Posted on 01/09/2004 5:27:41 PM PST by Mia T
|
by Mia T
- January 22, 2002
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE [YOU KNOW] 'UPDATED'
|
|
Background:
Using internal polling, the clinton 'infrastructure' determined that its cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind scheme is no longer working. The scheme, which successfully shepherded and shielded the vacuous, inept, corrupt clintons for nine years, is now, post-9/11, yielding diminishing returns--and worse--increasing ridicule.
Hence, we had the clinton 'infrastructure' interviewer recalculation last week that specified more interviewer gravitas...and less lapdog...but not more doggedness...that is to say...that specified Jeff Greenfield.
A miscalculation, as it turned out. Greenfield made up in contempt what he lacked in inexorability. Although he conducted the entire interview circumambulating on eggshells, Greenfield did eventually ask the hard-boiled questions...
ASIDE: The tough questioning was followed by Greenfield's sudden, post-interview departure from CNN, a development which will only further reinforce cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind 4th-estate malfeasance.
Analysis:
Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a (nonlinear) least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time.
Political survival time is defined as the length of the interval between the initial political trial balloon and political moribundity. Political moribundity is defined as two consecutive political failures--(one in the case of 9/11), or three not-necessarily-consecutive boo-filled public appearances, or one instance of a serious proposal generating laughter.
ASIDE: Since by any of these standards, hillary clinton is already flatlined, the more interesting question for this analysis would be: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"
Survival is influenced by one or more factors, called "predictors" or "covariates", which may be categorical (such as the quality of 'infrastructure') or continuous (such as intellect or eloquence or character).
Results:
|
GREENFIELD:
Tonight, a conversation with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on the nation and the world after September 11,
on GREENFIELD AT LARGE.
THE COMPLETE ANNOTATED INTERVIEW
(NB: a very long, you know, download because of the, you know, clinton criminal, you know, redundancy.)
|
|
|
 |
Donate Here By Secure Server
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
copyright Mia T 2004 |
|
hillary's head revisited:
hillary clinton, by contrast, subsists on cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind... In her new book, Political Fictions, Joan Didion indicts the fakery of access journalism practiced by vacant politicos like the clintons, whom she sees as "purveyors of fables of their own making, or worse, fables conceived by political strategists with designs on votes, not news."
|
|
PUFFY-faced polemicist Christopher "Hellbound" Hitchens claims Bill Clinton is a "lousy crook." ... He rips into jokes about President Bush's intellect as "another liberal snig that annoys me a lot these days," adding, "The fact has to be faced: the intellectual candlepower of this administration is a great deal brighter than the Clinton administration . . . [and] the level of professionalism is very much higher." HALF A HOUSE, HALF A BRAIN:
A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory
Why we were compelled to hit on Simon & Schuster,
our personal agitprop & money-laundering machine
|
|
Never the Twain Shall Meet
If the purpose of the call to the New York Daily News was single-minded -- to save the wife from certain defeat ("f---ing Jew bastard" was not going over well with the crucial Jewish vote), the purpose of the non sequitur was twofold -- (1) to recast the wife's vicious anti-Semitic slur as a (relatively) common, (relatively) benign "ethnic joke" and (2) to argue implicitly (if fallaciously) that if the wife is viscerally unable to tell an ethnic joke, then, according to clinton deconstructionist logic, it follows that the wife is viscerally unable to utter a vicious anti-Semitic slur. Casuistry in the service of clinton revisionism.... To those who say that the only thing this Gandhi "joke" confirms is that the wife is a poor comedian, that everybody ought to lighten up, I say, "wrong," (although it does confirm that the wife is no Jackie Mason, whose timing and judgment are impeccable, who manages to use ethnic humor with a certain benign benevolence and intelligence, Ed Sullivan notwithstanding). The wife's ethnic "joke" in fact also confirms the following:
 |
|
|
