Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grim outlook for Ares, says Beltway insider
The Orlando Sentinel ^ | Oct 27, 2008 7:08:52 PM | Mark Matthews

Posted on 10/29/2008 12:40:44 AM PDT by B-Chan

A former chairman of the House science committee told Brevard County leaders Monday that NASA’s next rocket is “on the chopping block” and that a new administration may abandon the Ares I as successor to the space shuttle.

The next president may look instead to use military rockets to launch NASA astronauts, said Robert Walker, a former Republican congressman from Pennsylvania who, as a Washington-based lobbyist, represents Brevard County.

Walker told county commissioners; U.S. Reps. Tom Feeney, R-Oviedo, and Dave Weldon, R-Indialantic; and representatives of the local aerospace community that the word in Washington and at recent space conferences was “that Ares I could be on the chopping block.”

Afterward, in an interview with the Orlando Sentinel, he elaborated: “The discussion I am hearing in the space community is that Ares will certainly be reviewed by the next administration.”

Walker’s assessment comes amid new reports of the rocket’s technical woes.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.orlandosentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ares; constellation; nasa; space
For the non-space-savvy: Ares I (aka "the Shaft") is a rocket kludged together by NASA Admin Michael Griffin (I-Thiokol) to keep NASA and industry employment high. The task of getting Americans into space is its secondary function.

In my opinion, the Shaft should be canceled and the job of boosting the crewed Orion spacecraft into orbit contracted out to private industry using privately-developed launch vehicles. In my opinion, the SpaceX Falcon 9 Heavy, which can lift 28,000 kg to orbit (Ref: 1965 Saturn V booster payload to orbit = 118,000 kg) at about $2K per kg of payload, would be an ideal replacement.

Note: I am not a rocket scientist, but I read a lot.

1 posted on 10/29/2008 12:40:44 AM PDT by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Darnit. Real damn shame the Aerospike engine didn't work.

We'd be flying the X-33 pretty soon if it had. What a drag.

So we're going to go back to putting Astronauts into space using old Redstone missiles from the '50s. How impossibly lamer can it get?

2 posted on 10/29/2008 12:57:39 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
A friend of mine went for an interview at Space X. In the midst of his plant trip the topic of the overall weight of the spacecraft came up. He quickly found out that they didn't even keep a spreadsheet (let along a database) to keep track of the weight of all the parts in order to know the weight of the overall craft.

I guess that's why they had several failures before they finally had a measure of success.

I would place my bets with Rutan before Space X.

3 posted on 10/29/2008 12:57:44 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Eliminate the Department of Education and the HUD, also halve Congressional office budgets and use the cheapest toilet paper in the White. Give the money to the taxpayers and NASA.


4 posted on 10/29/2008 1:01:51 AM PDT by Impy (Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Ths sounds like a convenient rationale to cancel the progrm and divert the ‘savings” into social and educational programs. The bottomless pit of entitlement spending will consume the country in future Administrations.


5 posted on 10/29/2008 1:21:17 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Be that as it may, SpaceX has a vehicle in orbit right now. Scaled does not, nor will it during the foreseeable future.

As for the flight failures, hey, rockets blow up. That’s why you test them and keep testing them until they don’t. The last one flew like a dream.


6 posted on 10/29/2008 1:28:53 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

7 posted on 10/29/2008 1:37:29 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama: If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

For the non-space-savvy: Ares I (aka “the Shaft”)

Shaft is his name. Shaft is his game. Can ya dig it?


8 posted on 10/29/2008 1:43:27 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama: If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

The Ares I isn’t the whole Constellation program. I support the idea of building the Ares V — a Saturn V-class heavy lift booster. The Ares I, however, is more a jobs program than a spacecraft design.


9 posted on 10/29/2008 1:49:47 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

What’s the white rocket plan
That keeps the sweet jobs for the workin’ man?

SHAFT
(Damn right)

What can’t lift Orion from this ball
But’s loved by LockMart Thiokol?

SHAFT
(NASA Ares I)

A sad pathetic bird
And no one really loves it but its mother...

(Mike Griffin)

They say that Shaft is a big piece of
SHUT YO MOUTH
I’m just talkin’ ‘bout the Shaft
AND YOU CAN’T QUIT IT


10 posted on 10/29/2008 2:01:50 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Unfortunately, I think the risk is pretty high that the entire Constellation program will be canceled to get more money for the socialist welfare state. We will pay the Russians for access to the ISS and the US moon/mars efforts will go back between the covers of magazines and books.


11 posted on 10/29/2008 2:06:14 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Ain’t I clean, bad machine
Super cool, super mean
Dealin’ good, for The Man.
Superfly, here I stand.


12 posted on 10/29/2008 2:20:17 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama: If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

“In my opinion, the SpaceX Falcon 9 Heavy, which can lift 28,000 kg to orbit (Ref: 1965 Saturn V booster payload to orbit = 118,000 kg) at about $2K per kg of payload, would be an ideal replacement.”

Yes, let private enterprise do it efficiently, the opposite of the government approach.

I hope SpaceX continues to succeed, I really like its approach.


13 posted on 10/29/2008 4:04:17 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“He quickly found out that they didn’t even keep a spreadsheet (let along a database) to keep track of the weight of all the parts in order to know the weight of the overall craft.”

Nonsense. In fact, the failures had nothing to do with weight, but were design flaws (since corrected) in both cases. In one, separation didn’t occur cleanly. In another, third stage fuel slosh caused oscillation, now solved with baffles.

The last shot made orbit on the third Falcon 1 flight, far beyond anything Rutan has tried so far. SpaceX has a full flight schedule already lined up for the next two years or so. It’s also working on a human-rated module.


14 posted on 10/29/2008 4:07:56 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

LOL


15 posted on 10/29/2008 4:14:11 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

That’s okay, as long as James Hansen’s neck is safe.


16 posted on 10/29/2008 4:32:06 AM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Stupid people shouldn't breed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Can’t we put Ayres in Ares and send him to the moon or sumpin’.


17 posted on 10/29/2008 5:45:47 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Bump


18 posted on 10/29/2008 10:02:18 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson