Free Republic

Jane Fonda resumes her performance as an historical revisionist on a subject that keeps coming back to haunt her: the Vietnam War. Jane basked in the glow of her safe audience at the festival -- taking advantage of the occasion to screen the sanitized version of her life in the recently released HBO documentary, Jane Fonda in Five Acts. At the event, gullible liberals made up most of her audience embracing the activist’s “proud” anti-war participation from the 1970s, but not everyone proved to be a fawning fan. Dozens of Vietnam veterans showed up to protest Fonda’s blatantly false wartime...

Has anyone noticed something that I have noticed recently? Kerry is unclear on Iraq. He says that President Bush had absolutely no justifiable reason for attacking Iraq. He says that there was no proof that Sadam Hussein was involved with Al Quiada. Then he says that if he were president he would have gone about conquering Iraq very differently. If there was no reason for attacking Iraq and he is criticizing Bush for attacking, why is he talking like he also would have attacked Iraq? Has anyone noticed this? Is this just one more example of a Kerry flip-flop or...

Just as the term "Clintonesque" has become a standard term to describe sleaze, dishonesty, calculated political attacks, etc...can we now use the term Kerryesque to descibe: -Lack of conviction -Flip-flopping -Being on both sides of an issue in one breath! -etc All in favor say AYE! and start using the term everywhere...especially in Letters to Editors, FR posts, discussions with other conservatives, phone calls to talk shows, debates with liberal "friends", etc.