clintonism and the theology of contempt by Mia T, November 2000 (sometime before the-first-Tuesday-after-the-first-Monday) "I view Hillary Clinton as a great danger to Jews if she is elected." former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir I... underestimated the propensity of my people for narrow-mindedness and self-destruction (the Jewish vote for Mrs. Clinton was about 70%).... Some anti-Semitism is irrational, founded in ignorance, as in Hillary's case.... But other forms of anti-Semitism can be earned, giving folks legitimate grievances against a people because they do crazy things like EXTEND HILLARY CLINTON'S POLITICAL LIFE! This is not to cast the entire blame on Jewish New Yorkers; they alone couldn't have elected her. In my initial optimism, I equally underestimated the urban pseudo-intellectual's high-mindedness, as well as the Everyman's yearning for celebrity in his midst. Julia Gorin, Getting used to Hillary Let us hope that the rabbi's question was merely rhetorical. . . Let us hope that Rabbi Potasnik, and by extension, New York Jews, are not as credulous and obsequious and passive as they appear. . . The simple answer to the rabbi's question is that the corrupt, self-serving, anti-Semitic, power-hungry harpy cannot be trusted. Weren't we to never forget?  The Holocaust must remain, for Jew and Gentile alike, a constant reminder that mass credulity and obsequiousness and passivity are necessary for the demagogue to prevail. To remember that six million Jews died in the Holocaust is to understand that centuries of anti-Semitic attitudes made this horror possible. We must ask ourselves what role our society played through the centuries that in any way contributed to the atmosphere that made such a genocide even thinkable. Which brings me to the clintons and clintonism. . . Senator Patrick Moynihan proffered one of the more incisive operant definitions of clintonism -- "defining deviancy down." Defining deviancy down, indeed. clintonism has made personal and public perversions, personal and public predations, not merely thinkable, not merely acceptable, but de rigueur. Watch us spin.   clintonism is the theology of contempt. Not only toward "f***ing Jew-bastards," or "dumb n***ers" or "extra-chromosome right-wingers" but toward any of us whose ideas are different from those of the clintons, Gore, and their acolytes. So the real question to be answered is this:
What fair-minded, clear-thinking person would vote for hillary clinton or Al Gore?" |
The dysfunctional twofer
One has to wonder how much longer
the Democrats
--both the leaders of the party and the rank and file--
will tolerate the clintons,
their corruption,
their ineptitude,
their utter failure to protect America from terrorism,
their hatespin
(the ugly parroting of which is on democrat display today),
their party-decimating, country-decimating self-serving agenda,
their suffocating sense of entitlement,
their rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.
has plainly destroyed the Democrat Party;
it has arrogated the Democrat Party as its own
and is now remaking it in its ugly image.
How can there not be multiple coups in the works?
a senator to Henry Hyde
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,
and listen to the song of that siren
till she transforms us into beasts.
Is this the part of wise men,
engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?
Are we disposed to be the number of those
who, having eyes, see not,
and having ears, hear not,
the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost,
I am willing to know the whole truth;
to know the worst, and to provide for it.
Patrick Henry
Theodore Roethke
he understands all too well its most significant byproduct.
You can see it in his eyes.
they now dart back and forth reflexively,
searching futilely for approval,
attempting desperately to dispel his own certain knowledge
that his moral authority is gone. . .
forever.
Mia T
If a white person was walking down the sidewalk, a black person had to get off the sidewalk so the white person could walk by. There were laws which prohibited Blacks to look at white people in the eye, and a black person could be sent to jail for "assault (reckless eyeballing)." ... Blacks who dared to challenge the rules were lynched by the thousands. Men and women were lynched. Lynchings were public events and white men, women and children went to watch Blacks being tortured and burned or hanged... Whites literally got away with murder for killing "uppity" Blacks. Historical Backdrop to FREEDOM SONG "When 'Queen Hillary' walks down the hall, you're not supposed to look at her. You're actually supposed to go into an office if there is one nearby. She doesn't want staff 'seeing' her. And I know she sure as hell doesn't want to meet you or any other staffer!" "You have to be kidding me!" John replied. "No, we got the word at a staff meeting. It's true. Look around. Do you see anyone else in the hall?" John looked around and sure enough people were starting to emerge, like prarie dogs peeking out of their burrows after a hawk had flown past. Gary Aldrich, "Unlimited Access" "I'm doing my chores for Hillary Clinton." RON BROWN (ON HIS COMMERCE-DEPT CRIMES) TO NOLANDA HILL "I will not go down alone." RON BROWN (DAYS BEFORE HIS DEATH, ON HIS PLEA AGREEMENT WITH THE DOJ) TO BILL CLINTON
"It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important." Ironically, the logic of this pronouncement by Martin Luther King would, in short order, be refuted by the fact of his own lynching. King's hope was misplaced and his reasoning was circular. The resultant rule of law relied on by King presumed an adherence to the rule of law in the first instance. Adherence to the rule of law is not something normally associated with the clintons. Moreover, racial and ethnic disrespect, intimidation, exploitation and hate have always been a fundamental clinton tactic and the reflexive use the "N"-word and other racial and ethnic slurs, an essential element in the clinton lexicon. When the "first black president" and his wife ran Arkansas, the NAACP sued them for intimidating black voters at the polls. But it is the clintons' refinement of the DNC drag and drop that is, arguably, the most insidious and repugnant application of their special brand of race-hate politics. Drag and drop is a vote fraud technique by which unwitting, unwilling and/or illegal voters -- typically inner-city blacks and other minorities -- are literally dragged into the voting booth and told where to mark the "x" -- often multiple times per election. Drag and drop does not merely undermine and corrupt our system of government. Drag and drop is not merely illegal and exploitive. Drag and drop is racist and dehumanizing. Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist, and arguably more so, than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a white man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing. In the senate race against Rick Lazio, it is widely understood that the drag and drop, (followed by the OLD ANGLE / NEW SQUARE / OVAL OFFICE SCHEME ) was clinton's vote fraud technique of choice used to overcome her low poll numbers, high personal negatives and consistent public failures. "UPPITY" BLACKS AND THE CLINTONS The Ron Brown death and the clinton legacy of lynching represent the pernicious endpoint, but the history of clinton race-hate politics is replete with a reflexive 'disposal' of 'uppity' blacks from to Marian Wright Edelman to Lani Guanier to Jocelyn Elders to Carl McCall... To former Atlanta Mayor Maynard Jackson. The clintons' anointment of their man, Terry McAuliffe, to the chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee didn't merely force Maynard Jackson to the back of the bus. It pushed him off. Two Degrees of Segregation: Al Sharpton, Donna Brazile, Carol Moseley Braun and the clintons The announcement that intellectual and ethical lightweight, Carol Moseley Braun intends to run for president raises the same fundamental question that hillary clinton's looming presence does: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?" In order to better understand the easy entry of Moseley Braun into democrat field, clinton-clinton precedent (president!) and the field's increasingly circus-like quality notwithstanding, one must consider the precipitating acts of Al Sharpton and Donna Brazile. The Al Sharpton candidacy, by definition, disturbed both the clinton calculus and literati sensibilities, inspiring an immediate if ineffectual Tawana-Brawley deathblow attempt by leftist media. Sharpton's response was swift and sure. He warned that the next time the media asked him about Tawana Brawley, he would invoke the clinton scandals and the media's apparent lack of interest in same when questioning hillary clinton. (Surely the clintons' rapes and other predations would trump this quaint little hoax...) Sharpton's Harlem office effectively burned to the ground the next day--an accident they say--but he was not deterred. The media, however, apparently were; they quickly buried Tawana Brawley beside Juanita Broaddrick, somewhere in that dark recess of expediency called access journalism. If the clintons wanted Sharpton out because of the sheer embarrassment of him before his salvo, they now would be satisfied with no less than Sharpton's head. Donna Brazile was to neutralize (decolorize?) Sharpton by creating black favorite son candidates in every state of the union. It seems that Brazile ultimately thought the better of it, warning that dem dissing was demonstrably dumb, that Sharpton could, a la Jesse Jackson, lure crucial black voters back into the democrat fold. So how then to siphon off the black votes that will go to Sharpton? Enter clinton lackey, Carol Moseley Braun, nothing more than a cynical extension of clinton drag and drop and legacy of lynching.
an Extension of clinton drag and drop and legacy of lynching
|
The movie, hillary talks: On Ethnic Slurs demonstrates that the couple's entire defense of the wife's anti-Semitic slur was based on lies, that not only does the wife tell ethnic jokes, she also reflexively and repeatedly utters vicious anti-Semitic, racial and other slurs. According to her friends, colleagues and even her hagiographer, hillary clinton is in a 'perpetual state of anger' and attack, hillary clinton's principal modus operandi is the utter and complete degradation of others. (3) Forget president. This is hardly the judgment, intelligence or temperment required of a senator. Mia T, 1.06.04
|
Panetta's comments follow closely on the heels of an attack on Dean by top Hillary Clinton strategist Harold Ickes, who complained to Time magazine two weeks ago that the Vermont governor was "quick of lip, and quick of temper and stubborn." Panetta Warning Reveals Widening Dean-Clinton Rift
...as opposed to?
