Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s $6 Billion NASA Funding Cut Jeopardizes Race To Moon Against China
Jalopnik ^ | RYAN ERIK KING MAY 9, 2025 12:25 PM EST Read More: https://www.jalopnik.com/1855263/trump-6-billi | RYAN ERIK KING MAY 9, 2025 12:25 PM EST Read More: https://www.jalopnik.com/1855263/trump-6-billi

Posted on 05/09/2025 1:18:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Pinching pennies and landing a crew of astronauts on the Moon before a geopolitical rivalry aren't two endeavors that go hand-in-hand. The Trump administration released NASA's proposed 2026 discretionary budget last week. The federal space agency would see a $6 billion cut if implemented as written, roughly a 24% decrease compared to 2025. However, the White House is confusingly still committed to beating China to the lunar surface despite shuttering all the projects working towards that goal.

The proposed 2026 budget has a 10% increase for human space exploration, but the $7 billion allocated won't be used for the significant pieces of technology developed for the Artemis program. The Space Launch System rocket and the accompanying Orion capsule spacecraft have been cancelled. Gateway, the space station slated to be built in lunar orbit, has also been cancelled. Frustratingly, the first Gateway module has already been built in Italy and arrived at Kennedy Space Center in Florida last month.

Adding to the wasted module, SLS and Orion only flew once for the uncrewed Artemis I mission in November 2022. The Trump administration has effectively flushed $47.5 billion down the toilet, according to Time. The stiffest complaints thrown at Artemis have been the budget overruns and development delays. These cancellations would only worsen the situation as NASA is forced to return to square one.

SpaceX could be contracted to launch Artemis missions

Joe Raedle/Getty Images With the current projects canned and a human spaceflight budget increase, the Trump administration is seemingly setting the stage to award a massive contract to a private space company. The contractor would have to develop a commercial platform to deliver NASA's Artemis astronauts to the Moon. Not to mention, the contractor is expected to beat China. The Chinese program's plans to land two taikonauts on the lunar surface by 2030, three years after the Artemis III landing, seemed conservative. Now, the emerging East Asian space power could pass the United States in this new space race.

It's no secret that Elon Musk's SpaceX would be the favorite to win the contract. It's also no secret that the government-gutting CEO detests the effort to return to the Moon and the Artemis program. As always, Musk claimed he could do it faster and cheaper. Let's ignore that delays with Starship's lunar lander are partly why Artemis has been pushed back before. Any crewed lunar exploration program is a protracted and expensive effort that requires steadfast leadership, the antithesis of the Trump White House. I wish the best to the astronauts who are asked to climb aboard a Moon-bound starship. You're gonna need it.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: agitprop; astroturf; china; fakenews; islam; jalopnik; moon; nasa; panicporn; redchina; ryanerikking; tds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: cgbg

hell, zero out all of NASA and start over from scratch ...


41 posted on 05/09/2025 3:49:37 PM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

LOL, if that is the measure, wouldn’t the Germans have beaten the South Africans???


42 posted on 05/09/2025 3:57:53 PM PDT by rlmorel ("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Uhhh, didn’t we already beat them to it, like 50+ years ago?


43 posted on 05/09/2025 3:59:59 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

explore and mine the oceans


44 posted on 05/09/2025 5:51:20 PM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Good point. But I am confused, is this where Russian collusion started? Are they in on this also? It’s so hard to figure out as you get older....lol


45 posted on 05/09/2025 6:20:06 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy ("Man is the only pack animal that will follow an unstable leader." Cesar Chavez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Is that Astronaut Flair? 😎


46 posted on 05/09/2025 8:27:52 PM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hyman Roth

heh, don’t know, but that both of those things make me laugh every time I see them, especially the bean commercial!


47 posted on 05/09/2025 9:45:19 PM PDT by rlmorel ("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Adding to the wasted module, SLS and Orion only flew once for the uncrewed Artemis I mission in November 2022. The Trump administration has effectively flushed $47.5 billion down the toilet, according to Time. The stiffest complaints thrown at Artemis have been the budget overruns and development delays. These cancellations would only worsen the situation as NASA is forced to return to square one.

Maybe this time we can cut our losses early. The STS Orbiters cost around $2B per flight in 2025 dollars. I don't know why we're trying to spend so much again when private companies are much cheaper. Just build the hardware and contract out the launches.
48 posted on 05/10/2025 11:40:03 AM PDT by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

from the Obama regime:

49 posted on 05/10/2025 5:57:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Bullstuff. Fedgov is insanely wasteful when it comes to space flight. The standards are the standards, but the red tape going through NASA are stupidly expensive.

Let the free market figure out how to do it less expensively, IF it is worth doing to begin with.

Otherwise the urinalists are simply peeing on themselves again.


50 posted on 05/10/2025 6:06:14 PM PDT by MortMan (Charter member of AAAAA - American Association Against Alliteration Abuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The Trump administration has effectively flushed $47.5 billion down the toilet, according to Time.

Ummm, the single mission the capsule flew was in 2022, as I read it. How does President Trump not throwing good money afte bad mean he squandered the money spent by the previous administration?

51 posted on 05/10/2025 6:08:04 PM PDT by MortMan (Charter member of AAAAA - American Association Against Alliteration Abuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I thought it was a ring.😏


52 posted on 05/13/2025 4:32:45 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first, we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson