Posted on 07/06/2005 10:10:07 AM PDT by malakhi
German and U.S. scientists have launched a project to reconstruct the Neanderthal genome, the Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology said Wednesday.
The project, which involves isolating genetic fragments from fossils of the prehistoric beings who originally inhabited Europe, is being carried out at the Leipzig-based institute.
[snip]
"Firstly, we will learn a lot about the Neanderthals. Secondly, we will learn a lot about the uniqueness of human beings. And thirdly, it's simply cool," Rubin said.
[snip]
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Well said. It's definitely a human trait, IOW, not something we get just from the Neandertal ancestors. :')
It's interesting...I remember some show on PBS years ago about the creation/evolution debate, and they had on some pretty famous paleontologist (can't remember his name), and he was foaming at the mouth about how creationists interpret the evidence, waving his bone fragments around as he made his point, and the guy looked just like those popular renderings of Neanderthal man, minus the facial hair, and in a suit -- low protruding brow, heavy-set jaw, and broad face. I thought it was rather comical to have this expert in paleontology on the program who looked like a cleaned up caveman.
I believe the human population absord the neanderthal population by killing males and mating with females. Seems to have been a very popular thing to do back in the old prehistory days.
Good find. Thanks.
Don't fall into the trap. Much of evolution is conjecture.
Blue/gray/green eyes are found (natively) ONLY in those regions formerly inhabited by Neanderthals: Europe and Middle East. Light eye color may be a Neanderthal legacy. (Please, no flames: I myself have blue eyes.)
Afrocentrists love this theory because if whites are part Neanderthall, it somehow makes us less human. So they'll want Neanderthals to be white (probably correctly) and King Tut to be a Subsaharan African (contrary to all known science.)
Of course the Afrocentrists have their own internal contradiction to deal with, namely 2 of their favorite dogmas, when combined, indict them:
(1) "Western Civilization is the root of all Evil", and
(2) "Blacks invented Western Civilization"
Oops!
a couple of links from the original Yahoo page:
Could Asia have been the cradle of humanity?
By David Ropeik, Globe Correspondent
July 5, 2005
http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2005/07/05/could_asia_have_been_the_cradle_of_humanity/
[the next one has appeared as three topics on FR, and has been GGG pinged]
Walking with ancestors: discovery rewrites American prehistory
By David Keys, Archaeology Correspondent
Published: 05 July 2005
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article296886.ece
Not so. There is more evidence of biological evolution than you could read in a lifetime. However, much of the progress that's made in science generally is the result of false conjecture, evolutionary biology included.
But you can't expect too much from mere men. I believe this debate is part of God's plan and will work out in the end. ;)
It need not have been so brutal. When white Americans met with American Indians, for example, peaceful interbreeding frequently occured; it wasn't all wars like in the cowboy movies.
On the other hand, Valerius Geist argues persuasively that very little Neanderthal/modern interbreeding could have taken place: Neanderthal Paradigm Very little, doesn't mean zero however; it would only take once for the necessary genes to cross over into a modern population, where they could be selectively acted on.
It sucks being of the cue tip generation and not conforming to head color.
My friend Val sent the link in email when that topic first appeared, and led me to FR. I didn't join until much later though. :')
Think of it as "resting". My mom hauled out a small, old, wood box (an old container for some product or other) and showed me a large clip of red hair, from my great-grandmother (died 1905). That color emerges here and there among the cousins and such. :')
Wouldn't it also be possible that the 'ginger gene' was a rare occurrence among H. sapiens sapiens which then got somewhat amplified during a cold spell such as the Younger Dryas?
I believe the human population [absorbed] the neanderthal population by killing males and mating with females.The Neandertal female probably had less trouble giving birth to "hybrid" children than going the other way, but any interbreeding (and it's clear that such did take place) probably took place more or less peacefully and over long periods of time, and the genes wound up mostly Neandertal.
In small genetic groups inbreeding is not good, that is why wife stealing was so popular, see the Spartan marriage habits. Science rediscovers humanity, but then again there was the habit of killing anyone that didn't fit, and perhaps cooking them for dinner, mankind a strange and wondrous group.
*************
"Ignorance" is preferable to cruelty.
***************
Thank you. You said it much better than I was able to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.