|
"She is angry. Not all the time. author Gail Sheehy |
|
"[Hillary Clinton] is in a perpetual former Clinton adviser to author Gail Sheehy |
|
"Hillary hit him between the eyes. She was angrier than Paul had ever seen her. 'You f**king Jew bastard!' she screamed." author Jerry Oppenheimer
|
|
[W]hen White House Counsel... Abner Mikva finally bowed to the law and delivered subpoenaed documents, she and her White House scandal team lashed at him with such a vicious streak of humiliating profanity that he resigned. Barbara Olson |
|
"Anyone that stood up... was smashed down and belittled,very personally. [N]ot only would she sort of humiliate you in front of your colleagues or whoever happened to be around, Hillary tended to kind of campaign against people behind their back, and that was certainly my experience." former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers
|
|
Longtime Hillary aide Carolyn Huber, who saved Mrs. Clinton's buns in 1996 with a convenient cover story about how her mysterious Rose Law Firm billing records magically appeared in the White House book room, described the former first lady's fits of rage to Sheehy as nearly lethal. "The person on the receiving end never gets over it," Huber remembered, reportedly shivering as she spoke those words. Hillary's Scheme |
|
The rages continued even after Mrs. Clinton took up residence in the White House, where she blew up at a Secret Service agent for declining to carry her bags. When the agent explained that he needed to keep his hands free in order to protect her, she replied, "If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags." Joyce Milton |
|
clinton's tin ear, foul mouth and malignant essence are legendary. I am reminded of the final scene in "The Dead Zone." Christopher Walken unmasks a narcissistic politico running for the Senate (aptly played by Martin Sheen) as the dangerous, self-serving demagogue that he is. The dangerous demagogue, realizing that he's finished, blows himself away... a perfect ending.... The only problem with this analogy is that clinton is--both clintons are--far too self-absorbed to see the cooked goose beyond their collective fat a$$... and too craven to do anything about it, in any case....
|
AQYX88A@prodigy.com (Randy Michaels) presentsML/NJ
Subject: Bozell-Ask these of HRC>Questions We Wish the Media Would Ask Mrs. Clinton
>Media Research Center By: L. Brent Bozell, Chairman
>Bringing political balance to the media
>
>As the First Lady stops in your cities this week to promote
>her new book we would be remise if we didn't convey our
>mystification as to why the national media here in
>Washington refuse to ask Mrs. Clinton certain questions
>regarding Whitewater and Travelgate. Our hope is that local
>media would not emulate the national media in giving Mrs.
>Clinton a virtual free pass on these matter (e.g. Barbara
>Walter's interview on ABC's 20/20 last Friday.)
>
>Toward that end we have put together a list of questions the
>national media refuse to ask the First Lady. These questions
>are respectful of the office of the First Lady, but they are
>also fair and direct, and thus deserving of fair and direct
>answers.I was able to pose these questions to the Commodities Scam
Queen herself. As a service to the Newsgroup I am transcribing
the answers she gave.>Former Travel Office Director Billy Dale says a former White
>House aid personally told him that President Clinton, your
>husband, was directly involved in the firing of all the
>Travel Office workers. You maintain that you expressed
>concerns about the Travel Office. Did the President express
>concerns as well, and did he have any role at all in the
>decision to fire the workers?CSQ: Well, you know I know that the President was concerned
about the mismanagement at the TO. But I can't really tell
you what he might have said to David Watkins that might have
caused Mr. Watkins to take the action he did. The President
was very busy at the beginning of his term forcing Gays upon
the military, and vaporizing young children. He didn't have
too much time to attend to instituting the efficiency
changes that he also promised the voters and delegated much of this
work to the VP, DW, and others. You remember that he said
he would cut the WH staff by 25% and we kept that promise.>Why do you continue to say that there was mismanagement in
>the White House Travel Office when a jury completely cleared
>Travel Office director Billy Dale of all charges --within
>just two hours? Haven't you put him, his family and his
>colleagues through enough?CSQ: We didn't do anything to Mr. Dale and his family. Mr.
Dale was indicted by a Grand Jury. I was not a witness before
the GJ, and you know their proceedings are secret so I don't
know why they indicted Mr. Dale. But you know Mr. Dale isn't
the first person to be indicted and subsequently acquitted.>Why did the White House and the Justice Department prosecute
>Mr. Dale for two years, costing him his entire life savings
>in legal fees, and what do you have to say to him and his
>family after the ordeal your administration has put them
>through, for no real reason at all?CSQ: Again, it's the job of the JD to prosecute cases of wrongdoing.
I've been told that much of the reason for the long prosecution
was due to delays requested by Mr. Dale's attorney. I'm am very
sorry that his family went through the ordeal as you call it,
but I'm also proud of our system that is able to get to the
true facts and not just rubber stamp a GJ indictment..>David Watkins has now testified, under oath, before a
>congressional committee that what his memo says is true:
>that you wanted the White House Travel Office workers fired
>and replaced with "our people," and that he acted under
>pressure from you believing he would be fired if he did not
>terminate the Travel Office workers. You continue to deny
>that you "had a hand in making the decision." In your
>denials are you not insinuating that Mr. Watkins -- in
>directly contradicting you -- has now lied under oath to
>Congress and should be prosecuted for perjury?CSQ: There's no contradiction. No one committed perjury. DW is
a very honourable men, so too are we all honourable me--
people. I certainly did want people suspected of mismanagement
dismissed. Sometimes I can't understand my critics. What
should I have done when I found out that Mr. Dale was running
other people's money through his own checking account? Not
care? I asked DW to look into it. It wasn't a big deal.
Once DW decided to dismiss the TO7, we did need to replace
them, and it was natural for us to look to people whom we
knew who were qualified. No one made a big deal when President
Reagan appointed his friend Ed Meese. It's just natural to
go with a qualified person instead of some unknown.>Why did you feel Catherine Cornelius, a 25 year old cousin
>of your husband's, could do a better job handling the duties
>of the Travel Office than the career employees who had been
>working there - some of them since the Kennedy
>Administration?CSQ: You know I knew that CC was some distant relative of the
President's. You know you have to remember that in a place like
Arkansas there's a lot of in-breeding and everyone's related to
everyone else. She wasn't a first cousin or anything like that.
I don't even think Bill ever slept with her. I have heard, though,
that CC is a bright young woman with experience running a large
travel agency in Little Rock.>You served on the special committee that investigated
>Watergate, which involved the White House misusing the
>Justice Department. Why did the Clinton White House force
>the FBI to issue a press release and then conduct an
>investigation to justify the Travel Office firings, when the
>administration knew there were no basis for them? Your
>administration is just as guilty of misusing the Justice
>Department as Nixon was, isn't it?CSQ: You know I don't know anything about forcing the FBI to do
anything. I just don't think that's been done since the
Nixon Administration. And so you see that's the difference.
Every Administration exercises power, but the Nixon
Administration abused that power. That was a dark time for
our country and I'm proud to have played a small role in
returning government to the people.>You continue to say that there is nothing at the bottom of
>Whitewater. But since the first allegations were made:>*Three White House Counsels - including Bernie Nussbaum -
>have resigned
>*The Deputy Secretary of Treasury, Roger Altman has resigned
>*The Treasury Department's Chief of Staff, Josh Steiner, has
>resigned
>*The Treasury Department General Counsel, Jean Hanson, has >resigned
>*The Deputy Attorney General Philip Heymann has resigned
>(basically because he was embarrassed to work in your
>administration and went back to teach law at Harvard)
>*Arkansas Governor Jim Guy Tucker -- as well as several
>others back in Arkansas -- have either been indicted or have
>pleaded guilty to charges in connection with Whitewater.
>If there's nothing there then why has all of this happened
>to so many people?CSQ: This is the way it is in Washington. I believe our turnover
rate is just about the same as the average of the last three
administrations. Usually some of the people who sign on
find that Washington is not for them, or they're not making
the same money they made in the private sector and they're
not willing to sacrifice for their country. Phil Heymann is
just such a person. I don't believe he said anything about
being embarrassed by our Administration, so I'm not going
to pretend and respond as if he did. As for Tucker, that's
an Arkansas matter and we haven't been in Arkansas for over
three years. I hope he's not guilty of the things he's
been charged with but if he is, he should be punished.>Vince Foster had Whitewater files in his office when his job
>was government work -- Associate White House Counsel -- and
>not personal legal work for you. Also, your original Rose
>Law Firm billing records are still missing and copies of
>those records were just found in the White House personal
>residence after a two year search. Why was Vince Foster
>doing personal legal work for you while employed by American
>taxpayers and while working on government time? Why have
>Whitewater files gone form the Rose Law Firm to Webster
>Hubbell's basement to Vince Foster's office -- and in the
>case of the billing record copies -- into the personal White
>House residence? Either this is a cover-up or it's the
>worst case of total incompetence by a White House staff in
>American history, is it not?CSQ: You've asked a lot of questions without letting me answer.
