Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $23,106
28%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 28%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: highprofile

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Nolte: High-Profile Leftists Victimized by Violent Crime – Now Will Democrats Care?

    10/03/2023 11:23:20 AM PDT · by ChicagoConservative27 · 13 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 10/03/2023 | JOHN NOLTE
    Several high-profile leftists have been victimized over the past few days by the violent crime wave that they either helped to unleash or downplayed. Now, will Democrats care? Could this be another case like New York City, a city that, just a few months ago, was a smug sanctuary city … until it actually had to give sanctuary to about only one percent of the illegal aliens invading our country? Oh, now…NOW, the Democrats who run New York are worried about the border. Now that it’s YOUR ELITE city being destroyed by Joe Biden’s third-world invasion, border security suddenly matters....
  • Jalen Rose out at ESPN as company continues high-profile layoffs

    06/30/2023 8:28:49 AM PDT · by ChicagoConservative27 · 19 replies
    NY Post ^ | 06/30/2023 | Andrew Marchand and Ryan Glasspiegel
    ESPN has let go of NBA Countdown’s Jalen Rose, The Post has learned. Rose, 50, had been on ABC/ESPN’s top NBA broadcast for a decade, which was especially impressive because of the amount of changes the network has made over that time. The Post first reported Friday morning that ESPN was laying off around 20 on-air personalities. Top NBA analyst Jeff Van Gundy was also let go by the network. ESPN had reduced Rose’s role at the network after his daily program with David Jacoby was canceled at the end of 2022.
  • Bill Cosby 'is paying private investigators six-figure fees to dig up dirt on rape accusers'

    12/28/2014 8:43:54 PM PST · by CorporateStepsister · 94 replies
    Daily Mail ^ | 28 December 2014 | By Ashley Collman for MailOnline
    Bill Cosby has refused to address the scores of rape allegations that have been hurled at him in recent months, but that doesn't mean he isn't working to clear his name. The comedian is allegedly paying private investigators six-figure fees to dig up dirt on the more than two dozen women who have come forward to accuse him of rape, according to a report in the New York Post. A source told the paper that Cosby has hired a Glendale, California, firm to discredit his many alleged victims' stories.
  • Second Nurse To Contract Ebola Retains High-Profile Attorney

    10/20/2014 7:41:26 AM PDT · by Enlightened1 · 44 replies
    Ap via CBS ^ | 10/20/14
    Amber Vinson, the second nurse in Dallas to contract the Ebola virus, has retained a high-profile attorney, her family said in a statement.
  • Roethlisberger hires high-profile Atlanta (defense) lawyer

    03/08/2010 1:14:10 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 38 replies · 266+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/8/10 | Kate Brumback - ap
    ATLANTA – A high-profile Atlanta defense attorney said Monday that he's been hired to represent Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger as police investigate a Georgia woman's claim he sexually assaulted her. Roethlisberger has not been charged. Police said a 20-year-old college student reported the assault after an encounter with Roethlisberger early Friday at a nightclub in central Georgia. Police in Milledgeville planned a news conference Monday afternoon on the case. Steelers President Art Rooney II said in a statement the team is closely monitoring the situation. "All of us in the Steelers family are concerned about the recent incident involving...
  • The Courts And Prop. 8 (The Dog Trainer's Diatribe Against Traditional Marriage Supporters Alert)

    11/19/2008 11:29:08 PM PST · by goldstategop · 22 replies · 1,119+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | 11/20/2008 | Los Angeles Times Masthead Editorial
    Although we too will welcome the day that Proposition 8 is consigned to history and the right to same-sex marriage is restored to Californians, we are sorry to see that the court agreed to take the cases directly, rather than letting this issue percolate up through the lower courts. We see no reason for the haste, despite the intensity of emotion roused by the measure's defeat.In fact, that very heatedness is a reason for the court to move slowly, allowing it to rule under cooler circumstances. Similarly, painful though it is to see Proposition 8 take effect, we agree with...
  • Prop. 8 Gay Marriage Ban Goes To The Supreme Court (Note The Bias Alert)

    11/19/2008 11:12:12 PM PST · by goldstategop · 7 replies · 531+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | 11/20/2008 | Maura Dolan and Jessica Garrison
    The California Supreme Court voted 6 to 1 on Wednesday to review legal challenges to Proposition 8, the voter initiative that restored a ban on same-sex marriage, but refused to permit gay weddings to resume pending a final decision. The court may hold a hearing on the lawsuits as early as March, a timetable that scholars said was swift considering the complexity and importance of the legal issues. The court's action, taken during a closed conference, suggested that the court wants to resolve all of the legal issues surrounding Proposition 8, including the fate of existing gay marriages, in a...
  • Top Court In California Will Review Proposition 8 (New York Times Sounds Disappointed Alert)

    11/19/2008 7:39:55 PM PST · by goldstategop · 28 replies · 1,149+ views
    New York Times ^ | 11/20/2008 | Jesse McKinley
    Responding to pleas for legal clarity from those on both sides of the issue, the California Supreme Court said Wednesday that it would take up the case of whether a voter-approved ban on same-sex unions was constitutional. The court, however, stopped short of suspending the ban, which California voters passed as Proposition 8 two weeks ago after an expensive and hard-fought campaign.
  • Calif. Supreme Court to Take up Gay Marriage Ban

    11/19/2008 6:12:15 PM PST · by XHogPilot · 16 replies · 739+ views
    Yahoo ^ | 19 Nov, 2008 | Lisa Leff
    SAN FRANCISCO – California's highest court agreed Wednesday to hear several legal challenges to the state's new ban on same-sex marriage but refused to allow gay couples to resume marrying before it rules. The California Supreme Court accepted three lawsuits seeking to nullify Proposition 8, a voter-approved constitutional amendment that overruled the court's decision in May that legalized gay marriage. All three cases claim the measure abridges the civil rights of a vulnerable minority group. They argue that voters alone did not have the authority to enact such a significant constitutional change.read entire article here
  • Proponents Of Proposition 8 Gratified With Supreme Court Rulings... (Prop. 8 News Update Alert)

    11/19/2008 5:20:21 PM PST · by goldstategop · 21 replies · 1,806+ views
    Protect Marriage.com ^ | 11/19/2008 | NA
    The official proponents of Proposition 8 and ProtectMarriage.com – Yes on 8, the campaign committee responsible for its enactment by voters today said it is “profoundly gratified” that the California Supreme Court granted all their requests by agreeing to accept original jurisdiction of three cases challenging the measure’s validity, granted their request to intervene in the cases as Real Parties in Interest, denied the request of others to delay implementation of Proposition 8, and refused to allow outside groups to directly participate in the litigation. “This is a great day for the rule of law and the voters of California,”...
  • Prop. 8 Gay Marriage Ban Goes To Supreme Court (Hearing Next Year. Prop. 8 Remains In Effect Alert)

    11/19/2008 2:56:03 PM PST · by goldstategop · 57 replies · 3,400+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | 11/19/2008 | Maura Dolan
    he California Supreme Court agreed today to review legal challenges to Prop. 8, the voter initiative that restored a ban on same-sex marriage, but refused to permit gay weddings to resume pending a ruling. Meeting in closed session, the state high court asked litigants on both sides for more written arguments and scheduled a hearing for next March. The court also signaled its intention to decide the fate of existing same-sex marriages, asking litigants to argue that question. Today's decision to review the lawsuits against Proposition 8 did not reveal how the court was leaning. The court could have dismissed...
  • All Eyes on SF Court Today for Prop. 8 Decision

