Skip to comments.
SCOTUS strikes down Texas sodomy ban
FOXnews
Posted on 06/26/2003 7:08:23 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
SCOTUS sided with the perverts.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0amanreapswhathesews; 0bedroomkgb; 0godwillnotbemocked; 1aslimmeyslope; 1scrotus; 1slimmeyslope; 3branchesofgovt; activistcourt; activistsupremecourt; ageofconsentlaws; aides; aidesincreasetaxesup; aidesintheusa; aidesupinsuranceup; aidsalert; antibiblecountry; antichristiantrolls; antirelgiontrolls; antireligion; antireligionbigots; antireligiontroll; aregayapparel; arroganceofscotus; ascrotus; assthumpingidiots; biblethumpingmorons; biggovernmentcorrupt; bluenose; blueoyster; bohica; bowtothesecularstate; bowtothewelfarestate; bugger; buggered; buggerer; buggery; busybodieslose; buttpirate; buyvaselinestock; catsdogsmice; celebratesin; chickenlollipoppers; christianbashing; civilrights; clintonlegacy; constitutiontrashed; crazyfundies; culturewar; davidsouterisafaggot; deathoftheusa; deathofthewest; degeneracy; depravity; destructionofusa; devianceuptaxesup; deviantsex; donwenow; downourthroats; downwenoware; druglaws; endofcivilization; evilinactivistcourts; evilinrighttoprivacy; falalafalalalalala; falalalalalalalala; farkinqueers; fecalcontact; fools; fudgepackersdelight; fundiesinthecloset; fundyhysteria; gay; gayagenda; gayarrogance; gaybashing; gaycheese; gaycivlrights; gaydar; gaygestapo; gaykeywords; gaymafia; gaymarriage; gaymoose; gaynarcissist; gaypride; gayrights; gaysarevictimtoo; gayscelebrate; gaysholdusacaptive; gaysoutofcloset; gaysremakeamerica; gayssuppressthetruth; gaystapo; gaytrolldolls; gaytyrants; gayvote; getoutofmyroom; goawaymrsgrundy; godless; godsjudgement; godswrath; governmentschoolsex; hatecrimelegislation; himom; hitlerywins; homeschoolnow; homoapologists; homophobes; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexualagendawins; homosexualvote; hyperventilating; ihavearighttosin; ihaverights; incestlaws; indoctrination; itsjustsex; itsunatural; jeebuslovesgays; keywordwarsaregay; kitcheneducation; kneepadbrigade; lawrencevtexas; legislatinghate; legislatingsin; legislaturemakeslaws; lewinksys4all; lewinsky; lewinskys; liars; liberalagenda; libertariansareevil; libertines; lotsdaughters; lpcausesbo; makejeebuscry; manboylove; manboyloveassoc; manholeinspectorjoy; menwithmen; moralrelativism; moralrelativistinusa; msgrundypatrol; mycousinknowsclay; nambla; namblawillwinnext; onepercentrulesusa; oralsex; ourgayapparel; paulwellstone; pcdecision; pederasty; peepingtomgovt; perversion; perverts; preverts; prisoners; privacyprotection; prostitutionlaws; publichealthhazard; puritanslose; readtheconstitution; relgionbashing; religionbashing; romans1godswrath; rosieishappytoday; rosietypes; rumprangers; samesexdisorder; samesexmarriage; samesexmarriages; scotusknowsbest; scotusmakeslaw; scotustrumpsgodslaw; scotustrumpstate; scotustyranny; scrotus; sexeducation; sexindoctrination; sexpolice; sin; singlorified; slimmeyslope; slipperyslop; slipperyslope; slouching; slurpslurp; snitchonyourneighbor; sodomandgomorrah; sodomites; sodommites; sodomy; sodomylaw; sodomylaws; spyinthebushes; statesrights; stronginthesouth; supremecourt; swalloworspit; talibanintheusa; talibannedtrolls; texassodomylaw; thefunpolice; thegayelite; thegayvote; thisisevil; tisseasontobeunhappy; tistheseason; tobejolly; usathirdworldcountry; vicesnowvirtues; victimlesscrime; victimsofaids; victimsofhepatitus; weakinthehead; whatstatesright; womenwithwomen; zscrotus; zslimmeyslope; zzgoodruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700 ... 1,721-1,734 next last
To: rintense
Homos have FIVES TIMES more partners. They also are three times more likely to have sex with animals than heteros.
