Free Republic

Proclaiming that E. Musk is a NAZI when that has zero shred of evidence and can be widely/easily refuted, is not just an insult. There are tons and tons of evidence that he is the opposite of a Nazi and not a shred of evidence that he is. The felons attacking his businesses and threatening his life are very, very dangerous to him and our entire nation. If that is not a cause of action... ?????????!!!!!!!!! REALLY?

The writer possibly confused some facts so that the conclusion he posts sounds totally wrong. It is and isn’t. True the Dems
do not have a Senate majority. But what they do have is a 60 vote rule to lean on and Repubs do not have 60 but barely over 50...53 to be exact and some of those are squishes...

Some votes require 6o...

This whole thing is crazy because the idiots pushing it are crazy, so my very narrowly drawn but THUNDEROUS response to it is...SHUT UP AND STOP YOUR VIOLENT ONSLAUGHT UNTIL - FIRST - YOU PROVE your idiotic charge that “He’s a Nazi”...

Case closed.

A better Reagan-reflecting daughter would be the one he had with his first wife - besides Michael the adopted son, there was Maureen Reagan - much more representative as his daughter...

NATO?

U.S.A. IS in NATO...

I saw a story headlined thusly...that the Euros plan is to draw a clear dividing line between their countries vs. Trump’s U.S. 2nd Presidential term.

Reminds me of a pop song: “You Can Go Your Own Way...you can call it another lonely day...etc etc etc.

Just act like Trump doesn’t exist or is a “nobody” in their collective worlds...

Did not bother to read the story details...

Just quoting from its major claims.

For your perusal...

SIX Republican Women Senators voted FOR Patel...

TWO GOP Women Senators voted NAY...

I disagree with almost every vote those 2 women make...

I am a woman.

Little wonder I disagree with your post...

It’s LIBERALISM not merely GENDER that matters!

So John Roberts as Chief Justice can block ANYTHING all by himself? That’s how it works? I thought it was 9 of them in the process of what happens in a case but you say Roberts acting alone means the rest don’t matter?

It IS Cash Patel.

Now to get him approved by the Senate...

Take a look at the Dept. of Justice alleged “fiasco” pick for example.

That Trojan Horse pick has not only bowed out of the nomination but has bowed out of his House Seat. Now we have who most likely PDJT actually wants. And the crybabies on our side and his enemies on the opposite side are left gasping for air and saying SHE was his ideal pick ALL ALONG.

Two birds with one stone.

Good.

There’s nothing wrong with whatever form of contact you use that gets through to your Senator’s office.

Fine - let their office know what your interest or concern is.

However, what you get back is a FORM answer from his or her staff member.

Also, in this case of voting for Majority Leader, like it or not like it, they do NOT give away for whom they will vote.

Not even a hint - before or after the result.

They say it’s because they don’t want the vote to be personalized into an awkward issue between Senators going forward.

Since he didn’t yet start shooting, what do you mean by “meant to get away”? Now if he shot and missed or shot and got Trump, I could understand “meant to get away”.

According to media reports, the SS agent on the inside of the fence perimeter recognized the protruding barrel of a gun held in the fence from its opposite side, where dense vegetation grew on the fence line, and upon that realization, pulled his gun and started shooting at what he could see.

The hidden perp ran away, jumped into his parked car, and “hit the road”. A person nearby saw this from outside the fence and believing it was suspicious behavior happening at the Trump golf course, followed him in their own vehicle, took a photo with their phone showing his car and license plate, and sent it to the county sheriff’s office.

Including info about what, where, why, etc they sent the pic and were following this vehicle.

Agree. His pronouncement makes no sense at all - unless you understand he has no idea what he’s talking about. Nor does anyone blathering about “both sides must accept a 2 state solution” - no matter if they’re the Pope or anybody else...

Don’t know Bob Good’s record in the House but the endorsement of McGuire by 2 big time Repubs named Trump and McCarthy makes me wonder WHY both endorsers wanted him instead of the incumbent, Good.

I’m not saying automatically accept it, no worries, I’m saying wonder what the two, Trump and McCarthy, saw in the race to prompt their endorsement of the challenger not the incumbent.

I wonder THAT, first and foremost.

I don’t know, don’t claim to know.

However, I don’t automatically WORRY that either man’s reason - Trump or McCarthy - spells trouble that they could have endorsed a RINO because they want a RINO there.

That doesn’t make sense to me.

Further, that district’s voters did not have to vote accordingly. But the voter’s did so.

Therefore, it doesn’t worry me.

Just my thoughts. I don’t automatically freak out if McCarthy’s name is attached to something. I have to know more than that.

But that’s just me...

No.

Because no advisor convinced DT to debate on ABC.

I don’t care, personally, whether he accepted ABC or not.

Up to him.

Everything is a rigged game and that’s how he fights it.

Iran is a gigantic KEY to the mess. Not the only, but HUGE.

The Biden Admin. has been helping Iran flourish financially.

Insanity.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/jim-mclaughlin-donald-trump-kamala-harris/2024/09/03/id/1178933/

‘Jim McLaughlin to Newsmax: Media Polls Undersampling
Republicans”

Article details below the headline...

What I know is, professional Republican poll interpreters have compared Trump’s actual election voting numbers vs. RCP avg. polling numbers and can show Trump outperforms in votes what he registers in polls prior to votes.

From 2016 against Hillary he over-performed RCP polling by 9 pts. and in 2020 he over-performed RCP avg. polling numbers by 5 pts.

I don’t have a source cite, only because I caught this claim in passing as I was jumping around among sources whether on the Net or Broadcast TV...

I know polls don’t always perfectly represent the actual votes cast and counted, and I know some folks when polled refuse to say they’re voting Trump out of fear they will be retaliated against. They don’t trust ANYONE...

“Trump isn’t due there (D.C.) until January.”

Very true - just a thought - she has no basis from which to draw true info about where he is and just assumed D.C. ??

Trying to catch up with “true facts” about this case and its
ruling.

Bottom line, this is not a Trump specific case. It’s different and yet the fact it was ruled this way does seem to apply to Trump’s case.

I could be wrong but I think his case must be specifically ruled on. A different case ruled on though applicable to Trump’s case does not nullify his case (like it
would automatically be reversed while never being taken up
by the Court.)

No...