges.” There’s just one...
  • Justice Alito Bristles at Conservative Supreme Court's Incremental Course

    06/27/2021 1:46:48 PM PDT · by nickcarraway · 51 replies
    The Hill ^ | 06/25/21 | JOHN KRUZEL
    Justice Samuel Alito has drawn attention for his fiery criticism of Supreme Court rulings, with some court watchers especially struck by the degree of barely concealed hostility he directed at fellow conservative justices. Alito voiced opposition last week as the court, now with six conservative justices and three liberals, handed a narrow win to a Catholic charity and spared ObamaCare from a GOP challenge. The two decisions signaled the court may not be moving as far or as fast to the right as some expected. “My guess is that he's frustrated with what appear to be political compromises to reach...
  • The Supreme Court Will Never Be Conservatives' Savior

    06/25/2021 3:39:19 AM PDT · by Kaslin · 14 replies
    Townhall.com ^ | June 25, 2021 | Josh Hammer
    For decades, going back at least as far as the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that concocted a constitutional right to abortion, conservatives have placed a great emphasis on winning back culture war ground through judicial nominations. As a consequence of that, Republicans have consistently told political pollsters that the Supreme Court is their top voting issue at a far higher clip than Democrats have. The Court, for instance, was certainly the decisive issue in the hotly contested 2016 presidential election. As the current Court term winds down -- one featuring a putative 6-3 "conservative" majority, including three new nominees...