661
posted on
06/26/2003 10:24:21 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: rintense
Homos have FIVES TIMES more partners. They also are three times more likely to have sex with animals than heteros.
662
posted on
06/26/2003 10:24:27 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: rintense
Homos have FIVES TIMES more partners. They also are three times more likely to have sex with animals than heteros.
663
posted on
06/26/2003 10:24:32 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: The Red Zone
Such a discussion needs to distinguish contingent political rights from absolute moral rights. Many acts which a political system ought to permit, are still morally wrong. I have no absolute moral right to lie about anything, even something so trivial as what I had for lunch. But I can, and should, have a political right to do so. Interesting point. I wonder why the Founding Fathers did not make the distinction. Probably because they thought the two were too intertwined and inseperable. They could not have foreseen an American as secular as ours is today. If the issue of "What is a Right?" ever becomes a major public debate, that would be an important discussion
To: LanPB01
Smithers - I think women and sea-men don't mix.
Mr. Burns - We know what you think!
To: OWK
I can go through some silly hocus pocus and say I'm married to my cat. But that doesn't give a reason to the state to recognize the relationship. States recognize marriages for the same reason that they recognize people: Because they are a fundamental fact of life. THE WAY GOD MADE IT. Marriages reflect the arrangement GOD has bequeathed to us to create children: a man and a woman. Comprendez-pas?
To: BlazingArizona
"... it's a huge victory for conservatives. It limits government intrusion into our private lives." It's a victory for all Americans for the reason you outlined, except those Americans that are predisposed to snoop and snitch on their neighbors.
The busybody neighbor of these two gay guys who brought the suit to the SCOTUS just got told that they're an anti-American jackass.
Comment #668 Removed by Moderator
To: puroresu
Re post #537:
BRAVO!! Best post of the thread.
To: kegler4
"OK, so Texas fix the anal intercourse ban so it applies to all genders. Problem solved."
Sorry, cut and pasted the wrong blurb on that last post.
670
posted on
06/26/2003 10:26:11 AM PDT
by
kegler4
To: rintense
Homos have FIVES TIMES more partners. They also are three times more likely to have sex with animals than heteros.
671
posted on
06/26/2003 10:26:34 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Trace21230
The main reason incest is criminalized is because children from incestuous unions are more likely to be deformed, mentally retarded, and generally undesirable.
So using this logic, I guess a father can screw his 16 year old son, then? If not, on what grounds would you oppose such acts?
672
posted on
06/26/2003 10:26:36 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: fooman
... And are four times more likely to repeat themselves.
To: Chancellor Palpatine
You're a little sick to be personalizing it that way.Why are you upset ? Its currently our constitutional right to privacy isn't it ? The state cannot invade our privacy. If we desire oral sex/anal sex or good old fashioned missionary sex, whats the beef ? Why would be illegal for my daughter and I to have sex ? She is a consenting 16 year old and if she was on the pill whats the issue ? Even if she got pregnant she doesn't have to give birth. She can abort.
674
posted on
06/26/2003 10:26:45 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: HumanaeVitae
" The fictiticious "Privacy Amendment" is a tad annoying, however."I posted on that here and elsewhere. The right doesn't preclude govm't from anything, other than infringing on that right in a more liberal fashion than given in the rest of the 4th.
To: Antoninus
I vote 1913. If a person does not have the right to the fruits of his own labor, and those proceeds can be used against him (eminent domain, etc), then he is not a free citizen.
To: The Red Zone
I can go through some silly hocus pocus and say I'm married to my cat. And yet you can't even manage to define the word "rights".
Go figure.
677
posted on
06/26/2003 10:26:57 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: Teacher317
If a person does not have the right to the fruits of his own labor, and those proceeds can be used against him (eminent domain, etc), then he is not a free citizen. Amen.
678
posted on
06/26/2003 10:27:41 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: IowaHawk
And then there was no one left to speak up for the window-peeping blue nosed religious extremists... slippery slope indeed - to think that laws against blue nosed religious extremists might one day be repealed!
To: Dead Corpse
Ms. Grundy is crying in her beer. Now she will finally have time to go take those kite flying lessons.
680
posted on
06/26/2003 10:27:59 AM PDT
by
FreeLibertarian
(You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700 ... 1,721-1,734 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson