Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $18,771
23%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 23%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: warpowersresolution

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • In Historic, Bipartisan Move, House Votes To Repeal 2002 Iraq War Powers Resolution

    06/17/2021 10:22:57 AM PDT · by BenLurkin · 13 replies
    NPR ^ | June 17, 2021 | CLAUDIA GRISALES
    The U.S. House of Representatives moved Thursday to repeal a nearly two-decade-old war powers measure, marking what many lawmakers hope will be the beginning of the end of wide-ranging authorities given to the president after the 9/11 terror attacks. The vote was 268 to 161. The measure now heads to the Senate. Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee of California — who in 2001 and 2002 voted against two war power measures passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks — was the sponsor of the repeal bill. The plan would end the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force, or...
  • Hans von Spakovsky: Trump killing of Soleimani and action against Iran legal – Despite Democratic complaints [Excellent]

    01/11/2020 8:30:49 AM PST · by jazusamo · 15 replies
    Fox News ^ | January 11, 2019 | Hans A. von Spakovsky
    The War Powers Resolution passed Thursday by the House in an effort to restrict President Trump’s ability to take military action to defend America against attack from Iran is a meaningless political document designed only to embarrass the president. The nonbinding resolution criticizes the president for not “consulting” with Congress and receiving its “authorization” before ordering the killing of Iranian general and terrorist mastermind Qassem Soleimani. The resolution also orders Trump to stop using military force against Iran until he gets congressional approval. Trump acted fully within his constitutional authority when he ordered the drone strike against Soleimani, a mass...
  • 'Code Pink Republicans!' — Mark Levin Unloads On Mike Lee and Rand Paul

    01/10/2020 9:12:00 AM PST · by jazusamo · 51 replies
    PJ Media ^ | January 10, 2020 | Michael van der Galien
    To say that conservative talk radio host Mark Levin isn't happy with Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee would be an understatement of epic proportions. The reason? Their decision to stand in front of leftwing-media cameras to blast the Trump administration after they were briefed on the decision to take out Iranian Terror General Qasem Soleimani. "Code Pink Republicans," as Levin called them, misinterpret the United States Constitution by pretending it's a libertarian or even populist document, which it is not. "The briefing lasted only 75 minutes, whereupon our briefers left," Lee said afterward. "This, however, is not the biggest...
  • Trump, at Ohio rally, says Democrats would have leaked Soleimani attack plans

    01/09/2020 5:09:57 PM PST · by jazusamo · 27 replies
    Fox News ^ | January 9, 2020 | Gregg Re
    President Trump was headlining his first campaign rally of the election year Thursday in Ohio flush with cash, chafing at a potential Senate impeachment trial and aiming to capitalize on his order to take out Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani after the military leader was said to have orchestrated an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. Almost immediately, Trump slammed Democrats' nonbinding War Powers Resolution, which they passed earlier in the day in a rebuke to the Soleimani strike -- and suggested Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and California Rep. Adam Schiff, would have tipped off the media about...
  • Is McCain Laying Out A False Choice That We Must Choose Either Obama's War Policy Or Isolationism?

    06/20/2011 4:17:56 PM PDT · by Laissez-faire capitalist · 21 replies
    6/20/2011 | Laissez-Faire Capitalist
    It seems as if that is the case, given that John McCain has chastised those GOP presidential candidates who wonder how Libya posed a threat to the U.S., how Obama has grounds for claiming that the U.S. isn't even at war with Libya or how he can claim - through Harold Koh and Jay Carney - that "the limited nature of this particular mission is not the kind of hostilities envisioned by the War Powers Resolution." Obama is claiming that since U.S. troops are supposedly at little risk in this particular mission and that we have no boots on the...
  • Obama Is Trying To Redefine What Constitutes Warfare (US-Libya)

    06/18/2011 1:21:21 AM PDT · by Laissez-faire capitalist · 13 replies
    6/18/2011 | Laissez-Faire Capitalist
    ...With Harold Koh (legal advisor for the Department of State) and Jay Carney in tow - engaged in a game of semantics. Harold Koh recently said: "We are not saying the president can take the country into war on his own. We are not saying the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional or should be scrapped or that we can refuse to consult Congress. We are saying the limited nature of this particular mission is not the kind of hostilities envisioned by the War Powers Resolution." Problem is, is that the WPA does not make any distinction between one kind of...
  • Obama: Limited Strikes For 90 Days Under WPA. Carney: These Limited Strikes Nullify WPA 90 Day Rule

    06/17/2011 9:04:13 AM PDT · by Laissez-faire capitalist · 16 replies
    6/17/2011
    On March 21, 2011, Obama cited the WPR which requires him to notify Congresa 48 hours before beginning military operations. That same day Obama said that the military strikes against Libya would be "limited in their nature, duration and scope." During the past almost 90 days, Obama has given updates on these "limited" strikes. Now that 90 days draws near, Carney says that since the strikes have been "limited" that basically the 90 day rule doesn't apply. He apparently wants to use a WPA provision which allows for the president to deploy U.S. forces and engage in military strikes for...
  • If "Boots On The Ground" Is The Definition Of War, Then Why Did Obama Invoke The War Powers Res.?

    06/17/2011 1:25:45 AM PDT · by Laissez-faire capitalist · 12 replies
    6/17/2011 | Laissez-Faire Capitalist
    If the Obama administration's definition of war, as it pertains to Libya is having "boots on the ground" there, then why did Obama cite/invoke the War Powers Resolution back in March, given that they say that we never had boots on the ground there, nor were going to? Secondly, if Obama cited/invoked the War Powers Resolution because we would be hitting Libya with air strikes, and airstrikes/predator drones constitutes warfare (hence the need for Obama to invoke the WPR before attacking Libya), then we are still at war with Libya, and therefore after 90 days Obama will have to get...
  • Obama, Through His Own Words, Hemmed Himself In On The US-Libyan War

    06/16/2011 7:24:12 PM PDT · by Laissez-faire capitalist · 20 replies
    6/16/2011 | Laissez-Faire Capitalist
    At UPI.com there is a 3/21/2011 news article entitled "Obama Sends War Powers Notification." In the article, Obama notified Congress of his decision to deploy U.S. forces against Gadhfi. Obama said that the strikes against Libya's air defense systems and military airfields to establish no-fly zones were authorized under U.N. security Resolution 1973. Obama said "These strikes will be limited in their nature, duration and scope. Their purpose is to support an international coalition as it takes all necessary measures to enforce U.N. Security Resolution 1973. These limited U.S. actions will set the stage for further action by other coalition...
  • War Powers Act Does Not Apply to Libya, Obama Argues (Obama claims he's above the law)

    06/15/2011 12:44:58 PM PDT · by tobyhill · 173 replies
    NY Times ^ | 6/15/2011 | Charles Savage
    The White House is telling Congress that President Obama has the legal authority to continue American participation in the NATO-led air war in Libya, even though lawmakers have not authorized it. In a broader package of materials the Obama administration is sending to Congress on Wednesday defending its Libya policy, the White House, for the first time, offers lawmakers and the public an argument for why Mr. Obama has not been violating the War Powers Resolution since May 20. On that day, the Vietnam-era law’s 60-day deadline for terminating unauthorized hostilities appeared to pass. But the White House argued that...
  • Boehner warns Obama that Libya will violate war powers

    06/14/2011 2:03:28 PM PDT · by Red Badger · 117 replies
    Washington Examiner ^ | 06/14/11 3:34 PM | By: Susan Ferrechio
    House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, sent President Obama a letter Tuesday afternoon warning him that the operation in Libya will be violating the War Powers Resolution by this Sunday, which marks the 90th day of U.S. military involvement in the country. Boehner wants "a clear explanation of the legal standing under the War Powers Resolution," that Obama is using to justify continuing the operations behind Sunday. The letter is below. June 14, 2011 Dear Mr. President: Five days from now, our country will reach the 90-day mark from the notification to Congress regarding the commencement of the military operation in...