Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $14,536
17%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 17%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: stupakamendment

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Bart Stupak to Retire

    04/09/2010 5:41:37 AM PDT · by PJ-Comix · 188 replies · 5,894+ views
    CBS News Political Hotsheet ^ | April 9, 2010 | Stephanie Condon
    Michigan Rep. Bart Stupak, the congressman who led anti-abortion rights Democrats in the House during health care negotiations, will retire this year, CBS News has learned. He is expected to announce his plans later this morning. Had Stupak sought re-election, he would have faced challengers from both the left and the right backed by interest groups angered by Stupak's health care vote. Stupak negotiated with Democratic leaders down to the eleventh hour for stricter abortion language in the health care bill, but he ultimately voted for it after President Obama agreed to sign an executive order assuring the new laws...
  • Why I Wrote The 'Stupak Amendment' And Voted For Health-Care Reform

    03/26/2010 8:09:16 PM PDT · by Steelfish · 108 replies · 2,193+ views
    Washington Post ^ | March 26, 2010 | Bart Stupak
    Why I Wrote The 'Stupak Amendment' And Voted For Health-Care Reform By Bart Stupak March 27, 2010 When I saw that Kathleen Parker's March 24 op-ed, "Stupak's original sin," defined me as a "backstabber," it reminded me of a Bible verse. Matthew 7:3 asks, "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?" The true motives of many blogs and organizations claiming to be pro-life have become clear in recent days: to politicize life issues as a means to defeat health care reform. One group...
  • Stupak Slams His Own Democratic Party (Jaw-Dropping Accusation about Mindset of Party of Abortion)

    03/13/2010 7:51:20 AM PST · by quesney · 178 replies · 7,374+ views
    National Review ^ | National Review
    Can't believe the National Review buried this nugget in the article. Disturbing, to say the least. ----- Stupak notes that his negotiations with House Democratic leaders in recent days [about the health care plan] have been revealing. “I really believe that the Democratic leadership is simply unwilling to change its stance,” he says. “Their position says that women, especially those without means available, should have their abortions covered.” The arguments they have made to him in recent deliberations, he adds, “are a pretty sad commentary on the state of the Democratic party.” What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass...
  • Yes, the Senate health care reform bill will subsidize abortions

    03/06/2010 3:45:08 AM PST · by Scanian · 5 replies · 418+ views
    The American Thinker Blog ^ | March 05, 2010 | Ann Kane
    Obama's implied directive to his duplicitous mouthpieces Sebelius and Pelosi: Say anything-just get this health care bill passed. The two ladies have been spreading the lie that the bill doesn't include federal funding of abortion. The Senate version of the bill doesn't contain the Stupak Amendment, thereby assuring federally subsidized abortion coverage. Douglas Johnson of National Right to Life cites the section and page number of the House version to prove it contains "The language that will allow direct federal funding of abortion, without restriction, in about 1,250 Community Health Centers." Here's the condensed version of the drama.
  • Obama's House Is Leaking Votes

    02/27/2010 9:37:25 PM PST · by CaroleL · 18 replies · 1,207+ views
    TalkingSides.com ^ | 02/28/10 | CaroleL
    There's been much speculation lately on the fate of Obamacare in the US Senate. The ins and outs of reconciliation, once a little known technicality in the rules of that legislative body, are now common knowledge to political junkies of all ideologies. But the actual death bed of the president's unpopular and obscenely expensive plan will most likely be the US House of Representatives.
  • Marcia Hamilton, the Stupak Amendment, and Constitutional Mayhem

    12/11/2009 6:41:10 AM PST · by jim byrd · 430+ views
    www.jimbyrd.com ^ | 12/11/2009 | Jim Byrd
    Professor Hamilton's equivocation of "prostate surgery treatments" to male birth control has, at this point in her article, relegated her to the bowels of abject ignorance, and her philippic starving for authenticity and factualness. Generally, when a male has "prostate surgery treatment," his prostate is removed because it is cancerous. This generally leaves him sterile, but so does the barring of funding for the surgery, as Professor Hamilton suggests, since generally all men left to die of prostate cancer become sterile after death, the ultimate birth control measure. This is an interesting parallel, nonetheless, since untreated ovarian cancer in women...
  • Abortion an obstacle to health-care bill

    11/09/2009 10:09:44 AM PST · by Yankee · 10 replies · 491+ views
    Waashington Post ^ | 11/9/09 | yankee
    Some Democrats vow to block final passage if amendment stays By Alec MacGillis Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, November 9, 2009 President Obama and Senate Democrats sought on Sunday to generate momentum from the House's passage of health-care legislation, even as a new hurdle emerged: profound dismay among abortion-rights supporters over antiabortion provisions inserted into the House bill.
  • House Dems Say Anti-Abortion Amendment MUST Be Stripped or ELSE

    11/09/2009 10:28:42 AM PST · by Shellybenoit · 17 replies · 842+ views
    WAPO/Plumline/The Lid ^ | 11/9/09 | The Lid
    The House Obamacare Abortion war is not done. Before the final vote on Saturday night, the house passed the Stupak Amendment, the only bi-partisan part of the bill. Sixty-four Democrats joined Republicans to pass the amendment, which if it wasn't passed would have caused the 40+ pro-life Democrats to vote no, putting Obamacare on the shelf next to Hillarycare. The Stupak amendment prohibits abortion coverage in the public insurance option included in the House bill and would also prevent private plans from offering coverage for abortion services if they accepts people who are receiving government subsidies. The passing of the...
  • Senior Democrat is 'confident' Stupak amendment will be stripped

    11/09/2009 9:59:46 AM PST · by MissesBush · 21 replies · 948+ views
    The Hill ^ | 11/09/09 | Michael O'Brien
    A House Democrat leader said Monday she's “confident” controversial language on abortion will be stripped from a final healthcare bill. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), the Democrats’ chief deputy whip in the House, said that she and other pro-abortion rights lawmakers would work to strip the amendment included in the House health bill that bars federal funding from going to subsidize abortions. “I am confident that when it comes back from the conference committee that that language won't be there,” Wasserman Schultz said during an appearance on MSNBC. “And I think we're all going to be working very hard, particularly...
  • Pro-Life Movement Must Unify After Strategy Difference on Stupak Abortion Amdt

    11/09/2009 9:17:57 AM PST · by julieee · 2 replies · 218+ views
    LifeNews.com ^ | November 9, 2009 | Steven Ertelt
    Pro-Life Movement Must Unify After Strategy Difference on Stupak Abortion Amdt There are too many unborn children and elderly and disabled at risk in the health care bill to let this one inning define where we go as a pro-life community. There is an entire game to be played and adopting Stupak has riled and motivated the pro-abortion forces. Divided, they win, but united we can stop abortion funding and defeat this pro-abortion, pro-rationing bill. http://www.LifeNews.com/nat5638.html
  • Pro-Life Advocates Upset Republicans May Vote Present on Stupak Amendment [electoral death warrants]

    11/07/2009 5:26:39 PM PST · by cmj328 · 120 replies · 3,239+ views
    Life News ^ | November 6, 2009 | Steven Ertelt
    Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A handful of pro-life Republicans in Congress have a difference of opinion on legislative strategy and it has produced a friction that has blossomed during the debate on the pro-abortion health care bill. The difference concerns whether the Stupak Amendment could result in helping the health care bill. The pro-life movement has been fighting for months to get language included in the health care reform bill to make sure it does not fund abortions through the public option and the affordability credits. After refusing pro-life Rep. Bart Stupak a vote on his amendment to stop abortion...