Free Republic 4th Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $76,140
94%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now at exactly 94%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: maryannefranks

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Lila Rose debates law professor Mary Anne Franks, who likens preborn babies to rapists

    02/17/2025 8:30:51 AM PST · by Morgana · 17 replies
    Live Action News ^ | February 13, 2025 | Jacob Airey
    On January 22, 2025, Live Action founder and president Lila Rose took part in a Georgetown University abortion debate with author and attorney Dr. Mary Anne Franks. The two discussed whether induced abortion — the direct and intentional killing of a preborn child — should be legal. Moderators for the debate were Elizabeth Oliver, President of Georgetown Right to Life (Class of 2026) and Max Wolff-Merovick (Class of 2028). In her opening statement, Rose said, “The question we are addressing tonight is this: ‘Should abortion be legal?’ Or, to put it more simply, ‘Should murder be legal?’” “The word ‘abortion’...
  • Should We Allow the Boston GLobe to Edit the Constitution?

    12/28/2021 3:21:40 PM PST · by River Hawk · 35 replies
    US Incorporated ^ | December 28th ,2021 | Allan Wall
    The Boston Globe has published a collection of essays entitled, “Editing the Constitution.” What does the Boston Globe have in mind? Besides the introduction to the collection, written by Abdallah Fayad, there are 13 essays proposing changes. Check them out for yourself, and see what you think. Let’s consider two of the essays — the one on immigration and the one on the First and Second Amendments.
  • REDO THE FIRST TWO AMENDMENTS

    12/16/2021 4:12:50 PM PST · by Extremely Extreme Extremist · 94 replies
    BOSTON GLOBE ^ | 16 DECEMBER 2021 | MARY ANNE FRANKS
    Speech and guns: two of the most contentious issues in America today, with controversies fueled not only by personal passions and identity politics but by competing interpretations of the Constitution. Perhaps more than any other parts of the Constitution, the First and Second Amendments inspire religious-like fervor in many Americans, with accordingly irrational results. As legal texts go, neither of the two amendments is a model of clarity or precision. More important, both are deeply flawed in their respective conceptualizations of some of the most important rights of a democratic society: the freedom of expression and religion and the right...