Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

English And Welsh Are Races Apart
BBC ^ | 6-30-2002

Posted on 07/04/2002 5:27:12 PM PDT by blam

Sunday, 30 June, 2002, 15:31 GMT 16:31 UK

English and Welsh are races apart

Gene scientists claim to have found proof that the Welsh are the "true" Britons.

The research supports the idea that Celtic Britain underwent a form of ethnic cleansing by Anglo-Saxons invaders following the Roman withdrawal in the fifth century.

Genetic tests show clear differences between the Welsh and English

It suggests that between 50% and 100% of the indigenous population of what was to become England was wiped out, with Offa's Dyke acting as a "genetic barrier" protecting those on the Welsh side.

And the upheaval can be traced to this day through genetic differences between the English and the Welsh.

Academics at University College in London comparing a sample of men from the UK with those from an area of the Netherlands where the Anglo-Saxons are thought to have originated found the English subjects had genes that were almost identical.

But there were clear differences between the genetic make-up of Welsh people studied.

The research team studied the Y-chromosome, which is passed almost unchanged from father to son, and looked for certain genetic markers.

Ethnic links: Many races share common bonds

They chose seven market towns mentioned in the Domesday Book of 1086 and studied 313 male volunteers whose paternal grandfather had also lived in the area.

They then compared this with samples from Norway and with Friesland, now a northern province of the Netherlands.

The English and Frisians studied had almost identical genetic make-up but the English and Welsh were very different.

The researchers concluded the most likely explanation for this was a large-scale Anglo-Saxon invasion, which devastated the Celtic population of England, but did not reach Wales.

Dr Mark Thomas, of the Centre for Genetic Anthropology at UCL, said their findings suggested that a migration occurred within the last 2,500 years.

Genetic links

It reinforced the idea that the Welsh were the true indigenous Britons.

In April last year, research for a BBC programme on the Vikings revealed strong genetic links between the Welsh and Irish Celts and the Basques of northern Spain and south France.

It suggested a possible link between the Celts and Basques, dating back tens of thousands of years.

The UCL research into the more recent Anglo-Saxon period suggested a migration on a huge scale.

"It appears England is made up of an ethnic cleansing event from people coming across from the continent after the Romans left," he said.

Celtic Britons

Archaeologists after the Second World War rejected the traditionally held view that an Anglo-Saxon invasion pushed the indigenous Celtic Britons to the fringes of Britain.

Instead, they said the arrival of Anglo-Saxon culture could have come from trade or a small ruling elite.

But the latest research by the UCL team, "using genetics as a history book", appears to support the original view of a large-scale invasion of England.

It suggests that the Welsh border was more of a genetic barrier to the Anglo-Saxon Y chromosome gene flow than the North Sea.

Dr Thomas added: "Our findings completely overturn the modern view of the origins of the English."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ancientautopsies; ancientnavigation; apart; archaeology; basques; bookofinvasions; caledonia; celts; cymraeg; cymru; cymry; domesdaybook; england; english; evolution; fartyshadesofgreen; genealogy; genetics; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; greatormecoppermine; helixmakemineadouble; history; iberia; ireland; kingarthur; normanconquest; pictish; picts; race; races; sociobiology; spain; uk; unitedkingdom; wales; welsh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-432 next last
To: syriacus
It is interesting that the Harp of the King David is the national symbol of Ireland. I think symbols like this persist long after language links have disappeared. (King David was of course an Israelite, but was not Jewish.)
221 posted on 07/05/2002 3:04:47 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: blam
It is a representation of a bearded man.
222 posted on 07/05/2002 3:18:17 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: blam
Was America a Phoenician Colony?

No.
223 posted on 07/05/2002 3:19:05 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe
I am willing to consider evidence that I'm wrong. Do you have any?
224 posted on 07/05/2002 3:31:37 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Simply explain how you can be so cock sure the Norsemen totally lost their lingustic heritage IN ONLY THREE GENERATIONS or less, but everyone else you promote doesn't lose theirs in THOUSANDS OF YEARS!

It sounds like you simply don't know what you are talking about. Do you have a reasonable explanation for this astonishing disparity?

225 posted on 07/05/2002 4:45:52 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe
Whether a conquering group loses its language depends on a number of factors, notably their relative numbers and whether or not they consider themselves culturally superior to those they conquer. Those conditions can vary.

I am just unaware of any evidence that the Normans who conquered England (and Sicily and Wales and Ireland, eventually) spoke any other language besides Norman French (and eventually the languages of the places they conquered). I am unaware of any evidence that these Normans spoke either their ancestral Scandinavian or any Celtic dialect that might have survived in Normandy (as far as I know, no such dialect survived). It may be difficult to explain why they lost their ancestral language so quickly, if they did. But unless and until I am faced with evidence that they did not lose it, I will assume that they did, in the face of all the evidence that their language was French (the language which had the most cultural prestige at the time, anyway, at least with the exception of Latin -- I will admit that I have been ignoring Latin, the language of the church and of the universities, once they got going, which was used throughout Europe).

226 posted on 07/05/2002 5:03:37 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I only meant that I thought it was interesting that the two groups seemed to have chosen similar sounds. I have only heard the two languages. I don't know anything about the vocabulary or the grammar of either language. (Other than a tiny bit about the origins and translations of family names and place names).
227 posted on 07/05/2002 5:03:58 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; LostTribe
ASLIP (The association for the study of language in prehistory)

Is this any help?

228 posted on 07/05/2002 5:26:50 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: blam
Thanks for the link.
229 posted on 07/05/2002 5:35:24 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
> It may be difficult to explain why they lost their ancestral language so quickly, if they did. But unless and until I am faced with evidence that they did not lose it, I will assume that they did,

Thank You,  I appreciate your candor.  None of which has anything to do with The Lost Tribes of Israel becoming the Celts/Europeans/Americans/Christians of today.

230 posted on 07/05/2002 6:39:28 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: LostTribe
Well, speaking as someone who's about as pure Gaelic as you get in Ireland (to judge by great grandparents' names, I'm one-eighth Norman, one-eighth Old English, and three-quarters Gaelic,) I must say I have no consciousness of being part of any lost tribe of Israel.
231 posted on 07/05/2002 7:13:34 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
"I am totally unaware of any evidence of their speaking some Celtic dialect."

To start with not all the men who attended William in the recovery of Great Britain to civilization were Normans! Secondly, not all the Normans spoke Norman-French. Thirdly, Norman-French was not necessarily a widespoken language, even in Normandy, if it was, in fact, spoken at all.

What you may or may not be personally aware of has no impact whatsoever on the reality of any given situation.

Since it's not my purpose to teach you about the Romantic Languages, I am going to leave you guessing about Gallo. Was it like French, or was it like Irish? The answer is on the Internet!

232 posted on 07/05/2002 7:19:22 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
> I must say I have no consciousness of being part of any lost tribe of Israel.

Neither do I. Bad memory I suppose. --ggg--. But we are both as Celtic as they come.

Just view the Celts from their global perspective, even a continental European one, not a narrow traditional Irish, English or Brittainy one, and the curtains will part. -Regards

233 posted on 07/05/2002 7:22:19 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Bagpipes are attributed to the Romans. They were adopted by Gaelic speakers. While the rest of Europe rusted away in the Dark Ages, the Celtic Fringe raised their use to a high art.
234 posted on 07/05/2002 7:22:40 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I'd like to note that one of the hallmarks of what is known as the "English filter" is the attempt to deny any legitimacy to any element of Celtic civilization, culture or history.

We know all about the "English filter" these days and most knowledgeable people are instantly prepared to refute or rebut it as required.

235 posted on 07/05/2002 7:26:13 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Since you're the one who's challenging received and settled opinion, it seems to me the burden of proof is on you. By the way, I looked up "Gallo" in my Encyclopaedia Britannica and found nothing. I then looked up "Normans" and "Normandy," and found no mention of their speaking any other language than Norman French. I am willing to look at any evidence you may provide.
236 posted on 07/05/2002 7:31:50 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
From a list of English Kings:  Notice the guys who lived in Anjou.  They spoke Gallo.  They probably knew French, but in their day French still consisted of many dialects.  William "The Conqueror" probably knew Gallo quite well.  Else he might not have been able to speak with his closest advisors.  I suspect we can find evidence that he understood Breton, and probably a couple of German dialects.
King/Queen reign Royal House
William I 1066-1087 Normandy `The Conqueror'
William II 1087-1100 Normandy `Rufus'
Henry I 1100-1135 Normandy `Beauclerc'
Stephen 1135-1141, 1141-1154 Blois
Matilda 1141 (April-Nov) Normandy `Empress Maud'
Henry II 1154-1189 Anjou
Richard I 1189-1199 Anjou `Coeur de Lion'
John 1199-1216 Anjou `Lackland'
Henry III 1216-1272 Anjou
Edward I 1272-1307 Anjou `Longshanks'
Edward II 1307-1327 Anjou `of Caernarfon'
Edward III 1327-1377 Anjou
Richard II 1377-1399 Anjou
Henry IV 1399-1413 Anjou
Henry V 1413-1422 Anjou (Prince Hal)
Henry VI 1422-1461, 1470-1471 Anjou
Edward IV 1461-1470, 1471-1483 Anjou
Edward V 1483 (April-June) Anjou
Richard III 1483-1485 Anjou

237 posted on 07/05/2002 7:34:33 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Uhh, you were aware, of course, that England was ruled for a very long time from Anjou, in Brittany?

Wouldn't want you to think I am tricking you. Nosirreebob!

238 posted on 07/05/2002 7:38:52 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
English is now unfashionable, and Celtic is now fashionable. I prefer to take no part in PC. My idiotic nationalist Irish relatives spurn Christianity, and give their children names like "Orla." It reminds of nothing so much as the Nazified Germans of a couple of generations ago.

No doubt the English treated my Irish people abominably. But that does not mean that humanity does not owe the English an enormous debt for their other deeds..

Blacks in this country seem, for whatever reason, unable to recognize this truth about whites in this country. I refuse to share their error.

239 posted on 07/05/2002 7:39:24 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"While the rest of Europe rusted away in the Dark Ages, the Celtic Fringe raised their use to a high art."

The Dark Ages was worldwide.

240 posted on 07/05/2002 7:40:34 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-432 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson