Posted on 12/29/2025 8:45:28 PM PST by CDR Kerchner
(Dec. 29, 2025) — New York State resident and registered voter Montgomery Blair Sibley, who challenged the claimed “natural born Citizen” status of former Vice President Kamala Harris, reported Monday on his Substack and website that the U.S. Supreme Court has docketed his petition for a Writ of Certiorari in his long-running “eligibility” case.
The action came after Sibley appealed a dismissal from the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court. ... continue reading at: https://www.thepostemail.com/2025/12/29/scotus-dockets-harris-eligibility-case/
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Just like with odoofus the illegal islamic, this case against kamalaladingdong legs up will find itself relegated to File 13.
The usurper U.S. Senator Kamala Harris and usurper VP was born at best a dual-Citizen depending on the outcome of the “Birthright Citizenship” previously taken up by SCOTUS, if Harris is even a U.S. Citizen at all when she was born in CA to parents temporarily in the USA on student VISA’s. See more on that argument here: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2025/09/22/kamala-harris-was-not-even-a-u-s-citizen-at-all-when-she-was-born-in-ca/
Being born a Citizen of Jamaica she thus is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of United States with ‘Unity of Citizenship’ and ‘Sole Allegiance’ to USA.
Per the original meaning and intent of the 14th Amendment she is not entitled to ‘Birthright Citizenship‘. She was first and foremost a Citizen of Jamaica at birth via her foreign national, Jamaican citizen father. See: https://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/Kamala-Harris-petition-not-constitutionally-eligible-for-VP-or-Pres.pdf
I just had a flashback to 2020-2021 where the filing of doomed proceedings was trumpeted in articles like this as some big deal. All this means is he filed his Petition for Writ of Certiorari. SCOTUS isn’t going to touch this with a ten foot pole. They read the papers and the majority is already aware of allegations that they’ve been acting as Trump’s lapdogs. Wake me when they grant the writ
She served 4 years. Like the Kenyan it’s too late. Y must U bother?
Wake me when they grant the writ
**********************************
Rest well.... you’ll have a long sleep. ;-)
If the court would agree based on her parents statuses, any future candidates with the same background are by default, not eleigible.
It sets a precedent for future candidates. Thats why its always been important to have this stuff ruled on. Otherwise you get people in place who don’t meet the constitutional requirements.
Fine but she got away with it. The time to do it is before it happens. Some people are not vigilant like the left.
It could affect Rubio, directly, if Harris is ruled ineligible going forward, I would think.
If hes got the same issue, it should affect him.
I agree with you, but scotus and the courts need a case in order to rule. If no one brings one, theres no chance for a ruling. Our republicans, or even the RNC or a comservative political organization could have brought them up as a case through the courts, but never did.
I believe it is the same issue, born in America, but to parents who weren’t American citizens at the time.
If so, he’s not eligible.
We’ll have to see what the court rules. However I’m more than willing to sacrifice Little Marco from running for President if we can prevent future anchor babies from becoming President one day. It could even be a factor in why he’s recently said he’s not planning on contesting JD for 28, who knows.
It is also interesting that it’s happening at the same time the court is considering whether anchor babies are even citizens, much less “natural born” ones. If they were going to “kill two birds with one stone” so to speak now would be a great time to do it!
Anchor babies should not be given citizen status. No other countries save another idiot one, does this. Its an insane notion when the parents are citizens of another country and the entire world recognizes this simple truth.
It turns citizenship into a purely geographical birth location issue. If the woman can get her legs over the finish line and squirt the kid out they get citizenship? Nope. You two are not citizens, obviously the kid is a citizen of the country in which the parents are citizens of.
Its such a no brainer everywhere else in the world, despite disagreeing on just about everything major, they agree on this point.
They ignored Obama so they would ignore her too.
There IS no “guarantee of birthright citizenship” in our US Constitution, US Code, Statutory or Case law. There is only bureaucratic history, administrative compliance to issue birth certificates to everyone to rely on for this error in judgment.
The 14th Amendment makes it CLEAR that, ONLY children of US Citizens, or those otherwise under the jurisdiction of our Constitution (those living in territories, on reservations, etc) NOT of a foreign country are born as US citizens.
This is SO simple it’s why the founders and congress left it alone; only referencing “natural born citizens” in our Constitution. it wasn’t until the 1860’s AFTER the war between the states was settled. Until this time, it was understood that “natural born citizen” meant only a citizen can produce a citizen.
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” – 14th Amendment
Children born of parents who are NOT “subjects” (as in “subjects of the crown” – CITIZENS) can NOT BE citizens themselves by “birthright.”.
That pesky little coordinating conjunction “and” certainly does confuse people, especially the semiliterate and agenda-driven lawyers and jurists today and for several decades past who haven’t understood a WORD of our US Constitution much less really read it in the context of its writing.
For reference: Coordinating Conjunctions
“And” is a coordinating conjunction used to join words, phrases, or clauses that are of equal importance and grammatical structure. It is one of the seven coordinating conjunctions in English, which can be remembered using the acronym FANBOYS (For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, So).
In the words of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (RIP) “The constitution says what it says and doesn’t say what it doesn’t say.”
???
To stop the next one.
Dovetails with the NBC case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.