Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fifth Circuit Assigns A.A.R.P. v. Trump To New Panel For Reargument, Judge Ho Concurs
Reason ^ | 5/20/25 | Josh Blackmon

Posted on 05/20/2025 3:25:49 PM PDT by CFW

On Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court remanded A.A.R.P. v. Trump to the Fifth Circuit with very precise instructions.

[snip]

Last Friday, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment of our court, which had dismissed this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Court remanded the case back to us for further proceedings, and directed us to proceed "expeditiously." A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. _, _ (2025). Accordingly, this matter is expedited to the next available randomly designated regular oral argument panel.

Judge Ho wrote an seven-page concurrence. He defended his colleague, Judge Wes Hendrix, against an unfair attack from the Supreme Court:

As an inferior court, we're duty-bound to follow Supreme Court rulings—whether we agree with them or not. We don't have to like it. But we have to do it. So I concur in our order today expediting our consideration of this matter, as directed by the Supreme Court. But I write to state my sincere concerns about how the district judge as well as the President and other officials have been treated in this case. I worry that the disrespect they have been shown will not inspire continued respect for the judiciary, without which we cannot long function. See, e.g., In re Westcott, 135 F.4th 243, 250–51 (5th Cir. 2025) (Ho, J., concurring).

Ho responds to Chief Justice Roberts, who boasts that the role of the Supreme Court is to check the other branches:

It is not the role of the judiciary to check the excesses of the other branches, any more than it's our role to check the excesses of any other American citizen. Judges do not roam the countryside looking for opportunities to chastise government officials for their mistakes. Rather, our job is simply to decide those legal disputes over which Congress has given us jurisdiction.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 5thcircuit; aarp; aarpvtrump; alienenemiesact; aliens; deportation; fifthcircuit; illegalaliens; jamesho; judgeho; judgewatch; lawfare; scotus; supremefart; texas; thesupremefart; weshendrix; wmmvtrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Go to the site and read the entire piece. It's a pretty good statement by Judge Ho. I'm looking for a link to the opinion itself.
1 posted on 05/20/2025 3:25:49 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CottonBall; spacejunkie2001; Bshaw; ptsal; 11th_VA; Reno89519; newfreep; frogjerk; OneVike; ...

Here is a link to Judge Ho’s Order if you are interested. It’s just 9 pages.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69913684/25/1/aarp-v-trump/


2 posted on 05/20/2025 3:32:45 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I like this guy!


3 posted on 05/20/2025 3:36:21 PM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

His wife, Heidi, is also nice.


4 posted on 05/20/2025 3:54:32 PM PDT by I-ambush (From the brightest star comes the blackest hole. You had so much to offer, why didya offer your sou?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: I-ambush

Also his brothers Tally and Gung


5 posted on 05/20/2025 3:57:46 PM PDT by Palio di Siena (Kralik…..you get the wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Palio di Siena

“ Also his brothers Tally and Gung”

Sister Justa hasn’t been heard from.


6 posted on 05/20/2025 4:01:26 PM PDT by KingLudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CFW

https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/2025-05-20-AAPR-v-Trump.pdf


7 posted on 05/20/2025 4:03:09 PM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Last Friday’s shenanigans from the Supreme Fart:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1007_g2bh.pdf


8 posted on 05/20/2025 4:06:07 PM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingLudd

Cousin Arapa is in


9 posted on 05/20/2025 4:07:10 PM PDT by Palio di Siena (Kralik…..you get the wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Thanks for posting the link to the order by SCOTUS. I should have included that link to provide background information in my original posting.


10 posted on 05/20/2025 4:14:03 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I-ambush

what about his Uncle Ho?


11 posted on 05/20/2025 4:20:57 PM PDT by God luvs America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I don’t think I’ve ever heard of a district court giving SCOTUS such a spanking.


12 posted on 05/20/2025 4:45:14 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingLudd
“Sister Justa hasn't been heard from.”
____________

Ironically, her twin brother Justin Prude has been quite successful in Canadian politics

13 posted on 05/20/2025 4:55:48 PM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFW

*


14 posted on 05/20/2025 5:10:00 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

His brother Bing is cool.

But I can’t stand his Dad Firenthe


15 posted on 05/20/2025 5:15:57 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I knew AARP had gone heavily toward the Leftist side but couldn’t believe they were so upset their maids and yard guys were being deported. They probably are but Wikipedia cleared it up in a footnote:

“The case was originally brought on behalf of two detainees using the pseudonyms A.A.R.P. and W.M.M. The court changed the case’s caption to W.M.M. v. Trump after the AARP sought to intervene, citing potential confusion with the lead plaintiff’s pseudonym and the retired adult advocacy organization.”


16 posted on 05/20/2025 5:17:49 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (Listen to me now, think about it later and cry about it some other day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikelTackNailer

This apparently caused the ‘real’ AARP a lot of problems with complaints and queries :-)


17 posted on 05/20/2025 5:19:26 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Of course I had to go an look up what this case was about in the first place as I did not recognize it by the case name.


18 posted on 05/20/2025 5:43:48 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

He’s right in his smackdown of Roberts. The Chief Justice made it sound like the SC is there to police the other branches of government.


19 posted on 05/20/2025 6:27:06 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palio di Siena

How about Ida?


20 posted on 05/20/2025 6:47:36 PM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson