Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of fraudulent Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears.
The evidence of forgery and manipulation of images of official documents, triggered by Israel Insider's revelation of the collection of Hawaii birth certificate images on the Photobucket site and the detective work of independent investigative journalists and imaging professionals in the three weeks since the publication of the images, implicate the Daily Kos, an extreme left blog site, and the Obama campaign, in misleading the public with official-looking but manipulated document images of doubtful provenance.
The perceived unreliability of the image has provoked petitions and widespread demands for Obama to submit for objective inspection the paper versions of the "birth certificate" he claimed in his book Dreams from My Father was in his possession, as well as the paper version of the Certificate of Live Birth for which the image on the Daily Kos and the Obama "Fight the Smears" website was supposedly generated.
Without a valid birth certificate, Obama cannot prove he fulfills the "natural born citizen" requirement of the Constitution, throwing into doubt his eligibility to run for President.
McKinnon, who says he is 25-30 years old, operates a website called OpenDNA.com and uses the OpenDNA screen name on various web sites and blogs, including his comments and diary on The Daily Kos. In recent years he has divided his time between Long Beach, California and Vancouver, British Columbia. He is a Democratic political activist, frequent contributor to the left wing Daily Kos blog, and a fervent Barack Obama supporter.
(Excerpt) Read more at web.israelinsider.com ...
Said to be knocked up in Hawaii Dec 1960, married in Maui in Feb 1961, in class at U Wash in Mar 1961, Barack born at ? in Aug 1961, newborn at Mercer Island WA in Aug 1961.
If I look at that and don't squint very hard I see four know location data points, two in Hawaii, well before Barack was born, and two in Washington bracketing when Barack was born.
If I knew nothing else, I'd interpolate the birth as being in Washington, especially given that Mercer Island was within "a few weeks" of birth...
Hope so. We bust this open too soon, and the dems have time to think it through, rather than being stampeded over the Hillary cliff...
We had a thread dedicated to that alleged MoDo column. It did have a link to another web site. We were not the only ones carrying it.
Down the memory hole.
FWIW, Live Search (I’ve avoided google, ever since google ‘disappeared’ all the images of BHO’s birth certificate) shows 80,000 hits on “OBAMAS TROUBLING INTERNET FUND RAISING” Even google gives 72,000 hits on this.
Hmmmmm. Did she get knocked up on her 18th birthday?
Barack was born almost exactly 9 months later...
Was it determined as to whether it was a spoof report? I find it strange now that some of the information Maureen Dowd was ‘alleged to be alleging’ is now turning up in those links that Fred Nerks ad Amitysville found.
oops, Amityschild not Amitysville. Sorry!
>>> Did she get knocked up on her 18th birthday?
That would be ‘convenient’ to avoid statutory rape charges.
Stanley Ann’s father threatened to have Obama Sr. kicked out of Harvard. He would have more of a case to do that if Stanley Ann was a minor when knocked up and ‘unmarried’.
Unless, she used false ID or forged her parents consent. Hence, the Anna Toot theory. But that would still give him leverage to have Obama Sr. thrown out of Harvard.
I wonder why he decided not to go through with it.
yet the Dinosaur Media refuses to report this story.
if this were a republican (we keep saying this these days) the leftists of the media would be SCREAMING DEMANDS for a document check.
Yeah. Too bad actually being old enough to get married without parental permission kicks the legs out from under the Toot theory.
The simplest thing again becomes getting married with the regular Stanley Ann Dunham ID. No need to complicate matters with an Anna Toot drinkin’ ID.
Still possible that an abandoned and po’d Stanley Ann used an Anna Toot ID at the hospital to deny Barak, Sr. any connection to Barak, Jr. She would have had to surrender her Dunham ID when she updated from single to married to Obama.
Possible but not as likely.
I think if he got married, she did it in Kenya.
But, I would really, really enjoy seeing a birth certificate show up with Barry Toot.
:))
Thank you, David.
Pinging everyone to #4,079 and #4,078.
Thanks, Lucy.
Curiouser and curiouser.
I bet Hitlery knows...
Woo Hoo!
I got Jerome Corsi’s book today, Obama Nation!
That also means I have expatguy’s exclusive!
I’m off to read it.
Anybody?
I am most interested in information about bundling.
The thing is...the FEC website shows that the total contributions to Obama are $336 mil. My file (that reconciles with the website - I can match figures up state by state) only totals $218 mil. Big diff there. I wonder what that could be?
I'm also wondering about the bundling because I have 1,241 individual contributors that gave over the allowable $4600 (2300 for primary & 2300 for general). Do they report the bundled totals this way? It doesn't read that way when you look at the rules at the FEC website.
The Gaza connection could be nothing IF the individuals are American citizens. But, really...living in the Rafah REFUGEE camp?
Any help would be really appreciated!
Oops! I did that dreaded double post thing :-)
Did you take into account PAC contributions?
The FEC site breaks monies out by individuals vs PACs and such. If you are just adding up the individuals, that would omit other monies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.