Keyword: trumpimmunity
-
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1819440000460902556 1:27 PM · Aug 2, 2024
-
VIDEO The liberal meltdowns over the SCOTUS immunity decision in the Trump appeal are starting to come in. Yes, some are quite wild as you can see in this example. However, it is NOTHING compared to the Supernova explosion I am expecting from a certain someone with whom most of us are familiar. So far today, this person appears to be in lockdown but I assure you, when it happens I fully expect the ANGER to be of Supernova magnitude. The reason I am not revealing the person's identity yet is because I want the DUmmie FUnnies to scoop this...
-
Former President Donald Trump shared a positive note following last week’s U.S. Supreme Court hearing, in which justices heard arguments from his legal team about “presidential immunity” stemming from charges brought against him by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Trump reacted to the “monumental” hearing Thursday, saying he thinks it was “made clear” that a president “has to have immunity.”
-
In Addition to being prohibited from attending my son Barron’s High School Graduation, I have just learned that the highly biased Judge in the Soros “appointed” D.A. Alvin Bragg’s Witch Hunt Case, will not allow me to attend the historic PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY argument in front of The United States Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 25th (next week!).
-
Special Counsel Jack Smith went completely off the rails and told a federal appeals court that Trump’s immunity argument would allow him to order his supporters to murder opposing lawmakers. Trump’s lawyers argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President. “In 234 years of American history, no president ever faced criminal prosecution for his official acts. Until 19 days ago, no court had ever addressed whether immunity from such prosecution exists,” Trump’s lawyers wrote in last month’s filing, according to CBS News. “To this day, no appellate court has addressed...
-
Sixteen former DC officials and “legal experts” submitted a brief to the US Court of Appeals in President Trump’s immunity appeal, arguing against immunity for ex-presidents in criminal cases. The list of attorneys includes former Bushies, turncoat Bill Kristol, Ty Cobb, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, a Mike Pence advisor, and unhinged nutcase George Conway. Here are the so-called “principled Republican” experts who are sh*tting on Trump today:
-
*BREAKING NEWS* The US Supreme Court on Friday denied Jack Smith’s request for a ruling on Trump’s immunity argument. Jack Smith last Monday asked the US Supreme Court to weigh in on Trump’s immunity claims. President Trump on Wednesday urged the US Supreme Court to reject Jack Smith’s request to expedite the ruling on his immunity argument. Trump’s lawyers argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President. "In 234 years of American history, no president ever faced criminal prosecution for his official acts. Until 19 days ago, no court had...
-
After years of assembling datapoints around the potential for the Supreme Court to be compromised, it was the discovery of Mary McCord’s husband Sheldon Snook deep in the office of Chief Justice John Roberts that finally sealed the deal for me personally. Yes, the Supreme Court is compromised. Quick Context. Mary McCord was the architect of all Trump targeting efforts. The FISA on Carter Page, the weaponization of the DOJ-NSD, the installation of Michael Atkinson as Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), the companion to Sally Yates in the Flynn targeting, lead staff for the Schiff/Nadler impeachment effort, later appointment by...
-
Trump is arguing that presidents, even after their term is over, are absolutely immune from criminal prosecutions arising out of their acts in office. Thursday afternoon in a Washington, D.C., federal court, former President Donald Trump filed a motion to dismiss the case pending against him there for his alleged actions in the aftermath of the 2020 election. The motion cites presidential immunity as a ground to dismiss the case in its entirety. The motion persuasively argues that the D.C. case should be dismissed, and if past practice is any guide all proceedings could and should be stayed while this...
-
Precedence: PA judge ruled that Trump's actions were protected by "Presidential Immunity" based on a previous 1982 case (Nixon vs. Fitzgerald) where the Supreme Court ruled that the President has "absolute immunity" for all decisions done as President "even if those actions were unlawful".
|
|
|