Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $30,959
38%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 38%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: stiffingthebase

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Hugh Hewitt and Harriet Miers: Jumping the Supreme Court Shark

    10/24/2005 3:32:25 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 19 replies · 592+ views
    RedState.org ^ | 10/24/2005 | Blanton
    Hugh Hewitt has jumped the shark. I do not know that I will ever be able to entertain an argument of his seriously again. Suspicion was raised when Hugh backed Arlen Specter for Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Suspicion is confirmed with Hugh's unyielding defense of Harriet Miers. Hugh has ceased to be a conservative pundit and is now a shill for the administration. While critics of the Miers nomination are willing to give her credit for much, Hugh has apparently ignored all objectivity and closed his eyes to all concerns so that he can be an effective pimp of...
  • Miers Vote May Hinge on Documents (Brownback: GOP Senators "Not a Rubber Stamp")

    10/24/2005 2:43:22 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 13 replies · 686+ views
    Seattle Times ^ | 10/24/2005 | Maura Reynolds
    WASHINGTON — Republican and Democratic senators called on President Bush yesterday to release documents relating to Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers' service as White House counsel, with some warning that she may not win confirmation otherwise. In discussions on television talk shows, senators of both parties said that the biggest obstacle to Miers' confirmation is a lack of information about her capabilities. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., ordinarily a Bush ally but also a social conservative who is expected to seek the GOP presidential nomination in 2008, warned that the Senate "is not a rubber stamp." "If we're to give advice...
  • Mystery-Woman Miers (Has Supported ICC, Gay Adoptions, Tax Hikes; Some "Conservative," Huh...?)

    10/23/2005 5:34:36 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 310 replies · 3,374+ views
    World Net Daily ^ | 10/03/2005 | Joseph Farrah
    WASHINGTON – Harriet Miers, President Bush's nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court to replace Sandra Day O'Connor, is on record as supporting the establishment of the International Criminal Court, homosexual adoptions, a major local tax increase and women in combat, WorldNetDaily has learned. While some conservative leaders and organizations were stunned by the appointment, most were not alarmed by the lack of a paper trail by the nominee who has never served as a judge at any level. But a profile of her positions as a leader of the American Bar Association, a Dallas city councilwoman and as presidential counselor...
  • President Questioned for Supreme Court pick Harriet Miers (Schlafly's Calm, Rational Questions)

    10/23/2005 2:47:26 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 54 replies · 2,343+ views
    TownHall.com ^ | 10/18/2005 | Phyllis Schlafly
    If U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts' confirmation hearing is any guide, we won't learn anything from Harriet Miers' confirmation hearing. So here are some questions we would like President George W. Bush to answer. You said, "Trust me." But why should we trust you when experience proves we could not trust the judgment of President Reagan (who gave us Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony M. Kennedy) or President George H.W. Bush (who gave us Justice David H. Souter)? Are you more trustworthy than Reagan or your father? You said, "She's not going to change. ... Twenty...
  • Too Many Yes-Men ("Sen. Harry Reid More Enthusiastic About Miers" Than Fellow Conservatives)

    10/23/2005 2:37:36 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 37 replies · 819+ views
    TownHall.com ^ | 10/19/2005 | Linda Chavez
    We need a fool in the White House. No, I've not joined the leftist Bush-is-an-idiot crowd. The president is a smart man, but he's in deep trouble. And no one in the White House seems willing to tell him why, which is where an official fool -- or White House jester, if you prefer -- would come in handy. In the Middle Ages, the court fool was often the only person who could point out the king's foibles and live to tell about it. No less than some medieval castle, the White House can become a haven for yes-men (and...
  • President Will, Justice Powell and Chief Justice Wilkinson (HUGH HEWITT slaps little George Will)

    10/22/2005 8:11:57 PM PDT · by Checkers · 257 replies · 3,794+ views
    HughHewitt.com ^ | October 22, 2005 09:47 AM PST | Hugh Hewitt
    George Will is quite rightly recognized as among the two or three finest pundits of the last 25 years. Put aside his bow ties and his very well known love of baseball: Will has consistently produced entertaining and insightful prose over a very long period of time. It is simply wrong to reject Will as "no big deal." But he can and does throw spokes, and he did so in Sunday's column. From Will's column: "Last week's ruling divided the justices into unlikely cohorts, thereby providing a timely reminder that concepts such as ``judicial activism,'' ``strict construction'' and ``original intent''...
  • Specter:Miers Expressed Belief in Constitutional Right to Privacy (Basic Underpinning Roe v. Wade)

    10/17/2005 11:41:08 PM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 104 replies · 1,376+ views
    HeraldToday.com ^ | 10/17/2005 | Steven Thomma and James Kuhnhenn
    WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers told the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday that she believes there's a right to privacy in the Constitution, a basic underpinning of the Supreme Court's landmark abortion ruling Roe v. Wade. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the panel chairman, said that during a nearly two-hour private meeting Monday, Miers also told him that she believed the court had properly decided a precedent-setting 1965 privacy case, Griswold v. Connecticut, which established the legal foundation that led to Roe v. Wade. Miers also assured a Senate Democrat on Monday that she's...
  • Window Into Miers' Legal Thinking in the 1990s Reflects a Glint of Liberalism

    10/15/2005 3:36:48 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 30 replies · 724+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | 10/14/2005 | Scott Gold and Richard A. Serrano
    HOUSTON — In the early 1990s, lawyer-bashing was all the rage. And Harriet Miers didn't like it one bit. Then the president of the State Bar of Texas, Miers used her monthly column in the Texas Bar Journal to condemn politicians who were trying to score points by disparaging the legal profession. She suggested the criticism was myopic, and noted that it was coming, by and large, from Republicans.It was time, she wrote, to "fight back." The written record of President Bush's nominee for the Supreme Court is meager. But her musings in the Texas Bar Journal in 1992 and...
  • Miers Hit on Letters and the Law ("Writings Both Personal and Official Have Critics Poking Fun")

    10/15/2005 2:37:57 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 448 replies · 4,583+ views
    Washington Post ^ | 10/15/2005 | Charles Babington
    Supreme Court confirmation battles usually involve excavations of the nominee's judicial opinions, legal briefs and decades-old government memos. Harriet Miers is the first nominee to hit trouble because of thank-you letters. Miers's paper trail may be relatively short, but it makes plain that her climb through Texas legal circles and into George W. Bush's inner circle was aided by a penchant for cheerful personal notes. Years later, even some of her supporters are cringing -- and her opponents are viciously making merry -- at the public disclosure of this correspondence and other writings from the 1990s. Bush may have enjoyed...
  • Conservatives Call to Withdraw Miers (Nomination "a Stupid, Stupid Mistake")

    10/14/2005 1:53:07 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 364 replies · 3,384+ views
    The Washington Times ^ | 10/14/05 | Charles Hurt
    The nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court has splintered President Bush's base and triggered a growing demand from his own supporters to withdraw her nomination. "What a stupid, stupid mistake," said Mark W. Smith, a member of the conservative Federalist Society who has actively supported Mr. Bush but wants to see the nomination withdrawn. "You cannot fix this for 25 years." Conservatives have stuck with Mr. Bush through the bloodiest and gloomiest days of the war in Iraq, held firm as administration officials are investigated for revealing a CIA operative's identity and given him a pass on the...
  • Mark Steyn: She's not ideal, but she'll get job done

    10/09/2005 5:00:55 AM PDT · by mal · 135 replies · 2,222+ views
    From President Bush's press conference on Tuesday: Question: "Are you still a conservative?" The president: "Am I what?" Any port in a storm, especially after the storm has passed. I said the other day that the minute Hurricane Katrina hit, the media started scampering around like Munchkins singing "Ding Dong, The Bush Is Dead." They always do, and it always fails. In terms of destroying Bush and the Republicans, Katrina was a total bust. Insofar as it has any political impact, it's likely to make Louisiana less Democrat. That's it.
  • Progressive Miers? ("It Looks As If We've Got Another O'Connor On Our Hands")

    10/09/2005 5:31:00 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 28 replies · 786+ views
    National Review ^ | 10/08/2005 | Stanley Kurtz
    This article “Miers espoused progressive views as elected official, record shows,” about Miers’ testimony in a 1990 voting rights lawsuit directly suggests that she would vote like O’Connor on affirmative action. Put that together with Miers’ reported advice on the Michigan Supreme Court case, and the feminist lecture series, and I think we begin to build up a substantive picture of her views. The most telling thing about this article may be Miers’ comment that she “wouldn’t belong to the Federalist Society” or other “politically charged” groups because they “seem to color your view one way or another.” From a...
  • "Who's In the Doghouse? Miers, Miers"Who Put Her In The Doghouse? Innerbelt Conservatives!

    10/08/2005 5:39:47 AM PDT · by joeclarke · 36 replies · 836+ views
    JoeClarke.Net ^ | 10/08/2005 | JoeClarke
    "Who's In the Doghouse? Miers, Miers." Who Put Her In The Doghouse? Innerbelt Conservatives! I have the highest esteem for these conservative pundits, but they have shot a week of broadcast time condescending a woman who is an "unknown" to them. There is probably a lot they don't know. I just don't like hearing 7/24 what they don't know. Has Air America offered them better contracts?
  • Miers Finds Few Buyers ("A Political Disaster in the Making")

    10/08/2005 3:16:37 AM PDT · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 162 replies · 2,760+ views
    WSJ Opinion Journal ^ | 10/07/2005 | James Taranto
    WASHINGTON--When President Bush nominated Harriet Miers on Monday, we saw it as a missed opportunity. It left us underwhelmed, not appalled. But having spent last evening communing here with some 1,000 conservatives at National Review's 50th anniversary dinner, we see a political disaster in the making. We talked to quite a few people, and we heard not a single kind word about the nomination from anyone who wasn't on the White House staff. A couple of our soundings led us to think that such support as it has received has been more sycophantic than sincere. One putative proponent privately distanced...