Posted on 02/05/2009 7:52:01 PM PST by MindBender26
Obama Born In The U.S. ? New Facts Say; “Probably Not!”
Let me be the first to admit that I have been a constant debunker of the “Obama Born Overseas” stories. How could it be possible? How could the DNC, Hillary, Edwards, the RNC, McCain, Romney, AP, BBC, ABC, FNC, etc, (and every 100th listing in the DC phone book) not have checked this out to its last level of possibility?
Well, it appears that they didn’t! Everyone assumed “the other guy did it.”
Forget for the moment all the clues left by the high-priced Obama and DNC legal teams. They are huge.
Obama and the DNC always argue “standing.” They could eliminate every legal challenge in 5 minutes by simply producing a certified copy of the original long-form birth certificate. Throw in the testimony of the Hawaii Registrar of Documents, a few retired FBI chief document examiners, and the doctor who delivered him for good measure.
If they did that in two or three courts of record, in light of the obvious media coverage it would receive, every other court nationwide would accept the precedence and the cases would all be over.
But they don’t. They keep telling the courts, “please don’t hear this case.” No proof of any kind. Just the legalese argument that the plaintiffs have no standing before that court.
That’s so overreaching, it’s like buying a refinery to get a 3000 mile oil change! And one day, some court is going to say…. “Show me the money, er,. ah, I mean, Show me the documents!”
But there is a second, and perhaps new point!
Where is that doctor who delivered him, or the midwife?
Stop and think. The delivery of a half Negro – half Caucasian baby was rare anyhere in 1961. Oriental babies were common in Hawaii of course, but a half Negro-half Caucasian baby with the funny name of Barrack Obama, in Hawaii? In 1961?
Even of you were a Republican, if you delivered a future President of the United States, wouldn’t you call some newspaper somewhere with your story. Or if you were the assistant obstetrician, or the anesthesiologist, or the scrub nurse?
What about the circulating nurse, or the pediatrician, one of a dozen nurses on the 24 hour-a-day shifts in the nursery, one of many nurses on the ward where Mrs. Obama would have stayed for three days, a records registrar, a technician of any kind, hell, even the janitor!
What about the clerks, ambulance drivers….. somebody ?!?!?!
Anybody ?!?!?!
Wouldn’t someone have been yelling their “credit” for this from the rooftops???? The date when he was born is (supposedly) known. Certainly all these (supposed) people would know where they were working then!
Where is somebody, anybody, who was there or even remembers the birth?
Sherlock Holmes once solved a case by noticing the dog that DID NOT bark.
Is this the same situation?
"Damn, they are cheap in Kenya. Carville priced it at 100 dollar bills through trailer parks." Well, $20 goes further in Kenya. At least before this global economic crisis. :-) Besides, Carville was just trying to help people with his same DNA structure.Just reading this new thread.
Thanks. I ran into your comment to me on the thread before refreshing to see you pinged me.
"It’s not terribly Hawaiian or Japanese is it? Were Arabic names common there in the early ‘60s?" Two years ago I wouldn't have had a clue what the derivation of Obama was. Today you still don't. It's Luo not Arabic. BTW Luo is close to Luau which mean party to a Hawai'ian and Obama was obviously one of those. :-)
"0bama is really the result of a drunken night of debauchery between a Honolulu tramp and a group of African merchant sailors. His reed basket was left on the beach at Pearl Harbor." Are you speaking of Andrew Jackson or Obama? :-)
Confirms what I said:
"It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a WND request seeking the information.
Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant" according to the legal description from the governor's office, the spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant.
...
the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf.
The governor may have reminded the state's bureaucrats of the law, in "an abundance of caution", prior to the election in order to not appear partisan in her official duties and generate any more votes for poor picked on BHO.
"I had a disturbing dream. It was like a demented nativity scene. And each of the attending animals had big ears and stuttered." I like your style of dreams. Demented is a good choice of words. :-)
You’ll also note that the “sealed” language is that of the author of the report, not any state official, nor even their “confidential source”. IOW, I think it’s a bit of hyperbole, or to be a little kinder “journalistic license”.
You said “no one sealed Obama’s Birth Certificate”.
I simple linked to an article titled “Obama’s Birth Certificate Sealed by Hawaii Governor.”
But Obama is conveniently hiding behind the law's meaning and intent.
Like you, my BC says what hospital I was born in and I have a certain ironic pride in that as I won $1.5million deal two years ago at the hospital of my birth. I even showed the General Contractor and we both thought it serendipitous.
No you still don't understand, the Certification is not a "source" or "original" document. It's prepared when someone requests one. If you requested one in 2000 and another in 2008, they would not look exactly the same. They might or might not, contain the same information. They might be printed on different paper in a different font. But if you were born in 1961 and someone else was born in 1941, but you both requested a Certification in 2007, they would look the same, except for the differences in the information they contain.
However there is one glaring difference in BHO's posted CoLB and others from the same year. The terminology of one field. BHO's says "Date Filed by Registrar". Others say "Date Accepted by State Registrar". hmm.
"You’ll also note that the “sealed” language is that of the author of the report, not any state official, nor even their “confidential source”. IOW, I think it’s a bit of hyperbole, or to be a little kinder “journalistic license”." It's just a matter of time before it's exposed on a national level. And Barry can't control foreign press. Foreign press are already writing articles about our illegitimate dear leader, regarding his eligibility and they are going to expose it before ABCCBSNBCFOX. Barry keeps twitching in his interviews and pressers.
This thread will die and fast. heh heh You can’t handle the truth.
What a shame the troll isn’t around any longer to appreciate your awesome pictures!
And if you read it carefully, you'll find that "sealed" is a not what anyone actually said. It's an interpretation and a loaded term. All Hawaiian birth records are in effect "sealed" unless one is one of those eligible to procure them, and the same is true of Obama's.
When you see this story in the NY Times, THEN and only then you can get excited. Until then, it’s just pissing in the wind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.