Free Republic 1st Qtr 2026 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $3,355
4%  
Woo hoo!! And now only $695 to reach 5%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: scotus

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Unhinged Rep. Jasmine Crockett Tells the Supreme Court “*$#! You” for Torpedoing Her Career After Ruling Clears Texas Redistricting

    01/05/2026 10:47:18 AM PST · by Red Badger · 64 replies
    Gateway Pundit ^ | January 05, 2026 | Jim Hᴏft
    Rep. Jasmine Crockett lashed out at the United States Supreme Court after a major ruling that cleared the way for Texas Republicans to implement a new congressional map. On December 4, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 6–3 emergency order granting a request from Texas Republicans to stay a lower court injunction that had blocked the state’s newly enacted redistricting plan. The decision allows Texas to proceed with the map for the 2026 midterm elections while litigation continues on the merits. Under the new map, Republicans could net as many as five additional House seats, reflecting...
  • What Happened to the Homicide Rate After the Supreme Court’s Bruen Decision?

    01/01/2026 4:18:41 AM PST · by marktwain · 24 replies
    AmmoLand ^ | December 30, 2025 | Dean Weingarten
    On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued a decision in N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen. Prior to the Bruen decision, Courts of Appeal in Progressive-dominated Circuits, such as the Ninth and Second circuits, had refused to honor Second Amendment precedent established in the Heller and McDonald decisions. Bruen admonished the lower courts for creating a procedure to treat the Second Amendment as a second-class right. Bruen created a simple test to determine if a statute was allowed by the Second Amendment. The Bruen case clarified that “bear” in the “right to...
  • Trump says National Guard being removed from Chicago, LA and Portland

    12/31/2025 3:35:20 PM PST · by E. Pluribus Unum · 26 replies
    Reuters ^ | December 31, 20255:07 PM CST | Kanishka Singh
    SummaryLocal leaders have criticized National Guard deployment Policy has faced legal challenges Trump says federal forces will 'come back' if crime rises WASHINGTON, Dec 31 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday his administration was removing the National Guard from Chicago, Los Angeles and Portland but he added in his social media post that federal forces will "come back" if crime rates go up.Local leaders in those cities and Democrats have said the deployments, which have faced legal challenges, were unnecessary. They have accused the Trump administration of federal overreach and of exaggerating isolated episodes of violence at...
  • CBS reporter calls it 'patently false' and 'dangerous' to claim Supreme Court is 'corrupt'

    12/29/2025 10:18:16 PM PST · by Olog-hai · 15 replies
    Fox News ^ | December 29, 2025 5:00pm EST | Lindsay Kornick
    CBS News’ chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford criticized the mainstream media’s coverage of the Supreme Court, calling it “dangerous” to claim the high court was “corrupt.” Crawford joined CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday to discuss what the panel considered the most underreported stories of the year. While some panelists cited the blanket use of pardons and cuts to the federal workforce as examples, Crawford instead pointed to a narrative she considered overreported: alleged political corruption in the Supreme Court. “You know, there is a narrative that the Supreme Court is corrupt,” Crawford said. “I mean, we saw that emerge...
  • SCOTUS Dockets Harris Eligibility Case

    12/29/2025 8:45:28 PM PST · by CDR Kerchner · 21 replies
    The Post Email Newspaper ^ | 29 Dec 2025 | Sharon Rondeau
    (Dec. 29, 2025) — New York State resident and registered voter Montgomery Blair Sibley, who challenged the claimed “natural born Citizen” status of former Vice President Kamala Harris, reported Monday on his Substack and website that the U.S. Supreme Court has docketed his petition for a Writ of Certiorari in his long-running “eligibility” case. The action came after Sibley appealed a dismissal from the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court. ... continue reading at: https://www.thepostemail.com/2025/12/29/scotus-dockets-harris-eligibility-case/
  • President Trump could now deploy the MARINES to Chicago after Democrats brought the case up to SCOTUS

    12/25/2025 11:47:32 AM PST · by DFG · 35 replies
    X ^ | 12/24/2025 | Eric Daugherty
    🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump could now deploy the MARINES to Chicago after Democrats brought the case up to SCOTUS "The unintended consequence here might be POTUS has to call the 82nd Airborne, or the Marines, or the 101st Airborne Division, like President Eisenhower did after Brown v Board." "Trump might have to do that first to protect federal buildings and ICE agents. THEN, if they fail, he can then call out the National Guard." HUGE BACKFIRE! DO IT!
  • Supreme Court rules on legality of Trump National Guard deployment to Illinois

    12/24/2025 9:47:57 AM PST · by Alas Babylon! · 31 replies
    Fox News ^ | 24 Dec 2025 | Breanne Deppisch
    The Supreme Court rejected the Trump administration's request to allow the president to proceed with immediately deploying National Guard troops to Chicago — delivering a blow, if temporary, to President Donald Trump as he seeks to expand his federalization push across the U.S. The justices declined the Trump administration’s emergency request to overturn a ruling by U.S. District Judge April Perry that had blocked the deployment of troops. An appeals court also had refused to step in. The Supreme Court took more than two months to act.
  • Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois

    12/23/2025 12:35:18 PM PST · by DFG · 73 replies
    NBC News ^ | 12/23/2025 | Lawrence Hurley
    The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed the Trump administration over its plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois over the strenuous objections of local officials. The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area. In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administration’s view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service...
  • How the Supreme Court could sway the midterms: Big decisions might prove decisive in the elections

    12/21/2025 9:06:47 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 9 replies
    Spectator World ^ | 12/20/2025 | Chris Mondics
    Each Supreme Court term typically includes at least one explosive case that inflames political passions and captures the public imagination. When the court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, or when it greatly broadened presidential immunity, as it did last year in Trump v. the United States, or when it ruled against race-based college admissions in 2023, it reaffirmed its centrality and reminded voters that it mattered. As it happens, very few Americans can name the chief justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (surveys show it is consistently under 16 percent), but most know instinctively the high...
  • Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Argues Presidents Should Not Be Able to Fire Government Experts

    12/10/2025 4:21:47 PM PST · by Olog-hai · 68 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 8 Dec 2025 | Elizabeth Weibel
    Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argued that the president of the United States should not be able to fire government experts such as scientists, doctors, economists, and PhDs, and she claimed it is “not in the best interest” of American citizens. During oral arguments for Trump v. Slaughter, while talking to U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer, Jackson said she did “not understand” why “agencies aren’t answering to Congress.” Jackson pointed out that “Congress established them and can eliminate them.” The oral arguments come after the Supreme Court, in September, allowed President Donald Trump to remove Rebecca Kelly Slaughter,...
  • John Yoo: Supreme Court showdown exposes shaky case against birthright citizenship

    12/10/2025 2:25:18 PM PST · by where's_the_Outrage? · 102 replies
    Fox News ^ | Dec 10, 2025 | John Yoo
    On Friday, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear challenges to President Donald Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship. The 14th Amendment automatically makes all babies born on American territory citizens. Trump’s effort to overturn the traditional reading of the constitutional text and history should not succeed. Ratified in 1868, the 14th Amendment provided a constitutional definition of citizenship for the first time. It declares that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." In antebellum America, states...
  • Humphrey's Executor On The Ropes

    12/10/2025 7:40:49 AM PST · by MtnClimber · 13 replies
    Manhattan Contrarian ^ | 9 Dec, 2025 | Francis Menton
    Can Congress create federal agencies with power to enforce the laws and prosecute crimes, but which agencies are outside the control of the President? In a 1935 decision called Humphrey’s Executor, the Supreme Court held that it could. I first wrote about this subject in a post back in December 2016 titled “Can The Separation Of Powers Of The Federal Government Be Righted?” December 2016 was immediatey after Donald Trump had first been elected President, but before he had taken office. The backdrop of the post was the issue of the extent to which the newly-elected President Trump would be...
  • SCOTUS Can Stop Blue Cities From Forcing Energy Diktats On The Rest Of The Country

    12/09/2025 11:40:01 AM PST · by Signalman · 8 replies
    The Federalist ^ | 12/9/2025 | Christopher Mills
    This week, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider a basic constitutional reality: county officials from Boulder, Colorado, cannot force their preferred climate policies on the rest of the nation. Obvious as it seems, that is what’s at stake in Suncor Energy Inc. v. Boulder County, a climate change case the court will weigh for review on Dec. 12. Like the other thirty-odd copycat climate lawsuits filed by states and localities from Honolulu to my hometown of Charleston, Boulder’s suit weaponizes tort law to try to transform state courts into vehicles for deploying sweeping climate mandates. If Boulder gets its way,...
  • Supreme Court Vacates Ruling That Upheld New York School Vaccine Mandate

