Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA's Bolden Confronts Unhappiness at Obama Space Plan at Kennedy Space Center
Associated Content ^ | February 6th, 2010 | Mark R. Whittington

Posted on 02/06/2010 10:37:21 PM PST by Marcus

NASA administrator Charles Bolden traveled to the Kennedy Space Center for the occasion of the launch of the space shuttle Endeavour STS 130. But he was also in Florida to confront the consequences of the new Obama administration space policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: charlesbolden; constellation; nasa; spaceexploration

1 posted on 02/06/2010 10:37:22 PM PST by Marcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marcus

Hope & Change NASA. You suckers vote for your boy slappy happy hayseed goober Bill Nelson.


2 posted on 02/06/2010 10:45:39 PM PST by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

“Obama Lied. NASA Died.”


3 posted on 02/06/2010 10:48:25 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

psssst,.....hey Charles, hit back at the Obamacy with an expose’ of the climate change hoax , you got nuthin’ to lose now, go for it


4 posted on 02/06/2010 10:55:00 PM PST by KTM rider ( ..........tell me this really isn't happening ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

Even congress isn’t going to sign off on this steaming load.


5 posted on 02/06/2010 11:26:52 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

The Space Shuttle is about due to launch (less than 3 hours and counting).

Any chance we could get Obama to go to the launchpad, and take a temperature reading underneath the booster rockets?


6 posted on 02/06/2010 11:27:29 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

One hour and 13 minutes to launch.


7 posted on 02/06/2010 11:32:21 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

To destroy a country, you destroy its dreams.


8 posted on 02/06/2010 11:37:19 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 380 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
“Obama Lied. NASA Died.”

Bolden himself, recommended that the Obama Administration kill the moon program. IOW, Obama was merely doing what Bolden wanted.

From: Obama’s ‘Game-changing’ NASA Plan Folds Constellation, Bets Commercial:

“You can hope forever that the president’s going to change his mind,” Bolden said during the all-hands address broadcast to the agency’s 10 field centers. “You can hope that I will go to the Hill and get beat up, and … will say, ‘OK, Congress, you’re right, my recommendations to the president were all wrong. I was dumb. And we need to go back and spend $30 billion … on the Constellation program.’ Ain’t going to happen.”

Bolden said the longer the agency resists the loss of Constellation, the longer it will take to devise a new plan.

“The sooner we all get through this period of denial and grief … the sooner we’re going to go to the Moon and to Mars and to other places,” he said. “If it takes a year to get through this, we’re a year behind. If it takes us two years to get through it, we’re two years behind.”

Bolden’s words of appreciation for NASA’s Constellation team throughout the week stood in contrast to the rough treatment the program received during the agency’s budget rollout, a hastily arranged media teleconference handled largely by his deputy, chief financial officer and a White House science adviser. Bolden read an opening statement and left the call without taking questions.

Jim Kohlenberger, chief of staff of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, told reporters that Constellation was undone by a raft of bad choices and that sunk costs were no reason to stick with a flawed program.

“The fact that we poured $9 billion into an unexecutable program really isn’t an excuse to pour another $50 billion into it and still not have an executable program,” Kohlenberger said.

9 posted on 02/07/2010 12:58:39 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Governement should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

“But...but...When I voted for Obama....Change was for everybody else!”


10 posted on 02/07/2010 1:41:29 AM PST by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

Yet another Obama promise with an expiration date.


11 posted on 02/07/2010 3:32:39 AM PST by pyrless (If you're gonna burn our flag, make sure you wrap yourself in it first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

Peronally I think we should thing beyond the moon since “we’ve been there and done that” mentality is on many taxpayers mind including my own when you look at the BIB bicks it would take just to do it all over again. Hell, build an in orbit space vehicle assemby gantry (yes I saw it on Star Trek). We’d still keep our foot in the door with flights while we fund the BEST engineers to build starships, manned or unmanned that can announce our presence “Out There”, but don’t stop Space Exploration funding !!!


12 posted on 02/07/2010 4:01:38 AM PST by Georgia1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Marcus
But he was also in Florida to confront the consequences of the new Obama administration space policy.

As our country gets deeper and deeper into debt, increases entitlement programs, and ratchets back on discretionary spending, the resulting impact on R&D is predictable, and has been predictable for more than twenty years.

The recipients of entitlements are most interested in keeping and increasing their government provided income. As a group they have little interest in R&D. As a group they have more and more voting power by numbers.

The R&D spending by the country has been decreasing steadily since the 1960s. It now has reached a tipping point. How much R&D is performed by socialist countries like Cuba? That is where we are heading, IMO.

13 posted on 02/07/2010 4:03:53 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

Obama administration space policy.With all his great powers spcecraft not required Obama will just beem them up.


14 posted on 02/07/2010 8:03:26 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia1

“We’d still keep our foot in the door with flights while we fund the BEST engineers to build starships, manned or unmanned that can announce our presence “Out There”, but don’t stop Space Exploration funding !!!”

“Starships” of any practical kind are far beyond our current level of technology.


15 posted on 02/07/2010 3:08:04 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

Of course but we should never stop doing the research.


16 posted on 02/07/2010 4:54:32 PM PST by Georgia1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Georgia1

“Of course but we should never stop doing the research.”

We aren’t really doing “starship” research. We haven’t got “interplanetary” down yet.


17 posted on 02/07/2010 4:55:40 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

Yes. But we have to walk first before we can run..right?


18 posted on 02/07/2010 5:08:25 PM PST by Georgia1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Georgia1

“Yes. But we have to walk first before we can run..right?”

Yes. Which is why we need to return to the moon.


19 posted on 02/07/2010 5:23:50 PM PST by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

Yes it was sarcasm.


20 posted on 02/07/2010 6:55:42 PM PST by Georgia1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson