Free Republic 1st Qtr 2021 Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $29,429
33%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 33% is in!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: supremes

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Argument analysis: Justices seem inclined to put off ruling on merits of Trump’s plan for census data

    12/01/2020 2:19:28 AM PST · by Be Careful · 24 replies
    SCOTUSblog ^ | November 30,2020 | Amy Howe
    The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. New York, the challenge to the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are in the United States illegally from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House of Representatives. The stakes are high in the case: If the justices allow the administration to implement the plan before it leaves office in January, states with large immigrant populations could lose political power, while states with fewer immigrants could gain it. After over 90 minutes of debate, several justices seemed skeptical of the legality of President Donald Trump’s...
  • John Roberts Is a Freaking Coward, and It's Time to Stop Pretending Otherwise

    11/29/2020 12:24:12 PM PST · by Kaslin · 69 replies
    Red State.com ^ | November 29, 2020 | Bonchie
    A few days ago, I wrote on the 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court to strike down Andrew Cuomo’s clearly unconstitutional COVID regulations. They were clearly unconstitutional because they specifically and unfairly targeted religious institutions. Cuomo didn’t even really attempt to make a salient case, as one simply doesn’t exist. His rules have been arbitrary and discriminatory, worrying more about Jewish kids going to school than mass protests in the street. Neil Gorsuch eviscerated Cuomo in response (see Neil Gorsuch Murders Andrew Cuomo, Twitter Murders John Roberts) Justice Gorsuch finally puts words to the thoughts of many. #SCOTUS pic.twitter.com/sXdvtkDm7x —...
  • As expected, Pennsylvania Supreme Court throws out Trump team’s challenge to mail-in ballots: The ball is now in the court of the Supreme Court of the United States, Can we expect justice?

    11/29/2020 12:38:52 PM PST · by SeekAndFind · 52 replies
    American Thinker ^ | 11/29/2020 | Thomas Lifson
    The ball is now in the court of the Supreme Court of the United States, with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court throwing out a big victory for the Trump legal team. The top court of the Keystone State has a terrible track record, allowing changes in election law that the state legislature did not authorize, so this story from the AP is no surprise:Pennsylvania’s highest court on Saturday night threw out a lower court’s order preventing the state from certifying dozens of contests on its Nov. 3 election ballot in the latest lawsuit filed by Republicans who are attempting to block...
  • Supreme Court votes 5-4 to block Gov. Cuomo's attendance limits at houses of worship

    11/25/2020 9:58:38 PM PST · by Trump20162020 · 97 replies
    Twitter ^ | November 26, 2020 | Steven Mazie
    BREAKING: Supreme Court votes 5-4 to grant Catholic Diocese and orthodox Jews' request to block Gov. Cuomo's attendance limits at houses of worship in New York. Chief Justice Roberts joins the three liberal justices in dissent.
  • Circuit Courts have been Reassigned

    11/20/2020 1:25:07 PM PST · by Blue Turtle · 75 replies
    Effective November 20, 2020, ordered pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 42. Look who is in charge of MI, WI, PA, and GA: 🇺🇸💪 MI - Brett M. Kavanaugh WI - Amy Coney Barrett PA - Samuel A. Alito GA - Clarence Thomas
  • Pelosi: Amy Coney Barrett 'an illegitimate Supreme Court justice'

    11/03/2020 11:31:37 AM PST · by jazusamo · 102 replies
    The Hill ^ | November 3, 2020 | Joe Concha
    Video at link. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called Amy Coney Barrett “an illegitimate Supreme Court justice" during an Election Day news conference on Tuesday, just one week after Barrett was confirmed as President Trump's third Supreme Court pick. “The president is installing an illegitimate Supreme Court justice one week before the election, after 60 million Americans have voted, who will dismantle the ACA, and won’t say, by the way, when asked, by Sen. [Dianne] Feinstein [D-Calif.], do you think Medicare is constitutional? She said she really couldn’t say." The GOP-led Senate confirmed Barrett in a largely party-line 52-48 vote...
  • One Judge Confirmed This Week

    10/31/2020 4:10:02 AM PDT · by cotton1706 · 20 replies
    This will be a weekly post. Count is now 220 judges confirmed 2 Trade Court judges 162 District Court judges 53 Circuit Court judges 3 Supreme Court justices We've been waiting for this one! Only one judge confirmed this week. But it was a doozy!! On Monday, Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed by the US Senate to the Supreme Court of the United States! Take a look at the above numbers and picture yourself four years ago, the weekend before the election. The above would be unthinkable, impossible even. But it's real. Leave out the three (yes THREE) Supreme Court...
  • Confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett (Live Thread)

    10/26/2020 7:30:14 AM PDT · by PapaBear3625 · 800 replies
    C-SPAN live feed ^ | 10/26/2020 | CSPAN
    Live feed of Senate hearing
  • Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Political Cartoon

    10/26/2020 7:14:31 AM PDT · by cotton1706 · 30 replies
  • Murkowski to Vote to Confirm Judge Barrett to the Supreme Court

    10/25/2020 8:54:24 AM PDT · by little jeremiah · 48 replies
    The Epoch Times ^ | October 24 2020 | JANITA KAN
    Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said on Saturday that she intends to vote to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court despite her objections to the process of taking up the nomination weeks before the election. Murkowski previously indicated that she wouldn’t support filling a Supreme Court vacancy before the election due to its proximity to Nov. 3 and a precedent that Republicans established in 2016 when considering President Barrack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland. She said during a speech on the Senate floor during a rare Saturday session that while she still opposes the process, she does...
  • Senate to convene rare Saturday session to debate Amy Coney Barrett nomination

    10/24/2020 10:57:52 AM PDT · by Navy Patriot · 45 replies
    Faux News ^ | October 24, 2020 | Marisa Schultz
    A procedural vote is set for Sunday, final confirmation on MondayThe Senate will gavel in a rare Saturday session this afternoon to debate confirming Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court -- just days before voters decide whether Republicans will maintain control of the Senate and the White House. Democrats, fiercely opposed to Barrett's confirmation so close to the election, boycotted the Judiciary Committee vote Thursday and Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., staged four delay tactics Friday on the Senate floor, including forcing a brief closed session.
  • Murkowski’s nod gives Barrett extra boost for Supreme Court

    10/24/2020 3:57:37 PM PDT · by Cathi · 49 replies
    ap ^ | ap
    WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett won crucial backing Saturday when one of the last Republican holdouts against filling the seat during an election season announced support for President Donald Trump’s pick ahead of a confirmation vote expected Monday.
  • Murkowski's nod gives Barrett extra boost for Supreme Court - Sen. Lisa Murkowski has announced that she'll vote to confirm Amy Coney Barrett

    10/24/2020 2:31:24 PM PDT · by 11th_VA · 54 replies
    ABC. Ews ^ | By LISA MASCARO and MARY CLARE JALONICK Associated Press October 24, 2020, 4:51 PM ET
    WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett won crucial backing Saturday when one of the last Republican holdouts announced her support for President Donald Trump's pick ahead of a confirmation vote expected Monday. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said during Saturday’s session that while she opposed her party’s decision to push ahead with the nomination process so close to the Nov. 3 presidential election, she supported the federal judge who is on track to lock in a conservative court majority for years to come...
  • Murkowski says she will vote to confirm Barrett to Supreme Court on Monday

    "Frankly, I've lost that procedural fight" and said she [Murkowski] was making a decision on confirming Barrett based on the judge's legal philosophy.
  • It's Over Libs: Murkowski Says She Will Vote to Confirm Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court on Monday

    10/24/2020 2:01:41 PM PDT · by wrrock · 31 replies
    TG ^ | 10/24/2020 | Evan
    Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she'll vote to put Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court. The Republican had backed waiting until after the election to fill the seat. watch her statement...
  • It's Official: Lisa Murkowski Will Vote to Confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court

    10/24/2020 2:07:10 PM PDT · by Navy Patriot · 24 replies
    TownHall ^ | October 24, 2020 | Matt Vespa
    With Murkowski's Announcement, Amy Coney Barrett's SCOTUS Confirmation Is Assured Okay, I might have overreacted toward Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), but her vote to not enter an executive session in the Senate regarding the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett should have raised red flags for everyone at the time. This is the weak sauce caucus, folks. Sens. Mitt Romney (R-UT), Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins (R-ME) are the three amigos when it comes to making trouble within our ranks in the Senate.
  • Supreme Court Denies Republican Challenge to Mail-in Ballot Extension in Pennsylvania

    10/19/2020 4:35:11 PM PDT · by JonPreston · 108 replies
    Fox News ^ | 10/19/2020 | Fox
    Judge Roberts casts deciding vote against Republicans. Pennsylvania ballots will be counted for an additional 3 days past 11/3/20.
  • Trump cases on census, asylum seekers, border wall head to Supreme Court Friday

    10/16/2020 10:57:06 AM PDT · by BeauBo · 7 replies
    WNEP News (Pennsylvania) ^ | October 16, 2020 | MARK SHERMAN and JESSICA GRESKO Associated Press Published
    Trump administration policies on the census, asylum seekers and the border wall, held illegal by lower courts, are on the Supreme Court's agenda Friday. The most pressing case before the justices when they meet privately, and by telephone because of the coronavirus pandemic, involves the census. They are considering the Trump administration's appeal to be allowed to exclude people living in the U.S. illegally from the population count that will be used to allocate seats in the House of Representatives — and by extension the Electoral College — among the states for the next 10 years. The administration wants the...
  • Supreme Court Justices Slam Google For Apparently Cheating Its Way To The Top

    10/14/2020 5:27:27 AM PDT · by gattaca · 58 replies
    The Federalist ^ | October 14, 2020 | Michael J. Pappas
    While a decision in Google v. Oracle isn’t expected for a few months, the justices’ pointed questioning at the Big Tech giant indicates Google broke the law to get ahead. Michael J. PappasBy Michael J. Pappas OCTOBER 14, 2020 The Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Google v. Oracle on Oct. 7. The case involves several legal issues, all of which boil down to one principal question: Did Google cheat and steal its way to the top? 

While a decision on the case isn’t expected for a few months, the justices’ pointed questioning at the Big Tech giant points to...
  • Democratic senator asks Amy Coney Barrett if she has ever sexually assaulted someone

    10/14/2020 3:52:39 AM PDT · by gattaca · 49 replies
    Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, asked a question pertaining to an issue that came up quite a bit during Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing but had yet to come up during Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s hearing: whether the Supreme Court nominee had ever sexually assaulted someone. Citing a statement from Chief Justice John Roberts in 2017 in which he acknowledged that the judiciary “is not immune” from the problem of sexual misconduct, Hirono said it is her duty “to ensure the fitness of nominees” for positions that have lifetime appointments. “Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted...