Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $59,212
73%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 73%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: 7to2

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Supreme Court upholds Biden rule requiring serial numbers and background checks for ghost guns

    03/26/2025 8:20:38 AM PDT · by Tench_Coxe · 19 replies
    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Biden administration regulation on the nearly impossible-to-trace weapons called ghost guns, clearing the way for continued serial numbers, background checks and age verification requirements to buy them in kits online.Seven justices joined the opinion, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, upholding the rule. Two justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented.(snip)Ghost guns are any privately made firearms without the serial numbers that allow police to trace weapons used in crime. The 2022 regulation was focused on kits sold online with everything needed to build a functioning firearm — sometimes in less than...
  • Supreme Court upholds rules requiring background checks for ‘ghost guns’

    03/26/2025 8:26:46 AM PDT · by Racketeer · 27 replies
    CNN ^ | March 26, 2025 | John Fritze
    The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld Biden-era federal regulations on “ghost guns,” mail-order kits that allow people to build untraceable weapons at home – handing gun control groups a rare win at the conservative high court. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion for a 7-2 majority that included both liberal and conservative justices in one of the most closely watched Supreme Court cases of the year. “Perhaps a half hour of work is required before anyone can fire a shot,” Gorsuch wrote. “But even as sold, the kit comes with all necessary components, and its intended function as instrument of...
  • SCOTUS Rejects Effort to Block Climate Lawsuits Against Energy Companies

    03/12/2025 5:12:24 AM PDT · by MtnClimber · 34 replies
    American Greatness ^ | 11 Mar, 2025 | Eric Lendrum
    On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rejected a lawsuit by Republican attorneys general that aimed at blocking left-wing lawsuits targeting energy companies for their alleged role in contributing to “global warming.” As ABC News reports, the lawsuit was filed by attorneys general from 19 different states in response to several Democrat-led lawsuits against oil and gas companies. The Republican lawsuit, led by Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, said that the lawsuits by Democratic states were essentially attempting to control national policy; he also warned that such efforts could run the risk of increasing energy prices. States...
  • Joe Biden Vows to Expand Obamacare After Supreme Court Decision

    06/17/2021 12:07:32 PM PDT · by ChicagoConservative27 · 36 replies
    breitbart ^ | 06/17/2021 | Charlie Spiering
    President Joe Biden celebrated the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Obamacare on Thursday, promising to expand the law in the future. “Today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision is a major victory for all Americans benefitting from this groundbreaking and life-changing law,” Biden wrote in a statement.
  • Supreme Court issues major ruling in Republican lawsuit against Obamacare filed by 18 states

    06/17/2021 9:11:29 AM PDT · by Drastic · 45 replies
    Patriot Fetch ^ | 6-17-2021 | Lou
    The United States Supreme Court issued their ruling today in a major lawsuit from 18 states that challenged the Affordable Care Act put in place by former President Barack Obama. This might come to a devastating blow to a vast number of Americans paying higher than normal premiums and/deductibles, but the Supreme Court ruled in a decision, 7-2, that Texas and the 17 other states “lacked standing to challenge its constitutionality.” The lawsuit also included two individuals who stood against the healthcare program that many Americans sometimes stated was overpriced and under-performing compared to their previous health insurances. In other...
  • Supreme Court spares Obamacare from GOP challenge

    06/17/2021 7:24:23 AM PDT · by rdl6989 · 87 replies
    NBC News ^ | June 17, 2021 | Pete Williams
    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 Thursday that the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, remains valid, rejecting a claim by a group of conservative states that a recent change to the law made it unconstitutional. Republicans have long opposed the law, former President Barack Obama's signature legislation. But more than 20 million Americans now depend on it for their health insurance, and there is broad public support for its requirement that insurance companies must cover pre-existing health conditions.
  • Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to Obamacare, upholding health care law

    06/17/2021 7:21:35 AM PDT · by NohSpinZone · 52 replies
    CBS News ^ | June 17, 2021 | By Melissa Quinn
    The Supreme Court on Thursday tossed out a closely watched legal battle targeting the Affordable Care Act, rescuing the landmark health care law from the latest efforts by Republican-led states to dismantle it. The court ruled 7-2 that the red states and two individuals who brought the dispute do not have the legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of the law's individual mandate to buy health insurance. Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. Justice Stephen Breyer delivered the majority opinion for the court. The Supreme Court did not address the constitutionality of Obamacare's individual mandate or whether it can...
  • Supreme Court Leaves Affordable Care Act Intact

    06/17/2021 10:14:59 AM PDT · by Erik Latranyi · 31 replies
    MSN ^ | 17 June 2021 | Brent Kendall
    WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, the third time it has preserved the 2010 healthcare law. Texas and other Republican-leaning states, backed by the Trump administration, sought to strike down the law on technical arguments after Congress reduced to zero the tax penalty for failing to carry health insurance. Thursday’s 7-2 decision, written by Justice Stephen Breyer, found that none of the plaintiffs suffered any injury from zeroing out the penalty and thus they lacked legal standing to bring the lawsuit at all. “We do not reach these questions of the Act’s validity,”...