the clintons' scheme to take over the world in 4 easy steps (NB: dwarfs)

12.17.03 | Mia T

[Mia T]

the clintons' scheme to take over the world in 4 easy steps (NB: dwarfs)

by Mia T, 12.17.03

 

 

hillary talks: L'Etat, c'est moi!
(Iowa parsed)

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

1. Privately encourage/sponsor most -- (I don't think Kucinich, Graham and Sharpton were on the clinton short list) -- of the dwarfs. (Group dynamics, if not political reflex, will ensure a mutual kill.)

2. Insert clinton "infrastructure" people in dwarf staffs (strictly as loaners) to ensure (a) that the dwarfs stick to clinton playbook and, equally important, (b) that no dwarf actually wins the presidency.

3. Script and direct playbook, which is, basically, bash Bush, bash the war, (look stupid, look weak, look irrational).

4. Continuously loop steps 1-3 even as the missus undermines the dwarfs by playing the hawk... and the military ("the easy part") expert, (Remember Al From!) and the patriot... and The Rock Star, while the co-rapist keeps his mouth (relatively) shut.

hillary talks:
ON MILITARY TACTICS ("The you know Easy Part")

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent2

hyperlinked images of shame
copyright Mia T 2003
.

by Mia T, 4.6.03

 

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

 

Mia T, THE ALIENS

 

Al From is sounding the alarm. "Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections."

Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem.

From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason.

That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically.

When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.)

Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent.

With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity.

With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.

The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.

 

ADDENDUM 12.13.03:

As for pathologic self-interest, check out Richard Miniter's C-SPAN interview; the interview is contained in my latest virtual hillary movie (below), hillary talks:ON TERROR; it is absolutely devastating for the clintons. Miniter lays out in sickening detail the clintons' monumental failure to protect America.

Note in particular Madeleine Albright's shocking reason given at the time of the USS Cole attack why the clinton administration should not respond militarily. It tell us everything we need to know about the clintons. It tell us why clinton redux is an absolutely suicidal notion.

Notwithstanding their cowardice, corruption, perfidy and essential stupidity, the clintons, according to Albright, made their decision not to go after the terrorists primarily to enhance their own legacy and power. The clintons calculated that such inaction would MAXIMIZE THEIR CHANCES TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. No matter that that inaction would also maximize the terrorists' power, maximize America's danger.

 

 

hillary talks:ON TERROR
(reinstalling the clintons in the White House has one advantage over suicide)

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

 

 

A Scoundrel's Pythagorean Imperative

Mia T, 12.14.03

z = distance between flag lapel pin and chin

d = distance between midpoint of chin and jowl

y = distance between the midpoint of chin and top button

x = distance between top button and flag lapel pin

 

 by Mia T, December 7, 2003

 

issus clinton failed to notice: 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. How fitting it is that the clintons were forced to reveal their inept and treasonous hand on this day, exactly 62 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

One has to surmise from hillary clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize.

(Incidentally, someone ought to clue in clinton's dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit"... or to the sharper subset, "fatuous dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit attempts ingénue exculpation ploy." What could they be thinking? Surely, clinton "infrastructure" knows that such a scheme requires freshness of face, not mouth....)

It is common knowledge that missus clinton limits the frequency, intensity and content of her cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Tim Russert's (Meet the Press, NBC) stomach-turning HILLARY 2004! boosterism and nonexistent follow-ups ("And why do you suppose there aren't enough troops to fight a war, missus CLINTON?") made it clear that she had the latter two -- intensity and content -- covered today. It was frequency that did her in.

Tokyo Rose also aided and abetted our enemies by using psychological warfare designed to lower the morale of our troops; and she was convicted of treason. One could easily argue that clinton's betrayal, because it is ultimately self-serving, is an even greater iniquity. And then, of course, there are the clintons' other self-serving treasonous acts....

 

Russert, therefore, was not only on the wrong page. He was in the wrong book.

The question isn't,
"Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?"

The question is,--
"Who in his right mind would want the seditious, America-undermining clintons unconfined?"
 

hillary talks: ON MILITARY TACTICS
("The Easy Part")

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)



hillary talks:ON TERROR
(reinstalling the clintons in the White House has one advantage over suicide)

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

hillary's Iraq Turkeys

1996 -- Another Self-Serving clinton Thanksgiving Jaunt

MORE  

[Mia T]

make that: "while the co-rapist keeps his everything (relatively) zipped."