    11/19/2008 11:10:29 AM PST · by nickcarraway · 28 replies · 1,070+ views
    NBC11 ^ | Wed, Nov 19, 2008
    Wednesday could be a big day in the fight over Proposition 8, a ban on same-sex marriage in California that voters approved Nov. 4. That's when the California Supreme Court could decide whether to review several lawsuits filed by Prop 8 opponents. The groups claim the ballot measure is unconstitutional. The court could also issue a stay on Prop 8 while it decides. That would allow same-sex marriages to resume until a final ruling is made on the lawsuits. Four Bay Area counties are the latest to join the legal fight to try to stop state Proposition 8. The Board...
  • San Francisco City Hall Examiner: Prop. 8 Lawsuit Update And Predictions (Funny Comments Alert)

    11/19/2008 10:20:11 AM PST · by goldstategop · 6 replies · 972+ views
    San Francisco City Hall Examiner ^ | 11/18/2008 | Melissa Griffin
    d) Equal Rights Advocates and California Women's Law Center - These (fellow) wimmins libbers argue that, if the process that brought us Prop 8 is legitimized, women stand a distinct chance of being harmed by whatever rights some unholy alliance of self-loathing chicks and unattractive men want take away from women as a group. They point out that the 1879 California State Constitution prohibited Chinese people from voting. e) Asian Pacific American Legal Center, et al. - This petition was filed by a group of organizations dedicated to the protection of the rights of minorities - including the NAACP. As...
  • On Prop. 8 Supreme Court Must Walk A Fine Line (Crocodiles Swimming In The Bathtub Alert)

    11/18/2008 12:52:20 PM PST · by goldstategop · 25 replies · 932+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | 11/18/2008 | Maura Dolan
    The California Supreme Court is being asked by Proposition 8 backers to do something extreme -– to overturn the will of voters who earlier this month banned gay marriage. It’s a choice fraught with potential political ramifications for the justices -- including threats of recall. “It is a time of lots of crocodiles in the bathtub,” said Santa Clara University law professor Gerald Uelmen, who has followed the court for decades. "Their oath requires them to ignore these kinds of political threats. But the threat of having to face a contested election is a significant one.”
  • Proposition 8 Supreme Court Filings (Pro and Con - Reference Thread)

    11/17/2008 10:53:30 PM PST · by goldstategop · 1 replies · 418+ views
    Courtinfo.ca.gov ^ | California Supreme Court Docket
    Proposition 8 Supreme Court Filings S168047 KAREN L. STRAUSS, et al., Petitioners v. MARK B. HORTON, et al. * Immediate Stay Request * Petitioner's Exhibits * Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Notice * Amended Petition * Motion to Intervene * Motion to Intervene by Official Proponents * Request for Judicial Notice * Preliminary Opposition * Preliminary Response from the Attorney General * Letters submitted in support of petition: The Bar Association of San Francisco et al. Forty-Four Members of the State Legislature Anti-Defamation League et al. Beverly Hills Bar Association et al. Los Angeles County Bar Association Sacramento Lawyers for Equality...
  • Rep. Jerry Lewis of California hires high-profile legal team

    06/13/2006 4:57:40 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 5 replies · 279+ views
    AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 6/13/06 | Erica Werner - ap
    House Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., under federal investigation over his ties to a lobbyist, has hired a high-profile legal team from a Los Angeles-based law firm. Lewis has denied wrongdoing and has said he has not been contacted by federal investigators in the probe, which became public last month and is being run by the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles. The team includes former Solicitor General Ted Olson; Robert Bonner, who once led the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles and was once head of Customs and Border Protection; Mel Levine, a former Democratic congressman from California;...
  • PLEASE! STOP POSTING SAME MESSAGE ON ALL BOARDS!

    08/16/2002 7:39:49 AM PDT · by Merchant Seaman · 754 replies · 30,137+ views
    Annoyed Reader
    The purpose of FreeRepublic.com's multiple message boards is to limit the topics for each board to particular topics. Posting the same message on all the boards defeats the purpose of multiple-boards for special topics. It is very annoying to see the same message on every bulletin board. PLEASE! DO THE READERS A FAVOR. STOP CROSS-POSTING YOUR MESSAGES!