Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $15,561
19%  
Woo hoo!! And now only $639 from reaching 20%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: stupidjudge

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Judge Boasberg suggested during Monday's hearing that NO deportation flights should have taken off because he had scheduled a hearing for 5pm and the DOJ should have known he would try to order the return of planes already in the air 🙄

    03/20/2025 9:53:38 AM PDT · by Macho MAGA Man · 76 replies
    Julie Kelly on Twitter X ^ | March 20, 2025 | Julie Kelly
    Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 @julie_kelly2 Boasberg suggested during Monday's hearing that NO deportation flights should have taken off because he had scheduled a hearing for 5pm and the DOJ should have known he would try to order the return of planes already in the air 🙄 He again confirms the inconsistencies between his 2 "orders" The written one was "pithier?" Is that a judicial term lol
  • Brooklyn man who sexually assaulted sleeping woman on trans-Atlantic flight to NYC sentenced to probation

    12/09/2022 8:51:41 PM PST · by grundle · 28 replies
    New York Daily News via Yahoo ^ | December 9, 2022 | Elizabeth Keogh
    Prosecutors asked for jail time — but Brooklyn Federal Judge Frederic Block said placing Katz on the sex offender registry was harsh punishment. “It will impact his ability to find employment and travel,” Block said. “[The] sex offender registry would cause enormous collateral damage.”
  • Judge Blocks Deportation of 4 in New Haven

    06/08/2009 9:07:42 AM PDT · by Blue Turtle · 7 replies · 702+ views
    NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) - A judge in Connecticut says federal agents violated the rights of four illegal immigrants during a raid in New Haven two years ago and has put a stop to deportation proceedings. Federal Judge Michael Straus ruled recently that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents went into the four men's apartments without warrants, probable cause and without their consent. He says the immigrants' rights were ``egregiously violated.''
  • Judge: Exposure Law Is Gender Specific

    10/20/2006 4:34:40 PM PDT · by grjr21 · 36 replies · 975+ views
    ABC News ^ | October 20, 2006 | Associated Press
    A judge dismissed an indecent exposure charge against a woman accused of disrobing in front of a 14-year-old boy, saying the law only applies to men. Superior Court Judge Robert W. Armstrong said earlier in the week that the law only mentions someone who "exposes his person." "It's gender specific," Armstrong said. He dismissed a misdemeanor charge against Alexis Luz Garcia, 40, of Corona, who was cited in May after parents of a neighbor boy said she showed him full-frontal nudity as he played basketball. Prosecutor Alison N. Norton said the decision to throw out the case will be appealed...
  • Delta Judge Won't Recuse Herself

    11/17/2005 7:22:09 AM PST · by yoe · 69 replies · 1,623+ views
    Wall Street Journal on line ^ | November 17, 2005 | Evan Perez
    NEW YORK -- The federal judge overseeing the bankruptcy of Delta Air Lines rejected a request by the carrier's pilot union that she step down from the case because of comments suggesting that the pilots are paid too much. U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Prudence Carter Beatty denied any antipathy toward Delta pilots, who are fighting efforts by the Atlanta-based airline to abandon the current pilot contract and slash their pay by 20%, or about $325 million a year. [snip] Judge Beatty said union officials were misinterpreting remarks she made during hearings since Delta sought bankruptcy-court protection in September. [snip] "I...
  • WHAT IS THE CONSTITUTION?

    07/26/2002 6:49:52 PM PDT · by Marianne · 94 replies · 1,760+ views
    The Future of Freedom Foundation ^ | April 2002 | Sheldon Richman
    Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is a smart man and an excellent writer. He is also a living example of how bad political and philosophical premises can put great talent in the service of an evil cause. In November, while speaking at the University of Missouri, Scalia was asked what he thought about proposals to impose a national ID card on the American people. Scalia said he personally opposes the idea and would vote against it if it were put to a vote. But when a student asked him whether a national ID would violate the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which...