Free Republic

Professor Jeremy Rabkin is concerned about the Internet Givaway, but he attempts to 'sooth the sheeple' with his Weekly Standard article "ICANN CAN'T". But wait ... then he backs up most of my warnings. The professor also suggests an international oversight system modeled after the World Bank or the IMF. [Creepy, right?] For those who don't know it: Obama is committing an impeachable High Crime -- he's illegally refusing to renew a contract that restricts ICANN to federal control. We lose control THIS MONTH -- September 30. And people are too confused to get angry about it. "ICANN CAN'T" started...

This gets into the nitty gritty of exactly HOW Obama is giving away critical aspects of the internet to shadowy foreign entities. And I will explain why the DNC is complicit and what we can do about it. Many have sounded the horn: Senators Cruz, Lankford, and Lee along with ... 1. Drudge 2. Washinton Examiner 3. Wall Street Journal 4. Breitbart 5. [UK] Daily Mail 6. The Hill [Links to this and other info coming up.] Congress ordered President Obama to renew one of the most important contracts in history. He's illegally refusing to do so. If DNC senators...

Note the difference between the WSJ's editorial on April 8, 2005 and its editorial now, as seen in the Jan. 7, 2007 editorial posted below. Where is the WSJ's apology for its April 8, 2005 editorial? http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006534 REVIEW & OUTLOOK The Berger File Sandy Berger didn't destroy documents with notes in the margin. Friday, April 8, 2005 12:01 a.m. Some people won't let a bad conspiracy theory go. We're referring to those who loudly assert that former NSC adviser Sandy Berger was trying to protect the Clinton Administration when he illegally removed copies of sensitive documents from the National Archives...