In the 2004 election campaign, there can be no more stark diffence between the parties than is exemplified by looking at John O'Neill and Michael Moore. In one sense, they have something in common. Each is having some impact on the election; O'Neill with a book and Moore with a "documentary." The similarities, however, end there. While O'Neill was very careful to use documents, affidavits, and other evidence to tell the truth, Moore has a very reckless disdain for the truth. He is clearly nothing more than a wealthy propagandist. O'Neill's efforts are those of the veterans who were there,...