HEAR KERR-EDY: "Iraq is George Bush's Vietnam"/"Iraq is not an imminent threat"

4.21.04 | Mia T

[Mia T]

KERR-EDY: "Iraq is George Bush's Vietnam"
(KERR-EDY CONSTRUCT: a lethally anachronistic, post-Vietnam, pre-9/11 liberal conceit)

by Mia T, 4.21.04

 

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

 

KERR-EDY: "Iraq is not an imminent threat"
(KERR-EDY CONSTRUCT: a lethally anachronistic, post-Vietnam, pre-9/11 liberal conceit)

 

by Mia T, 4.21.04

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

err-edy, a lethally anachronistic, post-Vietnam, pre-9/11 liberal conceit, is as much about providing Kerry with a detectable heatbeat as it is about providing cover for his Vietnam-seditious mouth. (Calling Iraq "Vietnam" a priori makes Iraq Vietnam in the seditious '71 Kerry sense.)

Kerry's problem isn't "haggard," the Botox counterexample notwithstanding. "Haggard" is electable. (See LBJ.)

"Cadaveric" is not, at least not outside of Hawaii.

Kerry's dissonant new "do," like the mortician's careful coif, only enhanced the funereal gloom. (One has to wonder if Shrum was brought brought in (dispatched?) to praise Kerry... or to bury him....) Enter Ted Kennedy. (Stage left.)

Chappaquiddick is Ted Kennedy's Vietnam
America's Real Two-Front War

(NEW Virtual Ted Kennedy Talks Movie!)

 

by Mia T, 4.17.04

 

merica's real two-front war: fundamentalist Islam on the right and a fundamentally seditious clintonoid neo-neoliberalism on the left, both anarchic, both messianically, lethally intolerant, both amorally perverse, both killing Americans, both placing America at grave risk, both quite insane.

If we are to prevail, the rules of engagement--on both fronts--must change.

Marquis of Queensberry niceties, multicultural hypersensitivity, unipolar-power guilt, hegemony aversion (which is self-sabotage in the extreme--we must capture what we conquer--oil is the terrorist's lifeblood)... and, most important, the mutual-protection racket in Washington--pre-9/11 anachronisms all--are luxuries we can no longer afford.

Notwithstanding, the underlying premise of our hyperfastidious polity, (that we must remain in the system to save the system) is fallacious at best and tantamount to Lady Liberty lifting herself up by her own bootstraps.

To borrow from the Bard, let's start metaphorically, or better yet, economically, by killing all the seditious solicitors, which include the clintons and their left-wing agitprop-and-money-laundering machine: the Viacom-Simon & Schuster-60-Minutes vertical operation, the horizontal (as in "soporific") Cronkite-ite news readers, the (hardly upright) Ben-Veniste goons and, of course, the clueless, cacophonic, disproportionately loud, left-coast Barbra-Streisand contingent.

America must not pull her punches.

To prevail, America must defeat--thoroughly destroy--her enemies. On both fronts.

[Mia T]

hic ;) (I actually agree with you. Too difficult to modify....)

[Mia T]

ping

[plain talk]

Well, he's right about one thing. "Iraq is not an imminent threat" -- anymore!

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[Incorrigible]

OMG! I was thinking that this would almost be scarier than the Hillary ones (they are so scary, I can't watch!) but all the hic cups made me laugh!

[Mia T]

Note the above JFK quote; regarding preemptive (actually preventive) war, John Kennedy doesn't seem to agree with his brother.

[Mia T]

;)

There are TWO movies. Click the 2nd window ("Iraq was not an imminent threat"), too.

[jla]

BTTT

[firewalk]

Thanks for the ping Mia
bttt

[Mia T]

goto
johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com
to hear the Kerr-edy's heartbeat.