Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $12,693
15%  
Woo hoo!! And now less than $300 to reach 16%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: environmentally

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Can America Afford to 'Go Green'?

    04/24/2009 4:05:33 AM PDT · by rmarley · 21 replies · 769+ views
    ABC News ^ | April 22, 2009 | DAN HARRIS
    Strange-looking synthetic trees that suck carbon dioxide out of the air. Algae that can turn into gas. A candy factory fueled by methane from a local dump. At an Earth Day celebration in Newton, Iowa, today, President Obama said the United States must lead the world in renewable energy. He said his energy plan would simultaneously help the environment and the economy.
  • Bush Will Push Nuclear Power As Clean, 'Renewable' Energy

    01/12/2005 5:33:11 AM PST · by Brilliant · 77 replies · 1,178+ views
    THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ^ | January 12, 2005 | JOHN J. FIALKA
    President Bush says the nation needs advanced nuclear-power plants, calling them a clean, "renewable" energy source for the future... New Mexico Republican Pete V. Domenici... said he welcomed Mr. Bush's remarks. "Without any question," he said, the long-term electricity-generating alternative to the nation's dwindling supplies of natural gas "will have to be nuclear power. If America is afraid of it, the world will use" advanced nuclear technology. Sen. Domenici is expected to offer an energy bill that will include financial incentives for the first new nuclear-power plants. Nuclear power now supplies 20% of the nation's electricity, according to the U.S....
  • Moralizing Environmentalist Dogma Is Immoral: Deadly Consequences of Green Policies Often Ignored

    10/29/2004 7:27:11 AM PDT · by MikeEdwards · 1 replies · 335+ views
    Canada Free Press ^ | October 29, 2004 | E. Calvin Beisner, Ph.D., and Rabbi Daniel Lapin
    With the presidential election only days away, John Kerry is getting a free pass as the more "environmentally-friendly" candidate. But voters need to take a much closer look at the credibility of organizations pushing that line before accepting it at face value. The Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, and other eco-activist groups insist the Bush administration isn't just misguided, it's immoral. Whether "gutting" environmental laws, "waging war" on the environment, colluding with "polluters," the dogmatic gist is that "W" stands for "World-killer." One might expect unimpeachable ethical standards from "white hat" critics like these. However, their notion of ethics...