Posted on 06/27/2005 5:22:48 PM PDT by kristinn
At the culmination of a gathering of global 'antiwar' groups in Istanbul to hold court on the liberation of Iraq led by the United States and the United Kingdom, the jurors who heard testimony against the liberators issued their findings which included a declaration of support for the terrorists in Iraq who are killing American, British and coalition soldiers and Iraqis.
The World Tribunal on Iraq is endorsed by leading leftwing organizations from around the world including American-based groups like Not in Our Name Project, United for Peace and Justice, Code Pink and International ANSWER.
The war on terror has reached a critical juncture. The left has publicly chosen sides with this announcement. There can be no more talk of 'we support the soldiers but not the war.' As Aloha Ronnie says, THE ENEMY IS WITHIN.
Here are two statements from the trbunal's announcement on Iraq:
10. There is widespread opposition to the occupation. Political, social, and civil resistance through peaceful means is subjected to repression by the occupying forces. It is the brutality of the occupation that has provoked a strong armed resistance and certain acts of desperation. By the principles embodied in the UN Charter and in international law, the popular national resistance to the occupation is legitimate and justified. It deserves the support of people everywhere who care for justice and freedom.
AND
III. Recommendations
Recognising the right of the Iraqi people to resist the illegal occupation of their country and to develop independent institutions, and affirming that the right to resist the occupation is the right to wage a struggle for self-determination, freedom, and independence as derived from the Charter of the United Nations, we the Jury of Conscience declare our solidarity with the people of Iraq.
The Tribunal also calls for the world community to support the terrorists by denying aid to those fighting them in Iraq:
10. That people around the world resist and reject any effort by any of their governments to provide material, logistical, or moral support to the occupation of Iraq.
The tribunal betrays the bravery of the 8 million Iraqis who their cast their votes in January by declaring the elected government of Iraq illegitimate. The terrorists couldn't have said it better:
9. Any law or institution created under the aegis of occupation is devoid of both legal and moral authority. The recently concluded election, the Constituent Assembly, the current government, and the drafting committee for the Constitution are therefore all illegitimate.
Link to the trbunal's pronouncement here.
Link to the list of endorsers here.
Some of you may read this and say this is not news. As with last night's posting about Code Pink, the left has been trying keep under wraps their support for the terrorists. Now, they have boldy declared themselves to be on the side of the terrorists.
We knew this day would come after September 11. We just didn't know the day.
I wanted to excerpt this article but did not find any paragraphs that were not important to the message
++++++
The Power of Hatred
By Ralph Kinney Bennett Published 06/28/2005
http://www.techcentralstation.com/062805D.html
The Islamoterrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan have shown a resilience that some have found surprising.
They have learned fast and learned much - about how to build more effective roadside bombs, for instance, and about the futility of engaging American forces directly in firefights.
They have shown an ugly ruthlessness about spilling Muslim blood.
They have demonstrated an extraordinary ability or extraordinary luck in preserving their leadership, sometimes with hairbreadth escapes.
And, although they may be scraping a barrel or two while husbanding their "finest" for later operations, they have thus far produced enough recruits (some with their hands taped to steering wheels) to continue their fight despite heavy losses.
Give them credit where credit is due. And credit them, too, for shedding light on a dark reality many Americans would prefer to ignore - the power of hatred.
It is fashionable to praise the power of an uplifting idea, but it makes us uncomfortable to admit the power of festering hatred. Yet it is pure hatred that is abroad and alive in the bomb-laden cars that ply the streets and roads of Iraq and in the calculated fury that leaves children dismembered in a market place and young policemen executed with their hands tied behind their backs.
All the efforts to comb the Koran and extol the virtues and ideals of "mainstream" Islam will not camouflage nor expiate the murderous hatred of the Islamofanatics at work in Iraq and around the globe.
Explore the radical Islamic websites. Consider their pronouncements - all they have said and written. There are no ideals there, few ideas, only impositions.
The old Saddamists, now in uneasy ad hoc alliance with the stone terrorists, don't really count. They may mouth some of the jihadist jargon and fight dirty, but they merely want a return to the grand political imposition that was Saddam's regime.
Their "vision," of a return to air-conditioned villas, rape rooms, big cars and Baghdad's best tables, will never be. They are doomed - either at the hands of coalition forces or at the hands of the true Islamofanatics - those who are at the implacable heart of the "resistance" in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The real faith of the Islamofanatics is a faith in fear. Since they have no transcending ideas or ideals, they are determined not only to kill the infidel "crusaders," but to frighten into silence or submission on pain of death those millions of Muslims and nominal Muslims who merely seek to live a quiet life and dare to believe that some freedom and democracy might not be such a bad proposition.
These hate-filled men seek to impose a way of life in which there is not the slightest element of liberty or individuality. There is only hatred.
