Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $20,264
25%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 25%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: infancy

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • The Politicization of Motherhood

    10/29/2017 7:28:25 AM PDT · by Pontiac · 33 replies
    WSJ ^ | Oct. 27, 2017 | James Taranto
    The premise of Ms. Komisar’s book—backed by research in psychology, neuroscience and epigenetics—is that “mothers are biologically necessary for babies,” and not only for the obvious reasons of pregnancy and birth. “Babies are much more neurologically fragile than we’ve ever understood,” Ms. Komisar says. She cites the view of one neuroscientist, Nim Tottenham of Columbia University, “that babies are born without a central nervous system” and “mothers are the central nervous system to babies,” especially for the first nine months after birth. What does that mean? “Every time a mother comforts a baby in distress, she’s actually regulating that baby’s...
  • The Greatest of These: The science of love.

    07/19/2005 4:55:31 PM PDT · by Mrs. Don-o · 2 replies · 321+ views
    Books & Culture/Christianity Today ^ | July 19, 2005 | Karl W. Giberson
    Review of: Love at Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection by Deborah Blum Berkley, 2004 360 pp., $16, paper Science is often at odds with common sense... [T]he most striking counterexample ...would have to be the early 20th-century conviction that physical affection, human contact, and love were irrelevant to infants. For a rather long period of time, the psychology of early childhood went completely off the rails .... More than half of the unhappy orphans assigned to an institution in Buffalo between 1862 and 1875 died before the age of one...Convinced that the deaths were the result...