[Mia T]

oops: "while the co-rapist keeps everything (relatively) zipped."

[Mia T]

ping

[backhoe]

Notwithstanding their cowardice, corruption, perfidy and essential stupidity, the clintons, according to Albright, made their decision not to go after the terrorists primarily to enhance their own legacy and power. The clintons calculated that such inaction would MAXIMIZE THEIR CHANCES TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. No matter that that inaction would also maximize the terrorists' power, maximize America's danger.

Mia, I can recall at least two incidents ( there may have been more ) where the nuclear football- the briefcase containing the launch codes- was not only out of Clinton's sight, it may have been lost for a while.

If that doesn't illustrate the Clintons cavalier attitude toward American security, nothing does.

[philman_36]

The clintons calculated that such inaction would MAXIMIZE THEIR CHANCES TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE.

CHA-CHING! We have a winner!

[WorkingClassFilth]

I think you had it right the first time...

"while the co-rapist keeps his everything (relatively) zipped."

That just about covers the whole enchilada including the abnormal development of hillary, the arrested development of bill and the fundamental mechanics of their business alliance.

On other topics...

"The clintons calculated that such inaction would MAXIMIZE THEIR CHANCES TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE."

Does anyone recall the chain of events and timing that led to them pressuring the Nobel committee to fork over the goods to bill? I seem to recall that the campaign was in the closing weeks of his reign and that it included such coarsely manipulative and mendacious acts that I actually felt embarrassed for the fools.

[WorkingClassFilth]

Oops!

My bad:

"...I actually felt embarrassed for the fools."

Should read:

"...I actually felt embarrassed for the swine.

[MamaLucci]

Russert's lack of follow-up while lobbing
soft balls hillary's! way was truly pathetic.
I've seen Larry King do tougher interviews. ;)

[Brian Allen]

<< Notwithstanding their cowardice, corruption, perfidy and essential stupidity, the clintons .... >>

The fact that pair of predatory, treasonous, lying, looting, mass-murdering, co-serial-rapist, RICO-racketeering gangster bastards represent a manifestation of evil that is, thank G-d, beyond a decent mans ability to grasp and/or to comprehend, is a given.

But notwithstanding the enormity of that evil it is always their monumental stupidity that grabs me by the throat.

That the psychopathological pair of them were able to criminally convert our nation's once most hallowed house and the office it represents to their criminally-insane pursuits -- and for eight long years bemanure them both -- casts doubt upon our collective intelligence and will remain a stain upon our beloved FRaternal republic's character for ages yet to come.

And, please G-d, that it does not prove to be the death of us.

Blessings, Beautiful Lady -- Brian

[Mia T]

 

The Nobel as clinton Pavlovian stimulus--a timeline:
(In this season of gift horses and attack dogs, let us not forget the good clinton dog, Buddy...)

WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East.

Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk
White House Lobbied For Clinton Nobel Peace Prize
Updated Friday, October 13, 2000
By Rita Cosby
 

 

There's been speculation in the last few months that Clinton was pursuing a Mideast peace accord in an effort to win the prize and secure his legacy as president.

AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL

 

 

At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.

Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers

 

ADDENDUM 12.13.03:

As for pathologic self-interest, check out Richard Miniter's C-SPAN interview; the interview is contained in my latest virtual hillary movie (below), hillary talks:ON TERROR; it is absolutely devastating for the clintons. Miniter lays out in sickening detail the clintons' monumental failure to protect America.

Note in particular Madeleine Albright's shocking reason given at the time of the USS Cole attack why the clinton administration should not respond militarily. It tell us everything we need to know about the clintons. It tell us why clinton redux is an absolutely suicidal notion.

Notwithstanding their cowardice, corruption, perfidy and essential stupidity, the clintons, according to Albright, made their decision not to go after the terrorists primarily to enhance their own legacy and power. The clintons calculated that such inaction would MAXIMIZE THEIR CHANCES TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. No matter that that inaction would also maximize the terrorists' power, maximize America's danger.

The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent2

 

 

Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers

 

By MIA T

 

 

HAPPAQUA, N.Y., Jan. 4 -- The clinton-PR-machine-generated report of the death of Buddy, the impeached ex-president's chocolate Labrador, raises more questions than it answers. The report states: "Buddy playfully took after a contractor leaving the Clinton home about noon and was struck by a sport utility vehicle on Route 117 at the bottom of Old House Lane...Neither Mr. Clinton nor Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton were [sic] home at the time. The only comment they will make on the matter is by way of a statement issued by Mrs. Clinton's office: 'My best memory is that I did not have any involvement in that death.'" 

Buddy
1997-2002

 The report fails to explain how Buddy was able to wrest from the strong arm of the Secret Service and negotiate the multimillion-dollar, taxpayer-financed retrofits that were installed to make the poorly located suburban house safe for the universally despised former first couple. The report also fails to include a timeline detailing the whereabouts of the clintons on the day of the death. The clinton report's indictment of a sport utility vehicle (SUV) has caused incipient whispers of a vast left-wing conspiracy and the ever-expanding list of dead adverse clinton witnesses to fill the Senate cloakroom.

 

Buddy was a 1997 'gift' from a 'benefactor' who subscribed to the notion: "If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog," particularly sage advice for a DC couple forever mired in scandal and antipathy. Whether Buddy also subscribed to that notion was questioned as recently as last January when he entangled himself in clinton's legs, dropping the impeached ex-president to the pavement; clinton insisted at the time that there was no malevolence involved, that they were simply playing a game of fetch. clinton refused to say who was doing the fetching.
(For more on CLINTON FETCHING, goto: 1996 -- Another Self-Serving clinton Thanksgiving Jaunt )

The White House reported that the clintons' first First Pet, Socks, a cat, "greeted the canine acquisition with a hiss previously reserved only for Ken Starr." Because Buddy remained Socks' nemesis throughout the clinton dog days, Socks was eventually exiled to Virginia, to the suburban home of Betty Currie, former clinton subornee and sex scheduler. At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.

 

Buddy web sites quickly exploded in cyberspace. (Socks web sites, too, Socks would add.) Mrs. clinton, a long-time adherent of synergistic exploitation, "authored" an instant book about three groups favored for exploitation by the clintons: dogs, cats and children. "Dear Socks, Dear Buddy: Kids' Letters to the First Pets" was published by the clintons' personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine, Simon & Schuster. (SEE: Is hillary clinton's $8M "book advance" a Peter-Principle artifact?)

Although Chappaqua locals share the national repugnance for the clintons, their feelings never spilled over to Buddy. "The big highlight for people was, 'I just saw Buddy,' never mind Mr. and Mrs. Clinton," said Christine Meyer, owner of Wags and Whiskers here.

 

COMING APART:
What clinton was REALLY saying. . . and why. . . when he bashed Bush in Canada
(Involves Nobel--play flash movie)

flash movie

[Mia T]

To find out what clinton was really thinking, don't forget to click (run your mouse over) clinton's words as the movie plays.

[Mia T]

So true. ;)

tweaked version

the clintons' scheme to take over the world in 4 easy steps (NB: dwarfs)

by Mia T, 12.17.03

 

 

hillary talks: L'Etat, c'est moi!
(Iowa parsed)

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

1. Privately encourage/sponsor most -- (I don't think Kucinich, Graham and Sharpton were on the clinton short list) -- of the dwarfs. (Group dynamics, if not political reflex, will ensure a mutual kill.)
2. Insert clinton "infrastructure" operatives in dwarf staff positions (strictly as loaners) to ensure (a) that the dwarfs stick to clinton playbook and, equally important, (b) that no dwarf actually wins the presidency.
3. Script and direct playbook, which is, basically, bash Bush, bash the war, (look stupid, look weak, look irrational, i.e., be the foil for HILLARY!).
4. Continuously loop steps 1-3 even as the missus undermines the dwarfs by playing the hawk... and the military ("the easy part") expert, (Remember Al From!)... and the patriot... and The Rock Star... while the co-rapist keeps everything on his end (relatively) zipped.

hillary talks:
ON MILITARY TACTICS ("The you know Easy Part")

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com