Hatred for any who are not of the narrowly defined faith.
Hatred for any doctrine, any idea that might allow men and women to seek their own way or just be left alone.
And most of all, hatred for the world itself as it is presently constituted.
Consider these words, written by one of the apostles of Islamic hatred, the Iranian Ayatollah Muhammad Baqer al-Sadr, back in 1980:
"The world as it is today is how others shaped it. We have two choices: either to accept it with submission, which means letting Islam die, or to destroy it, so that we can construct the world as Islam requires."
As this struggle continues, the ragged gaggle of mere thugs, opportunists and murderous nuts who move within the ambit of the Islamofanatics will be roughly sorted out leaving only the hard core. These are the ones who want "the world as Islam requires."
Their Islam "requires" submission or death, conversion or extermination.
This is the terrorism of the terrorized - of minds frightened into a deadly madness by a world with competing cultures and ideas and daunting possibilities of departure from dogma.
The considerable cultural and scientific accomplishments of the civilization that evolved from Islam mean little to the fanatics. They wish to return to a "clean" Islam in a distant past, or rather, in their ill-formed imagination of the past.
The rising numbers of foreign fighters who have made their way to Iraq are not fighting "for Iraq" They are there to kill "infidels" and those Muslims who are worse than infidels for their apostasy or indifference. They are there to continue the task they feel was so gloriously joined by the murderers who flew those planes into the World Trade Center at the outset of this long, bloody struggle.
Those fatuous lawmakers who float talk of "timetables" and gibber about "quagmires" and think we can simply "come home" from this fight, are guilty at the least of a monstrous ignorance.
We are taking a hard pounding, but we have taken harder. Our troops have the stomach to take it and pound back, but if they sense that we back home have lost our nerve then the fight is lost. The majority of us, who have had to make little or no sacrifice in this war, should at the least be signaling by the millions this July 4th that we not only support our military, but also the winning of this fight.
Somehow we must make it clear - to our troops, to our lawmakers, to our president - that we have the mettle and the patience for this; that we are prepared to sacrifice and fight, not merely "for democracy," but against implacable hatred - a hatred impervious to council, to appeal, even to weariness; an exterminating hatred that must itself be exterminated.
Then again they hate representative government and look for the totalitarian route since they know whats best for everyone.
Just my thoughts.
They are open minded pacifists, what else do you expect?
Of course they will condone the murder, bombings, kidnappings, blackmail, threats, torture, mutilation and any other technique applied by those who want to kill anyone who is not a Muslim.
Gee, can’t you get it? You must be a close minded war monger?!
Red6
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Wasn't Ms. Heinz-Kerry a supporter of ANSWER?
Au con-traire, I did catch the sarcasm, thus my own little stab at humor. I threw that "LOL!" in to indicate my intentions.
Funny how two people speaking the same language, so often misunderstand each other, isn't it?
Free gards,
FJM
Lemme unnerstand: ANSWER and Code Pink support an ARMED struggle against the US in Iraq, but they oppose 2nd Amendment gun ownership for Americans.
EMEMY=ENEMY
" anarchist-socialists."
What the heck does that mean?
Please DO NOT fake anti-American quotes from Hillary. It makes the real ones we're going to need against her in 08 unbelievable. Remember how that photoshopped picture of John Kerry & Hanoi Jane tainted the real one? I'm still not sure Dems weren't behind that.
Read the note at the bottom of the graphic art.
Hang 'em High ~ Bump!
Excellent essay and bookmarked. More need to see it, read it and understand the enemy we are fighting. I would only hope that President Bush talks about the common enemy this way tonight.
I was shocked to see Green Peace onboard. I mean, I knew they were well to the Left but in a fuzzy-headed, singing-with-the-whales sort of way. They are have done themselves irreparable harm in aligning with the terrorists.
The term certainly encompasses the spectrum of anti-freedom protestors -- from those who advocate no government at all (anarchy) to total control of the means of production and all power in a central government.
I saw it. That graphic may well take on a life of its own and go all over the Net (it's very well done). If it does, someone is going to be looking for a source - when did she say this? where did she say this? - and because she never actually did (though I am in agreement with you that it's how she thinks) it will DISCREDIT the many anti-American things she has said, especially when its source is traced back to Free Republic. If we disseminate any of her real statements, the reaction is going to be "it's those losers at FR again - remember that other quote they faked?" It'll be fruit from a poisoned tree.
We can't afford to squander our credibility on fakes, even if they're jokes. One theory of the Rathergate fiasco (it wasn't a fiasco for US) was that it started as a joke by some office clerklet who was too young ever to have seen typewritten memos.
World Tribunal on Iraq = Democratic Party
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1432201/posts
The Power of Hatred
By Ralph Kinney Bennett Published 06/28/2005
I just found it posted on FR, excerpted -
I'll go there and bump it a few times
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.