|
Posted on 02/14/2023 10:39:41 AM PST by ransomnote
Have you seen President Trump's powerful 4 minute video message? Don't miss it!
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
pookie18's toons! go there for the ones I can't post!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4132912/posts
numberonepal wrote:
“
Yes, THAT @nytimes.
The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?
The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illnesses — including Covid-19 — was published late last month. Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is its lead author, were unambiguous.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/21/opinion/do-mask-mandates-work.html
“
Someone tell all the hospitals, clinics, and Dr offices this; masks make it impossible to communicate with hearing disabled people (and there’s millions in the US).
.
This is bizarre.
Is BC/BS not in the business of providing "health insurance"?
(The game of not paying out claims vs getting income from their insured's premiums)
This scheme sounds self-destructive, since they are promoting an ineffective and pathogenic drug, which causes more damage (claims) than the "disease" from which it does not offer protection.
Big Farmah must be giving BC/BS a really, really, really big KICKBACK (of taxpayer dollars) for them to afford to bribe the corrupt doctors.
We should be printing off this report and handing it to our doctors.
This scheme sounds self-destructive, since they are promoting an ineffective and pathogenic drug, which causes more damage (claims) than the "disease" from which it does not offer protection.
Big Farmah must be giving BC/BS a really, really, really big KICKBACK (of taxpayer dollars) for them to afford to bribe the corrupt Farmah must be giving BC/BS a really, really, really big KICKBACK (of taxpayer dollars) for them to afford to bribe the corrupt doctors."
That's what I was thinking.(🤔)
BITT!!
Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
·
1h
BREAKING: President Trump has boarded his plane and is heading to East Palestine, OH
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1628430000050274310?s=20
I’m sending this out not only to my ping list, but a few others as well, because
Darlin and I are soliciting information and thoughts.
We noted the meme Melian posted with the covid test kit to which Steve van Doorn replied.
Darlin and I just yesterday received an unsolicited package from Cipher labs in Batavia Illinois.
We have not opened it.
On the shipping label at bottom it says:
FREE RAPID ANTIGEN TEST KITS
Order No. CG16476
TO OPT OUT, PLEASE CALL (773) 823-0530
We are now in a quandary as to what, if anything we should do about this.
We looked up the lab....they seem to be legit and are a govt connected lab producing these things.
We would like thoughts from our FReeQ Friends as to implications on the various outcomes of the different options before us.
1. Just keep them and do nothing.
One implication is that we get a pile of test kits which are expensive and not going to be used. We have not opened them so don’t know if they are like the pregnancy test thing in the meme, so therefore they would not be expected back for analysis. If not expected back, then they are not tracking us. If expected back for analysis, then yes, they are tracking.
We are hesitating to open them because we don’t know if/ when we opt out, do they want them back.
2. Call the number and opt out.
That seemingly would stop the pile of kits from growing. However, one concern we do have is that by opting out, it provides a data point for the lab to turn over to the government that here is a household that is “not with the program.” So the Texokies get put on another list.
At first I had thought to call our state of Oklahoma Attorney General’s office thinking it was a scam....but since they are legit, I see it is a scam, but a scam under color of government action. Government is paying the labs. Calling Attorney General might not be an option. But maybe it is. Would really like some insight on this one!
Thank you for any thoughts you might have on this matter.
Full Times Article....
https://dnyuz.com/2023/02/21/the-mask-mandates-did-nothing-will-any-lessons-be-learned/
The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?
February 21, 2023
The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illnesses — including Covid-19 — was published late last month. Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is its lead author, were unambiguous.
“There is just no evidence that they” — masks — “make any difference,” he told the journalist Maryanne Demasi. “Full stop.”
But, wait, hold on. What about N-95 masks, as opposed to lower-quality surgical or cloth masks?
“Makes no difference — none of it,” said Jefferson.
What about the studies that initially persuaded policymakers to impose mask mandates?
“They were convinced by non-randomized studies, flawed observational studies.”
What about the utility of masks in conjunction with other preventive measures, such as hand hygiene, physical distancing or air filtration?
“There’s no evidence that many of these things make any difference.”
These observations don’t come from just anywhere. Jefferson and 11 colleagues conducted the study for Cochrane, a British nonprofit that is widely considered the gold standard for its reviews of health care data. The conclusions were based on 78 randomized controlled trials, six of them during the Covid pandemic, with a total of 610,872 participants in multiple countries. And they track what has been widely observed in the United States: States with mask mandates fared no better against Covid than those without.
No study — or study of studies — is ever perfect. Science is never absolutely settled. What’s more, the analysis does not prove that proper masks, properly worn, had no benefit at an individual level. People may have good personal reasons to wear masks, and they may have the discipline to wear them consistently. Their choices are their own.
But when it comes to the population-level benefits of masking, the verdict is in: Mask mandates were a bust. Those skeptics who were furiously mocked as cranks and occasionally censored as “misinformers” for opposing mandates were right. The mainstream experts and pundits who supported mandates were wrong. In a better world, it would behoove the latter group to acknowledge their error, along with its considerable physical, psychological, pedagogical and political costs.
Don’t count on it. In congressional testimony this month, Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, called into question the Cochrane analysis’s reliance on a small number of Covid-specific randomized controlled trials and insisted that her agency’s guidance on masking in schools wouldn’t change. If she ever wonders why respect for the C.D.C. keeps falling, she could look to herself, and resign, and leave it to someone else to reorganize her agency.
That, too, probably won’t happen: We no longer live in a culture in which resignation is seen as the honorable course for public officials who fail in their jobs.
But the costs go deeper. When people say they “trust the science,” what they presumably mean is that science is rational, empirical, rigorous, receptive to new information, sensitive to competing concerns and risks. Also: humble, transparent, open to criticism, honest about what it doesn’t know, willing to admit error.
The C.D.C.’s increasingly mindless adherence to its masking guidance is none of those things. It isn’t merely undermining the trust it requires to operate as an effective public institution. It is turning itself into an unwitting accomplice to the genuine enemies of reason and science — conspiracy theorists and quack-cure peddlers — by so badly representing the values and practices that science is supposed to exemplify.
It also betrays the technocratic mind-set that has the unpleasant habit of assuming that nothing is ever wrong with the bureaucracy’s well-laid plans — provided nobody gets in its way, nobody has a dissenting point of view, everyone does exactly what it asks, and for as long as officialdom demands. This is the mentality that once believed that China provided a highly successful model for pandemic response.
Yet there was never a chance that mask mandates in the United States would get anywhere close to 100 percent compliance, or that people would or could wear masks in a way that would meaningfully reduce transmission. Part of the reason is specific to American habits and culture; part of it to constitutional limits on government power; part of it to human nature; part of it to competing social and economic necessities; part of it to the evolution of the virus itself.
But whatever the reason, mask mandates were a fool’s errand from the start. They may have created a false sense of safety — and thus permission to resume semi-normal life. They did almost nothing to advance safety itself. The Cochrane report ought to be the final nail in this particular coffin.
There’s a final lesson. The last justification for masks is that, even if they proved to be ineffective, they seemed like a relatively low-cost, intuitively effective way of doing something against the virus in the early days of the pandemic. But “do something” is not science, and it shouldn’t have been public policy. And the people who had the courage to say as much deserved to be listened to, not treated with contempt. They may not ever get the apology they deserve, but vindication ought to be enough.
Paul Sperry https://twitter.com/paulsperry_
@paulsperry_
·
12h
BREAKING: IRS records reveal donations/grants to Beau Biden Foundation mysteriously surged to $3.8 mil in 2020 as Biden ran for president, from $693k in 2019 & $535k in 2016. The 501(c)3 hides its donors. House Oversight is probing anonymous Chinese gifts to UPenn/Penn Biden Cntr
~~~~~~~~
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
·
13h
BREAKING: IRS-990 filings reveal the Bidens added ex-FBI chief Louis Freeh to the board of directors of the Beau Biden Foundation after Freeh pumped $100k into a trust fund for Joe Biden’s grandkids. Freeh,who’s Irish, referred to Biden as “Dad” in emails found on Hunter’s laptop
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1628096648759869450?s=20
DEVELOPING: Congressional investigators have learned that Biden kept a personal diary that includes entries detailing his Beijing meetings as Veep and spans critical periods covering the removal and storage of classified papers and his meeting with Tony Bobulinki re the CEFC deal
Dunno. Us boys from Mobile aren't always tapped for this kind of exposure. LOL.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4132758/posts?page=1
Will Biden’s Ukraine Trip Inspire Even More Of His Lies?
Issues & Insights ^ | 21 Feb, 2023 | I & I editorial board
Posted on 2/21/2023, 3:44:09 PM by MtnClimber
President Joe Biden made a “surprise” visit to Ukraine Monday. It doesn’t take a cynic to wonder how many tales from the trip he’ll come up with to pad his already bursting catalog of self-aggrandizing lies, which the media has mostly ignored for decades.
We can imagine Biden in the coming months telling audiences that “we were shot down twice” as the Air Force Special Air Mission jet approached the Rzeszow airport in Poland near the Ukraine border, and then while visiting the front, the Ukrainian forces “let me shoot some of their artillery,” which was particularly rewarding because “I know I killed bunch of Russkies and took out Corn Pop, too.”
Thanks for posting that.
Treat it like any other unsolicited junk mail. Throw it away.
BREAKING! Dr. John Littell KICKED OUT of Sarasota Memorial Hospital Board Meeting after testifying to the effectiveness of Ivermectin to treat Covid-19! pic.twitter.com/agwqvaJrtY— Chris Nelson 🇺🇸 🏝 (@ReOpenChris) February 21, 2023
Hi Texokie! Regarding your test kit, I’d just toss it. Unsolicited junk mail is just that, junk. You’re under no obligation to do anything.
Do not opt out.
Do not pass go.
Do enjoy this wonderful life!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