You know that Vince was very dear to us and it's still hard to
believe he's gone. He was working on our investment because
the President is supposed to place his assets in a blind trust.
The Counsel's office is supposed to do the legal work that is
required by the President and the Blind Trust is one of those
things. I don't know how Vince got the Rose files. I think
he probably just asked for them because he thought they might
be related to the Blind Trust. Some of them were, I'm sure.
We didn't really know what was in those files because that's
the intent of a Blind Trust. Counsel Nussbaum asked that the
papers be removed so their contents wouldn't be inadvertently
revealed to the President and myself which would have been a
violation of the Trust. I didn't even know what Counsel Nussbaum
did with the papers. Which is what he intended. Rather than
incompetence, I suggest that our Administration has demonstrated
great integrity, perhaps more-so than any Administration in recent memory.I'm so good at this.
>What did Vince Foster mean when he wrote in his personal
>notes before he died that Whitewater was a "can of worms
>that you shouldn't open?" Why would he write that?CSQ: I don't really know. It's too bad that Vince isn't here to
tell us what he meant. Whitewater was an insignificant land
deal where we were passive investors. In fact we were so
passive that we never put up any money. But we still lost
more than $40,000 which might be what he meant by a can of
worms. He knew how screwed up McDougal was, I guess.
Vince probably didn't want to include the $40,000 loss in the Blind
Trust, but since it's blind and we iced him there's no way
I could know.>The record of the four Rose Law Firm partners who came to
>Washington to serve in your husband's administration has
>been devastating:>*former Associate Attorney General Webster Hubbell is
>serving time in a federal prison
>*former Associate White House Counsel William Kennedy
>resigned in disgrace
>*former Associate White House Counsel Vince Foster killed >himself
>*you have a growing ethical cloud over your head.CSQ: Well, I didn't know about Webb's billing practices. I'm
saddened that he's in the hoosegow but if he committed a
crime he's got to do the time. As for myself, the cloud
you see is a figment of my enemies' imaginations. Your
statements about Bill Kennedy and Vince are just wrong.>How much responsibility do you accept for this shameful
>record, and what actions should you take in accepting
>responsibility?CSQ: Why do you call it shameful. The only thing I'm ashamed
of is letting that windbag Limbaugh beat us out of our
glorious health care reform. I'm a bit pissed too that he
conned the American people into tossing out patriots like
Dan Rostenkowski. My responsibility is only that I cannot
counter all the lies and distortions myself.CSQ: Is that all?
Yes. Thank you.
CSQ: Up yours.
Then there is the Black Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America, self-serving boiling pots of incontinence if there ever were any, they all love Mrs. Clinton – but they haven’t been listening – Mrs. Clinton has no answers for anything beyond spinning the same old rhetoric that she has repeated for years – anything she has had a hand in has been a complete failure starting with her days in Arkansas – she is the consummate dreamer and schemer, the latter which she is very adept at. Her politics are largely the same adolescent ones of her Marxist youth; as the junior senator (which she never accepted, she just took over the senate on the left) she has done little if anything she promised she would do. The woman is a fraud; a charlatan; as slick a Snake Oil Salesman as her predatory husband. She is not brilliant – she is cunning; she is anti-American in the sense of a Republic, deplores the US Constitution and the rule of law, in which she is most adept in re-writing to support her wishes. She is no patriot as she proved while visiting our military over Thanksgiving; she simply reinforced her dislike of all things military by reminding the soldiers that America was divided (more lies) as to their being there in the first place. No – she doesn’t really support our troops and Yes, she did all she could to undermine their confidence in their jobs. The latter may have been inadvertent which is very telling of just WHO she really is. Is it any wonder her call name while flying in the Black Hawk was Broomstick 1?
Her poverty of class; standards of character; purity of intent are mind boggling. However, dumbed down Americans of sound bite mentality, brain washed by the alphabet media and other spinners of the Clinton myth, will likely never learn the truth about this polychromatic fake as they are indeed like the mass migrations of the lemming and their demise will be about the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
he smartest woman in the world would relish "the raucous give and take of American democracy, " as Charles Kuralt once put it.
hen bill clinton offered up his "ethnic joke" non sequitur, unsolicited, to the New York Daily News, he doubtless never imagined that it would in fact be an ethnic joke by the wife (and to the press and about Gandhi, no less) that would ultimately yank off 
with its theology of contempt? 