Biden Green Screen Fail!

The Hill ^ | March 15, 2021 | Anon

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Reporter: "Do you have any plans to travel to the southern border?"

President Biden: "Not at the moment."

[Fury]

Disregard trying to reason. That FReeper advocates for secession. Whatever you post is going to bounce right off the old ‘noggin.

[central_va]

The first mpeg looks doctored. The second one does not. The first one was manipulated and altered but for what reason? Just to see if they can. Probably. They cut Biden out and made him look closer to the media. They did a terrible job probably on purpose. Who released the first one?

The first video, obvious altered video, was released as a bone to get us to make claims of forgery so in the future we will be gun shy when the fake is more obvious. We are being groomed.

[central_va]

The first video has been altered. You are in denial if you think otherwise.

[central_va]

You advocate boot licking the Feds, so there is that.

[COBOL2Java]

If you’re going to really standby this being ‘fake’ I dunno what to think. Maybe FR is full of nuts?

No, just the Noobs who eventually wing up attracting the ozone

[Fury]

Re: 84 - LOL! Just what I would have expected.

No sense discussing further as on this particular issue of green screen, we will never agree. I think there is no green screen, you do.

[central_va]

Fact: The first video posted was doctored.

I am not saying it was a grand conspiracy. Biden and his henchmen probably had nothing to do with it. It was probably done by someone in the media. All this does is to remind us to never take for granted what we are seeing is 100% real. Is 99% real, really real? Always keep your guard up for things like this.

[central_va]

No, no green screen.

It was altered for sure. One explanation is "they" cut the press and their mics out and moved them closer. No green screen needed.

[Codeflier]

Someone added the microphones. I agree, not green screen for Biden footage.

[Alberta's Child]

1. The person asking the question was a Biden staffer.

2. They added the microphones to the video to make it look like there were reporters on the scene.

[dangus]

SOMETHING weird as hell is going on. Conspiracy kooks take stuff the sort of errors that are certain to happen when dramatic events take place, and presume bizarre explanations. I’m not seeing that.

Also, after the past four years, nothing seems that bizarre. Good Heavens, we had a real attempted coup followed by a conspiracy to steal an election aided and abetted by Chinese-compromised REPUBLICAN elected officials. I’m going easy on conspiracy folks.

[central_va]

The first video was "doctored" in some way. If you deny that you are in denial or an idiot. Accepting the obvious fact it was altered does not make you a conspiracy theory type or a "nutjob".

We are trying to determine a motivation and a method. We have to deal in FACTS. Clearly no harm was done but why do this? Who benefited?

[KobraKai]

Just looking at the video proportionally, where Bidens hand skims over the gray mic, that would make that microphone the size of a basketball. You’re not even paying attention, you’re just trolling.

[KobraKai]

The media perpetrated a 4 year Russia Collusion absolute hoax, and you still give them the benefit of the doubt?

[Alberta's Child]

Your Post #62 actually reinforces the point about a fake video.

There may have been “two different camera angles” but then there should have been two different camera feeds (e,g., one camera angle from CNN and one from NBC).

THERE WEREN’T.

These were two different camera angles that were spliced into a single video clip and then released by the White House to the media. It looks like the AP was the single point of contact.

This was a staged production, dude.

[Ann Archy]

Come on, man! The ONLY thing semi weird is the guy in black running.

[KobraKai]

I thought it was weird how the reporters stood up to completely block the camera for Bidens walk across the grass. They’re probably instructed to do that just in case of a trip and fall.

[central_va]

Altered, but why?

[NELSON111]

Congrats. Now with total support from the Alphabet community (who keep moving goal posts and get their feelings hurt when you point out failure after failure and then just start talking ill of your dead mother) - and stuff like this - the once great Free Republic has become no better than "Before It's News."

we used to be conservative - and now we are a collection of cultish - compromising wackadoodles - where you can't have a conversation about anything - and if someone even posts a scientific article - a bunch of children (who are probably 70) jump in with stupid jokes.

What a shame.

[nesnah]

Altered, but why?

---

That’s the important question to be answered.