    12/09/2025 7:40:21 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 4 replies
    Epoch Times ^ | 12/09/2025 | Zachary Stieber
    The Supreme Court on Dec. 8 vacated a ruling upholding New York’s ban on religious exemptions to its school vaccine mandate and ordered a lower court to review its stance on the ban. The case is known as Miller v. McDonald. Justices vacated the March decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which had found the legislation banning religious exemptions to vaccination requirements was “neutral on its face” and did not “target or affirmatively prohibit religious practices.” The justices directed the appeals court to reconsider its ruling in light of Mahmoud v. Taylor, a Supreme Court...
  • Supreme Court revives Amish challenge to New York student vaccination requirement

    12/09/2025 5:42:21 PM PST · by CFW · 6 replies
    Christian Post ^ | 12/8/25 | Michael Gryboski,
    The U.S. Supreme Court has revived a lawsuit filed by a group of Amish parents against a New York state law that removes a religious exemption to school immunizations. In an orders list released Monday, the Supreme Court vacated a lower court ruling against the parents and other plaintiffs in the case of Joseph Miller et al. v. James McDonald et al. The case was sent back to the lower court for consideration in light of Mahmoud v. Taylor, a Supreme Court decision from June in which the high court ruled 6-3 that parents can opt their children out of...
  • Supreme Court Signals Support for Trump Admin in Landmark FTC Firing Case

    12/09/2025 6:02:43 AM PST · by V_TWIN · 15 replies
    townhall.com ^ | December 08, 2025 | Dmitri Bolt
    The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in the case of Trump v. Slaughter, which centers on whether the president has the authority to fire a member of the Federal Trade Commission without cause. A ruling in favor of the Trump administration would overturn a nearly century-old precedent. The Court seems poised to rule in favor of allowing the president to fire, without cause, members of independent executive agencies. Oral arguments lasted only 2.5 hours, as the Court's conservative majority appeared favorable to the administration's arguments, with Justice Neil Gorsuch arguing that those independent agencies constitute an...
  • Supreme Court appears poised to rule for Trump on independent agency firings (more winning)

    12/08/2025 11:02:54 AM PST · by CaptainK · 43 replies
    NBC News ^ | 12/8/25 | ZLawrence Hurley
    The Supreme Court on Monday appeared poised to side with President Donald Trump and allow him to fire a member of the Federal Trade Commission without cause, a provocative move aimed at upending the long-standing concept of independent federal agencies. In a significant case on the structure of the federal government, the conservative-majority court heard oral arguments on whether Trump had the authority to fire Rebecca Kelly Slaughter notwithstanding a law enacted by Congress to insulate the agency from political pressures. The 1914 law that set up the FTC says members can be removed only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty,...
  • Why the Supreme Court May Reject Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order

    12/06/2025 7:49:31 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 61 replies
    Red State ^ | 12/06/2025 | Joe Cunningham
    For the first time, the Supreme Court will directly confront the legality of Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The politics around the case are loud and predictable. But the constitutional question at the center of it is much quieter, and far more consequential: Can any president, Republican or Democrat, unilaterally reinterpret the Fourteenth Amendment? After reviewing the Court’s recent decisions and the skepticism justices have already shown toward this executive order, it’s clear that the conservative majority may not be willing to hand the White House a power this sweeping. In fact, the justices most hostile to broad...
  • The Supreme Court Is Poised to Strike Down Race-Based Redistricting

    12/06/2025 6:37:00 PM PST · by E. Pluribus Unum · 10 replies
    Chronicles Magazine ^ | December 2025 | Stephen B. Presser
    Abortion, religion, and race were the three intractable constitutional law conundrums of the second half of the 20th century. Back in the 1960s and ’70s, the justices of the Warren and Burger Supreme Courts felt compelled to step in and resolve them, though their constitutional warrant so to do was anything but clear. As readers of this magazine are well aware, for decades American society has been roiled by what we are slowly coming to see as the Supreme Court’s unwarranted judicial audacity—if not impudence, arrogance, and illegitimacy. Since Richard Nixon’s campaign in 1968, Republicans have been seeking to...
  • On the Sweeping Supreme Court Decision That Led to Widespread High School Censorship

    12/06/2025 3:55:39 PM PST · by ProgressingAmerica · 17 replies
    LiteraryHub ^ | November 25, 2025 | Kate Eichhorn
    Since the late 19th century, school yearbooks have been a ubiquitous and mostly unchanging element of American school life. Decade after decade, they deliver a predictable mix of class, club, and team photos, cheesy graphics, and cringey comments. But the most consistent feature of yearbooks may be what they don’t include—references to political upheaval or resistance movements. As public schools across the United States face heightened censorship and the threat of funding losses for noncompliance, school yearbooks remind us that there is nothing new about political censorship in schools. A few rare examples also reveal that there some students and...