Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Red Zone
Such a discussion needs to distinguish contingent political rights from absolute moral rights. Many acts which a political system ought to permit, are still morally wrong. I have no absolute moral right to lie about anything, even something so trivial as what I had for lunch. But I can, and should, have a political right to do so.

Interesting point. I wonder why the Founding Fathers did not make the distinction. Probably because they thought the two were too intertwined and inseperable. They could not have foreseen an American as secular as ours is today. If the issue of "What is a Right?" ever becomes a major public debate, that would be an important discussion

664 posted on 06/26/2003 10:24:46 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
If the issue of "What is a Right?" ever becomes a major public debate, that would be an important discussion

You are so right about that, no pun intended, and it might be one of the most "enlightening" things that could happen in this day and age, LOL!

818 posted on 06/26/2003 11:25:27 AM PDT by 88keys (proudly posting without reading all the other posts first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson