Posted on 06/17/2021 10:22:57 AM PDT by BenLurkin
The U.S. House of Representatives moved Thursday to repeal a nearly two-decade-old war powers measure, marking what many lawmakers hope will be the beginning of the end of wide-ranging authorities given to the president after the 9/11 terror attacks.
The vote was 268 to 161. The measure now heads to the Senate.
Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee of California — who in 2001 and 2002 voted against two war power measures passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks — was the sponsor of the repeal bill. The plan would end the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF, that greenlighted then-President George W. Bush's plans to invade Iraq.
"It's been such a long time coming," Lee said ahead of Thursday's vote. "It's Congress' responsibility to authorize the use of force, and that authorization cannot be blank checks that stay as authorizations for any administration to use the way they see fit."
Lee's legislation drew bipartisan support. Her repeal of the 2002 authority, which was issued on Oct. 16 of that year, had more than 130 co-sponsors.
In the Senate, Democrat Tim Kaine of Virginia is sponsoring a similar bill with help from Republican Todd Young of Indiana and four other GOP senators. On Wednesday, the repeal drew the support of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for the first time.
"It will eliminate the danger of a future administration reaching back into the legal dustbin to use it as a justification for military adventurism," Schumer said.
He noted that former President Donald Trump used the 2002 authority as a partial justification for an airstrike against an Iranian target in Iraq last year. Now, with the Iraq War over for nearly a decade, the 2002 authorization, and its use as a primary justification for military action, has lost its vital purpose, Schumer said.
A Senate committee is slated to take up the plan next week.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., earlier on Thursday warned that Democrats leading the charge on the repeal are ignoring a critical step addressing how the U.S. will fight against terrorists going forward.
For example, McConnell said that debate also needed to happen before President Biden rolled out his "hasty" plans to leave Afghanistan this year.
"Reality is more complicated, more dangerous, and less politically convenient than its supporters believe," McConnell said. "The fact of the matter is the legal and practical application of the 2002 AUMF extends far beyond the defeat of Saddam Hussein's regime. And tossing it aside without answering real questions about our ongoing efforts in the region is reckless."
What about the 2001 AUMF? The effort, which has been debated for years, is what Lee and others hope will signal the initial steps to dismantle both war power measures issued after 9/11.
The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force was issued to allow the president to order the invasion of Afghanistan, and it has remained a key justification for military action against terrorist groups around the world.
But some say if the 2001 measure is repealed, it must be replaced, which is the subject of ongoing discussions now, Lee said. She and other lawmakers warned that it could be a months-long process but could be resolved by year's end.
This week, the White House issued a statement supporting Lee's bill repealing the 2002 authority, noting it would have minimal impact.
The administration also signaled openness to considering the end of other war powers in lieu of stricter alternatives.
"The President is committed to working with the Congress to ensure that outdated authorizations for the use of military force are replaced with a narrow and specific framework appropriate to ensure that we can continue to protect Americans from terrorist threats," the White House statement said.
Barbara Lee was alone when she voted against the war in Iraq. Now her work is coming to fruition. 20 years later she just may have done the right thing. Was it al worth it? Hindsight will always be 20-20. she gets my Profile in Courage award.
marking what many lawmakers hope will be the beginning of the end of wide-ranging authorities given to the president after the 9/11 terror attacks ... in order to set country on the path for an even worse attack because that will go along way to helping destroy what is left of America
I remember when Trump said he was going to pull out of Afghanistan and a bipartisan group came out and cried, “we can’t leave our allies.”
They now fall over themselves to do everything they’ve wanted to do under Biden since they couldn’t let Trump get any positive things done in an election year.
“He noted that former President Donald Trump used the 2002 authority as a partial justification for an airstrike against an Iranian target in Iraq last year.”
Conveniently left out that Obama used it as justification for drone strike assassinations all over the planet, including against U.S. citizens.
Didn't she vote to impeach President Trump twice? In fact, in 2018, she cosponsored House Resolution 621, which called for the impeachment of President Trump. Yeah, she's certainly courageous.
I vote to end the freak show that is “bide”
Congress declares the war.
POTUS, as Commander in Chief fights it.
One entity doesn’t do both.
Bring our folks home to their families, and a country that loves them.
Next overseas folly, Speaker of the House, Senate Majority leader and every Committee chair GOES FIRST.
And they get all the “booster” shots needed before they ship out.
Rep. Barbara Lee is a communist. Period. She’ll do anything to prevent America from destroying our enemies.
Sen./Gov Tim Kaine. A doodoo bird if there ever was one. He has a perpetual smile that looks like someone shoved a large pickle up his butt.
He and Sen. Squish Warner (D-VA) are two of the biggest, dumbest cowards in the Senate. Our enemies love them.
She was alone in the vote against the 2001 act in the aftermath of 9/11 - only member of Congress in both Houses to do so. A lot more Dems joined her in the 2002 vote.
Bingo! That was my first observation.
Lee was right for the wrong reasons.
What no one is saying, but what everyone knows, is that repealing this law will only ensure that the next Republican President will not be allowed to use military force to protect the nation against any enemies of that time.
If SloJo or his female successor wanted to bomb the holy hell out of, and/or send troops into, some place like Ukraine, neither House nor Senate would rise up to stop it from happening. All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.